1
|
Boschheidgen M, Schimmöller L, Doerfler S, Al-Monajjed R, Morawitz J, Ziayee F, Mally D, Quentin M, Arsov C, Albers P, Antoch G, Ullrich T. Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6746. [PMID: 35469056 PMCID: PMC9038748 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10859-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate if follow-up mpMRI scans of patients in PI-RADS category 3 are safe enough to omit or delay prostate biopsy in the future and to determine an optimal control interval. This retrospective single center study includes consecutive PI-RADS category 3 patients with one or more follow-up mpMRI (T2WI, DWI, DCE) and subsequent MRI-targeted and systematic TRUS-guided biopsy between 2012 and 2018. Primary study objective was the verification of a significant PI-RADS category upgrade in follow-up mpMRI in patients with subsequent PCA positive biopsy versus patients with negative biopsy. Further objectives were development of the PI-RADS category and clinical parameters between initial and follow-up mpMRI in the context of histopathologic results and time interval. Eighty-nine patients (median PSA 6.6 ng/ml; PSAD 0.13 ng/ml/ml) were finally included (follow-up period 31 ± 18 months). 19 cases had PCA (median PSA 7.8 ng/ml; PSAD 0.14 ng/ml/ml). 4 cases had csPCA (median PSA 5.4 ng/ml; PSAD 0.13 ng/ml/ml) for which there was a significant PI-RADS upgrade after 12-24 months (mean 3.75; p = 0.01) compared to patients without PCA (mean 2.74). Without PCA the mean PI-RADS category decreased after 25-36 months (mean 2.74; p = 0.02). Clinical parameters did not change significantly except a PSAD increase for PCA patients after 24 months. Patients within PI-RADS category 3 may not need prompt biopsy since those with PCA reliably demonstrate a PI-RADS category upgrade in follow-up mpMRI after 12-24 months. PI-RADS 3 patients with negative biopsy do not benefit from follow-up mpMRI earlier than 24 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Boschheidgen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - L Schimmöller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - S Doerfler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - R Al-Monajjed
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - J Morawitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - F Ziayee
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - D Mally
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Quentin
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - C Arsov
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P Albers
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - G Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - T Ullrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma C, Downes M, Jain R, Ientilucci M, Fleshner N, Perlis N, van der Kwast T. Prevalence of adverse pathology features in grade group 2 prostatectomy specimens with syn- or metachronous metastatic disease. Prostate 2022; 82:345-351. [PMID: 34878188 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To validate the importance of recently established adverse histopathology features (cribriform pattern and intraductal carcinoma) as contra-indication for deferred treatment of Gleason score 7 (3 + 4) (grade group [GG] 2) prostate cancer, we investigated their frequency in GG2 radical prostatectomies with syn- or metachronous metastatic disease. METHODS GG2 prostatectomy specimens of patients with concomitant lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis at follow-up were identified in a clinical database of a tertiary care center and their pathology was reviewed for pathological stage, lymphovascular invasion, Gleason grade 4 subpatterns, presence of tertiary grade 5, and ductal adenocarcinoma histology. A control group of 99 GG2 prostatectomy specimens who had no metastatic disease (controls) was reviewed for the same adverse pathological features. RESULTS Of 1860 GG2 prostatectomy specimens (operated between 2002 and 2020), 45 (2.4%) had concurrent regional lymph node metastases or distant metastases at follow-up. Pathological stage distribution of cases and controls was 24% and 79% pT2, 42% and 15% pT3a, 33% and 6.1% pT3b -T4, respectively (p < 0.001). Eleven of 45 cases (24%) had ≤10% Gleason grade 4 component. Cribriform pattern or intraductal carcinoma was present in 84% of cases versus 34% of controls (p < 0.001), tertiary grade 5 in 16% of cases versus 5% controls (p = 0.05) and ductal adenocarcinoma in 16% of cases versus 2% of controls (p = 0.004). Among the seven cases without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma, two displayed ductal adenocarcinoma features. CONCLUSIONS Well-established unfavorable histopathologic features (intraductal and cribriform pattern carcinoma, ductal adenocarcinoma) are represented in about 90% of GG2 prostate cancers with local or distant metastatic disease and are much less common (38%) in those without metastatic disease. Strikingly, about 25% of GG2 prostatectomy cases with metastatic disease had an organ-confined disease and/or a small percentage of Gleason grade 4 pattern. This further emphasizes the relative importance of these adverse histopathological features (cribriform, intraductal, and ductal adenocarcinoma) rather than percentage Gleason grade 4 as contra-indicator of deferred treatment for patients with GG2 prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Ma
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, Anatomic Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Downes
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahi Jain
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Ientilucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathan Perlis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, Anatomic Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taguchi S, Morikawa T, Shibahara J, Fukuhara H. Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review. Int J Urol 2021; 28:614-621. [PMID: 33580599 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Since the Gleason score was developed in 1966 as a histological classification for prostate cancer, it has been widely used in clinical practice and has evolved over time. The concept of a "tertiary Gleason pattern" (also known as a minor Gleason pattern) was first proposed in 2000, and has been used in clinical practice since the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology conference. The prognostic significance of a tertiary Gleason pattern has been widely validated in various settings of prostate cancer, whereas its definition has yet to be fully established. Currently, a provisional definition of tertiary Gleason pattern is "<5% Gleason pattern 4 or 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens." In contrast, "Gleason grade grouping" was proposed in 2013 and came into use in clinical practice in 2016 according to the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology conference. Although the prognostic significance of Gleason grade grouping has already been widely confirmed, it does not incorporate the concept of tertiary Gleason pattern. Recently, the 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology conference discussed how to handle tertiary Gleason pattern in the current Gleason scoring system, but no consensus was reached on the issue. This review summarizes the evidence on the prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern and discusses how to deal with it in the context of the contemporary Gleason grade grouping. It also refers to reporting of the percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5, as well as quantitative Gleason score models incorporating tertiary Gleason pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teppei Morikawa
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junji Shibahara
- Department of Pathology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fukuhara
- Department of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu N, Ke ZB, Chen YH, Wu YP, Chen SH, Wei Y, Zheng QS, Huang JB, Li XD, Xue XY. Risk Factors for Pathologically Confirmed Lymph Nodes Metastasis in Patients With Clinical T2N0M0 Stage Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1547. [PMID: 32923401 PMCID: PMC7456999 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the risk factors for postoperatively pathological lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical T2N0M0 stage prostate cancer (PCa). Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data of 316 patients with clinical T2 stage PCa and preoperative negative lymph nodes [LN(−)] indicated by imaging (cT2N0M0) between January 2014 and May 2019. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for postoperatively pathological pLN(+) in patients with cT2N0M0 stage PCa. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between tumor burden and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score. Results A total of 45 patients (14.2%) were confirmed by postoperative pathology to have LN metastasis. Univariate analysis indicated that total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), PI-RADS v2 score, postoperative Gleason grade group (GGG), intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), clinical T2 substaging, and postoperative pathological tumor burden were risk factors for pLN(+) in all patients. Multivariate analysis showed that tPSA and postoperative GGG were risk factors for pLN(+) in all patients. Univariate analysis revealed that tPSA, PIRADS v2 score, clinical T2 substaging, IDC-P, postoperative pathological tumor burden, and postoperative GGG were risk factors for pLN(+) in patients with GGG ≥ 3. Multivariate analysis suggested that tPSA, PI-RADS v2 score, clinical T2 substaging, postoperative pathological tumor burden, and GGG were risk factors for pLN (+) in patients with GGG ≥ 3. Spearman correlation analysis showed that PI-RADS v2 score was positively correlated with clinical T2 substaging and postoperative pathological tumor burden. Conclusion There was a high risk of LN metastasis in patients with cT2 PCa if they had high preoperative tPSA or high postoperative GGG. Patients with cT2 PCa and GGG ≥ 3 had a high risk of LN metastasis if they had high PI-RADS v2 score, high preoperative clinical stage or high postoperative pathological tumor burden. PI-RADS v2 score predicted tumor burden well in patients with GGG ≥ 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Bin Ke
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ye-Hui Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yu-Peng Wu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shao-Hao Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yong Wei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qing-Shui Zheng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jin-Bei Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xue-Yi Xue
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fine SW, Meisels DL, Vickers AJ, Al-Ahmadie H, Chen YB, Gopalan A, Sirintrapun SJ, Tickoo SK, Reuter VE. Practice Patterns in Reporting Tertiary Grades at Radical Prostatectomy: Survey of a Large Group of Experienced Urologic Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019; 144:356-360. [PMID: 31584841 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0224-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— In prostate cancer, "tertiary" higher-grade patterns (TPs) have been associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. OBJECTIVE.— To determine variation regarding definition and application of TPs. DESIGN.— Online survey regarding TPs in a range of grading scenarios circulated to 105 experienced urologic pathologists. RESULTS.— Among 95 respondents, 40 of 95 (42%) defined TPs as "third most common pattern" and 55 (58%) as "minor pattern/less than 5% of tumor." In a tumor with pattern 3 and less than 5% pattern 4, of the 95 respondents, 35 (37%) assigned 3 + 3 = 6 with TP4, while 56 (59%) assigned 3 + 4 = 7. In a tumor with pattern 4 and less than 5% pattern 5, of the 95 respondents, 51 (54%) assigned 4 + 4 = 8 with TP5, while 43 (45%) assigned 4 + 5 = 9. Six scenarios were presented in which the order of most common patterns was 3, 4, and 5 (Group 1) or 4, 3, and 5 (Group 2) with varying percentages. In both groups, when pattern 5 was less than 5%, we found that 98% and 93% of respondents would assign 3 + 4 = 7 or 4 + 3 = 7 with TP5. In scenarios with 15% or 25% pattern 5, most respondents (70% and 80%, respectively) would include pattern 5 as the secondary grade, that is, 3 + 5 = 8 (Group 1) or 4 + 5 = 9 (Group 2). For 85 of 95 (89%), a TP would not impact Grade Group assignment. CONCLUSIONS.— This survey highlights substantial variation in practice patterns regarding definition and application of "tertiary" grading in radical prostatectomy specimens. High consistency was observed in 3 + 4 = 7/4 + 3 = 7 scenarios with truly minor pattern 5. These findings should inform future studies assessing the standardization and predictive value of "tertiary" patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samson W Fine
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Debra L Meisels
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ying-Bei Chen
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anuradha Gopalan
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - S Joseph Sirintrapun
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Satish K Tickoo
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Victor E Reuter
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Fine, Ms Meisels, Drs Al-Ahmadie, Chen, Gopalan, Sirintrapun, Tickoo, and Reuter) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Vickers), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Leenders GJLH, Kweldam CF, Hollemans E, Kümmerlin IP, Nieboer D, Verhoef EI, Remmers S, Incrocci L, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, Roobol MJ. Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups. Eur Urol 2019; 77:191-198. [PMID: 31439369 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grade groups (GGs) are an important parameter for therapeutic decision making in prostate cancer (Pca) patients. Invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) has an independent prognostic value for disease outcome, but are not included in the GG limiting their clinical use. OBJECTIVE To perform a proof-of-principle study incorporating CR/IDC in the current GG. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS All prostate biopsies of 1031 men with screen-detected Pca between 1993 and 2000 were reviewed for the current GG (ranging from 1 to 5) and CR/IDC. The cribriform grade (cGrade) was equal to the GG if CR/IDC was present and GG minus 1 if not. GG1 was cGrade1 if intraductal carcinoma was absent. INTERVENTION Biopsy review for GG and CR/IDC. A total of 406 patients had received radical prostatectomy (RP), 508 radiotherapy (RT), 108 surveillance, and eight hormonal therapy, and the treatment was unknown for one patient. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis disease-specific survival (DSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) after 15.1 yr (interquartile range 10.9-19.7 yr) follow-up were compared using Harrell's C-statistic. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The biopsy GGs were 486 GG1, 310 GG2, 104 GG3, 64 GG4, and 67 GG5; cGrade distributions were 738 cGrade1, 102 cGrade2, 91 cGrade3, 58 cGrade4, and 42 cGrade5. The cGrade had a better discriminative value than the GG for DSS (C-index 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.83 vs 0.76; 0.71-0.82) and MFS (0.79; 0.74-0.84 vs 0.77; 0.72-0.82). The discriminative value for BCRFS after RP and RT was similar for both models. Different diagnostic, such as use of sextant biopsies, and therapeutic strategies in the 1990s are the limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS The cGrade is a simple Pca grade modification with better discriminative values for DSS and MFS than the GG, particularly impacting decision making in men with current GG2 Pca. PATIENT SUMMARY Microscopic grading is an important factor for decision making in prostate cancer (Pca) patients. We show that a simple grade modification better predicts Pca outcome and might improve treatment choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charlotte F Kweldam
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Intan P Kümmerlin
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther I Verhoef
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:158.e1-158.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Focal Ablation of Early-Stage Prostate Cancer: Candidate Selection, Treatment Guidance, and Assessment of Outcome. Urol Clin North Am 2017; 44:575-585. [PMID: 29107274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer lesions smaller than 0.5 m3, or Gleason pattern 3, are likely clinically insignificant. Clinically significant disease is often limited to a single index lesion. Focal ablation targets this index lesion, maintains oncological control, and minimizes complications by preserving healthy prostate tissue. Template mapping biopsy or multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsies are used to identify appropriate index lesions. Multiple energy modalities have been tested, including high-intensity frequency ultrasound, cryoablation, laser ablation, photodynamic therapy, focal brachytherapy, radiofrequency ablation, irreversible electroporation. Outcome is assessed by biopsy of the target area, triggered by prostate-specific antigen measurements or MRI imaging, or performed per protocol at 12 months.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gasparrini S, Cimadamore A, Scarpelli M, Massari F, Doria A, Mazzucchelli R, Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R. Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians. Asian J Androl 2017; 21:212223. [PMID: 28782737 PMCID: PMC6337944 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_24_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Gleason grading system for prostate cancer (PCa) was developed in the 1960s by DF Gleason. Due to changes in PCa detection and treatment, the application of the Gleason grading system has changed considerably in pathology routine practice. Two consensus conferences were held in 2005 and in 2014 to update PCa Gleason grading. This review provides a summary of the changes in the grading of PCa from the original Gleason grading system to the prognostic grade grouping, as well as a discussion of the clinical significance of the percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Gasparrini
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marina Scarpelli
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Doria
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberta Mazzucchelli
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|