Phase 1 study of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma

Candidate Biomarkers for Specific Intraoperative Near-Infrared Imaging of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Near-infrared imaging of tumors during surgery facilitates the oncologic surgeon to distinguish malignant from healthy tissue. The technique is based on fluorescent tracers binding to tumor biomarkers on malignant cells. Currently, there are no clinically available fluorescent tracers that specifically target soft tissue sarcomas. This review searched the literature to find candidate biomarkers for soft tissue sarcomas, based on clinically used therapeutic antibodies. The search revealed 7 biomarkers: TEM1, VEGFR-1, EGFR, VEGFR-2, IGF-1R, PDGFRα, and CD40. These biomarkers are abundantly present on soft tissue sarcoma tumor cells and are already being targeted with humanized monoclonal antibodies. The conjugation of these antibodies with a fluorescent dye will yield in specific tracers for image-guided surgery of soft tissue sarcomas to improve the success rates of tumor resections.

Abstract

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The curative treatment highly depends on complete tumor resection, as positive margins are associated with local recurrence (LR) and prognosis. However, determining the tumor margin during surgery is challenging. Real-time tumor-specific imaging can facilitate complete resection by visualizing tumor tissue during surgery. Unfortunately, STS specific tracers are presently not clinically available. In this review, STS-associated cell surface-expressed biomarkers, which are currently already clinically targeted with monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic purposes, are evaluated for their use in near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of STS. Clinically targeted biomarkers in STS were extracted from clinical trial registers and a PubMed search was performed. Data on biomarker characteristics, sample size, percentage of biomarker-positive STS samples, pattern of biomarker expression, biomarker internalization features, and previous applications of the biomarker in imaging were extracted. The biomarkers were ranked utilizing a previously described scoring system. Eleven cell surface-expressed biomarkers were identified from which 7 were selected as potential biomarkers for NIRF imaging: TEM1, VEGFR-1, EGFR, VEGFR-2, IGF-1R, PDGFRα, and CD40. Promising biomarkers in common and aggressive STS subtypes are TEM1 for myxofibrosarcoma, TEM1, and PDGFRα for undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma and EGFR for synovial sarcoma.

Relationship between PDGFR expression and the response to pazopanib in intimal sarcoma of the pulmonary artery: A case report

Intimal sarcoma of the pulmonary artery (PAIS) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Pazopanib, which has been indicated in metastatic non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcomas and is expected to be active in PAIS, is a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets the tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and stem cell factor receptor. The present study reports findings related to two cases of PAIS with PDGF and VEGF expression following treatment with pazopanib. A case with a moderate to strong expression of PDGFR-α and -β presented a long-term stable disease when treated with pazopanib (progression-free survival, 5.8 months). In a second case with a weak expression of PDGFR-α and -β, the disease progressed rapidly on pazopanib (progression-free survival, 1.1 months). VEGFR-2 was not expressed in the tumors of both cases. The level of PDGFR expression in the tumor tissue may therefore be predictive of pazopanib efficacy.

Pristimerin inhibits the proliferation of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells by inducing apoptosis

Fibrosarcoma is a soft tissue sarcoma that is classified as a rare cancer. Therefore, no standard anti-tumor drug therapy has been established for fibrosarcoma. Although pristimerin (PM) has been reported to exert an anti-tumor effect on various types of cancer, no studies have examined the therapeutic effect of PM on soft tissue sarcoma. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the anti-tumor effect of PM on human fibrosarcoma cells (HT1080). The present study examined the cell viability, IC50 values and ability to induce apoptosis of PM in HT1080 and normal human dermal fibroblast (aHDF) cells. The effect of PM on the following signaling pathways associated with cell proliferation was also evaluated: AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). Using mice subcutaneously transplanted with fibrosarcoma cells, the effect of PM treatment was investigated on tumor growth inhibition, body weight and liver and renal function. The results revealed that PM administration reduced cell viability and induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent matter. In HT1080 cells, the IC50 value of PM was 0.16 µM at 24 h and 0.13 µM at 48 h. PM treatment also decreased the levels of phosphorylated AKT, mTOR, NF-κB and phosphorylated ERK in a dose-dependent manner. In the PM injection group, the increase in tumor volume was significantly reduced and the effect on weight loss and liver and renal function were revealed to be insignificant. PM exerted little effect on normal human dermal fibroblasts and was highly effective against human fibrosarcoma cells. The results indicated that PM may be used as a potential therapeutic agent against fibrosarcoma.

The Combination of Olaratumab with Doxorubicin and Cisplatinum Regresses a Chemotherapy-Resistant Osteosarcoma in a Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft Mouse Model

Chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma is a recalcitrant disease. It is a frequent cause of death to the patients who are usually adolescent or young adults. The goal of the present study was to determine the efficacy of the combination of olaratumab (OLA), doxorubicin (DOX), and cisplatinum (CDDP) on osteosarcoma, which is resistant to first-line therapy, in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. The osteosarcoma PDOX model was randomized into six treatment groups of six mice: control; CDDP alone; DOX and CDDP; OLA + DOX; OLA + CDDP; and OLA + DOX and CDDP. Tumor size and body weight were measured during 14 days of treatment. Tumor growth was regressed only by the treatment with a combination of OLA + DOX and CDDP. Tumors treated with this three-drug combination had the most tumor necrosis and the lowest Ki-67 index. The present study demonstrates the power of the PDOX model to identify novel effective treatment strategy for chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma.

Olaratumab combined with doxorubicin and ifosfamide overcomes individual doxorubicin and olaratumab resistance of an undifferentiated soft-tissue sarcoma in a PDOX mouse model

Olaratumab (OLA), a monoclonal antibody against platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα), has recently been used against soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) combined with doxorubicin (DOX), with limited efficacy. The goal of the present study was to determine the efficacy of OLA in combination with DOX and ifosfamide (IFO) on STS. Undifferentiated soft-tissue sarcoma (USTS) from a striated muscle of a patient was grown orthotopically in the right biceps femoris muscle of nude mice to establish USTS patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. USTS PDOX tumors were treated with OLA alone, DOX alone, DOX combined with IFO, OLA combined with DOX or IFO, and OLA combined with DOX and IFO. Tumor size and body weight were measured during the 14 days of treatment. Tumor growth was arrested by OLA combined with DOX and IFO. Tumors treated with OLA combined with DOX and IFO had the most necrosis. The present study demonstrates the power of the PDOX model to identify the novel effective treatment strategy of the combination of OLA, DOX and IFO for soft-tissue sarcomas.

Phase 1 study of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma

Olaratumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting human platelet‐derived growth factor receptor α, plus doxorubicin significantly improved overall survival in patients with advanced soft‐tissue sarcoma (STS) in a prior phase 1b/2 randomized trial. Subsequent exposure‐response analysis suggested that higher olaratumab exposures earlier might improve outcomes in patients at risk of early disease progression. This phase 1 study (3 treatment cohorts; minimum 6 patients each) investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with STS. Patients received olaratumab 15 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 during each 21‐day cycle until disease progression. Patients in Cohort 3 received a 20 mg/kg loading dose of olaratumab in Cycle 1. Doxorubicin was administered for up to 6 cycles. Patients in Cohort 1 received doxorubicin 25 mg/m² on Days 1, 2 and 3. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received doxorubicin 75 mg/m² on Day 1. One patient in Cohort 2 experienced a dose‐limiting toxicity of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were of mild and moderate severity, and were known doxorubicin toxicities. Olaratumab serum concentrations in Cohort 3 reached a steady‐state exceeding the target level in Cycle 1. Partial response was confirmed in 4 patients (2 each in Cohorts 2 and 3). Olaratumab plus doxorubicin had an acceptable safety profile in patients with STS. A loading dose of olaratumab 20 mg/kg was effective for achieving minimum serum concentrations above the target trough level in Cycle 1.