Spatial and temporal expansion of intrahepatic metastasis by molecularly-defined clonality in multiple liver cancers

A Ubiquitin-Dependent Switch on MEF2D Senses Pro-Metastatic Niche Signals to Facilitate Intrahepatic Metastasis of Liver Cancer

Effective treatment for metastasis, a leading cause of cancer-associated death, is still lacking. To seed on a distal organ, disseminated cancer cells (DCCs) must adapt to the local tissue microenvironment. However, it remains elusive how DCCs respond the pro-metastatic niche signals. Here, systemic motif-enrichment identified myocyte enhancer factor 2D (MEF2D) as a critical sensor of niche signals to regulate DCCs adhesion and colonization, leading to intrahepatic metastasis and recurrence of liver cancer. In this context, MEF2D transactivates Itgb1 (coding β1-integrin) and Itgb4 (coding β4-integrin) to execute temporally unique functions, where ITGB1 recognizes extracellular matrix for early seeding, and ITGB4 acts as a novel sensor of neutrophil extracellular traps-DNA (NETs-DNA) for subsequent chemotaxis and colonization. In turn, an integrin-FAK circuit promotes a phosphorylation-dependent USP14-orchastrated deubiquitination switch to stabilize MEF2D via circumventing degradation by the E3-ubiquitin-ligase MDM2. Clinically, the USP14(pS432)-MEF2D-ITGB1/4 feedback loop is often hyper-active and indicative of inferior outcomes in human malignancies, while its blockade abrogated intrahepatic metastasis of DCCs. Together, DCCs exploit a deubiquitination-dependent switch on MEF2D to integrate niche signals in the liver mesenchyme, thereby amplifying the pro-metastatic integrin-FAK signaling. Disruption of this feedback loop is clinically applicable with fast-track potential to block microenvironmental cues driving metastasis.

Construction and validation of a nomogram for patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinoma: A SEER-based study

BACKGROUND

American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-TNM system doesn't accurately predict prognosis. Our study was designed to identify prognostic factors in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinoma (MHCC), establish and validate a nomogram model to predict the risk and overall survival (OS) of MHCC patients.

METHODS

We selected eligible HCC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, used univariate and multivariate COX regression to determine prognostic factors in MHCC patients, and used these factors to build a nomogram. The accuracy of the prediction was evaluated using the C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to compare the nomogram with AJCC-TNM staging system. Finally, the prognosis of different risks was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method.

RESULTS

4950 eligible patients with MHCC were enrolled in our study and randomly assigned to the training cohort and test cohort in a 7:3 ratio. After COX regression analysis, age, sex, histological grade, AJCC-TNM stage, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy in total 9 factors could be used to independently determine OS of patients. the above factors were used to construct a nomogram, and the consistency C-index was 0.775. C-index, DCA, NRI and IDI showed that our nomogram was superior to the AJCC-TNM staging system. K-M plots for OS were performed using the log-rank test, the P-value of which was <0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The practical nomogram can provide more accurate prognostic prediction for multiple hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

LR-3 and LR-4 Lesions Are More Likely to Be Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Patients with LR-5 or LR-TR Lesions

BACKGROUND

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classifies liver nodules from LR-1 to LR-5 based on risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is challenging to know the nature of the LR-3 and LR-4 lesions.

AIMS

To test our hypothesis that in patients with a definite HCC (LR-5) or treated HCC (LR-TR), a coexisting LR-3 or LR-4 lesion is more likely to represent HCC compared to patients without LR-5 or LR-TR lesions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including all adult patients who received liver transplantation in our institution from 1/1/2014 to 3/3/2020 who had any LR-3 or LR-4 lesion on pre-transplant MRI.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in the final cohort (115 LR-3 and LR-4 lesions total). When accompanied by LR-5 or LR-TR lesions, 41% (28/69) of LR-3 lesions were HCC compared to 12% (3/25) when not accompanied by LR-5 LR-TR lesions. When accompanied by LR-5 or LR-TR lesions, 83% (10/12) of LR-4 lesions were HCC, versus 33% (3/9) when not accompanied by LR-5 or LR-TR lesions. In a multivariable analysis of all lesions, the presence of a LR-5 or LR-TR lesion was significantly associated with LR-3 or LR-4 lesions representing HCC (OR 6.4, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LR-3 and LR-4 lesions are more likely to be HCC in patients with LR-5 or LR-TR lesions. The presence of coexisting definite HCC may be a useful diagnostic feature to improve risk stratification of lesions without typical imaging features of HCC. This may also affect decision-making prior to liver transplant when HCC burden must be accurately determined.

Circulating Cell-Free DNA Captures the Intratumor Heterogeneity in Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, with more than 40% of patients initially diagnosed with multinodular HCCs. Although circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been shown to effectively detect somatic mutations, little is known about its utility to capture intratumor heterogeneity in patients with multinodular HCC undergoing systemic treatment.

Direct molecular evidence for both multicentric and monoclonal carcinogenesis followed by transdifferentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma to cholangiocarcinoma in a case of metachronous liver cancer

Frequent recurrence is a major issue in liver cancer and histological heterogeneity frequently occurs in this cancer type. However, it has remained elusive whether such cancers are multicentric or monoclonal. To elucidate the clonal evolution of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) development, the somatic mutation frequency and signatures in a patient with triple occurrence of liver cancer every three years were examined, with samples designated as #1HCC, #2HCC and #3cHCC-CCA, respectively. A total of four tumor regions, including HCC (#3HCC) and intrahepatic CCA (#3iCCA) components of #3cHCC-CCA, and three nontumor regions (#1N, #2N and #3N) were precisely dissected from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of each surgical specimen. DNA was extracted and subjected to tumor-specific somatic mutation determination. Of note, five nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), namely those of KMT2D, TP53, DNMT3A, PKHD1 and TLR4, were identified in #3cHCC-CCA. All five SNVs were detected in both #3HCC and #3iCCA and #2HCC but not in #1HCC. The telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation C228T, but not C250T, was observed in all tumors. Digital PCR of C228T also indicated the presence of the TERT promoter mutation C228T in nontumorous liver tissues (#1N, #2N and #3N) at a frequency of 0.11–0.83% compared with normal liver and blood samples. These results suggest the following phylogenetic evolution of three metachronous liver cancers: #1HCC was not related to #2HCC, #3HCC and #3iCCA; both #3HCC and #3iCCA arose from #2HCC. From the above, three novel findings were deduced: i) Both multicentric occurrence and intrahepatic metastasis may be involved in liver cancer in a three-year interval; ii) transdifferentiation from HCC to iCCA is a possible pathogenic mechanism of cHCC-CCA; and iii) a nontumorous, noncirrhotic liver may contain a preneoplastic region with a cancer driver mutation in the TERT promoter.

Clinical utility of clonal origin determination in managing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence is the driving factor for reduced long-term survival in patients following resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Extensive research efforts have been conducted to understand the molecular processes precipitating disease recurrence. Modern genomic techniques have identified two distinct mechanisms for recurrent HCC (RHCC): Intrahepatic metastasis (IM-HCC); and multicentric origin (MO-HCC). Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library were methodically searched for primary research articles in English with the aim of appraising existing literature on the identification of clonal origin of RHCC and its potential clinical utility.

AREAS COVERED

Molecular and next-generation sequencing techniques, when applied to clonal origin identification, yield superior accuracy than traditional clinicopathological criteria. Despite various treatment modalities, no optimal therapy has yet been identified for treating clonally differentiated RHCC. Patients with MO-HCC appear to experience improved long-term survival following re-treatment compared to their IM-HCC counterparts (91.7% vs 22.9% 5-year survival, p < 0.001). However, cautious interpretation is advised as heterogeneous classification criteria and small sample sizes restrict the generalizability of such findings.

EXPERT OPINION

Improved identification of clonal origin in RHCC may facilitate further research on RHCC treatment strategies and enable the development of novel therapeutic targets, potentially leading to individualized treatment approaches in the future.

Finding the seed of recurrence: Hepatocellular carcinoma circulating tumor cells and their potential to drive the surgical treatment

The treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies on liver resection, which is, however, burdened by a high rate of recurrence after surgery, up to 60% at 5 years. No pre-operative tools are currently available to assess the recurrence risk tailored to every single patient. Recently liquid biopsy has shown interesting results in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment allocation strategies in other types of cancers, since its ability to identify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) derived from the primary tumor. Those cells were advocated to be responsible for the majority of cases of recurrence and cancer-related deaths for HCC. In fact, after being modified by the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, CTCs circulate as “seeds” in peripheral blood, then reach the target organ as dormant cells which could be subsequently “awakened” and activated, and then initiate metastasis. Their presence may justify the disagreement registered in terms of efficacy of anatomic vs non-anatomic resections, particularly in the case of microvascular invasion, which has been recently pointed as a histological sign of the spread of those cells. Thus, their presence, also in the early stages, may justify the recurrence event also in the contest of liver transplant. Understanding the mechanism behind the tumor progression may allow improving the treatment selection according to the biological patient-based characteristics. Moreover, it may drive the development of novel biological tailored tests which could address a specific patient to neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategies, and in perspective, it could also become a new method to allocate organs for transplantation, according to the risk of relapse after liver transplant. The present paper will describe the most recent evidence on the role of CTCs in determining the relapse of HCC, highlighting their potential clinical implication as novel tumor behavior biomarkers able to influence the surgical choice.

Comparison of the surgical outcomes in patients with synchronous versus metachronous multiple hepatocellular carcinoma

Multiplicity is one of the characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and patients with multiple HCC (≤ 3 nodules) are recommended as candidates for liver resection. To confirm the validity of resecting multiple HCC, we compared the surgical outcomes in patients with synchronous and metachronous multiple HCC. Patients who underwent resection for multiple HCC (2 or 3 nodules) were classified into the "synchronous multiple HCC" group, while those undergoing resection for solitary HCC and repeated resection for 1 or 2 recurrent nodules within 2 years after initial operation were classified into the "metachronous multiple HCC" group. After one-to-one matching, longer operation time and more bleeding were seen in the synchronous multiple HCC group (n = 98) than those in the metachronous multiple HCC group (n = 98); however, the complication rates were not different between the two groups. The median overall survival times were 4.0 years (95% CI, 3.0-5.9) and 5.9 years (4.0-NA) for the synchronous and metachronous multiple HCC (after second operation) groups, respectively (P = 0.041). The recurrence-free survival times were shorter in the synchronous multiple HCC group than in the metachronous multiple HCC group (median, 1.5 years [95% CI, 0.9-1.8] versus 1.8 years, [1.3-2.2]) (P = 0.039). On multivariate analysis, independent factors for overall survivals in the synchronous multiple HCC group were older age, cirrhosis, larger tumor, and tumor thrombus. Taken together, resection of metachronous multiple HCC still has good therapeutic effect, even better than synchronous multiple HCC, so resection is suggested for metachronous multiple HCC.

High platelet count as a poor prognostic factor for liver cancer patients without cirrhosis

A low platelet count, one of parameters of portal hypertension, is clinically a predictor of postoperative mortality, while platelets induce tumor development during growth factor secretion. In this study, we retrospectively investigated whether high platelet count negatively affects the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients undergoing initial and curative resection for HCC were included. Surgical outcomes were compared between the high platelet (platelet count ≥ 20 × 10⁴/μL) and control (< 20 × 10⁴/μL) groups in patients without cirrhosis and between the low platelet (< 10 × 10⁴/μL) and control (≥ 10 × 10⁴/μL) groups in patients with cirrhosis. Among patients without cirrhosis, tumor was larger (P < 0.001) and tumor thrombus was more frequent (P < 0.001) in the high-platelet group than in the control group. After a median follow-up period of 3.1 years (range 0.2-16.2), median overall survival was 6.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-7.8) and 7.6 years (6.6-10.9) in the high-platelet (n = 273) and control (n = 562) groups, respectively (P = 0.027). Among patients with cirrhosis, liver function was worse (P < 0.001) and varices were more frequent (P < 0.001) in the low-platelet group. The median overall survival of patients in the low-platelet group (n = 172) was significantly shorter than that of patients in the control group (n = 275) (4.5 years [95% CI, 3.7-6.0] vs. 5.9 years [4.5-7.5], P = 0.038). Taken together, thrombocytopenia indicates poor prognosis in HCC patients with cirrhosis, while thrombocytosis is a poor prognostic predictor for those without cirrhosis.

A Novel lncRNA NONHSAT053785 Acts as an Independent Risk Factor for Intrahepatic Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in body fluids have been considered as promising novel biomarkers for tumor-related diseases. The present study aimed to investigate the expression level of lncRNA NONHSAT053785 in serum and its correlation with clinical characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods

The droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to measure the serum levels of NONHSAT053785 in 112 HCC patients, 96 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, and 99 healthy controls (HC). The correlation between NONHSAT053785 and clinical characteristics was analyzed by chi-square test and Spearman correlation test. The risk factors of intrahepatic metastasis (IM) were detected by univariate and multivariate analyses. Furthermore, the diagnostic value of NONHSAT053785 in HCC and its predictive ability in IM were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The level of NONHSAT053785 was significantly increased in the serum of HCC patients and was higher in HCC patients with IM as compared to those without. Additionally, the expression level of NONHSAT053785 was significantly related to IM, Child–Pugh classification, and peripheral blood indicators such as liver metabolic enzymes and positively correlated to IM, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, and some peripheral blood indicators. Furthermore, the serum NONHSAT053785 was indicated as an independent predictor for IM in the elderly, non-smoking, drinking, and tumor size ≥5 cm subjects. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.801 (P <0.0001) for diagnosis of HCC and 0.678 (P =0.0015) for predicting IM.

Conclusion

The increase in serum NONHSAT053785 levels was related to an increased risk of IM, and hence, may serve as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of HCC and the prediction of IM.

Spatial and temporal expansion of intrahepatic metastasis by molecularly-defined clonality in multiple liver cancers

Multiple hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is divided into two categories: intrahepatic metastasis (IM), which is a true relapse of HCC, and multicentric origin (MO), which is a second primary tumor. Clinical diagnosis of multiple HCC is usually made based on tumor location and/or time to recurrence; however, it is often difficult to distinguish the two types of multiple HCC. Using 41 matched pairs of multiple HCC specimens, we confirmed the accuracy of clinical diagnoses using exome sequence data and investigated the importance of discriminating the type of multiple HCC. Genomic analysis revealed that 18 (43.9%) patients diagnosed as having genomic IM had common mutations in a pair of HCC tumors with the main tumor of these patients being more progressive compared to those with genomic MO. The accuracy of clinical diagnosis based on lobe (Definition 1) and segment (Definition 2) were 68.3% and 78.0%, respectively. Intriguingly, recurrence ≥2 years after initial surgery for 3 patients was IM. The survival of patients with clinical IM was significantly shorter than for those with clinical MO based on both Definition 1 (P = 0.045) and Definition 2 (P = 0.043). However, mean survival was not different between the patients with genomic IM and those with MO (P = 0.364). Taken together, genomic analysis elucidated that liver cancer may spread more extensively and more slowly than previously thought. In addition, distinguishing multiple HCC as IM or MC may have provided biological information but was not of clinical importance with respect to patient prognosis.