Does LEAP change the screening paradigm for food allergy in infants with eczema?

Early peanut introduction: To test or not to test?

OBJECTIVE

To review recent evidence and international guidelines on early peanut introduction for preventing peanut allergy and provide an update on the status of the debate around testing before early peanut introduction.

DATA SOURCES

Review of published literature documenting: infant feeding guidelines; impact of early peanut introduction on peanut allergy; risk factors for peanut allergy; and impact of early peanut introduction guidelines on infant feeding practices and allergy.

STUDY SELECTION

We used a narrative approach and present both pro and con arguments for testing before peanut introduction. Data from randomized controlled trials and post-hoc analyses of these trials and observational studies were included.

RESULTS

Allergy prevention guidelines around the world now consistently recommend introducing peanut into an infant's diet before 12 months of age for countries with high peanut allergy prevalence. In the US, guidelines recently shifted away from recommending allergy testing before introduction for those at risk of peanut allergy. There is evidence primarily from Australia that recommending early introduction without prior testing is safe and effective in increasing early peanut introduction for both high and low-risk infants, although the subsequent reduction in peanut allergy prevalence at the population level was less than expected.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence supports recommending early peanut introduction without routinely testing for peanut allergy. If testing is offered, this should be based on shared decision making between families and practitioners and only be undertaken where there is provision for rapid access to definitive diagnosis including oral food challenges.

Association Between Earlier Introduction of Peanut and Prevalence of Peanut Allergy in Infants in Australia

IMPORTANCE

Randomized clinical trials showed that earlier peanut introduction can prevent peanut allergy in select high-risk populations. This led to changes in infant feeding guidelines in 2016 to recommend early peanut introduction for all infants to reduce the risk of peanut allergy.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the change in population prevalence of peanut allergy in infants after the introduction of these new guidelines and evaluate the association between early peanut introduction and peanut allergy.

DESIGN

Two population-based cross-sectional samples of infants aged 12 months were recruited 10 years apart using the same sampling frame and methods to allow comparison of changes over time. Infants were recruited from immunization centers around Melbourne, Australia. Infants attending their 12-month immunization visit were eligible to participate (eligible age range, 11-15 months), regardless of history of peanut exposure or allergy history.

EXPOSURES

Questionnaires collected data on demographics, food allergy risk factors, peanut introduction, and reactions.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

All infants underwent skin prick tests to peanut and those with positive results underwent oral food challenges. Prevalence estimates were standardized to account for changes in population demographics over time.

RESULTS

This study included 7209 infants (1933 in 2018-2019 and 5276 in 2007-2011). Of the participants in the older vs more recent cohort, 51.8% vs 50.8% were male; median (IQR) ages were 12.5 (12.2-13.0) months vs 12.4 (12.2-12.9) months. There was an increase in infants of East Asian ancestry over time (16.5% in 2018-2019 vs 10.5% in 2007-2011), which is a food allergy risk factor. After standardizing for infant ancestry and other demographics changes, peanut allergy prevalence was 2.6% (95% CI, 1.8%-3.4%) in 2018-2019, compared with 3.1% in 2007-2011 (difference, -0.5% [95% CI, -1.4% to 0.4%]; P = .26). Earlier age of peanut introduction was significantly associated with a lower risk of peanut allergy among infants of Australian ancestry in 2018-2019 (age 12 months compared with age 6 months or younger: adjusted odds ratio, 0.08 [05% CI, 0.02-0.36]; age 12 months compared with 7 to less than 10 months: adjusted odds ratio, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.02-0.53]), but not significant among infants of East Asian ancestry (P for interaction = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In cross-sectional analyses, introduction of a guideline recommending early peanut introduction in Australia was not associated with a statistically significant lower or higher prevalence of peanut allergy across the population.

International Peanut Allergy Prevention, 6 Years After the Learning Early About Peanut Study

Six years ago, the Learning Early About Peanut (LEAP) trial findings helped fundamentally shift the paradigm of peanut allergy prevention. Although the results of LEAP are well accepted, policy-makers, caregivers, and clinicians struggle with how best to implement and apply the study's key findings in clinical practice. Differences in guidelines highlight issues related to peanut allergy prevention implementation, including caregiver acceptability, cost, fidelity, feasibility, appropriateness, and adoption. The goals of this rostrum are to review how the LEAP study has informed international peanut allergy prevention policy, as well as to review the strengths and ongoing controversies in peanut allergy prevention implementation.

Food allergy and omics

Food allergy (FA) prevalence has been increasing over the last few decades and is now a global health concern. Current diagnostic methods for FA result in a high number of false-positive results, and the standard of care is either allergen avoidance or use of epinephrine on accidental exposure, although currently with no other approved treatments. The increasing prevalence of FA, lack of robust biomarkers, and inadequate treatments warrants further research into the mechanism underlying food allergies. Recent technological advances have made it possible to move beyond traditional biological techniques to more sophisticated high-throughput approaches. These technologies have created the burgeoning field of omics sciences, which permit a more systematic investigation of biological problems. Omics sciences, such as genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, microbiomics, and exposomics, have enabled the construction of regulatory networks and biological pathway models. Parallel advances in bioinformatics and computational techniques have enabled the integration, analysis, and interpretation of these exponentially growing data sets and opens the possibility of personalized or precision medicine for FA.

Changes to infant feeding guidelines: Relevance to dermatologists

The newly revised Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines recommends that all infants, including those at high risk of allergy, be introduced foods traditionally considered allergenic (such as peanut butter, dairy, wheat and egg) within the first year of life. High-risk infants are those with early onset eczema (<3-months old) or with moderate to severe eczema not responding to treatment (<6-months old). Eczema can also represent a symptom of allergy presentation and the recommended introduction of some foods in this group may lead to allergic reactions at home. Although there have been no reported deaths from gradual food introduction to infants at home and cohort studies have only reported mild to moderate reactions, there is anecdotal evidence that more severe reactions can occur rarely. Allergic reactions, even if they are not life-threatening, can be a terrifying experience for parents. Dermatologists play an important role when dealing with high-risk infants in promoting the message of early allergenic food introduction yet also instigating appropriate allergy testing when necessary. This short review aims to provide an update to Australasian dermatologists on the newly revised Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines and provide a food allergy screening pathway for high-risk infants prior to commencement of allergenic foods.