Cost-effectiveness of carbon-ion radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Deep learning in pulmonary nodule detection and segmentation: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The accurate detection and precise segmentation of lung nodules on computed tomography are key prerequisites for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of lung cancer. This study was designed to compare detection and segmentation methods for pulmonary nodules using deep-learning techniques to fill methodological gaps and biases in the existing literature.

METHODS

This study utilized a systematic review with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library databases up to May 10, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria was used to assess the risk of bias and was adjusted with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. The study analyzed and extracted model performance, data sources, and task-focus information.

RESULTS

After screening, we included nine studies meeting our inclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2019 and 2023 and predominantly used public datasets, with the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection and Image Database Resource Initiative and Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 being the most common. The studies focused on detection, segmentation, and other tasks, primarily utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks for model development. Performance evaluation covered multiple metrics, including sensitivity and the Dice coefficient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential power of deep learning in lung nodule detection and segmentation. It underscores the importance of standardized data processing, code and data sharing, the value of external test datasets, and the need to balance model complexity and efficiency in future research.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Deep learning demonstrates significant promise in autonomously detecting and segmenting pulmonary nodules. Future research should address methodological shortcomings and variability to enhance its clinical utility.

KEY POINTS

Deep learning shows potential in the detection and segmentation of pulmonary nodules. There are methodological gaps and biases present in the existing literature. Factors such as external validation and transparency affect the clinical application.

Economic evaluation of stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery technologies in the treatment of cancers: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review study investigated the cost-effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of various types of cancers.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from 30 December 1990 to 1 January 2023. The entered studies were screened in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria encompassed all types of economic evaluation studies that investigated SRT/SRS technologies in the treatment of various cancers.

RESULTS

A total of 47 articles were included in the review. The findings suggest that the use of Linear accelerator technology for the treatment of lung cancer (8 out of 12 studies) and prostate cancer (4 out of 5 studies) was a cost-effective strategy. Linear accelerator was found to be cost-effective in the treatment of liver metastases and liver cancer (2 out of 5 studies). All of the included studies that used Gamma Knife technology in brain metastases reported Gamma-Knife was a cost-effective treatment. Furthermore, in the treatment of prostate and liver cancer, proton therapy was identified as a cost-effective option than other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that SRT/SRS is a cost-effective procedure for the treatment of various types of cancers. Therefore, it is recommended to use SRT/SRS technology for optimal use of resources.

Survival outcomes after using charged particle radiotherapy as a treatment modality for gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Charged particle therapy is an emerging radiation treatment for a number of tumors; however, more research is needed to determine its safety and efficacy when treating intra-axial brain tumors (commonly known as gliomas). The overall survival of patients treated with charged particle radiation versus those receiving photon therapy were compared in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The databases used as part of the search strategy were the following: MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane. The search was conducted in order to find pertinent clinical studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of overall survival at 1,3, and 5 years.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with a total of 1140 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Following treatment, the patient's follow-up period lasted 44.4 months (range: 14.3 - 91.2 months). At one year (relative risk 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 - 1.28; p = 0.049), three years (relative risk 1.73, 95% CI 1.41 - 2.12; p = 0.001), and five years (relative risk 2.00, 95% CI 1.52 - 2.63; p = 0.005), charged particle radiotherapy had a significantly higher pooled overall survival than photon therapy.

CONCLUSION

Charged particle therapy could be associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with gliomas compared to photon therapy. More prospective randomized trials and comparative studies are strongly encouraged to enable accurate meta-analysis and a better exploration of prognosis.

Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is a treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that results in better outcomes with fewer side effects despite its high cost. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CIRT for HCC from medical and economic perspectives by comparing CIRT and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with localized HCC who were ineligible for surgery or radiofrequency ablation.

Methods and Materials

This study included 34 patients with HCC who underwent either CIRT or TACE at Gunma University between 2007 and 2016. Patient characteristics were employed to select each treatment group using the propensity score matching method. Life years were used as the outcome indicator. The CIRT technical fee was ¥3,140,000; however, a second CIRT treatment on the same organ within 2 years was performed for free.

Results

Our study showed that CIRT was dominant over TACE, as the CIRT group had a higher life year (point estimate, 2.75 vs 2.41) and lower total cost (mean, ¥4,974,278 vs ¥5,284,524). We conducted a sensitivity analysis to validate the results because of the higher variance in medical costs in the TACE group, which demonstrated that CIRT maintained its cost effectiveness with a high acceptability rate.

Conclusions

CIRT is a cost-effective treatment option for localized HCC cases unsuitable for surgical resection.

The rationale for a carbon ion radiation therapy facility in Australia

Australia has taken a collaborative nationally networked approach to achieve particle therapy capability. This supports the under-construction proton therapy facility in Adelaide, other potential proton centres and an under-evaluation proposal for a hybrid carbon ion and proton centre in western Sydney. A wide-ranging overview is presented of the rationale for carbon ion radiation therapy, applying observations to the case for an Australian facility and to the clinical and research potential from such a national centre.

Value of carbon-ion radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an important part of modern radiotherapy. Compared to conventional photon radiotherapy modalities, CIRT brings two major types of advantages to physical and biological aspects respectively. The physical advantages include a substantial dose delivery to the tumoral area and a minimization of dose damage to the surrounding tissue. The biological advantages include an increase in double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA structures, an upturn in oxygen enhancement ratio and an improvement of radiosensitivity compared with X-ray radiotherapy. The two advantages of CIRT are that the therapy not only inflicts major cytotoxic lesions on tumor cells, but it also protects the surrounding tissue. According to annual diagnoses, lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide, followed by breast cancer. However, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are optimally received the treatment of lobectomy. Some patients with comorbidities or combined cardiopulmonary insufficiency have been shown to be unable to tolerate the treatment when combined with surgery. Consequentially, radiotherapy may be the best treatment option for this patient category. Multiple radiotherapy options are available for these cases, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Although these treatments have brought some clinical benefits to some patients, the resulting adverse events (AEs), which include cardiotoxicity and radiation pneumonia, cannot be ignored. The damage and toxicity to normal tissue also limit the increase of tumor dose. Due to the significant physical and biological advantages brought by CIRT, some toxicity induced by radiotherapy may be avoided with CIRT Bragg Peak. CIRT brought clinical benefits to lung cancer patients, especially geriatric patients. This review introduced the clinical efficacy and research results for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with CIRT.

Research Progress of Heavy Ion Radiotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a high incidence and poses a serious threat to human health. However, the treatment outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer are still unsatisfactory, especially for high grade lesions. As a new cancer treatment, heavy ion radiotherapy has shown promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. This article discusses the clinical progress of heavy ion radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer mainly from the different cancer stages, the different doses of heavy ion beams, and the patient’s individual factors, and explores the deficiency of heavy ion radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and the directions of future research, in order to provide reference for the wider and better application of heavy ion radiotherapy in the future.