Small airway involvement in the late allergic response in asthma

Inherent differences of small airway contraction and Ca2+ oscillations in airway smooth muscle cells between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse strains

BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse strains are widely used as animal model in studies of respiratory diseases, such as asthma. Asthma is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, which is eventually resulted from the excessive airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction mediated by Ca²⁺ oscillations in ASM cells. It is reported that BALB/c mice have inherently higher airway responsiveness, but show no different contractive response of tracheal ring as compared to C57BL/6 mice. However, whether the different airway responsiveness is due to the different extents of small airway contraction, and what's underlying mechanism remains unknown. Here, we assess agonist-induced small airway contraction and Ca²⁺ oscillations in ASM cells between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice by using precision-cut lung slices (PCLS). We found that BALB/c mice showed an intrinsically stronger extent of small airway narrowing and faster Ca²⁺ oscillations in ASM cells in response to agonists. These differences were associated with a higher magnitude of Ca²⁺ influx via store-operated Ca²⁺ entry (SOCE), as a result of increased expression of SOCE components (STIM1, Orai1) in the ASM cells of small airway of BALB/c mice. An established mathematical model and experimental results suggested that the increased SOC current could result in increased agonist-induced Ca²⁺ oscillations. Therefore, the inherently higher SOC underlies the increased Ca²⁺ oscillation frequency in ASM cells and stronger small airway contraction in BALB/c mice, thus higher airway responsiveness in BALB/c than C57BL/6 mouse strain.

Neutrophil phenotypes in bronchial airways differentiate single from dual responding allergic asthmatics

INTRODUCTION

Allergic asthmatics with both an early (EAR) and a late allergic reaction (LAR) following allergen exposure are termed 'dual responders' (DR), while 'single responders' (SR) only have an EAR. Mechanisms that differentiate DR from SR are largely unknown, particularly regarding the role and phenotypes of neutrophils. Therefore, we aimed to study neutrophils in DR and SR asthmatics.

METHODS

Thirty-four allergic asthmatics underwent an inhaled allergen challenge, samples were collected before and up to 24 h post-challenge. Cell differentials were counted from bronchial lavage, alveolar lavage and blood; and tissue neutrophils were quantified in immune-stained bronchial biopsies. Lavage neutrophil nuclei lobe segmentation was used to classify active (1-4 lobes) from suppressive neutrophils (≥5 lobes). Levels of transmigration markers: soluble (s)CD62L and interleukin-1Ra, and activity markers: neutrophil elastase (NE), DNA-histone complex and dsDNA were measured in lavage fluid and plasma.

RESULTS

Compared with SR at baseline, DR had more neutrophils in their bronchial airways at baseline, both in the lavage (p = .0031) and biopsies (p = .026) and elevated bronchial neutrophils correlated with less antitransmigratory IL-1Ra levels (r = -0.64). DR airways had less suppressive neutrophils and more 3-lobed (active) neutrophils (p = .029) that correlated with more bronchial lavage histone (p = .020) and more plasma NE (p = .0016). Post-challenge, DR released neutrophil extracellular trap factors in the blood earlier and had less pro-transmigratory sCD62L during the late phase (p = .0076) than in SR.

CONCLUSION

DR have a more active airway neutrophil phenotype at baseline and a distinct neutrophil response to allergen challenge that may contribute to the development of an LAR. Therefore, neutrophil activity should be considered during targeted diagnosis and bio-therapeutic development for DR.

EAACI position paper on the clinical use of the bronchial allergen challenge: Unmet needs and research priorities

Allergic asthma (AA) is a common asthma phenotype, and its diagnosis requires both the demonstration of IgE-sensitization to aeroallergens and the causative role of this sensitization as a major driver of asthma symptoms. Therefore, a bronchial allergen challenge (BAC) would be occasionally required to identify AA patients among atopic asthmatics. Nevertheless, BAC is usually considered a research tool only, with existing protocols being tailored to mild asthmatics and research needs (eg long washout period for inhaled corticosteroids). Consequently, existing BAC protocols are not designed to be performed in moderate-to-severe asthmatics or in clinical practice. The correct diagnosis of AA might help select patients for immunomodulatory therapies. Allergen sublingual immunotherapy is now registered and recommended for controlled or partially controlled patients with house dust mite-driven AA and with FEV1 ≥ 70%. Allergen avoidance is costly and difficult to implement for the management of AA, so the proper selection of patients is also beneficial. In this position paper, the EAACI Task Force proposes a methodology for clinical BAC that would need to be validated in future studies. The clinical implementation of BAC could ultimately translate into a better phenotyping of asthmatics in real life, and into a more accurate selection of patients for long-term and costly management pathways.

Plasma proteome changes linked to late phase response after inhaled allergen challenge in asthmatics

BACKGROUND

A subset of individuals with allergic asthma develops a late phase response (LPR) to inhaled allergens, which is characterized by a prolonged airway obstruction, airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. The aim of this study was to identify changes in the plasma proteome and circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells associated with the LPR following inhaled allergen challenge.

METHODS

Serial plasma samples from asthmatics undergoing inhaled allergen challenge were analyzed by mass spectrometry and immunosorbent assays. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Mass spectrometry data were analyzed using a linear regression to model the relationship between airway obstruction during the LPR and plasma proteome changes. Data from immunosorbent assays were analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Out of 396 proteins quantified in plasma, 150 showed a statistically significant change 23 h post allergen challenge. Among the most upregulated proteins were three protease inhibitors: alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin and plasma serine protease inhibitor. Altered levels of 13 proteins were associated with the LPR, including increased factor XIII A and decreased von Willebrand factor. No relationship was found between the LPR and changes in the proportions of classical, intermediate, and non-classical monocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic reactions to inhaled allergens in asthmatic subjects were associated with changes in a large proportion of the measured plasma proteome, whereof protease inhibitors showed the largest changes, likely to influence the inflammatory response. Many of the proteins altered in relation to the LPR are associated with coagulation, highlighting potential mechanistic targets for future treatments of type-2 asthma.

Allergen Provocation Tests in Respiratory Research: Building on 50 Years of Experience

Allergen provocation test is an established model of allergic airway diseases, including asthma and allergic rhinitis, allowing the study of allergen-induced changes in respiratory physiology and inflammatory mechanisms in sensitised individuals as well as their associations. In the upper airways, allergen challenge is focused on the clinical and pathophysiological sequelae of the early allergic response and applied both as a diagnostic tool and in research settings. In contrast, the bronchial allergen challenge has almost exclusively served as a research tool in specialised research settings with a focus on the late asthmatic response and the underlying type 2 inflammation. The allergen-induced late asthmatic response is also characterised by prolonged airway narrowing, increased non-specific airway hyperresponsiveness and features of airway remodelling including the small airways, and hence, allows the study of several key mechanisms and features of asthma. In line with these characteristics, the allergen challenge has served as a valued tool to study the crosstalk of the upper and lower airways and in proof of mechanism studies of drug development. In recent years, several new insights into respiratory phenotypes and endotypes including the involvement of the upper and small airways, innovative biomarker sampling methods and detection techniques, refined lung function testing as well as targeted treatment options, further shaped the applicability of the allergen provocation test in precision medicine. These topics, along with descriptions of subject populations and safety, in line with the updated GINA2021, will be addressed in this paper.

Allergen bronchoprovocation test: an important research tool supporting precision medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergen bronchoprovocation test (ABT) has been used to study asthma pathophysiology and as a disease-modelling tool to assess the properties and efficacy of new asthma drugs. In view of the complexity and heterogeneity of asthma, which has driven the definition of several phenotypes and endotypes, we aim to discuss the role of ABT in the era of precision medicine and provide guidance for clinicians how to interpret and use available data to understand the implications for the benefits of asthma treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we summarize background knowledge and applications of ABT and provide an update with recent publications on this topic. In the past years, several studies have been published on ABT in combination with non-invasive and invasive airway samplings and innovative detection techniques allowing to study several inflammatory mechanisms linked to Th2-pathway and allergen-induced pathophysiology throughout the airways.

SUMMARY

ABT is a valuable research tool, which has strongly contributed to precision medicine by helping to define allergen-triggered key inflammatory pathways and airway pathophysiology, and thus helped to shape our understanding of allergen-driven asthma phenotypes and endotypes. In addition, ABT has been instrumental to assess the interactions and effects of new-targeted asthma treatments along these pathways.

Small Airway Dysfunction in Children With Controlled Asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation of the central and distal airways. The aim of this study was to assess the small airway (SA) of children with moderate-severe asthma with normal FEV1.

METHODS

This was an open-label, prospective, observational, cross-sectional study with consecutive inclusion of patients with moderate-severe asthma, receiving standard clinical treatment, with normal baseline FEV₁. We determined multiflow FEno (CAno), oscillatory resistance and reactance (R5-R20, X5), forced spirometry (FEV1, FEF_25-75), total body plethysmography (RV/TLC) and bronchodilation test. SA involvement was defined as: CAno>4.5 ppb, R5-R20>0.147kPa/L/s, X5<-0.18kPa/L, FEF_25-75<-1.65 z-score, RV/TLC>33%. Poor asthma control was defined as ≤ 19 points on the ACT questionnaire or ≤ 20 on the c-ACT.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 100 cases, 76 had moderate asthma and 24 had severe asthma; 71 children were classified as poorly controlled and 29 were well-controlled. In total, 77.78% of the group with all the correct determinations (n=72) showed ≥ 1 altered SA parameter and 48.61% ≥ 2 parameters. There were no differences between well-controlled or poorly controlled cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with moderate-severe asthma, with normal FEV₁, show a phenotype of dysfunctional SA. In our series, the evaluation of SA using the techniques described above did not provide information on disease control.

Small airway function in children with mild to moderate asthmatic symptoms

BACKGROUND

Clinical significance of small airway obstruction in mild pediatric asthma is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate small airway properties in children with mild to moderate asthmatic symptoms and the association of small airway function with asthma control and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

Children (5-10 years old) with recurrent wheezing (n = 42) or persistent troublesome cough (n = 16) and healthy controls (n = 19) performed impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry, and a multiple-breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) was measured at multiple flow rates to determine alveolar NO concentration (Calv). Asthma control was evaluated with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) use within the past month, and asthma exacerbations within the past year.

RESULTS

IOS, spirometry, and exhaled NO indexes that are related to small airway function differed between children with recurrent wheezing and healthy controls, whereas only forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity was associated with persistent cough. The MBNW indexes showed no difference between the groups. Among symptomatic children, conducting airway ventilation inhomogeneity and Calv were associated with asthma exacerbations (P = .03 and P = .002, respectively), and lung clearance index and Calv were associated with EIB (P = .04 and P = .004, respectively). None of the proposed small airway indexes was associated with the C-ACT score or SABA use.

CONCLUSION

Subtle changes were observed in the proposed small airway indexes of IOS, spirometry, and exhaled NO among children with mild to moderate recurrent wheezing. Small airway dysfunction, expressed as ventilation inhomogeneity indexes and Calv, was also associated with asthma exacerbations and EIB.