Comparative testing of reliability and audit utility of ordinal objective calculus complexity scores. Can we make an informed choice yet?

Comparing different kidney stone scoring systems for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the predictive performance of five previously described scoring systems (i.e., S.T.O.N.E., Guy's, Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES), the Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-RESC) and the new Stone Kidney Size (SKS) score) for postoperative outcomes regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and complications in adult patients.

METHODS

Data from 349 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in three urology departments were analyzed. SKS, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems were used to retrospectively calculate predictions for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with SFR and complication rates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and areas under curves (AUC) were compared to identify the method with the highest predictive value.

RESULTS

Median SKS, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC, CROES and Guy's scores were 4, 7, 3, 170.8 and 2, respectively. Overall, SFR was 67.0% (234/349) with a complications rate of 36.7% (128/349). AUCs of each method for predicting stone-free status, highlighted reasonable predictive capabilities with 0.709, 0.806, 0 0.869, 0.207, and 0.735, respectively; however, the S-ReSC scoring system had the best discriminative performance. According to multivariate logistic regression and AUC results, none were effectively capable of predicting complications.

CONCLUSIONS

All scoring systems correlated significantly with stone-free status; although, S-ReSC appears to have the greatest predictive ability. This method is also relatively easy to implement and highly reproducible. However, none of the methods analyzed are able to accurately predict postoperative complications.

Morphometry scores: Clinical implications in the management of staghorn calculi

Due to their large size, rapid growth, and attendant morbidity, staghorn calculi are complex clinical entities that impose significant treatment-related challenges. Moreover, their relative heterogeneity-in terms of both total stone burden and anatomic distribution-limits the ability to standardize their characterization and the reporting of surgical outcomes. Several morphometry systems currently exist to define the volumetric distribution of renal stones, in general, and to predict the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy; however, they fall short in their applicability to staghorn stones. In this review, we aim to discuss the clinical utility of morphometry systems and the influence of pelvicalyceal anatomy on the management of these complex calculi.

Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clinical studies assessing the feasibility and accuracy of three stone scoring systems’s (SSSs: Guy’s stone score, CROES nomogram and S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring system) have reported contradictory outcomes. This systematic evaluation was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence with regard to the feasibility and accuracy of three SSSs.

Methods

A systematic search of Embase, Pubmed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies that compared three SSSs up to Mar 2018. Patients were categorized according to stone free (SF) and no-stone free (NSF), Outcomes of interest included perioperative variables, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications.

Results

Ten studies estimating three SSSs were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that SF patients had a significantly lower proportion of male (OR = 1.48, P = 0.0007), lower stone burden (WMD = -504.28, P < 0.0001), fewer No of involved calyces (OR = -1.23, P = 0.0007) and lower proportion of staghorn stone (OR = 0.33, P < 0.0001). Moreover, SF patients had significantly lower score of Guy score (WMD = -0.64, P < 0.0001), but, S.T.O.N.E. score (WMD = -1.23, P < 0.0001) and a higher score of CROES nomogram (WMD = 29.48, P = 0.003). However, the comparison of area under curves (AUC) of predicting SFR indicated that there was no remarkable difference between three SSSs. Nonetheless, Guy score was the only stone scoring system that predicted complications after PCNL (WMD = -0.29, 95% CI: − 0.57 to − 0.02, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicated that the three SSSs were equally, feasible and accurate for predicting SFR after PCNL. However, Guy score was the only stone scoring system that predicted complications after PCNL.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update

Preoperative nomograms offer systematic and quantitative methods to assess patient- and stone-related characteristics and their impact on successful treatment and potential risk of complication. Discrepancies in the correlation of perioperative variables to patient outcomes have led to the individual development, validation, and application of four independent scoring systems for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity. The optimal nomogram should have high predictive ability, be practically integrated into clinical use, and be widely applicable to urinary stone disease. Herein, we seek to provide a contemporary evaluation of the advantages, disadvantages, and commonalities of each scoring system. While the current data is insufficient to conclude which scoring system is destined to become the gold standard, it is crucial that a nephrolithometric scoring system be incorporated into common practice to improve surgical planning, patient counseling, and outcome assessment.