ASP8273 tolerability and antitumor activity in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Lazertinib as a frontline treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Long-term follow-up results from LASER201

OBJECTIVE

This analysis of the first-line cohort of LASER201 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib 240 mg as a frontline therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 43 patients, with EGFR mutation-positive (Exon19Del, n = 24; L858R, n = 18; G719X, n = 1) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had not previously received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy, received once-daily lazertinib 240 mg. EGFR mutation status was confirmed by local or central testing. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor shrinkage, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

At the primary data cut-off (DCO; January 8, 2021), the ORR was 70 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 56.0-83.5), DCR was 86 % (95 % CI: 75.7-96.4) and the median DoR was 23.5 (95 % CI: 12.5-not reached) months. The median PFS was 24.6 (95 % CI: 12.2-30.2) months. At the final DCO (March 30, 2023), the median OS was not estimable and the median follow-up duration for OS was 55.2 [95 % CI: 22.8-55.7] months. OS rates at 36 months and 54 months were 66 % (95 % CI: 47.5-79.3 %) and 55 % (95 % CI: 36.6-70.7 %), respectively. The most commonly reported TEAEs were rash (54 %), diarrhea (47 %), pruritus (35 %), and paresthesia (35 %). No drug-related rash or pruritus TEAEs of grade 3 or higher were reported. Diarrhea and paresthesia of grade 3 or higher were reported in 3 (7 %) and 1 (2 %) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrated long-term clinical benefit with lazertinib 240 mg in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had not previously received EGFR TKIs. The safety profile for lazertinib was tolerable and consistent with that previously reported.

ABCB1 overexpression through locus amplification represents an actionable target to combat paclitaxel resistance in pancreatic cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest types of cancer and the chemotherapies such as gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel are confronted with intrinsic or acquired resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate mechanisms underlying paclitaxel resistance in PDAC and explore strategies to overcome it.

METHODS

Three paclitaxel (PR) and gemcitabine resistant (GR) PDAC models were established. Transcriptomics and proteomics were used to identify conserved mechanisms of drug resistance. Genetic and pharmacological approaches were used to overcome paclitaxel resistance.

RESULTS

Upregulation of ABCB1 through locus amplification was identified as a conserved feature unique to PR cells. ABCB1 was not affected in any of the GR models and no cross resistance was observed. The ABCB1 inhibitor verapamil or siRNA-mediated ABCB1 depletion sensitized PR cells to paclitaxel and prevented efflux of ABCB1 substrates in all models. ABCB1 expression was associated with a trend towards shorter survival in patients who had received gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel treatment. A pharmacological screen identified known and novel kinase inhibitors that attenuate efflux of ABCB1 substrates and sensitize PR PDAC cells to paclitaxel.

CONCLUSION

Upregulation of ABCB1 through locus amplification represents a novel, conserved mechanism of PDAC paclitaxel resistance. Kinase inhibitors identified in this study can be further (pre) clinically explored as therapeutic strategies to overcome paclitaxel resistance in PDAC.

Targeting the EGFR/RAS/RAF signaling pathway in anticancer research: a recent update on inhibitor design and clinical trials (2020-2023)

INTRODUCTION

Recent years have seen significant strides in drug developmenttargeting the EGFR/RAS/RAF signaling pathway which is critical forcell growth and proliferation. Protein-protein interaction networksamong EGFR, RAS, and RAF proteins offer insights for drug discovery. This review discusses the drug design and development efforts ofinhibitors targeting these proteins over the past 3 years, detailingtheir structures, selectivity, efficacy, and combination therapy.Strategies to combat drug resistance and minimize toxicities areexplored, along with future research directions.

AREA COVERED

This review encompasses clinical trials and patents on EGFR, KRAS,and BRAF inhibitors from 2020 to 2023, including advancements indesign and synthesis of proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) forprotein degradation.

EXPERT OPINION

To tackle drug resistance, designing allosteric fourth-generationEGFR inhibitors is vital. Covalent, allosteric, or combinationaltherapies, along with PROTAC degraders, are key methods to addressresistance and toxicity in KRAS and BRAF inhibitors.

The advance of the third‑generation EGFR‑TKI in the treatment of non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Lung cancer is currently the second most common type of cancer with the second incidence rate and the first mortality rate worldwide. Non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for ~85% of the total number of cases of lung cancers. Concerning the treatment of NSCLC, targeted therapy has become a research hotspot in recent years because of its favorable efficacy, high selectivity and minimal adverse reactions. Among the drugs used in targeted therapy, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the most common and are categorized into four generations. The use of first and second‑generation drugs leads to drug resistance within 8‑14 months. This resistance is primarily caused by the T790M mutation, which is the most observed mechanism. A third‑generation drug has been developed to address this issue and a fourth‑generation drug is expected to overcome multiple resistance mechanisms, including third‑generation drug resistance. However, the fourth‑generation drug has not been launched yet. At present, multiple third‑generation targeted drugs have been launched globally, with three being launched in China and several being at research and clinical trial stages. The present article provides a review of the development process, mechanism of action and clinical trials of the third‑generation EGFR‑TKIs, aiming to provide some reference and suggestions for the clinical treatment of NSCLC and scientific research on third‑generation targeted drugs.

Overview of the multifaceted resistances toward EGFR-TKIs and new chemotherapeutic strategies in non-small cell lung cancer

The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been vastly studied over the last decade. This has led to the rapid development of many generations of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, patients treated with third-generation TKIs (osimertinib, avitinib and rociletinib) targeting the EGFR T790M mutation have shown emerging resistances and relapses. Therefore, further molecular understanding of NSCLC mutations, bypass signalling, tumour microenvironment and the existence of cancer stem cells to overcome such resistances is warranted. This will pave the way for designing novel and effective chemotherapies to improve patients' overall survival. In this review, we provide an overview of the multifaceted mechanism of resistances towards EGFR-TKIs, as well as the challenges and perspectives that should be addressed in strategising chemotherapeutic treatments to overcome the ever evolving and adaptive nature of NSCLC.

A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

ASP8273, a novel, small molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with activating mutations or EGFR T790M resistance mutations. The current study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations not previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluated ASP8273 versus erlotinib/gefitinib in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. They were ineligible if they received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included overall survival, investigator-assessed PFS, best overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), and the safety/tolerability profile.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 530) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive ASP8273 (n = 267) or erlotinib/gefitinib (n = 263). Patient demographics between both treatment groups were generally balanced. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.6-11.1 months) for patients receiving ASP8273 and 9.6 months (95% CI 8.8-NE) for the erlotinib/gefitinib group, with a hazard ratio of 1.611 (P = 0.992). The ORR in the ASP8273 group was 33% (95% CI 27.4-39.0) versus 47.9% (95% CI 41.7-54.1) in the erlotinib/gefitinib group. Median DoR was similar for both groups (9.2 months for ASP8273 versus 9.0 months for erlotinib/gefitinib). More grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in patients receiving ASP8273 than in those receiving erlotinib/gefitinib (54.7% versus 43.5%). An independent data monitoring committee carried out an interim safety analysis and recommended discontinuing the study due to toxicity and limited predicted efficacy of ASP8273 relative to erlotinib/gefitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line ASP8273 did not show improved PFS or equivalent toxicities versus erlotinib/gefitinib.

CLINICALTRIAL.GOV NUMBER

NCT02588261.

Clinical management of third-generation EGFR inhibitor-resistant patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Current status and future perspectives

Discovery of activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a predictive biomarker for first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has initiated an era of precision oncology for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the robust efficacy of first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs, disease relapse is inevitable. EGFR T790M mutation is the predominant cause of disease relapse and third-generation, irreversible EGFR inhibitors designed for targeting EGFR T790M and activating mutations have demonstrated promising clinical activity and tolerability. Unfortunately, disease progression inevitably occurs and heterogenous resistance mechanisms have been reported with limited subsequent treatment strategies available. Till now, treatment approaches for patients progressed from third-generation EGFR TKIs have not been clearly established. In this review, we summarize the recent findings in resistance mechanisms to third-generation EGFR TKIs and emerging treatment approaches for EGFR-mutant patients after resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs. We further discuss clinical challenges and future perspectives for management of EGFR-mutant patients resistant to third-generation EGFR TKIs.

ASP8273 tolerability and antitumor activity in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations occur in approximately 50% of East Asian patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). ASP8273 is an irreversible EGFR‐TKI, given orally, that inhibits EGFR activating mutations and has shown clinical activity in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor‐TKI‐naïve Japanese adult patients (≥20 years) with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled in this open‐label, single‐arm, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02500927). Patients received ASP8273 300 mg once daily until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end‐point was to determine the safety of ASP8273 300 mg; the secondary end‐point was antitumor activity defined by RECIST version 1.1. Thirty‐one patients (12 men and 19 women; median age, 64 years [range, 31‐82 years]) with EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC were enrolled; as of 23 February 2016, 25 patients (81%) were still on study. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87%) had an exon 19 deletion (n = 13, 42%) or an L858R (n = 14, 45%) EGFR activating mutation, and two (7%) had an L861Q mutation. Five patients (16%) had other EGFR activating mutations, two had an activating mutation and the T790M resistance mutation. The most commonly reported treatment‐emergent adverse event was diarrhea (n = 24, 77%). All patients had at least one post‐baseline scan; one patient (3%) achieved a confirmed complete response, 13 (42%) had a confirmed partial response, and 15 (48%) had confirmed stable disease (disease control rate, 94% [n = 29/31]) per investigator assessment. Once‐daily ASP8273 at 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in TKI‐naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC.