Caregiver burden in cerebral palsy: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver difficulties scale

Tools to measure the burden on informal caregivers of cancer patients: A literature review

OBJECTIVES

(1) To describe existing tools to assess the burden of informal caregivers of people with cancer, (2) to describe how these tools have been validated and (3) to describe the areas of interest of existing assessment tool entries.

BACKGROUND

The caregiver burden of informal caregivers of people with cancer greatly affects their lives. There is a wide variety of relevant assessment tools available, but there are no studies to help researchers to select tools.

METHODS

A search was conducted using the keywords 'cancer', 'caregiver', 'burden' and 'scale' in Medline (PubMed), CINAHL and EMBASE to include articles that developed or applied tools to assess the burden on informal caregivers of cancer patients. Once eligible tools were identified, we searched their 'primary reference' studies. If the original scale was assessed in a population other than informal caregivers of cancer patients, we again searched for psychometric measures in the population of caregivers of cancer patients.

RESULTS

This study retrieved 938 articles on developing or applying the informal caregiver burden instrument for cancer patients, including 42 scales. Internal consistency of the original scales ranged from 0.53 to 0.96. Nineteen scales initially developed to assess caregiver burden for patients with dementia, stroke and other disorders were later used for caregivers of cancer patients, eight of which have not yet been validated. Reclassifying all scale domains of concern revealed that scale assessments focused more on caregivers' physical health, emotional state and caregiving tasks.

CONCLUSION

This review identifies many scales for assessing informal caregiver burden in cancer patients and gives scales recommended. However, a portion still needs to be validated. The development of a new scale proposes to be based on a theoretical framework and to consider dimensions for assessing support resources.

IMPACT

What problem did the study address?: This paper collates assessment tools on the burden of informal carers of people with cancer. It also provides information on the applicable population, reliability and validity. What were the main findings?: 41 scales could be considered for use, eight of which have not been validated. The scales focus more on assessing caregivers' physical health, emotional state and caregiving tasks, and less on the dimension of support resources. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: There are implications for informal carers of cancer patients in hospitals or in the community, as well as for relevant researchers.

REPORTING METHOD

Retrieved with reference to systematic evaluation.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Disability and caregiver burden: Unique challenges in a developing country

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors, including degree of disability, that contribute to the caregiver burden of raising children with cerebral palsy in Sri Lanka.

METHODS

Participants were caregivers of children with cerebral palsy attending the pediatric neurology clinic of the only tertiary care center in southern Sri Lanka. The locally validated Caregiver Difficulties Scale (CDS) was administered, and demographic information was obtained in a structured interview. Disability data was accessed through the medical record.

RESULTS

Of 163 caregivers who participated in this study, 133 (81.2%) demonstrated a moderate to high level of burden, and 91 (55.8%) were at high risk for psychological burden. In the bivariate analysis, caregiver burden significantly correlated with degree of physical disability based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the presence of medical co-morbidities, and having two or more children. However, only the GMFCS level and number of children remained significant predictors of caregiver burden after controlling for confounding effects.

CONCLUSION

Raising a child with cerebral palsy in Sri Lanka is likely to cause caregiver burden, particularly if they have a high level of disability or one or more siblings. Monitoring caregiver burden as part of routine cerebral palsy management is important, which allows targeting psychosocial support to families most in need.

The Chinese version of the Caregiver Difficulties Scale: Psychometric evaluation

BACKGROUND

Evaluating caregiver burden and its health impact is an essential component of long-term care plan for children with disabilities; the Caregiver Difficulties Scale (CDS) has high conceptual sensitivity. The aim of this study was to adapt the CDS to Chinese and investigates the psychometric properties of this tool.

METHODS

The study was carried out among caregivers of children with cerebral palsy (n = 194). The CDS, Caregivers Burden Inventory (CBI) and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) were used for data collection. Twenty experts were consulted to evaluate the content validity of the scale. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to measure the construct validity of CDS. The Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated among CDS, CBI and WHOQOL-BREF to examine the convergent validity and discriminant validity. The reliability was evaluated by examining internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

The result of expert consultation showed that the S-CVI was 0.894 and the I-CVI ranged from 0.70 to 1.00. The fit indices showed that the original correlated four-factor model of CDS was adequate: χ²  = 268.397; df = 243; χ² /df = 1.105; RMSEA = 0.023; CFI = 0.985; NNFI = 0.869; TLI = 0.982; IFI = 0.986. The score of CDS was positively strong associated with the scores of CBI (r = +0.764); negatively correlating with the scores of WHOQOL-BREF (r = -0.627). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.840; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was 0.843.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the CDS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate burden for caregivers of children with CP in China.