Identifying bias in CCR1 antagonists using radiolabelled binding, receptor internalization, β-arrestin translocation and chemotaxis assays

Fluorophore-Labeled Pyrrolones Targeting the Intracellular Allosteric Binding Site of the Chemokine Receptor CCR1

In this study, we describe the structure-based development of the first fluorescent ligands targeting the intracellular allosteric binding site (IABS) of the CC chemokine receptor type 1 (CCR1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that has been pursued as a drug target in inflammation and immune diseases. Starting from previously reported intracellular allosteric modulators of CCR1, tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA)-labeled ligands were designed, synthesized, and tested for their suitability as fluorescent tracers to probe binding to the IABS of CCR1. In the course of these studies, we developed LT166 (12) as a highly versatile fluorescent CCR1 ligand, enabling cell-free as well as cellular NanoBRET-based binding studies in a nonradioactive and high-throughput manner. Besides the detection of intracellular allosteric ligands by direct competition with 12, we were also able to monitor the binding of extracellular antagonists due to their positive cooperative binding with 12. Thereby, we provide a straightforward and nonradioactive method to easily distinguish between ligands binding to the IABS of CCR1 and extracellular negative modulators. Further, we applied 12 for the identification of novel chemotypes for intracellular CCR1 inhibition that feature high binding selectivity for CCR1 over CCR2. For one of the newly identified intracellular CCR1 ligands (i.e., 23), we were able to show CCR1 over CCR2 selectivity also on a functional level and demonstrated that this compound inhibits basal β-arrestin recruitment to CCR1, thereby acting as an inverse agonist. Thus, our fluorescent CCR1 ligand 12 represents a highly promising tool for future studies of CCR1-targeted pharmacology and drug discovery.

CCR2+ Macrophages Promote Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Alveolar Bone Remodeling

During mechanical force-induced alveolar bone remodeling, macrophage-mediated local inflammation plays a critical role. Yet, the detailed heterogeneity of macrophages is still unknown. Single-cell RNA sequencing was used to study the transcriptome heterogeneity of macrophages during alveolar bone remodeling. We identified macrophage subclusters with specific gene expression profiles and functions. CellChat and trajectory analysis revealed a central role of the Ccr2 cluster during development, with the CCL signaling pathway playing a crucial role. We further demonstrated that the Ccr2 cluster modulated bone remodeling associated inflammation through an NF-κB dependent pathway. Blocking CCR2 could significantly reduce the Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) progression. In addition, we confirmed the variation of CCR2+ macrophages in human periodontal tissues. Our findings reveal that mechanical force-induced functional shift of the Ccr2 macrophages cluster mediated by NF-κB pathway, leading to a pro-inflammatory response and bone remodeling. This macrophage cluster may represent a potential target for the manipulation of OTM.

Targeting Chemokine Receptor CCR1 as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is an incurable plasma B-cell malignancy with 5-year survival rates approximately 10-30% lower than other hematologic cancers. Treatment options include combination chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. However, not all patients are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation, and current pharmacological agents are limited in their ability to reduce tumor burden and extend multiple myeloma remission times. The "chemokine network" is comprised of chemokines and their cognate receptors, and is a critical component of the normal bone microenvironment as well as the tumor microenvironment of multiple myeloma. Antagonists targeting chemokine-receptor 1 (CCR1) may provide a novel approach for treating multiple myeloma. In vitro CCR1 antagonists display a high degree of specificity, and in some cases signaling bias. In vivo studies have shown they can reduce tumor burden, minimize osteolytic bone damage, deter metastasis, and limit disease progression in multiple myeloma models. While multiple CCR1 antagonists have entered the drug pipeline, none have entered clinical trials for treatment of multiple myeloma. This review will discuss whether current CCR1 antagonists are a viable treatment option for multiple myeloma, and studies aimed at identifying which CCR1 antagonist(s) are most appropriate for this disease.

Effects of blocking chemokine receptor CCR1 with BX471 in two models of fibrosis prevention and rescue in mice

Background

The induction, progression and resolution of liver fibrosis are influenced by multiple chemokines. The inhibition of CCR1 signalling by a specific non-peptide inhibitor (BX471) reduces kidney fibrosis after unilateral ureteral obstruction via suppression of leukocyte recruitment in mice. However, it remains unclear whether selective CCR1 inhibition also affects hepatic fibrogenesis. Therefore we aimed to study the effect of this intervention on liver fibrosis in prevention (CCl₄ administration) and rescue (ABCB4-deficient mice) mouse models.

Methods

In the prevention model, hepatic fibrosis was induced by repeated injections of CCl₄. Additionally, the verum group was treated with subcutaneous injections of BX471, while controls received vehicle only. ABCB4 deficient mice (on the BALB/c-background) with sclerosing cholangitis and biliary fibrosis received BX471 or vehicle, respectively (rescue model). Liver histopathology was assessed after Sirius red staining of collagen, and hepatic collagen contents were measured. In addition, we performed gene expression analyses of fibrosis-related genes.

Results

BX471 injections were tolerated moderately well by all mice, and all mice developed hepatic fibrosis. Significant differences were neither observed in serum aminotransferase activities after 6 weeks of treatment between the two groups in the prevention nor in the rescue model. Interestingly, hepatic collagen contents were significantly higher in mice treated with BX471 in the prevention model as compared to controls but histological stages of liver sections did not differ. Of note, we observed only moderate effects on liver fibrosis in the ABCB4 knock-out model.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that BX471 treatment did neither affect serum and tissue markers of liver injury and fibrosis in the CCl₄ model and only moderately in the Abcb4 ^-/- model of biliary fibrosis. The animal models indicate that treatment with BX471 alone is unlikely to exert major beneficial effects in chronic liver disease.

Biased antagonism of CXCR4 avoids antagonist tolerance

Repeated dosing of drugs targeting G protein-coupled receptors can stimulate antagonist tolerance, which reduces their efficacy; thus, strategies to avoid tolerance are needed. The efficacy of AMD3100, a competitive antagonist of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 that mobilizes leukemic blasts from the bone marrow into the blood to sensitize them to chemotherapy, is reduced after prolonged treatment. Tolerance to AMD3100 increases the abundance of CXCR4 on the surface of leukemic blasts, which promotes their rehoming to the bone marrow. AMD3100 inhibits both G protein signaling by CXCR4 and β-arrestin1/2-dependent receptor endocytosis. We demonstrated that biased antagonists of G protein-dependent chemotaxis but not β-arrestin1/2 recruitment and subsequent receptor endocytosis avoided tolerance. The peptide antagonist X4-2-6, which is derived from transmembrane helix 2 and extracellular loop 1 of CXCR4, limited chemotaxis and signaling but did not promote CXCR4 accumulation on the cell surface or cause tolerance. The activity of X4-2-6 was due to its distinct mechanism of inhibition of CXCR4. The peptide formed a ternary complex with the receptor and its ligand, the chemokine CXCL12. Within this complex, X4-2-6 released the portion of CXCL12 critical for receptor-mediated activation of G proteins but enabled the rest of the chemokine to recruit β-arrestins to the receptor. In contrast, AMD3100 displaced all components of the chemokine responsible for CXCR4 activation. We further identified a small molecule with similar biased antagonist properties to those of X4-2-6, which may provide a viable alternative to patients when antagonist tolerance prevents drugs from reaching efficacy.