KEYNOTE-025: Phase 1b study of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with previously treated programmed death ligand 1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Effect of primary tumor volume on survival of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the survival effect of thoracic gross tumor volume (GTV) in three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The data cases were obtained from a single-center retrospective analysis. From May. From 2008 to August 2018, 377 treatment criteria were enrolled. GTV was defined as the volume of the primary lesion and the hilus as well as the mediastinal metastatic lymph node. Chemotherapy was a platinum-based combined regimen of two drugs. The number of median chemotherapy cycles was 4 (2-6), and the cut-off value of the planning target volume (PTV) dose of the primary tumor was 63 Gy (30-76.5 Gy). The cut-off value of GTV volume was 150 cm3 (5.83-3535.20 cm3).

RESULTS

The survival rate of patients with GTV <150 cm3 is better than patients with GTV ≥150 cm3. Multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that peripheral lung cancer, radiation dose ≥63 Gy, GTV <150 cm3, 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy, and CR + PR are good prognostic factors for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The survival rate of patients with GTV <150 cm3 was longer than patients with ≥150 cm3 when they underwent 2 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent 3D radiotherapy (p < 0.05). When performing 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent 3D radiotherapy, there was no significant difference between <150 cm3 and ≥150 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume of stage IV NSCLC primary tumor can affect the survival of patients. Appropriate treatment methods can be opted by considering the volume of tumors to extend patients' lifetime to the utmost.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immunotherapy is an emerging antitumor therapy that can improve the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only about 20% of NSCLC patients can benefit from this treatment. At present, whether patients with driving gene-positive NSCLC can benefit from immunotherapy is one of the hot issues. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC and concluded the efficacy of altered subtypes.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Results

In all, 86 studies involving 4524 patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORRs in clinical trials treated with monoimmunotherapy of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS alteration were 6%, 0%, and 23%, respectively. In retrospective studies, the pooled ORRs of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, MET, HER2, RET, and ROS1 alteration were 8%, 3%, 28%, 24%, 23%, 14%, 7%, and 8%, respectively. Among them, the pooled ORRs of KRAS non-G12C mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, MET-exon 14 skipping, and MET-amplification were 33% 40%, 20%, 34%, 17%, and 60%, respectively. In addition, the pooled mPFS rates of EGFR, KRAS, MET, HER2, and RET alteration were 2.77, 3.24, 2.48, 2.31, and 2.68 months, while the pooled mOS rates of EGFR and KRAS alteration were 9.98 and 12.29 months, respectively. In prospective data concerning EGFR mutation, the pooled ORR and mPFS treated with chemo-immunotherapy (IC) reached 38% and 6.20 months, while 58% and 8.48 months with chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (ICA). Moreover, the pooled mPFS and mOS of monoimmunotherapy was 2.33 months and 12.43 months.

Conclusions

EGFR-, ALK-, HER2-, RET-, and ROS1-altered NSCLC patients have poor reactivity to monoimmunotherapy but the efficacy of immune-based combined therapy is significantly improved. KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, and MET amplification have better responses to immunotherapy, and more prospective studies are needed for further research.

Incidence of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Containing Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many cancers, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are among the most frequently encountered toxic effects. Understanding the incidence and prognostic associations of cirAEs is of importance as their uses in different settings, combinations, and tumor types expand. To evaluate the incidence of cirAEs and their association with outcome measures across a variety of ICI regimens and cancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or other ICIs in patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Key findings of our study include variable cirAE incidence among tumors and ICI regimens, positive association with increased cirAE incidence and response rate, as well as significant association between increased vitiligo incidence and overall survival. Across 174 studies, rash, pruritis, and vitiligo were the most reported cirAEs, with incidences of 16.7%, 18.0%, and 6.6%, respectively. Higher incidence of cirAEs was associated with ICI combination regimens and with CTLA-4-containing regimens, particularly with higher doses of ipilimumab, as compared to PD-1/L1 monotherapies. Outcome measures including response rate and progression-free survival were positively correlated with incidence of cirAEs. The response rate and incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash were associated with expected rises in incidence of 0.17% (p = 0.0238), 0.40% (p = 0.0010), and 0.18% (p = 0.0413), respectively. Overall survival was positively correlated with the incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash; this association was significant for vitiligo (p = 0.0483). Our analysis provides benchmark incidence rates for cirAEs and links cirAEs with favorable treatment outcomes at a study level across diverse solid tumors and multiple ICI regimens.

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease after chemoimmunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Objectives

The combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (chemo-ICI) has become the new standard of treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Recently, slight changes in interstitial shadows, defined as interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), have been identified. In patients with ES-SCLC who received chemo-ICI, there are limited data on the incidence of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (D-ILD) in daily practice and the association between the development of D-ILD and ILA in the baseline computed tomography (CT).

Materials and methods

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to investigate the incidence of D-ILD, the risk factors for developing D-ILD, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with ES-SCLC who received chemo-ICI between August 2019 and November 2021.

Results

This study enrolled 70 patients (median age, 71 years; including 58 men) from nine institutions in Japan. There were 62 patients (89%) treated with carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab and 8 patients treated with carboplatin or cisplatin/etoposide/durvalumab. Twenty-nine patients (41.4%) were found to have ILA at baseline CT. Eleven patients (15.7%) developed D-ILD. The proportion of patients with ILA was significantly higher in the group who developed D-ILD than in the group who did not (9/11 (81.8%) vs. 20/59 (33.9%), respectively, P = 0.0057). In addition, the frequency of ground glass attenuation (GGA) and reticulation was higher in patients who developed D-ILD. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between patients who developed D-ILD and those who did not (median PFS, 8.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-9.5) months vs. 5.0 (95% CI, 4.5-5.6) months, respectively, P = 0.11 and median OS, not reached (NR) (95% CI, 8.7-NR) vs. 18.2 (95% CI, 13.2-NR) months, respectively, P = 0.20).

Conclusion

The incidence of D-ILD in patients with ES-SCLC who received chemo-ICI in clinical practice was higher than that in clinical trials. Patients with pre-existing ILA were more likely to develop D-ILD.

Potential biomarkers for immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

For individuals with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the primary treatment is platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), primarily PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, have been found to be effective in patients with NSCLC who have no EGFR/ALK mutations. Furthermore, ICIs are considered a standard therapy. The quantity of fresh immunogenic antigens discovered by cytotoxic T cells was measured by PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB), which were the first biomarkers assessed in clinical trials. However, immunotherapy did not have response efficacy markers similar to targeted therapy, highlighting the significance of newly developed biomarkers. This investigation aims to review the research on immunotherapy for NSCLC, focusing primarily on the impact of biomarkers on efficacy prediction to determine whether biomarkers may be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy.

Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in NSCLC: Current Developments and Applicability

Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate among all cancer types, resulting in over 1.8 million deaths annually. Immunotherapy utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ICIs, predominantly monoclonal antibodies, modulate co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory signals crucial for maintaining immune tolerance. Despite significant therapeutic advancements in NSCLC, patients still face challenges such as disease progression, recurrence, and high mortality rates. Therefore, there is a need for predictive biomarkers that can guide lung cancer treatment strategies. Currently, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is the only established biomarker for predicting ICI response. However, its accuracy and robustness are not consistently reliable. This review provides an overview of potential biomarkers currently under development or in the validation stage that hold promise in improving the classification of responders and non-responders to ICI therapy in the near future.

Treatment-free survival after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in mNSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Recent research has suggested that patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) can achieve ongoing response after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), but the best time to discontinue and the factors influencing efficacy remain unknown.

Method

A systematic search was performed for prospective clinical trials in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs published up to July 10, 2022. Eligible studies reported treatment-free survival (TFS) after discontinuation of ICI in partial objective responders. We calculated objective response rate (ORR) and TFS using random-effects models with respective 95% confidence intervals (Cis), and performed subgroup analyses to discuss the specific associations between ORR and TFS and the associated influencing factors.

Results

Across the 26 cohorts (3833 patients) included, the weighted mean ORR for all patients was 29.30% (95% CI 24.28% to 34.57%), with ICI plus chemotherapy (48.83%, 95% CI 44.36% to 53.30%) significantly higher than monotherapy (23.40%, 95% CI 18.53% to 28.62%). 395 patients were all patients who were complete or partial responders in the study, 194 discontinued ICI treatment, and nearly 35.5% achieved a durable response. No significant differences in TFS were found between subgroups according to the ICI regimen classification. Four cohorts of patients who completed 35 courses of treatment showed high levels of pooled TFS at 6 (80.18%, 95% CI 53.03% to 97.87%) and 12 months (66.98%, 95% CI 46.90% to 84.47%). Three cohorts of patients discontinued ICI treatment due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with the TFS rates at 6 (76.98%, 95% CI 65.79% to 86.65%) and 12 months (64.79%, 95% CI 50.20% to 78.19%).

Conclusion

Patients with mNSCLC were able to achieve ongoing responses after discontinuation of ICI. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that different treatment regimens, different drugs or different treatment durations may have an impact on TFS.

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapy of non-small cell lung cancer-A summary of clinical trials and current progresses

Background

This review discusses the impact of mono or combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, comparing clinical outcomes and safety. Cancer subtype, tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression state and T cell infiltration (TIL) density are considered for interpretations. Besides, current progresses in the field of immunotherapy are discussed.

Results

Anti-PD-(L)1 is a safe and an effective strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Clinical responses to nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in particular, are promising. The most desired clinical responses are for patients receiving combination of anti-PD-(L)1 or anti-PD-(L)1/anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) with chemotherapy (taxane and platinum). PD-L1 expression state (PD-L1 ≥ 50%), patient performance state (PS: 0-1 ECOG scale) and effector T cell (Teff) immune signature considerably affect ICI responses. Higher ICI responses are also expected in TMB ^high but EGFR^-/ALK^- cancer patients. In regard with safety profile, adverse events (AEs) related to anti-PD-(L)1 are lower compared with that for platinum-based and docetaxel therapy. Toripalimab is the safest among various immunotherapy drugs. Bispecific antibodies against anti-PD-(L)1 with dominant signaling or alternative checkpoints in tumor microenvironment (TME) is the current focus in immunotherapy of cancers like NSCLC. Besides, the contribution of extracellular vesicles (EVs) to immune escape and their implication in cancer diagnosis and therapy is on the eye of current investigations.

Conclusion

Appropriate biomarker selection will improve therapy outcomes in ICI treated NSCLC patients, particularly in cases under combinatory ICI therapy. Application of bispecific antibodies and EV-based targeted therapy are effective novel strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

Immunotherapeutic approaches in EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was the first tumor virus in humans. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) accounts for approximately 60% of the 200,000 new tumor cases caused by EBV infection worldwide each year. NPC has an insidious onset and is highly malignant, with more than 70% of patients having intermediate to advanced disease at the time of initial diagnosis, and is strongly implicated in epithelial cancers as well as malignant lymphoid and natural killer/T cell lymphomas. Over 90% of patients with confirmed undifferentiated NPC are infected with EBV. In recent decades, much progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of NPC and developing therapeutic approaches. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main treatment options for NPC; however, they have a limited efficacy in patients with locally advanced or distant metastatic tumors. Tumor immunotherapy, including vaccination, adoptive cell therapy, and immune checkpoint blockade, represents a promising therapeutic approach for NPC. Significant breakthroughs have recently been made in the application of immunotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC (RM-NPC), indicating a broad prospect for NPC immunotherapy. Here, we review important research findings regarding immunotherapy for NPC patients and provide insights for future research.

Comparison between immunotherapy efficacy in early non-small cell lung cancer and advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Currently, immunotherapy is widely used in the treatment of various stages of non-small cell lung cancer. According to clinical experience and results of previous studies, immunotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy seems to exhibit better efficacy against early resectable non-small cell lung cancer as compared to advanced lung cancer, which is often defined as unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. However, this observation has not been established in clinical studies. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in early and late lung cancer, wherein objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were used as evaluation indexes. The present study also evaluated the safety of immunotherapy in early and late lung cancer, wherein the rate of treatment-related adverse reactions (TRAEs) was used as an indicator.

METHODS

Electronica databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other databases, were searched to identify relevant studies. Besides this, all the available reviews, abstracts, and meeting reports from the main international lung cancer meetings were searched manually. ORR, DCR, and TRAEs were extracted as the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 52 randomized controlled trials involving 13,660 patients were shortlisted. It was observed that immunotherapy alone significantly improved DCR in early lung cancer in comparison to advanced lung cancer. Importantly, the improvement in ORR was not to the same extent as reported in the case of advanced lung cancer. The combination of immunotherapy with other therapies, especially immunochemotherapy, significantly improved ORR and DCR in early lung cancer. In terms of safety, immunotherapy either alone or in combination with other therapies exhibited a better safety profile in early lung cancer than in advanced lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, the benefits of immunotherapy in early lung cancer appeared to be better than those observed in advanced lung cancer, especially with the regard to the regimen of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy. In terms of safety, both immunotherapy alone and its combination with chemotherapy were found to be safer in early lung cancer as compared to advanced lung cancer.

Progression-free survival assessed per immune-related or conventional response criteria, which is the better surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Progression-free survival (PFS) has been used as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in lung cancer trials. The pattern of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) differs from that to conventional chemotherapy, so immune-related response evaluation criteria were proposed. This study aims at determining which PFS measure, PFS assessed per immune-related response evaluation criteria (iPFS), or conventional criteria (cPFS), is the better surrogate endpoint for OS in trials of ICIs in lung cancer. We selected clinical trials in lung cancer that administered ICIs to at least one arm and reported both median OS and median PFS from PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. We compared the correlation between treatment effect (hazard ratio) on OS and cPFS or iPFS and the correlation between median OS and median cPFS or iPFS using weighted linear regression at trial level. We analyzed 78 ICI arms (13,438 patients) from 54 studies, including 66 arms with cPFS, seven arms with iPFS, and five arms with both kinds of PFS. We demonstrated an excellent correlation between treatment effect (hazard ratio) on OS and iPFS (RWLS2  = 0.91), while the correlation was moderate for cPFS (RWLS2  = 0.38). Similarly, the correlation between median OS and median iPFS was also strong (RWLS2 ranging from 0.86 to 0.96) across different phases of trials and different types of lung cancer, ICI, and treatment modalities, while it was much weaker for median cPFS (RWLS2 ranging from 0.28 to 0.88). In conclusion, iPFS provides better trial-level surrogacy for OS than cPFS in trials of ICIs in lung cancer.

Immunotherapy Use in Patients With Lung Cancer and Comorbidities

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is now in widespread clinical use for the treatment of lung cancer. Although patients with autoimmune disease and other comorbidities were excluded from initial clinical trials, emerging real-world experience suggests that these promising treatments may be administered safely to individuals with inactive low-risk autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis, mild to moderate renal and hepatic dysfunction, and certain chronic viral infections. Considerations for ICI in autoimmune disease populations include exacerbations of the underlying autoimmune disease, increased risk of ICI-induced immune-related adverse events, and potential for compromised efficacy if patients are receiving chronic immunosuppression. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in higher-risk autoimmune conditions, such as myasthenia gravis or multiple sclerosis, requires careful evaluation on a case-by-case basis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in individuals with solid organ transplant carries a substantial risk of organ rejection. Ongoing research into the prediction of ICI efficacy and toxicity may help in patient selection, treatment, and monitoring.

Phase 1 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved outcomes over chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase 3 international trials. In the phase 1 KEYNOTE-011 study (parts B and C), we evaluated the safety/activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients received 4 cycles (every 3 weeks) of pembrolizumab 200 mg plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m²/carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 mg/mL/min and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² in part B [nonsquamous]; carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min and paclitaxel 200 mg/m²/nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² (weekly) in part C [squamous]), followed by maintenance pembrolizumab (and pemetrexed, part B). The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 3 weeks of treatment. Overall response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1 by central review) was exploratory.

RESULTS

In part B (median follow-up, 16.0 months; n = 12) 1 DLT occurred (grade 4 hyponatremia). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 patients (75%). Two patients had grade 5 treatment-related AEs (pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease). In part C (median follow-up, 9.9 months; n = 14), 2 DLTs occurred (both grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 patients (79%); none were fatal. ORR was 73% in part B and 50% in part C, irrespective of PD-L1 status.

CONCLUSION

Safety results show first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is feasible in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Antitumor activity was observed irrespective of PD-L1 status and was comparable to that in international studies.

TRIAL REGISTER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01840579.

Assessment of TMB, PD-L1, and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio as predictive potential in a phase Ib study of sintilimab in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Sintilimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the programmed cell death 1 (PD-L1). We aimed to assess the safety and activity of sintilimab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

This phase Ib study included six cohorts. Cohort A-C were sintilimab monotherapy settings, and enrolled pretreated patients (2/3 L cohorts). Cohort D-F were treatment-naïve patients (1 L cohorts), and received sintilimab plus different chemotherapies. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR). Exploratory endpoints were potential biomarkers for the prognosis after treatment, such as tumor mutation burden scores (TMB), PD-L1 and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR).

RESULTS

The ORR was 14.6% in the 2/3 L cohorts (n=146), and 73.2% in the 1 L cohorts (n=61). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 55 patients (37.7%) in 2/3 L cohorts, and in 38 (62.3%) in 1 L cohorts. 157 patients had available TMB scores, and in 2/3 L cohorts, patients in the high TMB groups (TMB≥10) showed a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those in the low TMB groups (TMB<10). No significant differences in PFS and OS were observed across different PD-L1 groups in both 1 L and 2/3 L cohorts. A high LMR was significantly associated with an improved PFS in 1 L cohorts (P=0.022).

CONCLUSION

Sintilimab alone or combined with chemotherapy had a tolerable safety profile in solid tumors. The combination therapy showed a favorable activity with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. LMR might be a prognostic factor for the combination regimen in these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02937116. Registered 18 October 2016.

From Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 to CTLA-4 and to MUC1-Is the Better Response to Treatment in Smokers of Cancer Patients Drug Specific?

Whether smokers respond to anti-cancer drugs differently than non-smokers remains controversial. The objective of this study is to explore whether the better response of the smokers is specific to therapy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1, anti-checkpoint inhibitor, individual drugs on the cell surface, or lung cancer. Our results showed that among all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, when the data from anti-PD-1/PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-MUC1 drugs are combined, the mean hazard ratios (HR) of smokers and non-smokers were 0.751 and 1.016, respectively. A meta-analysis with a fixed effect (FE) model indicated that the smokers have an HR value of 0.023 lower than that of the non-smokers. A stratified subgroup meta-analysis indicated that when treated with anti-CTLA-4 drugs, smokers had reduced HR values of 0.152 and 0.165 on average and FE model meta-analysis, respectively. When treated with an anti-MUC1 drug, smokers had reduced HR values of 1.563 and 0.645, on average and FE model meta-analysis, respectively. When treated with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab drugs, smokers had, on average, reduced HR and FE model meta-analysis values (0.257 and 0.141), respectively. Smoking is a clinical response predictor for anti-PD/PD-L1 monotherapy or first-line treatment in lung, urothelial carcinoma, and head and neck cancer. Smokers treated with other drugs have shown worse responses in comparison to non-smokers. These data suggest that, along with the progress in the development of new drugs for cancer, drugs acting on specific genotypes of smokers likely will arise.

Impact of Smoking History on Response to Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of smoking history on the clinical benefit of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Twenty-three randomized clinical trials and seven real-world studies were included in this meta-analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and odds ratios for the overall response rate (ORR) were extracted. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was applied to obtain pooled estimates.

Results

Data from 16 high-quality trials involving 10,643 NSCLC patients receiving either immunotherapy or chemotherapy/placebo enabled direct comparison of the survival impact of smoking. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy was found to significantly prolong OS and PFS as compared to chemotherapy/placebo in smokers (HR for OS, 0.76 [0.69-0.83], P<0.00001; HR for PFS, 0.65 [0.56-0.75], P<0.00001), and these trends were less or not significant in non-smokers (HR for OS, 0.91 [0.78-1.06], P=0.25; HR for PFS, 0.68 [0.45-1.03], P=0.07). Consistent results were obtained for the first-line or second/third-line use of immunotherapy and for non-squamous NSCLC patients only. Furthermore, the data from 7 trials and 7 real-world studies involving 4,777 patients receiving immunotherapy allowed direct comparison of therapeutic outcomes between smokers and non-smokers. Prolonged OS (HR 0.86 [0.75-0.99], P=0.04) and PFS (HR 0.69 [0.60-0.81], P<0.0001) and a higher response rate (ORR 1.20 [0.94-1.53], P=0.15) were observed in smokers compared to non-smokers receiving immunotherapy.

Conclusions

Immunotherapy was found to have a greater benefit in NSCLC patients with a smoking history than in those who had never smoked.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been changed by the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Albeit great benefits are achieved with target therapies, resistance invariably occurs and recourse to alternative treatments is unavoidable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) role and the best setting of immunotherapy administration in oncogene-driven NSCLC are matter of debate.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review through PubMed, in order to gather all the available information regarding ICI activity and efficacy in oncogene-addicted NSCLC, from both prospective trials and retrospective series. A meta-analysis of objective response rate in different molecular subgroups was provided. Combinatorial strategies including ICIs and related toxicities were also recorded.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis. EGFR mutation may be a biomarker of poor response to single-agent ICIs (7% of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients achieved disease response in prospective trials), while encouraging results have been shown with combination strategies. KRAS-mutated disease (response rate, RR, 22%) has different clinical and pathological characteristics, and the co-existence of additional mutations (e.g., STK11 or TP53) influence tumor microenvironment and response to immunotherapy. Other molecular alterations have been marginally considered prospectively, and data from clinical practice are variegated, given poor effectiveness of ICIs in ALK-rearranged disease (RR 9.5%, pooling the data of retrospective studies) or some encouraging results in BRAF-(RR 25%, retrospective data) or MET-driven one (with estimations conditioned by the presence of both exon 14 skipping mutations and gene amplification in reported series).

CONCLUSIONS

In oncogene-addicted NSCLC (with the exception of KRAS-mutated), ICIs are usually administered at the failure of other treatment options, but administering single-agent immunotherapy in later disease phases may limit its efficacy. With the progressive administration of TKIs and ICIs in early-stage disease, molecular characterization will become fundamental in this setting.

Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials

Background

Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells with or without immune cells is widely reported in clinical trials of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Various cutpoints have been studied.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and conference proceedings up to December 2019 for randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We retrieved data on objective response rate (ORR), 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 2-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) in various PD-L1 subgroups. Results were pooled and analyzed based on different cutpoints, with nonrandomized comparisons made with pooled chemotherapy outcomes.

Results

A total of 9810 patients in 27 studies were included. In treatment-naïve patients, benefits with PD-1 blockade over chemotherapy were seen in ORR in patients having PD-L1 50% or greater, in 2-year OS for PD-L1 1% or greater, and in 1-year PFS, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS for unselected patients. First-line PD-1 blockade compared with chemotherapy demonstrated higher ORR, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 50% or greater; lower ORR, higher 2-year PFS, and similar 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 1%-49%; and lower ORR, similar 1-year PFS, and lower 2-year OS if PD-L1 was less than 1%. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade demonstrated similar or superior outcomes to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

Conclusions

PD-L1 should guide the choice of PD-1 blockade vs chemotherapy in treatment-naïve patients. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade provides a favorable outcome profile to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

Background

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have been progressively used in cancer treatment and produced unique toxicity profiles. This systematic review aims to comprehend the patterns and occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) based on ICI.

Methods

PICOS/PRISMA methods were used to identify published English-language on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from 2015 to 2020. Published clinical trials on ICI monotherapy, combined ICIs, and ICI plus other treatment with tabulated data on grade≥3 trAEs were included. Odds ratio (OR), χ² tests were used to analyze for effect size and associations.

Results

This review included 145 clinical trials involving 21786 patients. Grade 3-5 trAEs were more common with ICI when they were plused with other treatments compared with ICI monotherapy(54.3% versus 17.7%, 46.1%, p<0.05). Grade 3-5 trAEs were also more common with CTLA-4 mAbs compared with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 (34.2% versus 15.1%, 13.6%, p<0.05). Hyperthyroidism (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.7–8.6), nausea (OR 3.7, 95%CI 2.5–5.3), diarrhea (OR 2.7, 95%CI 2.2–3.2), colitis (OR 3.4, 95%CI 2.7–4.3), ALT increase (OR 4.9, 95%CI 3.9–6.1), AST increase (OR 3.8, 95%CI 3.0–4.9), pruritus (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.9), rash (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.1–3.8), fatigue (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.2–3.7), decreased appetite (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.8), and hypophysitis (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.2–3.3) were more frequent with combined ICIs. Diarrhea (OR 8.1, 95%CI 6.4–10.3), colitis (OR 12.2, 95%CI 8.7–17.1), ALT increase (OR 5.1, 95%CI 3.5–7.4), AST increase (OR 4.2, 95%CI 2.8–6.3), pruritus (OR 4.1, 95%CI 2.0–8.4), rash (OR 4.4, 95%CI 2.9–6.8), hypophysitis (OR 12.1, 95%CI 6.3–23.4) were more common with CTLA-4 mAbs; whereas pneumonitis (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1–10.3) were more frequent with PD-1 mAbs.

Conclusions

Different immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with different treatment-related adverse events profiles. A comprehensive data in this systematic review will provide comprehensive information for clinicians.

Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Pembrolizumab in Black Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has become an integral part of front-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, pivotal trials had significant underrepresentation of Black patients (pts). Lack of sufficient evidence regarding safety and efficacy of ICIs among minority racial groups poses a challenge in delivery of optimal cancer directed care.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed pts with stage IV NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab across three MedStar facilities between January 1, 2014, and May 3, 2019. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were primary endpoints and were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0).

RESULTS

In total, 136 pts were identified, with 74 (54.4%) White, 53 (39%) Black, 2 (1.5%) Asian, and 7 (5.1%) other racial groups. Median age was 70 years in White pts and 65 years in Black pts (p < .01). There was no difference in median PFS (5.7 vs. 5.9 months; p = .651) or OS (11.8 vs. 12.4 months; p = .949) between White and Black pts. In the subset of patients whose tumors had high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%), there was still no difference in efficacy by race. Median PFS (8.7 vs. 3.9 months; p = .843) and OS (14.7 vs. 11.3 months; p = .581) in White versus Black pts were not different. Incidence of irAEs in White versus Black pts was 24.3% and 22.6%, respectively (p = .83).

CONCLUSION

We found no major differences in either safety or efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab between White and Black pts. Use of first-line pembrolizumab-based treatment in Black pts with stage IV NSCLC is safe and efficacious, based on these real-world data.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment of solid and hematological malignancies. There are certain populations of patients underrepresented in the original trials including minority racial groups, patients with autoimmune diseases, and those with chronic viral illnesses. Our study focuses on Black patients with metastatic lung cancer who received pembrolizumab and concludes similar safety and response to treatment when compared with White patients. Black patients are an important demographic group in clinical practice often facing systemic health care disparities. This study paves a path for future studies in underrepresented populations receiving immunotherapy across various malignancies.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy-induced pneumonitis in chemo-naïve patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the extensive use of the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment, the incidence and characteristics of pneumonitis caused by this combination therapy have not been examined in clinical settings.

METHODS

We conducted a 36-centre, retrospective cohort study in patients with chemo-naïve advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer who received a combination of platinum, pemetrexed and pembrolizumab between December 2018 and June 2019.

RESULTS

The study comprised 299 patients. The most frequent grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse event was pneumonitis. There were 37 patients (12.4%, 95% CI 8.9-16.7) with all-grade pneumonitis and 10 (3.3%, 95% CI 1.6-6.1) with grade ≥3 pneumonitis. Of these, 21 (7.0%, 95% CI 4.4-10.5) and 9 patients (3.0%, 95% CI 1.4-5.6) developed all-grade and grade ≥3 pneumonitis within 90 days after initiating the combination therapy, respectively. The median time to treatment failure and progression-free survival was 5.9 (95% CI 5.0-6.8) and 7.5 (95% CI 6.5-8.7) months, respectively. In the survival analysis after adjusting for immortal time bias, pneumonitis was independently associated with shorter progression-free survival (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.07-3.69, P = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.12-8.20, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-related pneumonitis occurred at a higher rate in the real-world population than that reported previously; it led to worse survival outcomes. Pneumonitis requires more attention. Additional studies are required to improve the safety of this combination therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000038084.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Are Associated With Clinical Benefit in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Background

The immunotherapy plus chemotherapy combination is one of the most promising treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy often causes immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which have been reported to be associated with the good clinical outcomes. However, the effects of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the association between irAEs caused by immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and clinical efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with advanced NSCLC, who received a combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy at six institutions in Japan between January 2019 and September 2019. We examined the effect of irAEs on various clinical outcomes.

Results

We included 70 patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with irAEs and patients without irAEs. Patients with irAEs had significantly longer progression-free survival than those without irAEs on univariate (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.30–0.93, p = 0.026) and multivariate (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.29–0.97, p = 0.041) analyses. In addition, patients with grade 1–2 irAEs (mild irAEs) had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than those with grade 3-5 irAEs (severe irAEs) or without irAEs on univariate (398 days versus 189 days, respectively; p = 0.0061) and multivariate (not reached versus 412 days, respectively; p = 0.021) analyses.

Conclusion

Patients with NSCLC who experienced mild irAEs showed better response to treatment with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy than those with severe irAEs or without irAEs. Further large-scale research is warranted to confirm these findings.

The progress and challenge of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer

The use of programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard therapy for the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast to current traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments can directly attenuate tumour-mediated exhaustion and effectively modulate the host anti-tumour immune response in vivo. In addition, compared with traditional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy can significantly prolong survival without obvious side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Ideally, several biomarkers could be used to monitor the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments; however, the current lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a widespread limitation and challenge for further clinical applications, as does the possibility of immune-related adverse events and drug resistance. In this review, we aimed to summarise the latest progress in anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment of advanced NSCLC, worldwide, including in China. An exploration of underlying biomarker identification and future challenges will be discussed in this article to facilitate translational studies in cancer immunotherapy.

Immune Escape in Prostate Cancer: Known and Predicted Mechanisms and Targets

Complex immune evasion mechanisms and lack of biomarkers predicting responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade therapies compromise immunotherapy's therapeutic efficacy for patients with prostate cancer. The authors review established and nominated immune evasion mechanisms in prostate cancer and discuss how the precise treatment strategies can be developed to improve efficacy of immunotherapy.

Nivolumab versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 2-year follow-up from a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study (CheckMate 078)

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 CheckMate 078 study, nivolumab showed significant overall survival (OS) benefit and superior tolerability versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on long-term outcomes with immunotherapy in Asian patients are limited. We report 2-year efficacy and safety data.

METHODS

Patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and disease progression after platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks; n = 338) or docetaxel (75 mg/m² every 3 weeks; n = 166) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other protocol-defined reasons. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.

RESULTS

After 25.9 months minimum follow-up, 21 patients (6 %) remained on nivolumab versus 0 on docetaxel. Median OS was 11.9 months with nivolumab versus 9.5 months with docetaxel (HR: 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.61-0.93); 2-year OS rates were 28 % versus 18 %, respectively. Survival benefits were observed across a variety of predefined subgroups. At 2 years, 39 % and 0 % of responders had ongoing responses with nivolumab and docetaxel, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12 % of patients with nivolumab versus 47 % with docetaxel, leading to discontinuation in 4 % and 5 % of patients, respectively. No new treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

At 2 years, nivolumab maintained a favorable safety profile and continued to demonstrate superior OS versus docetaxel in this predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated NSCLC. These data are consistent with long-term outcomes from the global CheckMate 017/057 studies.

Pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in treatment-naive multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-185): subgroup analysis in Japanese patients

The global, randomized, open-label KEYNOTE-185 study closed early after an interim analysis showed an unfavorable benefit-risk profile with pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) versus Rd alone in treatment-naive, transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. This subgroup analysis reported outcomes in the Japanese population. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab plus Rd or Rd alone, stratified by age and International Staging System. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Fifty-two Japanese patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus Rd (n = 27) or Rd (n = 25). The median follow-up was 7.2 months (range, 0.4-13.8). The median PFS was not reached (NR); 6-month PFS was 91.2% versus 86.2% with pembrolizumab plus Rd versus Rd [hazard ratio (HR), 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06-1.63]. The median overall survival (OS) was NR; 6-month OS was 96.2% versus 95.7% with pembrolizumab plus Rd versus Rd (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.03-3.72). With pembrolizumab plus Rd versus Rd, grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 70.4% versus 69.6% of patients; serious adverse events occurred in 40.7% versus 52.5%. Although in the Japanese subgroup of KEYNOTE-185 adding pembrolizumab to Rd did not show an unfavorable risk-benefit, the analysis is limited by short follow-up and small sample size, affecting generalizability of the results.

Different patterns of treatment-related adverse events of programmed cell death-1 and its ligand-1 inhibitors in different cancer types: A meta-analysis and systemic review of clinical trials

Programmed cell death receptor-1 and its ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have been applied to many cancers, but the difference of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) across cancer types remains unknown. We performed a meta-analysis and systemic review to compare the incidences of commonly reported all-grade AEs across cancer types and found that the most frequent AEs were fatigue, rash/pruritus, loss of appetite/nausea and diarrhea. However, each cancer type also had its higher incidences of AEs involving a relevant system, such as melanoma with epidermal AEs (rash, diarrhea and enterocolitis), lung cancer with dyspnea and pneumonitis, digestive system cancers with amylase and lipase elevation; and renal cell and urothelial cancer with kidney injury (creatinine elevation and proteinuria). However, the incidence of hepatitis did not follow the pattern to show a difference. We did another comparison between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in lung cancer and urothelial cancer respectively, and found that the risk of most AEs did not differ much, except for more hypothyroidism in PD-1 inhibitors, and more kidney injury in PD-L1 inhibitors. Besides possible immunological mechanisms for treatment-related AEs, the influence of previous radiotherapy and the clinical characteristics of the diseases themselves should also be considered and is worth further investigation. With the result of this meta-analysis, clinicians could estimate the risk of certain AE in certain cancer type, to make treatment options and to customize monitor strategies.

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy in clinical trials

Background:

Inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have unprecedented effects in cancer treatment. However, the objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy have not been systematically evaluated.

Methods:

We searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database from inception to July 2019 for prospective clinical trials on single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab) with information regarding ORR, PFS, and OS.

Results:

Totally, 28,304 patients from 160 perspective trials were included. Overall, 4747 responses occurred in 22,165 patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy [ORR, 20.21%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 18.34–22.15%]. Compared with conventional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy was associated with more tumor responses (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.52–2.57) and better OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67–0.83]. The ORRs varied significantly across cancer types and PD-L1 expression status. Line of treatment, clinical phase and drug target also impacted the response rates in some tumors. A total of 2313 of 9494 PD-L1 positive patients (ORR, 24.39%; 95% CI, 22.29–26.54%) and 456 of 4215 PD-L1 negative patients (ORR, 10.34%; 95% CI, 8.67–12.14%) achieved responses. For PD-L1 negative patients, the ORR (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.70–1.20) and PFS (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.87–1.51) associated with immunotherapy and conventional treatment were similar. However, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy decreased the risk of death in both PD-L1 positive (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.60–0.72) and PD-L1 negative (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74–0.99) patients compared with conventional therapy.

Conclusion:

The efficacies associated with PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy vary significantly across cancer types and PD-L1 expression. This comprehensive summary of clinical benefit from immunotherapy in cancer patients provides an important guide for clinicians.

Are there any ethnic differences in the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of lung cancer?

Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, data on ethnic differences in response to these treatments are still lacking. We reviewed the currently available clinical data on immune checkpoint inhibitors and analyzed the ethnic difference in terms of treatment efficacies and side effects. Despite different epidemiology, genetic susceptibility and molecular profiles, Asian lung cancer patients demonstrated comparable outcomes to Western patients in terms of response rates and survival benefits. The incidence of immune-related adverse events has been reported with a higher incidence in Japanese patients, but was not consistent across other Asian patient populations, and warrants further investigation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related dermatologic adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a pillar in the management of advanced malignancies. However, nonspecific immune activation may lead to immune-related adverse events, wherein the skin and its appendages are the most frequent targets. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events include a diverse group of inflammatory reactions, with maculopapular rash, pruritus, psoriasiform and lichenoid eruptions being the most prevalent subtypes. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events occur early, with maculopapular rash presenting within the first 6 weeks after the initial immune checkpoint inhibitor dose. Management involves the use of topical corticosteroids for mild to moderate (grades 1-2) rash, addition of systemic corticosteroids for severe (grade 3) rash, and discontinuation of immunotherapy with grade 4 rash. Bullous pemphigoid eruptions, vitiligo-like skin hypopigmentation/depigmentation, and psoriasiform rash are more often attributed to programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors. The treatment of bullous pemphigoid eruptions is similar to the treatment of maculopapular rash and lichenoid eruptions, with the addition of rituximab in grade 3-4 rash. Skin hypopigmentation/depigmentation does not require specific dermatologic treatment aside from photoprotective measures. In addition to topical corticosteroids, psoriasiform rash may be managed with vitamin D₃ analogues, narrowband ultraviolet B light phototherapy, retinoids, or immunomodulatory biologic agents. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and other severe cutaneous immune-related adverse events, although rare, have also been associated with checkpoint blockade and require inpatient care as well as urgent dermatology consultation.

Effectivity and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for different level of PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC: A meta-analysis of 4939 patients from randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Effective improvement for the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors had been shown in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients compared with traditional therapy. However, we do not have ample evidences to demonstrate the safety and effectivity in the treatment of PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC. The relation was controversial about the expression of PD-L1 and survival outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library) and major conference proceedings were systematically searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to compare PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients reporting adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs). The incidence, Hazard Ratio (HR), Odds Ratio (OR), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 4939 patients from 10RCTs were included. In the group of PD-L1 ≥ 1%, PD-L1 ≥ 5%, PD-L1 ≥ 10%, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, the HR of OS is 0.31(95%CI 0.38-0.23; p < 0.0001), 0.47(95%CI 0.82-0.12; p = 0.008), 0.85(95%CI 1.17-0.53; p < 0.0001), 0.47(95%CI 0.59-0.36; p < 0.0001) respectively. The HR of PFS is 0.13(95%CI 0.01-0.24; p = 0.027), 0.31(95%CI 0.00-0.62; p < 0.0001), 0.62(95%CI 0.30-0.93; p < 0.0001), 0.40(95% CI 0.20-0.59; p < 0.0001) respectively. In terms of summary adverse events, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors groups had a significant lower risks in any treat-realated AEs than chemotherapy. About irAEs, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors groups had a significant higher risks in irAEs than chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are generally effected and safer than chemotherapy for patients with PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC. However, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can generate a unique spectrum of irAEs, and even life-threatening.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Subgroup analysis from the KEYNOTE-100

Interim results from the two-cohort, phase 2 KEYNOTE-100 study (NCT02674061) of 376 patients with previously treated advanced recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) showed that pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with an objective response rate (ORR) of 8.0% (95% CI, 5.4-11.2). We present outcomes for the Japanese patients (n = 21) enrolled in KEYNOTE-100. Patients with epithelial ROC had received either 1-3 prior chemotherapy lines and had platinum-free interval or treatment-free interval (PFI; TFI) of 3-12 months (cohort A) or 4-6 prior chemotherapy lines and had PFI/TFI of ≥3 months (cohort B). All patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks as monotherapy for 2 years or until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Primary objectives were ORR per RECIST v1.1 for each cohort and higher programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor expression. The relationship between PD-L1 expression (measured as combined positive score [CPS]) and ORR was assessed. Twenty-one Japanese patients (cohort A, n = 19; cohort B, n = 2) were treated. The median (range) age was 57 (37-78) years; 19 (90.5%) patients had ECOG status of 0 and 16 (76.2%) patients had stage III-IV disease. ORR was 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4-41.9) and seemed to increase with increasing PD-L1 expression. A total of 13 (61.9%) patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), and 5 (23.8%) had grade 3-4 TRAE. There were no treatment-related deaths in this subpopulation. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with ROC, with no new safety signals identified in this subpopulation. The data suggested a trend toward higher PD-L1 expression among some patients with higher ORR.

Revisiting Immunotherapy: A Focus on Prostate Cancer

Therapeutic interventions to harness the immune system against tumor cells have provided mixed results in the past for several solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. However, immunotherapy has advanced considerably over the last decade and is becoming an integral combination for treating patients with advanced solid tumors. In particular, prostate cancer immunotherapy has shown modest efficacy for patients in the past. With several key discoveries on immune mechanisms and advanced molecular diagnostic platforms recently, immunotherapy is re-emerging as a viable option for prostate cancer, especially castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), to stimulate antitumor immunity. Combination of patient-tailored immunotherapy and immune checkpoint blockers with conventional cytotoxic agents and androgen receptor-targeted therapies should move the field forward. With a recent adaptation that the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been successful in the treatment of more than a dozen solid tumors, including melanoma, lymphoma, liver, cervical, gastrointestinal, and breast cancers, it is a timely endeavor to harness immunotherapy for prostate cancer. Here, we provide an account on the progression of immunotherapy with new discoveries and precision approaches for tumors, in particular CRPC, from mechanistic standpoint to emerging limitations and future directions.

Management of Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: Focus on Asian Populations

The interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) induces exhaustions of cytotoxic lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment, which facilitates tumor immune evasion. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, which prevents the receptors and ligands from binding to each other, disrupts the T-cell exhaustion signaling, thereby increasing antitumor immunity. Inspiringly, it has revolutionized the treatment of many different types of cancers including non-small-cell lung carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, and so on. However, with the intention of generating an antitumor immune response, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may also lead to a spectrum of side effects. The profile of adverse events (AEs) of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is not exactly the same with other immune checkpoint blockades, such as blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. Although cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems are common victims, AEs of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade might occur in any other organ system of the human body. These toxicities can be life-threatening if not managed promptly, and proper treatment intervention is imperative for optimal control and prevention of severe damage. Currently, clinical practice for the management of AEs in PD-1/PD-L1 blockade remains sporadic and variable. The majority of initial clinical trials were carried out in Caucasians. The trials of multiple races usually included a small portion of Asian participants, and results were calculated and interpreted for the entire included subjects without any race-specific conclusions. Therefore, the information on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in Asians is far from systematic or comprehensive. Recently, as the results of clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in Asian populations have been gradually released, we summarized current evidence with a specific focus on the Asian population, hoping to outline strategies and offer guidance on the management of AEs in cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in the Asian world.

KEYNOTE-025: Phase 1b study of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with previously treated programmed death ligand 1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 (PD-1), has been shown to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%. We report safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b KEYNOTE-025 study, which evaluated pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with previously treated NSCLC. Eligible patients had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and had received ≥1 platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety of pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1 in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and received ≥1 pembrolizumab dose. The median (range) age was 66.0 (41-78) years, and 61% had received ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Eleven patients (29%) experienced grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (AE); 9 patients (24%) experienced immune-mediated AE and infusion reactions, with pneumonitis (11%; any grade) being most common. Among evaluable patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (n = 11), ORR was 27% (95% CI, 6-61). Among evaluable patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% (n = 37), ORR was 22% (95% CI, 10-38). Median (95% CI) progression-free survival and OS were 3.9 (2.0-6.2) months and 19.2 (8.0-26.7) months, respectively. In summary, pembrolizumab was generally well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in Japanese patients with previously treated PD-L1-expressing NSCLC. Outcomes were consistent with those from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-010 study. (Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02007070.).