Low incidence of heparin‐induced skin lesions in orthopedic surgery patients with low‐molecular‐weight heparins

A disproportionality analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the overall population and in pregnancy women using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

Background

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is extensively utilized as an anticoagulant for the prevention and management of various thrombotic conditions. However, despite the widespread use of LMWH in clinical indications, its adverse events (AEs) have not received substantial attention, and there is a lack of systematic and comprehensive AE studies. This study aims to evaluate AE signals associated with LMWH in the overall population and in pregnancy women from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Methods

We used the Standardized MedDRA Query to identify pregnancy-related AE reports. Disproportionality analyses were employed to identify LMWH-related AE by calculating the reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).

Results

For the overall population, the significantly reported adverse signals in SOCs were pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal conditions, vascular disorders, blood and lymphatic system disorders, and product issues. The five strongest AEs signal of LMWH-related were anti factor X antibody positive (n = 6, ROR 506.70, PRR 506.65, IC 8.31, EBGM 317.03), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia test positive (n = 19, ROR 263.10, PRR 263.02, IC 7.65, EBGM 200.79), anti factor X activity increased (n = 10, ROR 255.93, PRR 255.89, IC 7.62, EBGM 196.61), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia test (n = 14, ROR 231.85, PRR 231.80, IC 7.51, EBGM 182.09), and spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome (n = 3, ROR 230.31, PRR 230.30, IC 7.50, EBGM 181.16). For pregnancy women, the five strongest AEs signals of LMWH-related included sternal fracture (n = 3, ROR 243.44, PRR 243.35, IC 6.61, EBGM 97.94), syringe issue (n = 12, ROR 97.49, PRR 97.34, IC 5.94, EBGM 61.21), bleeding time prolonged (n = 3, ROR 97.38, PRR 97.34, IC 5.94, EBGM 61.21), spinal compression fracture (n = 10, ROR 90.24, PRR 90.13, IC 5.87, EBGM 58.30), and injection site haematoma (n = 19, ROR 79.23, PRR 79.04, IC 5.74, EBGM 53.47). Additionally, unexpected AEs associated with LMWH in pregnancy women were observed, including premature baby death, placental necrosis, abortion, antiphospholipid syndrome, systolic dysfunction, compartment syndrome, body height decreased, rubella antibody positive, and ultrasound doppler abnormal.

Conclusion

This study identified unexpected AE signals of LMWH-relate in pregnancy women. Our study could provide valuable evidence for the clinical practice of LMWH, especially for identifying AEs and ensuring safe usage in pregnancy women.

The Use of Biomarkers in Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

The use of biomarkers varies from disease etiognosis and diagnosis to signal detection, risk prediction, and management. Biomarker use has expanded in recent years, however, there are limited reviews on the use of biomarkers in pharmacovigilance and specifically in the monitoring and management of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Objective

The objective of this manuscript is to identify the multiple uses of biomarkers in pharmacovigilance irrespective of the therapeutic area.

Design

This is a systematic review of the literature.

Data Sources and Methods

Embase and MEDLINE database searches were conducted for literature published between 2010-March 19, 2021. Scientific articles that described the potential use of biomarkers in pharmacovigilance in sufficient detail were reviewed. Papers that did not fulfill the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) definition of a biomarker were excluded, which is based on the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH)-E16 guidance.

Results

Twenty-seven articles were identified for evaluation. Most articles involved predictive biomarkers (41%), followed by safety biomarkers (38%), pharmacodynamic/response biomarkers (14%), and diagnostic biomarkers (7%). Some articles described biomarkers that applied to multiple categories.

Conclusion

Various categories of biomarkers including safety, predictive, pharmacodynamic/response, and diagnostic biomarkers are being investigated for potential use in pharmacovigilance. The most frequent potential uses of biomarkers in pharmacovigilance in the literature were the prediction of the severity of an ADR, mortality, response, safety, and toxicity. The safety biomarkers identified were used to evaluate patient safety during dose escalation, identify patients who may benefit from further biomarker testing during treatment, and monitor ADRs.

Ultrasound-induced destruction of heparin-loaded microbubbles attenuates L-arginine-induced acute pancreatitis

PURPOSE

Acute pancreatitis (AP) involves sudden inflammation caused by abnormal activation of pancreatic enzymes. The mechanisms underlying AP include oxidative stress, high levels of inflammatory mediators and inflammatory cell infiltration. Heparin, a key therapeutic drug, exerts anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and anticoagulative effects. However, safe and effective drug delivery remains an obstacle. This study is the first to investigate the therapeutic effects of heparin-loaded microbubbles (HPMB) combined with ultrasound (UHPMB) and the role of heparin in acoustic cavitation.

METHODS

The characteristics of the microbubbles, including particle size, concentration, release, stability, and development, were studied. Heparin concentration in the HPMB was measured, and heparin-induced anticoagulation was evaluated. Drug safety was explored using hemolysis and cell viability assessments. The ability of HPMB to alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation were investigated in vitro. L-arginine induces AP in vivo. UHPMB was used for AP treatment. Serum amylase levels were measured and pancreatic architecture and pathological features were evaluated to determine AP severity. In vivo efficacy was evaluated, and the underlying mechanism of heparin action during acoustic cavitation was explored.

RESULTS

HPMB was spherical and presented as an emulsion-like solution without aggregation. HPMB was visible and stable and effectively released the drug under ultrasound (US). HPMB and UHPMB led to lower AP severity than in the untreated group. US-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) enhanced the therapeutic effect by decreasing oxidative stress and inflammation in AP models without injuring vital organs. UHPMB regulated VEGF/Flt-1 and SOD-1 expression. HPMB can also mitigate oxidative stress and inflammation in H₂O₂-pretreated cells.

CONCLUSION

UHPMB exhibits a strong ability not only to selectively target pancreatic lesions and release heparin but also to provide efficient protection by inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation.

Localized and Generalized Skin Adverse Drug Reactions to Nadroparin Calcium Injection in 6 Cases of Pregnant Women

Background

Despite the increasing number of skin adverse drug reactions caused by nadroparin calcium have been reported, mostly, little is known regarding of their details of clinical characteristics, especially for generalized skin adverse drug reactions. We sought to evaluate localized and generalized characteristics of the skin adverse drug reaction to nadroparin calcium injection in pregnant women.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 6 pregnant women, who experienced localized and generalized skin adverse drug reactions during long-term nadroparin calcium injection. The patients' clinical and imaging information were retrieved from medical records. The skin prick test, patch test, and intradermal test were performed after they stopped lactation. Causality assessment of suspected adverse drug reactions was performed on these cases.

Results

The average total dose of nadroparin calcium injection in the 6 cases was 64.17 ± 22.66. Localized skin adverse drug reaction, manifested as erythema at the injection point, appeared after 47.5 ± 17.4 days of subcutaneous injection of nadroparin calcium. Generalized urticaria-like lesions, progressing from the injection site on the abdomen, appeared in 5.17 ± 3.60 days after the first appearance of localized reaction, while laboratory test results revealed essential peripheral blood eosinophilia. All rashes in the 6 cases subsided in 2–5 weeks after drug withdrawal. After delivery, 5 of 6 cases received complete skin tests to evaluate drug hypersensitivity. Results presented positive in the intradermal test within 7 days. Both the skin prick test and skin patch test were negative. Localized skin reactions and generalized urticaria-like adverse drug reactions were considered as definitely and probably caused by nadroparin calcium injection, respectively.

Conclusion

Subcutaneous injection of nadroparin calcium in pregnant women appears to be at risk of localized and generalized urticaria-like adverse drug reaction. It is important to follow up the pregnant woman during nadroparin calcium injection for evaluating adverse drug reactions. Timely detection of symptoms is pivotal in early diagnosis and treatment of adverse drug reactions.

The Anticoagulant and Nonanticoagulant Properties of Heparin

Heparins represent one of the most frequently used pharmacotherapeutics. Discovered around 1926, routine clinical anticoagulant use of heparin was initiated only after the publication of several seminal papers in the early 1970s by the group of Kakkar. It was shown that heparin prevents venous thromboembolism and mortality from pulmonary embolism in patients after surgery. With the subsequent development of low-molecular-weight heparins and synthetic heparin derivatives, a family of related drugs was created that continues to prove its clinical value in thromboprophylaxis and in prevention of clotting in extracorporeal devices. Fundamental and applied research has revealed a complex pharmacodynamic profile of heparins that goes beyond its anticoagulant use. Recognition of the complex multifaceted beneficial effects of heparin underscores its therapeutic potential in various clinical situations. In this review we focus on the anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant activities of heparin and, where possible, discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms that explain the diversity of heparin's biological actions.