Favourable multi‐institutional experience with penoscrotal decompression for prolonged ischaemic priapism

Clinical outcomes of the Burnett "snake" maneuver shunt modification for ischemic priapism

BACKGROUND

Major ischemic priapism (IP) is defined as a persistent penile erection for >4 hours. IP may cause serious complications, especially if prompt resolution is not achieved. Therefore, selecting the most effective and usable shunt technique is crucial in IP cases that are refractory to medical therapy.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and complication risks of distal corporoglanular shunt procedures with and without the Burnett "snake" maneuver.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who presented with IP and underwent surgical treatment at our institution between 2005 and 2021. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 26) underwent distal shunt + Burnett snake maneuver, and group 2 (n = 56) underwent distal shunt-only. Clinical history, parameters of IP, details of medical and surgical treatments, and follow-up information were evaluated.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes included differences in IP resolution and recurrence, functional erections, and complications between corporoglanular shunt procedures with and without the Burnett snake maneuver.

RESULTS

In group 1, 24 of 26 patients (92.3%) experienced priapism resolution with a single surgical intervention, while this outcome was observed in 30 of 56 patients (53.6%) in group 2 (P < .001). Notably, priapism recurrence was significantly lower in group 1, occurring in 1 of 24 patients (4.2%), as opposed to 8 of 30 patients (26.6%) in group 2 (P < .001). Of the patients with documented sexual function status at follow-up, functional erections (capable of penetration with or without phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors) were noted in 6 of 14 patients (42.8%) in group 1 and 13 of 26 patients (50%) in group 2 (P = .66).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study provides valuable insights regarding technical aspects of distal shunt procedures with and without the Burnett snake maneuver for treating major IP episodes. These results can help surgeons with clinical decision making for patients who present with IP.

STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the single-site retrospective design with potential selection bias, inaccuracies in medical record data, challenges in controlling confounding variables, and the lack of validated questionnaire scores for erectile function evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that modifying distal shunt procedures using the Burnett snake maneuver significantly improves priapism resolution and effectively prevents further priapism episodes without introducing additional complications or erectile function loss, thereby distinguishing it from distal shunt-only procedures.

Rapid adoption of penoscrotal decompression for ischemic priapism in private practice

Refractory ischemic priapism is a difficult to treat clinical entity for which there are a host of shunt procedures identified, but no singular agreed upon technique for surgical therapy. Recent literature describes success using a penoscrotal decompression technique that uses a similar dissection of a penoscrotal penile prosthesis placement. We demonstrate that this technique is easily applicable in the private practice setting as it uses a familiar setup to most general urologists in our case report.

Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?

Prolonged ischemic priapism presents a treatment challenge given the difficulty in achieving detumescence and effects on sexual function. To evaluate current practice patterns, an open, web-based multi-institutional survey querying surgeons' experience with and perceived efficacy of tunneling maneuvers (corporoglanular tunneling and penoscrotal decompression), as well as impressions of erectile recovery, was administered to members of societies specializing in male genital surgery. Following distribution, 141 responses were received. Tunneling procedures were the favored first-line surgical intervention in the prolonged setting (99/139, 71.2% tunneling vs. 14/139, 10.1% implant, p < .001). Although respondents were more likely to have performed corporoglanular tunneling than penoscrotal decompression (124/138, 89.9% vs. 86/137, 62.8%, p < .001), penoscrotal decompression was perceived as more effective among those who had performed both (47.3% Very or Extremely Effective for penoscrotal decompression vs. 18.7% for corporoglanular tunneling; p < .001). Many respondents who had performed both tunneling procedures felt that most regained meaningful sexual function after either corporoglanular tunneling or penoscrotal decompression (33/75, 44.0% vs. 33/74, 44.6%, p = .942). While further patient-centered investigation is warranted, this study suggests that penoscrotal decompression may outperform corporoglanular tunneling for prolonged priapism, and that recovery of sexual function may be higher than previously thought after tunneling procedures.

Surgical and minimally invasive treatment of ischaemic and non-ischaemic priapism: a systematic review by the EAU Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines panel

Surgical treatments for ischemic priapism (IP) include shunts or penile implants. Non-ischemic priapism (NIP) is usually the result of penile/perineal trauma causing an arterial fistula and embolisation may be required. We conducted a systematic review on behalf of the EAU Sexual and Reproductive health Guidelines panel to analyse the available evidence on efficacy and safety of surgical modalities for IP and NIP. Outcomes were priapism resolution, sexual function and adverse events following surgery. Overall, 63 studies (n = 923) met inclusion criteria up to September 2021. For IP (n = 702), surgery comprised distal (n = 274), proximal shunts (n = 209) and penile prostheses (n = 194). Resolution occurred in 18.7-100% for distal, 5.7-100% for proximal shunts and 100% for penile prostheses. Potency rate was 20-100% for distal, 11.1-77.2% for proximal shunts, and 26.3-100% for penile prostheses, respectively. Patient satisfaction was 60-100% following penile prostheses implantation. Complications were 0-42.5% for shunts and 0-13.6% for IPP. For NIP (n = 221), embolisation success was 85.7-100% and potency 80-100%. The majority of studies were retrospective cohort studies. Risk of bias was high. Overall, surgical shunts have acceptable success rates in IP. Proximal/venous shunts should be abandoned due to morbidity/ED rates. In IP > 48 h, best outcomes are seen with penile prostheses implantation. Embolisation is the mainstay technique for NIP with high resolution rates and adequate erectile function.

Penile implants in low flow priapism

Priapism is a persistent or prolonged erection, in the absence of sexual stimulation, that fails to subside. Prolonged ischaemic or low flow priapism is defined as a full or partial erection persisting for more than 4 h and unrelated to sexual interest or stimulation, characterised by little or no cavernous blood flow. Low flow priapism leads to progressive corporal fibrosis, which could, in turn, lead to long-lasting erectile dysfunction if left untreated. Penile prosthesis implantation is recognised as a management option in refractory and delayed low flow priapism for restoring erectile function with high patient satisfaction rates. However, the ensuing corporal fibrotic scarring poses a surgical challenge to clinicians, given the higher complication rates in this patient subset. Postoperative patient satisfaction has been closely linked to preoperative expectations and perceived loss of penile length. Therefore, thorough patient counselling concerning the risk and benefits of penile implants should be a priority for all clinicians. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the ideal prosthesis choice and procedural timing in refractory low flow priapism. In this review, we will examine the existing literature on penile implants in patients with priapism and discuss the options for managing complications associated with penile prosthesis surgery.

Successful Management of Prolonged Acute Ischemic Priapism With Penoscrotal Decompression: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Intracavernosal injection of Trimix (a combination of phentolamine, papaverine, and alprostadil) is used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. A rare but serious side effect of Trimix is priapism, a persistent erection lasting for more than four hours. Penoscrotal decompression is a newer technique being used to treat refractory and persistent ischemic priapism. Here, we report a unique case of priapism treated with penoscrotal decompression in a patient following an unmeasured injection of Trimix. A 36-year-old male presented to the emergency room complaining of a persistent painful erection over the previous five days following a Trimix injection and illicit methamphetamine use. At bedside, aspiration and irrigation were attempted without any improvement. Phenylephrine injection was contraindicated due to sinus tachycardia. The patient then underwent bilateral penoscrotal decompression on day six post-Trimix injection. The procedure was successful with a resolution of the erection, though some moderate corporal fibrosis was noted. At a 10-day follow-up, the patient reported moderate pain in his penis but had regained complete potency. Misuse of Trimix can cause persistent ischemic priapism. Penoscrotal decompression is a novel technique used to treat persistent ischemic priapism and has been shown to have positive efficacy in the resolution of priapism as well as in salvaging erectile function. To our knowledge, treatment of persistent priapism with penoscrotal decompression after using Trimix has not yet been reported in the literature. Given the rarity of this, our report highlights a unique case that has potential benefit for future practitioners who are faced with this clinical scenario.

Priapism or Prolonged Erection: Is 4 - 6 Hours of Cavernous Ischemia the Time Point of Irreversible Tissue Injury?

INTRODUCTION

Ischemic priapism remains a significant cause of morbidity among men. To date, the precise time when penile ischemia results in permanent, non-reversible cavernosal smooth muscle injury, compromising subsequent erectile integrity, remains ill-defined.

OBJECTIVES

To review the medical literature pertaining to ischemic priapism, focusing on factors that predict the exact timeline of irreversible cavernous tissue injury.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed. Our search included both publications on animal models and retrospective clinical series through January 2022. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they contained original data regarding nonreversible tissue injury on histology and/or provided a timeline of erectile function loss or preservation and had full text available in English.

RESULTS

Innovative studies in the 1990s using invitro models with strips of rabbit, rat, canine and monkey corpus cavernosal tissue demonstrated that anoxia eliminated spontaneous contractile activity and reduced tissue responsiveness to electrical field stimulation or pharmacological agents. The same models demonstrated that the inhibitory effects of field stimulated relaxation, were mediated by nitric oxide. Subsequent studies using similar models demonstrated that exposure of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle to an acidotic environment impairs its ability to contract. A pH of 6.9 was chosen for these experiments based on a case series of men with priapism, in whom a mean pH of 6.9 was measured in corporal blood after 4-6 hours of priapism. Invivo animal studies demonstrated that after erection periods of 6-8 hours, microscopy shows sporadic endothelial defects but otherwise normal cavernous smooth muscle. In these studies, greater durations of ischemic priapism were shown to result in more pronounced ultrastructural changes and presumably irreversibility. In studies involving human corporal tissues, samples were obtained from men who had experienced priapism for at least 12 hours. Overall, erectile function outcome data is deficient in priapism reporting, especially within treatment windows less than 6 hours. Some reports on ischemic priapism have documented good erectile function outcomes with reversal by 12 hours.

CONCLUSION

Based on our extensive review of animal models and clinical reports, we found that many clinical papers rely on the same small set of animal studies to suggest the time point of irreversible ischemic damage at 4-6 hours. Our review suggests an equal number of retrospective clinical studies demonstrate that ischemic priapism reversed within 6-12 hours may preserve erectile function in many patients. Dekalo S, Stern N, Broderick GA, et al. Priapism or Prolonged Erection: Is 4 - 6 Hours of Cavernous Ischemia the Time Point of Irreversible Tissue Injury? Sex Med Rev 2022;XX:XXX-XXX.

Management of Priapism: 2021 Update

Priapism is defined as a persistent penile erection lasting more than 4 hours. Priapism is a rare condition but when present it requires prompt evaluation and definitive diagnosis. Priapism has 2 pathophysiologic subtypes: ischemic and nonischemic. Ischemic priapism accounts for a majority of cases reported. Ischemic priapism is a urologic emergency and requires intervention to alleviate pain and prevent irreversible damage to erectile tissues. This article highlights current guidelines and the contemporary literature on priapism.

Priapism and Sickle Cell Disease: Special Considerations in Etiology, Management, and Prevention

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited medical condition where sickled red blood cells cause vaso-occlusive crisis. One major complication of SCD is priapism, defined as an erection of the penis lasting over four hours beyond sexual stimulation or orgasm. SCD priapism is caused by sickled erythrocytes obstructing venous outflow and can lead to permanent erectile dysfunction. This article reviews the pathology, physiology, and management of SCD priapism, including potential novel therapeutic agents.

Melanotan Tanning Injection: A Rare Cause of Priapism

Melanotan II, an injectable melanocortin analog, is illicitly available on the internet to generate a sunless tan through melanocyte induction. It is also used as a sexual stimulant in unlicensed performance enhancement clinics, and has been investigated as a possible treatment agent in erectile dysfunction. We describe in this case report a patient presenting with acute ischemic priapism after subcutaneous injection of melanotan II. The patient was initially managed with cavernosal aspiration and irrigation, and intracavernous injection of phenylephrine without achieving detumescence. After failing initial management, the patient underwent operative management with penoscrotal decompression, a promising alternative technique for the management of refractory ischemic priapism. Priapism after melanotan II injection has only been reported in the literature twice before. This case report highlights a rare presentation of acute ischemic priapism after melanotan II use, managed with surgical decompression. Future therapeutic applications of these agents and updated management guidelines should consider priapism as a possible side effect. CW. Mallory, DM Lopategui, BH. Cordon. Melanotan Tanning Injection: A Rare Cause of Priapism. Sex Med 2021;9:100298.