Robotic management of genitourinary injuries from obstetric and gynaecological operations: a multi-institutional report of outcomes

Pneumovesical vesicovaginal fistula repair: Lessons learned from an initial series of 25 patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to share the experiences and outcomes of laparoscopic pneumovesical repair for vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records from a single institution over 10 years was conducted. The focus was on patients who underwent VVF repair using a pneumovesical approach with three 5 mm laparoscopic ports. The study evaluated perioperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and complication rates to assess the efficacy and safety of this surgical method. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to determine the learning curve based on operative time.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients with VVF, 23 (88.5%) had successful fistula closure after the first surgery. One patient required open surgery conversion due to challenges in maintaining pneumovesicum, and two experienced recurrences, although successful repairs were achieved in subsequent surgeries. The average patient age was 47.4 years, with a mean operative time of 99.9 min. The postoperative hospital stay averaged 9.1 days, and catheterization lasted about 11 days. The CUSUM chart indicated a learning curve, with fluctuations until the 19th case, followed by a consistent upward pattern.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pneumovesical VVF repair is an effective and safe technique, especially suitable for fistulas near the ureteral orifice or deep in the vaginal cavity. The method demonstrates favorable outcomes with minimal complications and allows for easy reoperation if necessary.

Robot-Assisted Partial Cystectomy Using the "Double Bipolar Method"

The "double bipolar method" (DBM) in robotic surgery has been widely used in Japanese general surgery and gynecology; however, it is not commonly used in the field of urology. A 55-year-old female was diagnosed with stage IA endometrial cancer. A 2-cm cystic lesion was incidentally observed at the dome of the bladder on magnetic resonance imaging. A simultaneous robot-assisted total hysterectomy and partial cystectomy using the da Vinci Xi system was planned. The gynecological procedure was first performed with the DBM, and the DBM was also used in the partial cystectomy without additional instruments to reduce surgical costs. Maryland bipolar forceps was used to excise the peritoneum, fat, and bladder wall without bleeding, enabling delicate and precise resection using the forceps' tips. Robot-assisted partial cystectomy using the DBM was feasible. When performing combined surgeries with other departments, if the DBM is already being utilized, it is worthwhile to attempt to decrease surgical cost.

Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison

PURPOSE

Open ureteral reimplantation is considered the standard surgical approach to treat distal ureteral strictures or injuries. These procedures are increasingly performed in a minimally invasive and robotic-assisted manner. Notably, no series comparing perioperative outcomes and safety of the open vs. robotic approach are available so far.

METHODS

In this retrospective multi-center study, we compared data from 51 robotic ureteral reimplantations (RUR) with 79 open ureteral reimplantations (OUR). Both cohorts were comparatively assessed using different baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression for independent predictors was performed.

RESULTS

Surgery time, length of hospital stay and dwell time of bladder catheter were shorter in the robotic cohort, whereas estimated blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion rate and postoperative complications were lower than in the open cohort. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, robotic approach was an independent predictor for a shorter operation time (coefficient - 0.254, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.342 to - 0.166; p < 0.001), a lower estimated blood loss (coefficient - 0.390, 95% CI - 0.549 to - 0.231, p < 0.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (coefficient - 0.455, 95% CI - 0.552 to - 0.358, p < 0.001). Moreover, robotic surgery was an independent predictor for a shorter dwell time of bladder catheter (coefficient - 0.210, 95% CI - 0.278 to - 0.142, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RUR represents a safe alternative to OUR, with a shorter operative time, decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay. Prospective research are needed to further define the extent of the advantages of the robotic approach over open surgery.

Iatrogenic bladder injury following gynecologic and obstetric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Iatrogenic bladder injury is a rare complication following obstetric and gynecologic surgery and only sparse information is available regarding length of transurethral catheterization following injuries, suturing techniques including choice of suture, and complications. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate length of transurethral catheterization in relation to complications following iatrogenic bladder injury. Second, we aimed to evaluate the number of complications following repair of iatrogenic bladder injuries and to describe suture technique and best choice of suture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, and the results were presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched, and followed by screening from two independent reviewers. Studies published between January 2000 and March 2023 describing methods of bladder injury repair following obstetric or gynecologic benign surgery were included. Data extraction was done using Covidence. We performed a meta-analysis on complications after repair and explored this with a meta-regression analysis (Metafor package R) on length of catheterization to determine if length of catheterization influenced the risk of complication. A risk of bias tool from Cochrane was used to assess risk of bias and the study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021290586).

RESULTS

Out of 2175 articles, we included 21 retrospective studies, four prospective studies, and one case-control study. In total, 595 bladder injuries were included. Cesarean section was the most prominent surgery type, followed by laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. We found no statistically significant association between length of transurethral catheterization and numbers of complications following repair of iatrogenic bladder injuries. More than 90% of injuries were recognized intraoperatively. Approximately 1% had complications following iatrogenic bladder injury repair (0.010, 95% confidence interval 0.0015-0.0189, 26 studies, 595 participants, I2  = 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review did not identify conclusive evidence on the length of postoperative catheterization following bladder injury warranting further research. However, the rate of complications was low following iatrogenic bladder injury with a wide range of repair approaches.

Robotic ureteral reimplantation for the management of ureterovaginal fistula: four cases at a single center

Background

To describe our initial experience with robotic ureteral reimplantation for the management of ureterovaginal fistulas.

Methods

Between January 2018 and January 2020, four patients received robotic ureteral reimplantation for ureterovaginal fistulas. All patients were diagnosed based on anterograde urography and computed tomography urography (CTU). Follow-up was performed with magnetic resonance urography and renal ultrasound as well as the clinical assessment of symptoms.

Results

The mean age of all patients was 50.3 (range, 37–65) years. The cause of the ureterovaginal fistula in four patients was due to a previous hysterectomy. The mean time from fistula diagnosis to robotic repair surgery was 14.5 (range, 3–36) months. All robotic procedures were successfully performed without intraoperative complications or open conversion. The mean operative time was 137 (range, 116–171) minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 25 (range, 10–50) mL. No postoperative complications that were high grade (grade III and IV) occurred within one month of surgery. Patients had the double-J (D-J) stents removed 2 months after surgery and the nephrostomy tubes removed 3 months after the operation. There was a 100% success rate without serious complications, such as the leakage of urine and side progressive hydronephrosis, during the 6 to 24 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

Our initial results and experience showed that robotic ureteral reimplantation for the management of ureterovaginal fistula is safe and feasible.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of injuries to bladder and ureter following gynecological surgery and obstetric injury: A single-center experience

Introduction:

The objective of the study is to evaluate the outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of injuries to urinary tract following gynecological surgery and obstetric injury.

Methods:

This retrospective analysis from prospectively collected data of repair of injuries to bladder and ureter using da Vinci Si robotic platform was carried out. Between April 2014 and May 2019, 27 patients were operated on in a single surgical unit; 25 had hysterectomy and 2 were obstetric cases. Fifteen patients underwent vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair, ten underwent ureteral reimplant, with concomitant psoas hitch, and two underwent Boari flap repair following gynecological surgery and obstetric injury.

Results:

Among 15 patients of VVF repair, 3 cases were previously attempted failed repair, 2 underwent concomitant ureteral reimplant, and 1 underwent concomitant ovarian cystectomy. The mean total operative time was 126 (75–206) min, and the mean hospital stay was 4.4 (3–6) days. Among 12 cases of ureteral injury, 5 were on the right side and 7 were on the left side; the mean total operative time was 150.16 (110–215) min, and the mean hospital stay was 4 (3–7) days. No case required conversion to open in this cohort. All cases were successfully cured without any recurrence of fistula or stricture during their mean follow-up period of 35.3 (9–66) months.

Conclusions:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair for injuries to bladder and ureter is effective and highly successful even in previously failed cases.

Contemporary Analysis of Ureteral Reconstruction 30-Day Morbidity Utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database: Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Approaches

OBJECTIVES

To characterize 30-day morbidity of upper ureteral reconstruction (UUR) and lower ureteral reconstruction (LUR) surgery by comparing open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches using a national surgical outcomes registry.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed for patients who underwent UUR and LUR between 2007-2017. Primary endpoints included 30-day complications, transfusion, readmission, return to operating room (ROR), and prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to observe the association of MIS approach on 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

3042 patients were identified with 2116 undergoing UUR and 926 undergoing LUR. Of 2116 patients undergoing UUR, 1733 (82%) were performed via MIS approach. On multivariable analysis, open approach for UUR was associated with increased odds of any 30-day complication (odds ratio (OR) 1.6 [1.1-2.4]; p=0.014), major complication (OR 1.8 [1.04-3.0]; p=0.034), transfusion (OR 3.7 [1.2- 11.5]; p=0.025), ROR (OR 2.0 [1.0-3.9]; p=0.047), and prolonged LOS (OR 5.4 [3.9-7.6]; p<0.001). Of the 926 patients undergoing LUR, 458 (49%) were performed via a MIS approach. On multivariable analysis, open approach for LUR was associated with increased odds of any 30-day complication (OR 1.5 [1.1-2.1]; p=0.028), minor complication (OR 1.7 [1.1-2.6]; p=0.02), transfusion (OR 8.1 [2.7-23.7]; p<0.001), and prolonged LOS (OR 4.2 [2.4-7.3]; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Utilization of a national surgical database revealed an open approach was associated with increased 30-day morbidity across multiple postoperative outcome measures. These findings suggest a MIS approach should be considered, when feasible, for upper and lower ureteral reconstruction.

A Multi-Institutional Experience with Robotic Vesicovaginal and Ureterovaginal Fistula Repair After Iatrogenic Injury

Objectives: To describe our multi-institutional experience with robotic repair of iatrogenic urogynecologic fistulae (UGF), including vesicovaginal fistulae (VVF) and ureterovaginal fistulae (UVF). Methods: We performed a retrospective review identifying patients who underwent robotic repair of VVF and UVF between January 2010 and May 2019. All patients failed conservative management with Foley catheter or upper tract drainage (ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube), respectively. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Success was defined as no vaginal leakage of urine postoperatively, in the absence of drains, catheters, or stents. Results: Of 34 patients, 22/34 (65%) had VVF and 12/34 (35%) had UVF repair. VVF etiology included radiation (1/22, 4.5%) and surgery (21/22, 95.5%). Four of 22 (18%) had undergone prior repair attempt. Median console time was 187 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 151-219), estimated blood loss (EBL) was 50 mL (IQR: 50-93), and median length of stay (LOS) was 1 day (IQR: 1-2). Two of 22 (9%) patients had a postoperative complication. At mean follow-up of 28.9 months, 20/22 (91%) VVF cases were clinically effective. UVF etiology was gynecologic surgery in all cases; 8/12 (67%) were left-sided, 4/12 (33%) were right-sided. None was repeat repairs. Two of 12 (17%) underwent ureteroureterostomy, and 10/12 (83%) had reimplant. Median console time was 160 minutes (IQR: 133-196), EBL was 50 mL (IQR: 50-112), and LOS was 1 day (IQR: 1-1). No complications were encountered. At mean follow-up of 29.3 months, 100% of UVF repairs were effective. Conclusions: Robotic repair of iatrogenic UGF may be effectively performed with low complication rates by experienced urologic surgeons.

Robotic Versus Open Ureteroneocystostomy: Is There a Robotic Benefit?

Aim: We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent an open vs robotic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral obstruction. Methods: Retrospective review was performed on adult patients who underwent primary ureteroneocystostomy for obstruction from January 2012 to April 2018. Intraoperative outcomes of estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time, as well as postoperative outcomes of catheter and stent duration, length of hospital stay, inpatient nurse-controlled opioid use, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and outpatient opioid prescription, complications, readmission, radiologic and clinical stricture recurrence, and follow-up, were compared. Among the open cohort, indications for an open approach were evaluated, identifying patients with prior complex open abdominal surgery that would make an open approach preferable. Results: Open ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 27 patients compared with 18 who underwent a robotic approach. The open and robotic cohorts were not significantly different in age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, stricture location or side, abdominal surgery (laparoscopic or open), pelvic radiation, or preoperative urinary tract infection. The robotic group had a significantly lower rate of prior open abdominal surgery. The robotic cohort had significantly lower EBL, length of stay (LOS), catheter duration, prescribed morphine milliequivalents (MME) at discharge, and rate of PCA usage. Among the open cohort, 13 (48%) patients demonstrated indications making an open approach preferable. Comparing the robotic group with the remaining 14 open patients revealed a significantly lower rate of inpatient PCA use, prescribed MME at discharge, LOS, and catheter duration. Mean operative time was higher in the robotic group. EBL was not significantly different in this subanalysis. Conclusions: Robotic ureteroneocystostomy provides similar outcomes when compared with an open approach in well-selected patients when assessing for recurrent ureteral obstruction or adverse events. Robotic surgery is associated with lower postoperative narcotic pain prescriptions at discharge, lower PCA usage, and shorter LOS, which are important benefits when compared with open surgery.

Does Early Ureteroneocystostomy After Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury Jeopardize Outcome?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent early repair (≤7 days) of iatrogenic ureteral injury with ureteroneocystostomy and compare them to those repaired in a delayed fashion (>7 days).

METHODS

A retrospective review of billing data between 2012 and 2018 identified patients who underwent ureteroneocystostomy for a benign ureteral disease. Inclusion criteria included all ureteral injuries related to a laparoscopic, robotic, or open surgical injury. Patients with ureteral injury related to radiation, stones, or reconstructive surgery were excluded. Patients undergoing reconstruction during the initial injury or within ≤7 days were designated as having undergone early repair, while the remaining were considered delayed repair. Demographics, as well as inpatient and postdischarge data were acquired, and statistical analysis was performed comparing the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Early repair was performed on 12 patients, while 55 underwent delayed repair. No significant difference in age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Score, laterality, stricture location, or history of pelvic/abdominal radiation was noted. Inpatient complications were significantly higher in the immediate group (58 vs 18%, P =.004). Thirty- and 90-day complications were similar. Two patients in the delayed group and none in the immediate group demonstrated stricture recurrence (P =.710). A higher rate of Boari flap ureteral reconstruction was performed in the delayed cohort (P =.001).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, there was no detectable difference in outcomes when comparing early and delayed ureteroneocystostomy for iatrogenic ureteral injuries.

The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery

In this article, we review the current uses and future directions of robotic surgery in the field of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Pelvic surgery is ideal for the use of surgical robots, which provide improved visualization and ease of suturing deep within the pelvis. Robots have been successfully used for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, in procedures such as sacrocolpopexy, sacrohysteropexy, and uterosacral ligament plication. Surgeons have used the robotic successfully to treat various etiologies of female pelvic pain including fibroids, endometriosis, and nerve entrapment. Robotic repair of iatrogenic injury has been described with excellent outcomes and avoidance of conversion to open surgery in the event of an injury caused using the robotic platform. While more data is needed on this topic, there has been increasing interest in using the robot for urologic reconstruction including repair of vesico-vaginal fistula, cystectomy, augmentation cystoplasty, and continent and non-continent diversions. Recently the use of the robot has been described in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in females, with robotic placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. While robotic surgery is associated with increased cost, the outcomes of robotic surgery in female urology are promising. More studies that properly evaluate the benefits of robotic surgery as compared to open and laparoscopic approaches are needed.

Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature

Objectives

To evaluate the recent developments in robotic urological surgery, as the introduction of robotic technology has overcome many of the difficulties of pure laparoscopic surgery enabling surgeons to perform complex minimally invasive procedures with a shorter learning curve. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is now offered as the standard for various surgical procedures across multiple specialities.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies evaluating robot-assisted simple prostatectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, surgery for urolithiasis, distal ureteric reconstruction, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, augmentation ileocystoplasty, and artificial urinary sphincter insertion. Article titles, abstracts, and full text manuscripts were screened to identify relevant studies, which then underwent data extraction and analysis.

Results

In all, 72 studies evaluating the above techniques were identified. Almost all studies were retrospective single-arm case series. RAS appears to be associated with reduced morbidity, less blood loss, reduced length of stay, and comparable clinical outcomes in comparison to the corresponding open procedures, whilst having a shorter operative duration and learning curve compared to the equivalent laparoscopic techniques.

Conclusion

Emerging data demonstrate that the breadth and complexity of urological procedures performed using the da Vinci® platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is continually expanding. There is a gaining consensus that RAS is producing promising surgical results in a wide range of procedures. A major limitation of the current literature is the sparsity of comparative trials evaluating these procedures.

Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation for ureterovaginal fistula

INTRODUCTION

We present a video describing the technical considerations for performing an extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation.

METHODS

A 55-year old woman presented with urinary incontinence secondary to a ureterovaginal fistula after robotic-assisted hysterectomy. After failure of more conservative measures, she proceeded to a robotic ureteral reimplantation. Following port placement, the ureter is identified at the level of the iliac vessels and dissected circumferentially. The ureter is dissected free to the level of the ureterovaginal fistula, transected, and the distal remnant ligated. The ureter is spatulated, a cystotomy created, and a running anastomosis with mucosa-to-mucosa apposition performed over a stent. Care is taken to ensure it is tension free. The integrity of the anastomosis is tested with retrograde filling of the bladder. Postoperatively, a drainage catheter is left to allow for adequate healing. Follow-up imaging is performed to ensure a patent anastomosis.

RESULTS

The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course. A cystogram showed adequate healing at 10 days, and the stent was removed at 6 weeks. A follow-up renal ultrasound 6 weeks later showed no hydronephrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation is a useful technique for managing ureterovaginal fistula; here we highlight pertinent technical considerations.

[Application of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 10 patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch and 6 undergoing conventional laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation between June, 2013 and December, 2014 in the General Hospital of PLA. The indications, surgical techniques and outcomes of the two procedures were compared.

RESULTS

All the patients completed the laparoscopic procedures without conversion to open surgery. Robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic procedures were comparable in terms of the mean operation time (165.50=52.57 vs 152.50=73.60 min), mean volume of blood loss (81.00=69.35 vs 46.67=31.41 mL), mean duration of catheter retention (6.75=1.74 vs 7.50=2.43 days), and mean postoperative hospital stay (7.10=2.08 vs 8.67=3.14 days). The patients were followed up for a mean of 13.5 months, during which none of the patients experienced anastomotic leak, vesicoureteral reflux or hydronephrosis.

CONCLUSION

There are no significant differences in surgical indications, surgical techniques or postoperative effect between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic procedures of ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch, but robotic-assisted laparoscopy can reduced the complexity in operation and increase the surgical precision in patients with a history of pelvic surgery, pelvic adhesion or secondary reimplantation.

A Case of Type 2 Youssef's Syndrome following Caesarean Section for Placenta Previa Totalis

Vesicouterine fistula is a rare type of urogenital fistulas. It is most commonly observed after cesarean section (C/S) due to iatrogenic reasons. In this article, a case of a vesicouterine fistula which developed after C/S operation is presented. This was the patient's second C/S and this time placenta previa totalis was the primary pathology. Since it is a rare complication, we found it interesting, and, in this article, this clinical problem was discussed with details about diagnosis and treatment in light of the literature.

Is the robotic approach feasible for repair of iatrogenic injuries of the lower ureter?

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the robotic approach as treatment of iatrogenic ureteral injuries.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation at the University of Missouri from 2009 to 2014. Patient charts were analyzed for demographics, prior abdominal surgeries, circumstances of injury, outcomes, and other relevant information.

RESULTS

Nine patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 44.6. Patients had an average of 4.3 abdominal surgeries. Injury occurred during hysterectomy (open, laparoscopic, or vaginal) in eight patients (88.9 %), five cases were laparoscopic, two utilized robotic assistance, and one injury occurred during uterosacral vault suspension. All cases were related to gynecological procedures. On average, ureteral injury was detected 17.2 days after the initial surgery and repaired 62.3 days after initial operation. The average surgical repair time was 295.9 min (range 168-498) with an average blood loss of 77.2 mL (range 20-150). Four patients required a psoas hitch, with one receiving both a psoas hitch and a Boari flap. Postoperatively, patients had an average hospital stay of 2.7 days. One patient had ileus for greater than 3 days, and another was readmitted within 30 days for pain control and antiemetics following stent removal. One patient underwent open reimplantation 3 years after original surgery for development of ureteral stricture. At follow-up, all patients had returned to baseline renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic approach is feasible and a safe option for distal iatrogenic ureteral injuries occurring during gynecological procedures. Prior abdominal surgery or delayed repair does not preclude a robotic approach.

Reoperations following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Decade of Experience

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of data regarding the operative management of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. We reviewed operative management of robot-assisted radical cystectomy specific complications during our 10-year experience with this procedure and assessed the feasibility, safety and outcomes of robot-assisted reoperations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent surgical interventions for robot-assisted radical cystectomy specific complications between 2005 and 2015. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fit to evaluate predictors of surgical intervention after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe time to surgical interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients (23%) underwent surgical intervention after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Mean followup was 27 months. Average time to any surgical intervention after cystectomy was 14 months. The reoperation rate was 5%, 2% and 16% at 30, 31 to 90 and greater than 90 days, respectively. Using the Kaplan-Meier method surgical interventions occurred at a rate of 30% at 2 years and 46% at 5 years. Interventions for ureteroileal complications were the most common (48 cases) followed by interventions for bowel obstruction, fistulas and abdominal wall related complications (11 cases). Clavien 3 or greater complications and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in experienced hands the long-term complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy are notable. Of our patients 23% required surgical interventions after the procedure. Our initial experience with robot-assisted management of robot-assisted radical cystectomy complications appears safe and feasible, although the decision to proceed is determined primarily by surgeon experience.

Robotic surgery in gynecology

FDA approved Da Vinci Surgical System in 2005 for gynecological surgery. It has been rapidly adopted and it has already assumed an important position at various centers where this is available. It comprises of three components: A surgeon's console, a patient-side cart with four robotic arms and a high-definition three-dimensional (3D) vision system. In this review we have discussed various robotic-assisted laparoscopic benign gynecological procedures like myomectomy, hysterectomy, endometriosis, tubal anastomosis and sacrocolpopexy. A PubMed search was done and relevant published studies were reviewed. Surgeries that can have future applications are also mentioned. At present most studies do not give significant advantage over conventional laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecological disease. However robotics do give an edge in more complex surgeries. The conversion rate to open surgery is lesser with robotic assistance when compared to laparoscopy. For myomectomy surgery, Endo wrist movement of robotic instrument allows better and precise suturing than conventional straight stick laparoscopy. The robotic platform is a logical step forward to laparoscopy and if cost considerations are addressed may become popular among gynecological surgeons world over.