R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study

Brentuximab vedotin plus AVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy in a patient with classic Hodgkin lymphoma following gray zone lymphoma after autologous stem-cell transplantation failure

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached yet concerning treatment strategies for a sequential classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) following gray zone lymphoma (GZL). Prognosis of GZL after a failed autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is poor and treatment strategy is very limited. As yet there are limited data showing clinical outcomes of brentuximab vedotin (BV) for GZL, especially for sequential CHL after GZL.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of CHL following primary refractory GZL after a failed auto-HCT and showed favorable response to first-line CHL-directed chemoradiotherapy consisting of BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazin (AVD) followed by irradiation. The sequential cases with an early evolution, whose diagnosis of second lymphoma was made within a year, have been recently reported very poor survival shorter than a year. Whether a sequential CHL following GZL should be treated as a primary or relapsed disease has not been clearly elucidated. Our patient showed favorable response to first-line CHL-directed chemoradiotherapy without allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and has in continuous remission for 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of our case could help for physicians to make better treatment decisions and provide insights for further exploration in future studies.

Prognostic value of the Kyoto Prognostic Index in higher-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphomas treated by upfront autologous stem cell transplantation in JCOG0908 trial

Background

There is currently no standard prognostic model optimized for the patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with upfront intensive immunochemotherapy including autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The Kyoto Prognostic Index (KPI) has been proposed as a novel prognostic model for DLBCL, which can accurately identify especially high-risk patients. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of the KPI in JCOG0908 trial in which higher-risk DLBCL patients defined by the conventional International Prognostic Index (IPI) were treated with upfront high dose therapy followed by ASCT.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients with DLBCL, not otherwise specified, enrolled in JCOG0908 and confirmed by the central pathological review were analyzed. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We compared the discrimination ability of the KPI with that of the IPI.

Results

According to KPI, 3-year OS and PFS rates were 86.7% and 76.7% in low-intermediate, 73.3% and 60.0% in high-intermediate, and 61.5% and 46.2% in high-risk group. According to IPI, 3-year OS and PFS rates were 75.0% and 50.0% in low-intermediate, 82.9% and 74.3% in high-intermediate, and 63.6% and 54.5% in high-risk group. The concordance-indices of KPI and IPI were 0.642 and 0.580 for OS and 0.606 and 0.606 for PFS.

Conclusions

The KPI may be a suitable predictor of outcome than the IPI for patients with higher-risk DLBCL treated with upfront intensive immunochemotherapy including ASCT.

R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study

The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high‐dose chemotherapy/autologous stem‐cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high‐risk DLBCL patients having an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2‐y progression‐free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow‐up of 40.3 mo, 2‐y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%‐81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%‐79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%‐85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%‐92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non‐hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R‐CHOP‐14 showed higher 2‐y PFS and less toxicity compared with R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER in patients with high‐risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN‐CTR, UMIN000003823).