1
|
Ko M, Yang K, Ahn YC, Ju SG, Oh D, Kim YB, Kwon DY, Park S, Lee K. Dosimetric Comparison and Selection Criteria of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Adaptive Re-Plan in T3-4 Nasopharynx Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3402. [PMID: 39410022 PMCID: PMC11476283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy requires caution when treating patients with targets near neural structures. Intuitive and quantitative guidelines are needed to support decision-making concerning the treatment modality. This study compared dosimetric profiles of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) for adaptive re-planning in cT3-4 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa) patients, aiming to establish criteria for selecting appropriate treatment modalities. METHODS HT and IMPT plans were generated for 28 cT3-4 NPCa patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy. Dosimetric comparisons were performed for target coverage and high-priority organs at risk (OARs). The correlation between dosimetric parameters and RT modality selection was analyzed with the target OAR distances. RESULTS Target coverages were similar, while IMPT achieved better dose spillage. HT was more favorable for brainstem D1, optic chiasm Dmax, optic nerves Dmax, and p-cord D1. IMPT showed advantages for oral cavity Dmean. Actually, 14 IMPT and 14 HT plans were selected as adaptive plans, with IMPT allocated to most cT3 patients (92.9% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.013). The shortest distances from the target to neural structures were negatively correlated with OAR doses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were carried out to discover the optimal cut-off values of the shortest distances between the target and the OARs (temporal lobes and brainstem), which were 0.75 cm (AUC = 0.908, specificity = 1.00) and 0.85 cm (AUC = 0.857, specificity = 0.929), respectively. CONCLUSIONS NPCa patients with cT4 tumor or with the shortest distance between the target and critical neural structures < 0.8 cm were suboptimal candidates for IMPT adaptive re-planning. These criteria may improve resource utilization and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mincheol Ko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
- Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea;
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sang Gyu Ju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Yeong-bi Kim
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea;
| | - Dong Yeol Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Seyjoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (M.K.); (K.Y.); (D.O.); (D.Y.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Kisung Lee
- Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen H, Wang H, Mo J, Zhang J, Xu C, Sun F, Ou X, Zhu X, Du L, Ju H, Ye R, Shi G, Kwok RT, Lam JW, Sun J, Zhang T, Ning S, Tang BZ. Unrestricted molecular motions enable mild photothermy for recurrence-resistant FLASH antitumor radiotherapy. Bioact Mater 2024; 37:299-312. [PMID: 38694765 PMCID: PMC11061705 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Ultrahigh dose-rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is an emerging technology with excellent therapeutic effects and low biological toxicity. However, tumor recurrence largely impede the effectiveness of FLASH therapy. Overcoming tumor recurrence is crucial for practical FLASH applications. Here, we prepared an agarose-based thermosensitive hydrogel containing a mild photothermal agent (TPE-BBT) and a glutaminase inhibitor (CB-839). Within nanoparticles, TPE-BBT exhibits aggregation-induced emission peaked at 900 nm, while the unrestricted molecular motions endow TPE-BBT with a mild photothermy generation ability. The balanced photothermal effect and photoluminescence are ideal for phototheranostics. Upon 660-nm laser irradiation, the temperature-rising effect softens and hydrolyzes the hydrogel to release TPE-BBT and CB-839 into the tumor site for concurrent mild photothermal therapy and chemotherapy, jointly inhibiting homologous recombination repair of DNA. The enhanced FLASH radiotherapy efficiently kills the tumor tissue without recurrence and obvious systematic toxicity. This work deciphers the unrestricted molecular motions in bright organic fluorophores as a source of photothermy, and provides novel recurrence-resistant radiotherapy without adverse side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanchen Shen
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hongbin Wang
- The Second Ward of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, 150081, China
| | - Jianlan Mo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Jianyu Zhang
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Changhuo Xu
- MOE Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
| | - Feiyi Sun
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xinwen Ou
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xinyan Zhu
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lidong Du
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
- MOE Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
| | - Huaqiang Ju
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ruquan Ye
- Department of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Guangfu Shi
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ryan T.K. Kwok
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jacky W.Y. Lam
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jianwei Sun
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tianfu Zhang
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shipeng Ning
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ben Zhong Tang
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
- School of Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Institute of Aggregate Science and Technology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK-Shenzhen), Guangdong, 518172, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yahya N, Mohamad Salleh SA, Mohd Nasir NF, Abdul Manan H. Toxicity profile of patients treated with proton and carbon-ion therapy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:240-250. [PMID: 36683266 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton and carbon-ion therapy may spare normal tissues in regions with many critical structures surrounding the target volume. As toxicity outcome data are emerging, we aimed to synthesize the published data for the toxicity outcomes of proton or carbon-ion therapy (together known as particle beam therapy [PBT]) for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed and Scopus electronic databases to identify original studies reporting toxicity outcomes following PBT of primary NPC. Quality assessment was performed using NIH's Quality Assessment Tool. Reports were extracted for information on demographics, main results, and clinical and dose factors correlates. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS Twelve studies were selected (six using mixed particle-photon beams, five performed comparisons to photon-based therapy). The pooled event rates for acute grade ≥2 toxicities mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia weight loss are 46% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]-29%-64%, I2 = 87%), 47% (95% CI-28%-67%, I2 = 87%), 16% (95% CI-9%-29%, I2 = 76%), and 36% (95% CI-27%-47%, I2 = 45%), respectively. Only one late endpoint (xerostomia grade ≥2) has sufficient data for analysis with pooled event rate of 9% (95% CI-3%-29%, I2 = 77%), lower than intensity-modulated radiotherapy 27% (95% CI-10%-54%, I2 = 95%). For most endpoints with significant differences between the PBT and photon-based therapies, PBT resulted in better outcomes. In two studies where dose distribution was studied, doses to the organs at risk were independent risk factors for toxicities. CONCLUSION PBT may reduce the risk of acute toxicities for patients treated for primary NPC, likely due to dose reduction to critical structures. The pooled event rate for toxicities derived in this study can be a guide for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noorazrul Yahya
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, CODTIS, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Siti Athiyah Mohamad Salleh
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, CODTIS, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nurul Faiqah Mohd Nasir
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben-Ami T. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Children, Current Treatment Approach. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2024; 46:117-124. [PMID: 38447121 PMCID: PMC10956687 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare and locally aggressive form of childhood cancer. Treatment of pediatric NPC includes chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Most studies on the treatment of pediatric NPC are single-arm studies. With current treatment protocols survival rates for patients with nonmetastatic disease exceed 80%, although most children will have long-term treatment-related late effects. Efforts to reduce early and late toxicities include reduced radiotherapy doses in children with good responses to induction chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of immunotherapy in both the primary setting and in children with progressive or relapsed disease. This review summarizes current clinical approaches to the treatment of pediatric NPC.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ng WT, Chow JCH, Beitler JJ, Corry J, Mendenhall W, Lee AWM, Robbins KT, Nuyts S, Saba NF, Smee R, Stokes WA, Strojan P, Ferlito A. Current Radiotherapy Considerations for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5773. [PMID: 36497254 PMCID: PMC9736118 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Successful curative treatment requires optimal radiotherapy planning and precise beam delivery that maximizes locoregional control while minimizing treatment-related side effects. In this article, we highlight considerations in target delineation, radiation dose, and the adoption of technological advances with the aim of optimizing the benefits of radiotherapy in NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Tong Ng
- Clinical Oncology Center and Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Cancer Metastasis and Personalized Therapy, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518009, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - James C. H. Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - June Corry
- Division of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia
| | - William Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Anne W. M. Lee
- Clinical Oncology Center and Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Cancer Metastasis and Personalized Therapy, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518009, China
| | - K Thomas Robbins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9620, USA
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nabil F. Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Robert Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - William A. Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35100 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ng WT, But B, Wong CH, Choi CW, Chua ML, Blanchard P, Lee AW. Particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:41-56. [PMID: 36065359 PMCID: PMC9440257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle beam therapy yields excellent short-term treatment outcomes among NPC patients. Particle beam therapy is generally safe in primary and recurrent NPC patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. An approximately 5% mortality rate was reported among recurrent NPC patients.
Background/purpose A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to better understand the benefits of particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treatment. The survival outcomes and toxicity of primary and recurrent NPC patients treated with proton or carbon ion beam therapy were investigated. Method PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched between 1 January 2007 to 3 November 2021. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies with either primary or recurrent NPC patients, sample size of ≥10 patients, and proton or carbon ion beam therapy as interventions. Twenty-six eligible studies with a total of 1502 patients were included. We used a random-effect meta-analysis to examine the impact of particle beam therapy on primary NPC patients and qualitatively described the results among recurrent patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and toxicity. Results The pooled OS at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year and 5-year for primary NPC patients who received particle beam therapy were 96 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 92 %-98 %), 93 % (95 % CI = 83 %-97 %), 90 % (95 % CI = 73 %-97 %) and 73 % (95 % CI = 52 %-87 %) respectively. The pooled 1-year and 2-year PFS, and LC for these patients were above 90 %. For locally recurrent NPC patients, the 1-year OS rate ranged from 65 % to 92 %, while the 1-year LC rate ranged from 80 % to 88 %. Both proton and carbon ion beam therapy were generally safe among primary and recurrent patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. Approximately a 5 % mortality rate was reported among recurrent patients. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated particle beam therapy has great potential in treating NPC, yielding excellent survival outcomes with low toxicity. However, further investigations are needed to assess the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this newer form of radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Williams VM, Parvathaneni U, Laramore GE, Aljabab S, Wong TP, Liao JJ. Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Nasopharynx Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from a Single Institution. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:28-40. [PMID: 34722809 PMCID: PMC8489486 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00057.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Advances in radiotherapy have improved tumor control and reduced toxicity in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Local failure remains a problem for some patients with advanced primary tumors, and toxicities are significant given the large treatment volume and tumor proximity to critical structures, even with modern photon-based radiotherapy. Proton therapy has unique dosimetric advantages, and recent technological advances now allow delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio in NPC. We report our 2-year clinical outcomes with IMPT for NPC. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed treatment records of patients with NPC treated with IMPT at our center. Demographics, dosimetry, tumor response, local regional control (LRC), distant metastasis, overall survival, and acute and late toxicity outcomes were reviewed. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Results Twenty-six patients were treated from 2015 to 2020. Median age was 48 years (range, 19–73 years), 62% (n = 16) had T3-T4 disease, 92% (n = 24) were node positive, 92% (n = 24) had stage III-IV disease, and 69% (n = 18) had positive results for Epstein-Barr virus. Dose-painted pencil-beam IMPT was used. Most patients (85%; 22 of 26) were treated with 70 Gy(RBE) in 33 fractions once daily; 4 (15%) underwent hyperfractionated accelerated treatment twice daily. All received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy; 7 (27%) also received induction chemotherapy. All patients (100%) completed the planned radiotherapy, and no acute or late grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. At median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-60), there were 2 local regional failures (8%) and 3 distant metastases (12%). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year LRC, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival were 92%, 87%, and 85% respectively. Conclusion IMPT is feasible in locally advanced NPC with early outcomes demonstrating excellent LRC and favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical use of IMPT for NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vonetta M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - George E Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Saif Aljabab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tony P Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wong KCW, Hui EP, Lo KW, Lam WKJ, Johnson D, Li L, Tao Q, Chan KCA, To KF, King AD, Ma BBY, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:679-695. [PMID: 34194007 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00524-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The past three decades have borne witness to many advances in the understanding of the molecular biology and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated cancer endemic to southern China, southeast Asia and north Africa. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive, interdisciplinary overview of key research findings regarding NPC pathogenesis, treatment, screening and biomarker development. We describe how technological advances have led to the advent of proton therapy and other contemporary radiotherapy approaches, and emphasize the relentless efforts to identify the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy with radiotherapy through decades of clinical trials. Basic research into the pathogenic role of EBV and the genomic, epigenomic and immune landscape of NPC has laid the foundations of translational research. The latter, in turn, has led to the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets and of improved approaches for individualizing immunotherapy and targeted therapies for patients with NPC. We provide historical context to illustrate the effect of these advances on treatment outcomes at present. We describe current preclinical and clinical challenges and controversies in the hope of providing insights for future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth C W Wong
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Edwin P Hui
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kwok-Wai Lo
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wai Kei Jacky Lam
- Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - David Johnson
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Lili Li
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Qian Tao
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kwan Chee Allen Chan
- Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ka-Fai To
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ann D King
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Brigette B Y Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee A, Kitpanit S, Chilov M, Langendijk JA, Lu J, Lee NY. A Systematic Review of Proton Therapy for the Management of Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:119-130. [PMID: 34285941 PMCID: PMC8270076 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00082.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose With improved technology, more patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) are receiving definitive treatment with proton therapy, which allows greater sparing of dose to normal tissues without compromising efficacy. As there is no randomized data, the purpose of this study was to systematically review the available literature on proton therapy in this setting, focusing on the toxicity endpoints. Materials and Methods A systematic search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted in 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A total of 491 studies were found on the topic of NPC and proton therapy. Following independent study selection by 2 investigators, 9 studies were found to have sufficient focus and relevance to be incorporated into the systematic review. Results All 9 studies were retrospective and examined only NPC patients except for one that also included paranasal sinus cancer. One study was a reirradiation study. Four studies used 3D or double scatter technique, while all others used intensity-modulated proton therapy. Oncologic outcomes were similar to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) rates, with 2-year local and regional progression-free survival (LRFS) ranging from 84% to 100%, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 75% to 88.9%, and 2-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 88% to 95% in the up-front setting. Four comparison studies with IMRT found significantly lower feeding tube rates (20% versus 65%, P = .015; and 14% versus 85%, P < .001) with proton therapy as well as lower mucositis (G2 46% versus 70%, P = .019; and G3 11% versus 76%, P = .0002). All other acute and late effects were largely improved with proton therapy but not statistically significant. Conclusions NPC patients receiving proton therapy maintain good outcomes with improved toxicity profile, likely due to sparing of dose to normal structures. Prospective studies are ongoing to better quantify the magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Marina Chilov
- Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jiade Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ben-Ami T, Kontny U, Surun A, Brecht IB, Almaraz RL, Dragomir M, Pourtsidis A, Casanova M, Fresneau B, Bisogno G, Schneider DT, Reguerre Y, Bien E, Stachowicz-Stencel T, Österlundh G, Wygoda M, Janssens GO, Zsiros J, Jehanno N, Brisse HJ, Gandola L, Christiansen H, Claude L, Ferrari A, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Orbach D. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents: The EXPeRT/PARTNER diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 4:e29018. [PMID: 33844410 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare pediatric tumor. Collaborative studies performed over the last decades showed improved results compared to historical data, but standardized guidelines for diagnosis and management of pediatric NPC are still unavailable. This study presents a European consensus guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric NPC developed by the European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT). Main recommendations include induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-flurouracil, concomitant chemoradiotherapy in advanced disease, and to consider maintenance treatment with interferon beta (IFN-β) for selected high-risk patients. Dose adjustments of radiotherapy based on response to induction chemotherapy may decrease the rates of long-term treatment-related complications that affect most of the survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Ben-Ami
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit, Kaplan Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Udo Kontny
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Aurore Surun
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Ines B Brecht
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard-Karls-Universitaet, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ricardo López Almaraz
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo-Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Monica Dragomir
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu,", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Apostolos Pourtsidis
- Pediatric and Adolescents Oncology Clinic Children's Hospital MITERA, Athens, Greece
| | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Paris-Saclay University, Paris-Sud University, Paris, France
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology Oncology Division, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Yves Reguerre
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Félix Guyon University Hospital, St. Denis, Réunion Island, France
| | - Ewa Bien
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Gustaf Österlundh
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marc Wygoda
- Department of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - József Zsiros
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Jehanno
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Herve J Brisse
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Lorenza Gandola
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Daniel Orbach
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yoon HG, Ahn YC, Oh D, Noh JM, Park SG, Nam H, Ju SG, Kwon D, Park S. Early Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Combination in Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone in Oropharynx Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071549. [PMID: 33801766 PMCID: PMC8037748 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is expected to reduce toxicity more effectively than intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Because of long waiting before starting IMPT, authors began IMRT first and then determined whether to continue IMRT or to switch into IMPT at time of adaptive re-plan, based on the rival plan comparison in 148 OPC patients. Early clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between IMRT alone and IMRT/IMPT combination groups through propensity score matching method. We found that, with comparable oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles (mucositis and need for analgesic use) were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone. Abstract Purpose: To report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 148 OPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center, were retrospectively reviewed. During the 5.5 weeks’ RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses. Results: With the median follow-up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, the IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (p < 0.001); and analgesic quantification algorithm (AQA) in 37.0% and 19.4% (p = 0.019), respectively. The same trends were observed after PSM: mucositis in 39.5% and 15.8% (p = 0.021); and AQA in 47.4% and 21.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, grade ≥ 3 mucositis was significantly less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.027 and 0.024, respectively). AQA score ≥ 3 was also less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.085 and 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: In treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Gyul Yoon
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Seung Gyu Park
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea;
| | - Heerim Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea;
| | - Sang Gyu Ju
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Dongyeol Kwon
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
| | - Seyjoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (H.G.Y.); (D.O.); (J.M.N.); (S.G.J.); (D.K.); (S.P.)
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yang K, Ahn YC, Nam H, Hong SD, Oh D, Noh JM. Clinical features of post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis and their outcomes following surgical intervention in nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2021; 114:105180. [PMID: 33497910 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the incidence and clinical features of post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN), and effectiveness of surgical intervention for its treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospectively, we reviewed 380 NPC patients who underwent high dose radiotherapy (RT) (single RT in 355 and re-RT in 25) from January 2008 till December 2017 at the authors' institute, among who 22 developed Grade ≥ 3 PRNN. The management of PRNN was discussed through weekly multidisciplinary head and neck oncology conference, and surgical debridement was performed when feasible. RESULTS The incidence of PRNN was significantly higher following re-RT than in single RT (11/355, 3.1% vs. 11/25, 44.0%, p < 0.001). The PRNN patients in single RT group tended to be older and had more advanced initial tumor extents. The intervals from the latest RT start till PRNN assignment were similar between groups (7.3 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.140). Nineteen patients underwent surgical debridement: two open; and 17 endoscopic approach, respectively. Endoscopic mucosal reconstruction was performed in eight patients. Resolution of PRNN was achieved in 11 patients (64.7%). The rates of 3-year overall survivals (OS) from the initial RT, latest RT (adjusting re-RT), and PRNN assignment were 84.4%, 70.9%, and 54.7%, respectively. Eight patients (36.4%) succumbed to death: NPC progression in three (13.6%); evidently PRNN-related events in two (9.1%), probably PRNN-related events in two (9.1%); and inter-current death in one (4.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION PRNN needs close collaboration among head and neck oncologists and could be successfully recovered, without compromising survival, following timely surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Heerim Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Duk Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Park SG, Ahn YC, Oh D, Noh JM, Ju SG, Kwon D, Jo K, Chung K, Chung E, Lee W, Park S. Early clinical outcomes of helical tomotherapy/intensity-modulated proton therapy combination in nasopharynx cancer. Cancer Sci 2019; 110:2867-2874. [PMID: 31237050 PMCID: PMC6726680 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of combining helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in treating patients with nasopharynx cancer (NPC). From January 2016 to March 2018, 98 patients received definitive radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT). Using simultaneous integrated boost and adaptive re‐plan, 3 different dose levels were prescribed: 68.4 Gy in 30 parts to gross tumor volume (GTV), 60 Gy in 30 parts to high‐risk clinical target volume (CTV), and 36 Gy in 18 parts to low‐risk CTV. In all patients, the initial 18 fractions were delivered by HT, and, after rival plan evaluation on the adaptive re‐plan, the later 12 fractions were delivered either by HT in 63 patients (64.3%, HT only) or IMPT in 35 patients (35.7%, HT/IMPT combination), respectively. Propensity‐score matching was conducted to control differences in patient characteristics. In all patients, grade ≥ 2 mucositis (69.8% vs 45.7%, P = .019) and grade ≥ 2 analgesic usage (54% vs 37.1%, P = .110) were found to be less frequent in HT/IMPT group. In matched patients, grade ≥ 2 mucositis were still less frequent numerically in HT/IMPT group (62.9% vs 45.7%, P = .150). In univariate analysis, stage IV disease and larger GTV volume were associated with increased grade ≥ 2 mucositis. There was no significant factor in multivariate analysis. With the median 14 month follow‐up, locoregional and distant failures occurred in 9 (9.2%) and 12 (12.2%) patients without difference by RT modality. In conclusion, comparable early oncologic outcomes with more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achievable by HT/IMPT combination in treating NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Gyu Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Gyu Ju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongyeol Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwanghyun Jo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwangzoo Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunah Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woojin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seyjoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|