Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): is a new standard ready to be accepted?

Minimally Invasive Management of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Penile Cancer: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges

The diagnosis of occult inguinal lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) has remained a challenge, with substantial perioperative complications. The recent refinements in the technique of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSLNB) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy with considerably lower morbidity compared to conventional open modified/superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). Although DSLNB, if available, has been endorsed as the preferred method for nodal staging in patients with invasive PSCC and no palpable inguinal lymphadenopathy in the recent penile cancer guidelines, its utilization has been quite limited so far. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted ILND have emerged as alternatives for nodal staging in this patient population and are shown to improve the rate of wound infections and postoperative pain. For management of nodal metastasis in patients with clinically palpable inguinal lymph nodes, minimally invasive ILND has shown promising results as well. Nonetheless, given the rarity of PSCC and the absence of prospective studies and clinical trials, nodal staging and treatment of nodal metastasis in clinical practice will likely continue to vary across the medical centers in the following years. In this review, we first summarize the evolution of DSLNB and minimally invasive ILND and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each management strategy. We further discuss the remaining challenges and future perspectives in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in patients with PSCC.

Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence-guided inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety and efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in patients with penile cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial (ChiCTR2100044584) was performed among patients with penile caner who underwent bilateral modified ILND at four centres in China between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2022. Patients aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas were included. Each enrolled patient was randomly assigned to either ICG fluorescence-guided ILND by a laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach in one groin, with non-ICG fluorescence-guided ILND in the other groin acting as a control. The primary outcome was the number of retrieved ILNs. Secondary outcomes included complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the ILN non-compliance (inadequate removal of ILNs) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and the 42 who completed the entire study were included in the per protocol (PP) analysis. There were no ICG-related complications in any of the patients. The results of the ITT and PP analyses indicated that the total number of unilateral ILNs retrieved was higher on the ICG side than on the non-ICG side (mean 13 vs 9 ILNs, difference 4 ILNs [95% CI 2.7-4.4], P = 0.007), and the number of unilateral deep and superficial ILNs was higher on the ICG side. Furthermore, the LN non-compliance rate was lower on the ICG side than on the non-ICG side. Additionally, there was no significant difference in local complications in the groins between the two sides (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An ICG fluorescence-guided ILND was safe for patients with penile cancer. This procedure can improve the number of ILNs retrieved and reduce the LN non-compliance rate without increased complications. ICG fluorescence-guided ILND is beneficial and recommended for selected patients with penile cancer.

External validation of nomogram to predict inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer (PC) occurs less frequently in Europe and in the United States than in South America and parts of Africa. Lymph node (LN) involvement is the most important prognostic factor, and inguinal LN (ILN) dissection can be curative; however, ILN dissection has high morbidity. A nomogram was previously developed based on clinicopathological features of PC to predict ILN metastases. Our objective was to conduct an external validation of the previously developed nomogram based on our population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included men with cN0 ILNs who underwent ILN dissection for penile carcinoma between 2000 and 2014. We performed external validation of the nomogram considering three different external validation methods: k-fold, leave-oneout, and bootstrap. We also analyzed prognostic variables. Performance was quantified in terms of calibration and discrimination (receiver operator characteristic curve). A logistic regression model for positive ILNs was developed based on clinicopathological features of PC.

RESULTS

We analyzed 65 men who underwent ILN dissection (cN0). The mean age was 56.8 years. Of 65 men, 24 (36.9%) presented with positive LNs. A median 21 ILNs were removed. Considering the three different methods used, we concluded that the previously developed nomogram was not suitable for our sample.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the previously developed nomogram that was applied to our population had low accuracy and low precision for correctly identifying patients with PC who have positive ILNs.

Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy through a hypogastric subcutaneous approach (VEIL-H) with a leg subcutaneous approach (VEIL-L) in the surgical management of penile cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 2012 and October 2016, 72 penile cancer patients who underwent VEIL-H (n = 37) or VEIL-L (n = 35) by one experienced surgeon in our hospital were retrospectively included. Data associated with demographic characteristics and perioperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications occurred and no deaths were recorded. No difference was noted with respect to demographic and clinicopathological data, operative time, estimated blood loss, spare of the great saphenous vein, dissected inguinal lymph nodes, patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis, positive inguinal lymph nodes, duration of drain, postoperative hospital days, and postoperative complications between two groups (p > 0.05). Two patients of each group received a bilateral laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in one session. The pathological results of all dissected pelvic lymph nodes were negative. Median follow-up was 16.2 months, during which time three patients in VEIL-L group and two patients in VEIL-H group developed regional or distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypogastric approach is as effective and safe as VEIL-L for penile cancer. Moreover, VEIL-H can avoid the operation on both the limb and abdomen if laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy is required.