Perspectives of parents and nurses on the content validity of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with a chronic condition: A mixed-methods study

Translation, Reliability and Development of a Calculator for the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) in Caregivers of Individuals With Cerebral Palsy

INTRODUCTION

Care for patients with cerebral palsy (CP) poses significant challenges, with emphasis on the crucial role of family involvement in patients' well-being. The Family Empowerment Scale (FES) assesses parents/caregivers' perception of their ability to promote and influence their children's development in three domains: family, service system and community.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to translate the FES into Brazilian Portuguese, to develop a calculator for data transformation and analysis and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale with Brazilian caregivers of children and adolescents with CP.

METHODS

Translation occurred in four stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation and review of the translated version. A calculator was then developed in the Excel program, to present data in absolute values and graphically for each subscale. Statistical analysis included Bland-Altman, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Internal Consistency, and Floor and Ceiling Effect.

RESULTS

In total, 50 parents and caregivers participated to the measurement properties investigation, and the scale demonstrated good reliability for the family (ICC = 0.80) and services (ICC = 0.81) subscales, as well as for the overall scale (ICC = 0.88). The community subscale showed moderate reliability (ICC = 0.68), with an adequate Cronbach's alpha (0.89). The FES showed no ceiling or floor effects and a small limit of agreement. The data of all participants were analysed using the calculator.

CONCLUSION

The FES-Brazilian Portuguese presented good reliability for assessing family empowerment in caregivers of children and adolescents with CP in Brazil, offering insights into this construct and guiding family-centred interventions. In addition, the calculator could be viable for adequate management and dissemination of data.

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Family Empowerment Scale

PURPOSE

To systematically review and evaluate existing psychometric evidence for the Family Empowerment Scale (FES), which has been widely used to measure empowerment across the world.

METHODS

Three databases were searched up until December 2021. Eligible studies were identified by an interdisciplinary team using the PRISMA procedure. The methodological quality of psychometrics (Risk of Bias standards) and sufficiency of each psychometric property (e.g., reliability, content validity, construct validity, responsiveness) were independently evaluated by three members, following COnsesus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 3278 caregivers were included in the review. Studies reported limited information about content validity and study sample characteristics. There is sufficient evidence with moderate methodological quality to support structural validity for a four and three-bifactor structure. Sufficient evidence with good methodological quality was found for internal consistency. No studies examined responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Future psychometric studies of the FES should include diverse families and establish content validity following current COSMIN standards. Structural validity evidence does not support the original three-factor structure, which suggests the need to refine the theoretical measurement constructs. Responsiveness is needed prior to using FES as an instrument of change in applied research studies.Implications for RehabilitationThe evidence for the use of the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) is primarily with families of children with disabilities who identify as white, non-Hispanic, and live in the US.Across studies, evidence suggests the FES items work well together to measure family empowerment.Caution should be used when using the FES to measure changes in empowerment over time.

Development and content validity of the Person Experiences Interview Survey (PEIS): a measure of the mental health services experiences of people with developmental disabilities

Purpose

People with developmental disabilities and mental health service experiences have a right to be included in healthcare decisions, including the evaluation of their mental health services and providers. However, few self-report measures address this need. This study aimed to fill this gap by developing and evaluating the content validity, including comprehension, relevance, and comprehensiveness, of the Person Experiences Interview Survey (PEIS) with people with developmental disabilities and mental health experiences.

Methods

The research team established a measurement framework based on the Family Experiences Interview Survey (FEIS), resulting in 21 PEIS items that were written in collaboration with young adults with developmental disabilities and mental health service experiences. Comprehension, relevance, and comprehensiveness were evaluated through cognitive interviews with people with developmental disabilities and mental health service experiences (respondents; n = 9) ages 23-49 years. Comprehensiveness and relevance were also evaluated in focus groups with family caregivers (n = 9) and mental health providers (n = 10) who serve this population. Two researchers independently coded open-ended responses to the PEIS for comprehension. A content validity index (CVI), indicating relevance, was calculated for each participant group for each item, and comprehensiveness was rated for item sets.

Results

Fifteen of the 21 items met the criteria of ≥80% comprehension, with 89-100% of responses containing all or some intended information. All items met the CVI ≥80% criterion in at least two of the three groups. In all item sets, between 1 and 4 family members or providers felt one question was missing. Respondents used the response scale in a manner that corresponded with their open-ended descriptions, and family caregivers and providers had positive feedback about the response scale's visual cues and number of choices. Using these findings, four items were removed and six items were revised, resulting in a 17-item measure.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel and promising measure, the Person Experiences Interview Survey (PEIS). It also demonstrates that the employment of accessible methods allows people with developmental disabilities to meaningfully evaluate mental health services and providers. The PEIS shows great promise for application in the field by engaging those directly involved in the evaluation of mental health services and providers.

Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools andReview Instruments

The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperativeto ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensionalnature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presenceof cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomescan be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardizedand validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, andto estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made tostandardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensiveassessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides anoverview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intentfor healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensionsof PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessmenttools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and theACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have notbeen specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in researchsettings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL,while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specifictools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest,PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.

The relationship between family empowerment and fine motor, gross motor and cognitive skills in young children with cerebral palsy

BACKGROUND

Family empowerment in families of young children with cerebral palsy (CP) is an important consideration because the first few years of life can be overwhelming for parents. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between family empowerment, fine motor (FM), gross motor (GM) and cognitive development in children with CP who were under 3 years of age.

METHODS

Forty-one children with a mean age of 23.8 months participated in this study. The Family Empowerment Scale (FES) was completed by the participants' parents, whereas the FM, GM and cognitive subscales of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third edition (B-III) were administered by physical therapists.

RESULTS

Statistically significant positive correlations were found between the FES total and B-III raw scores for FM, GM and cognitive subscales with coefficients ranging from 0.35 to 0.41. Significant relationships were also found between the FES Community subscale and the B-III FM, GM and cognitive subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of a relationship between family empowerment and FM, GM and cognitive abilities in young children with CP, with a greater severity of impairments related to lower levels of caregiver empowerment.

Prognostic factors influencing parental empowerment after discharge of their hospitalized child: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

There is a growing number of children with medical complexity (CMC). After hospitalization, care often has to be continued at home, making transitional care very important. However, many parents do not feel empowered in their role as caregiver for the child. To move forward in this field, we explored prognostic factors associated with parental empowerment after discharge of hospitalized children.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, we collected data on potential prognostic factors found in the literature and on parental empowerment by means of the Family Empowerment Scale (FES). Linear regression analyses were performed to explore the associations between the prognostic factors and the FES.

RESULTS

Data from 228 patients and their parents were analyzed. Out of twelve factors included in the study, three showed significant associations with parental empowerment. Parents of CMC felt more empowered compared to parents of children with less complex conditions (β = 0.20, p = 0.00). We found a positive association between the age of the child and parental empowerment (β = 0.01, p = 0.00). Employed couples felt more empowered compared to unemployed couples (β = 0.30, p = 0.00). These three variables explained 11% of variance in the FES scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Parental empowerment is associated with the patient's age, child's medical complexity, and parental employment status.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Attention should be paid to the discharge preparation of parents of children with less medical complexity. Awareness is required for parents of younger children and parental employment status, because they are at risk for lower parental empowerment.

Validity and reliability of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate

BACKGROUND

Empowerment is recognized as a crucial concept in strengthening the position of parents in healthcare services. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Family Empowerment Scale (FES).

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted between January and March 2021, with 348 family members actively caring for their children in the age group of 0-18 years with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The English FES was translated into Turkish using back translation and modified so that it is generic and convenient for all families. The construct validity, internal validity, internal consistency, and split-half test reliability and responsiveness of the Turkish FES were examined.

RESULTS

The original FES structure with three factors (family, health services provided to the child and community participation) and 34 items was verified in Turkish culture. This obtained structure can explain 66% of the variance of the relevant concept. Scores of parents ranged between 34 and 170 points. Increasing scores indicated a positive significance regarding family empowerment. The Cronbach's α reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.976.

CONCLUSION

The study findings and the goodness-of-fit values indicated that the FES and its Turkish version are a valid and reliable measurement instrument to be used in Turkish culture.

Tele-Clinic Visits in Pediatric Patients with Marfan Syndrome Using Parentally Acquired Echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To test feasibility of tele-clinic visits using parentally acquired vital signs and focused echocardiographic images in patients with Marfan syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

We included patients with Marfan syndrome aged 5-19 years followed in our clinic. We excluded patients with Marfan syndrome and history of previous aortic root (AoR) surgery, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, or AoR ≥4.5 cm. We trained parents in-person to acquire focused echocardiographic images on their children using a hand-held device as well as how to use a stadiometer, scale, blood pressure (BP) machine, and a digital stethoscope. Before tele-clinic visits, parents obtained the echocardiographic images and vital signs. We compared tele-clinic and on-site clinic visit data. Parental and clinic echocardiograms were independently analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen patient/parent pairs completed tele-clinic visits, conducted at a median of 7.0 (IQR 3.0-9.9) months from the in-person training session. Parents took a median of 70 (IQR 60-150) minutes to obtain the height, weight, heart rate, BP, cardiac sounds, and echocardiographic images before tele-clinic visits. Systolic BP was greater on-site than at home (median +13 mm Hg, P = .014). Height, weight, diastolic BP, heart rate, and AoR measurements were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides information for implementing tele-clinic visits using parentally acquired vital signs and echocardiographic images in patients with Marfan syndrome. The results show that tele-clinic visits are feasible and that parents were able to obtain focused echocardiographic images on their children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03581682.

Children living with long-term conditions: A meta-aggregation of parental experiences of partnership nursing

AIM

To explore how parents of children with long-term conditions experience partnership in paediatric and neonatal nursing care and to identify existing partnership barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND

Parent-nurse partnership is fundamental to paediatric and neonatal nursing. Partnership is characterised by five attributes: parental participation, negotiation, mutual trust and respect, shared roles and decision-making, and communication. Little is known about the parental experiences of partnership nursing specific to children living with a long-term condition.

DESIGN

A qualitative meta-aggregation review following Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation approach.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in six electronic databases. Studies were assessed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Qualitative findings with illustrative quotes from included studies were extracted and grouped into categories which informed the synthesised findings. This review has been reported according to the PRISMA guidelines.

FINDINGS

A total of 4,404 studies were screened, 162 full-text studies were assessed against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a total of six studies were included. The meta-aggregation developed three overarching synthesised findings which were as follows: (a) empowering parents to become involved, (b) effective communication to recognise mutual expertise and (c) collaborative nurse-family relationships.

CONCLUSION

Parents valued collaboration where both parents and nurses are recognised equally for their skills and expertise. A power struggle existed between parents and nurses when expertise was not recognised. Parents appreciated nurses who empowered them to develop new skills and knowledge in the care of their own child.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses need to recognise the skills and knowledge that parents have surrounding the care requirements of their own children. Collaboration and negotiation are key to successful partnership between nurses and parents. Nurses need to frequently reflect on how they are successfully partnering with both parents and children and ensure all parties in the nurse/parent/child triad feel supported and empowered.

Role of parents in fatigue of children with a chronic disease: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

As parents majorly impact their child's well-being, and as fatigue is a highly prevalent threat to the well-being of children with a chronic disease, we aimed to explore the association between parental factors and fatigue in children with a chronic disease.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Two Dutch children's hospitals.

POPULATION

Children 2-18 years of age with either an autoimmune disease, cystic fibrosis or post-cancer treatment, and one of their parents.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Paediatric fatigue was measured using the PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale. Parental factors included parental pain, fatigue and physical symptoms, parental distress, catastrophising thoughts about their child's pain and family empowerment. Multiple linear regressions were used to study associations with paediatric fatigue. A multivariable regression model was used to assess the effect of the different parental factors on paediatric fatigue. All analyses were adjusted for the age and sex of the child.

RESULTS

204 families participated (mean age 11.0±4.3 and 43.5±6.3 years for children and parents, respectively; 69% participation rate). More parental pain, fatigue and physical symptoms, and more parental distress and pain catastrophising were associated with more paediatric fatigue. More parental empowerment was associated with less paediatric fatigue on both subscales. In the multivariable model, only paediatric age remained significantly associated with fatigue. In a separate multivariable model for children 8-18 years old, more parental distress (β=-1.9, 95% CI -3.7 to -0.1) was also significantly associated with more paediatric fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of children with a chronic disease, parental factors, both physical and psychosocial, were associated with paediatric fatigue. Our study provides evidence that more family empowerment is associated with less paediatric fatigue. This exploratory study adds to our knowledge of associated factors with fatigue in paediatric chronic disease, providing starting points for targeted interventions.

The relationship between the Family Empowerment Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure-66 in Young Children with cerebral palsy

BACKGROUND

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of motor disability in children. A concept to consider in order to meet the needs of children with CP and their families is family empowerment. Family empowerment can be defined as the process by which families acquire the skills, knowledge and resources to allow them to gain control and improve the quality of their lives. The relationship between gross motor function and family empowerment may be important because children with CP vary so widely in their ability to perform motor skills, which may affect their family's levels of empowerment. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) and Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in children with CP who were under 3 years of age.

METHODS

Forty-one children with a mean age of 23.8 months participated in this study. The FES was completed by the participants' parents or regular caregivers and includes a total score and subscales of empowerment in the family, in service situations and in community/political environments. The GMFM-66 was administered by a physical therapist and consists of a total score of gross motor function (GMFM-66) and subscores for Dimension B (sitting), Dimension C (crawling and kneeling), Dimension D (standing) and Dimension E (walking, running and jumping).

RESULTS

Statistically significant positive correlations were found between the FES total and GMFM (total score and Dimensions B-E) with coefficients varying from 0.43-0.62. Significant relationships were also found between most subscales of the FES and the GMFM-66.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of a relationship between family empowerment and gross motor function in young children with CP and suggests that caregivers of children with higher gross motor function report higher levels of self-efficacy.

Perspectives of parents and nurses on the content validity of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with a chronic condition: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Insight into parental empowerment is important to understanding the impact of health care policy and to supporting and strengthening parents in the care of their child. The Family Empowerment Scale (FES) is a valid 24-item instrument that measures parental empowerment. It was originally developed for parents of children with emotional disabilities. It has been translated from English into Dutch. Before using the translated FES in another context, the aim of this study was to assess the content validity of the Dutch FES in the context of children with a chronic condition in a children's hospital, according to parents and nurses.

METHOD

This content validity study has a convergent, mixed-methods design. The content validity index was used to examine the relevance, according to 22 parents and 12 nurses quantitatively, on a scale and item level. The qualitative part assessed the comprehensiveness and comprehension of the FES through cognitive interviewing with eight parents and four nurses. The results of both analyses were converged to determine content validity.

RESULTS

The scale-content validity index was 0.88; three items scored < 0.78 on the item level. For 10 (of 24) items, issues were noticed about the tone and clarity of wording. Participants considered the FES to be not only an instrument of research but also an instrument that could be used to give insight into the personal degree of parental empowerment.

CONCLUSION

The content validity of the Dutch FES for parents of children with a chronic condition can be considered sufficient. Resolving some minor translation issues in some of the items is advised. The FES can be used in further research to examine the value of the FES in health care services, aiming to support the needs of parents and to increase their empowerment.