Randomized controlled pilot trial with ion-exchange water softeners to prevent eczema (SOFTER trial)

Neonatal skin health and associated dermatological conditions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes recent developments in neonatal skincare management and situates these findings within the preexisting literature on neonatal dermatology.

RECENT FINDINGS

The studies included in this review expand research methods evaluating skincare management to different contexts across the world. Several studies explore the roles of emollient therapy, disinfection, and skin-to-skin contact on improving neonates' long-term health outcomes. Recent findings also assess the impact of neonatal interventions on atopic dermatitis risk later in life as well as epidemiological and microbiome variables that may predict this risk. Additionally, updates on various dermatological conditions unique to neonates are discussed in further detail.

SUMMARY

Neonatal skincare management differs in notable ways from that of other age groups. The presentation of dermatologic diseases as well as the rare conditions that affect neonates make their clinical management unique. The recent literature on neonatal dermatology can help inform clinicians regarding important considerations in treating their neonatal population.

How to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema) in 2024: Theory and Evidence

Atopic dermatitis (AD) or eczema is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by dry, itchy, and inflamed skin. We review emerging concepts and clinical evidence addressing the pathogenesis and prevention of AD. We examine several interventions ranging from skin barrier enhancement strategies to probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics; and conversely, from antimicrobial exposure to vitamin D and omega fatty acid supplementation; breastfeeding and hydrolyzed formula; and house dust mite avoidance and immunotherapy. We appraise the available evidence base within the context of the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We also contextualize our findings in relation to concepts relating AD and individual-patient allergic life trajectories versus a linear concept of the atopic march and provide insights into future knowledge gaps and clinical trial design considerations that must be addressed in forthcoming research. Finally, we provide implementation considerations to detect population-level differences in AD risk. Major international efforts are required to provide definitive evidence regarding what works and what does not for preventing AD.

Emollient application from birth to prevent eczema in high-risk children: the BEEP RCT

Background

Atopic eczema is a common childhood skin problem linked with asthma, food allergy and allergic rhinitis that impairs quality of life.

Objectives

To determine whether advising parents to apply daily emollients in the first year can prevent eczema and/or other atopic diseases in high-risk children.

Design

A United Kingdom, multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled prevention trial with follow-up to 5 years.

Setting

Twelve secondary and four primary care centres.

Participants

Healthy infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema, screened and consented during the third trimester or post delivery.

Interventions

Infants were randomised (1 : 1) within 21 days of birth to apply emollient (Doublebase Gel®; Dermal Laboratories Ltd, Hitchin, UK or Diprobase Cream®) daily to the whole body (excluding scalp) for the first year, plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). Families were not blinded to allocation.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome was eczema diagnosis in the last year at age 2 years, as defined by the UK Working Party refinement of the Hanifin and Rajka diagnostic criteria, assessed by research nurses blinded to allocation. Secondary outcomes up to age 2 years included other eczema definitions, time to onset and severity of eczema, allergic rhinitis, wheezing, allergic sensitisation, food allergy, safety (skin infections and slippages) and cost-effectiveness.

Results

One thousand three hundred and ninety-four newborns were randomised between November 2014 and November 2016; 693 emollient and 701 control. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466/532), 82% (427/519) and 74% (375/506) at 3, 6 and 12 months. At 2 years, eczema was present in 139/598 (23%) in the emollient group and 150/612 (25%) in controls (adjusted relative risk 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.16; p = 0.61 and adjusted risk difference -1.2%, 95% confidence interval -5.9% to 3.6%). Other eczema definitions supported the primary analysis. Food allergy (milk, egg, peanut) was present in 41/547 (7.5%) in the emollient group versus 29/568 (5.1%) in controls (adjusted relative risk 1.47, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 2.33). Mean number of skin infections per child in the first year was 0.23 (standard deviation 0.68) in the emollient group versus 0.15 (standard deviation 0.46) in controls; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.09. The adjusted incremental cost per percentage decrease in risk of eczema at 2 years was £5337 (£7281 unadjusted). No difference between the groups in eczema or other atopic diseases was observed during follow-up to age 5 years via parental questionnaires.

Limitations

Two emollient types were used which could have had different effects. The median time for starting emollients was 11 days after birth. Some contamination occurred in the control group (< 20%). Participating families were unblinded and reported on some outcomes.

Conclusions

We found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children. Emollient use was associated with a higher risk of skin infections and a possible increase in food allergy. Emollient use is unlikely to be considered cost-effective in this context.

Future research

To pool similar studies in an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN21528841.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/67/12) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 29. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Environmental Interventions for Preventing Atopic Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we detail the exposome (consisting of environmental factors such as diet, microbial colonization, allergens, pollutants, and stressors), mechanistic and clinical research supporting its influence on atopic disease, and potentiation from climate change. We highlight contemporary environmental interventions and available evidence substantiating their roles in atopic disease prevention, from observational cohorts to randomized controlled trials, when available.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early introduction to allergenic foods is an effective primary prevention strategy to reduce food allergy. Diverse dietary intake also appears to be a promising strategy for allergic disease prevention, but additional study is necessary. Air pollution and tobacco smoke are highly associated with allergic disease, among other medical comorbidities, paving the way for campaigns and legislation to reduce these exposures. There is no clear evidence that oral vitamin D supplementation, prebiotic or probiotic supplementation, daily emollient application, and antiviral prophylaxis are effective in preventing atopic disease, but these interventions require further study. While some environmental interventions have a well-defined role in the prevention of atopic disease, additional study of many remaining interventions is necessary to enhance our understanding of their role in disease prevention. Alignment of research findings from randomized controlled trials with public policy is essential to develop meaningful public health outcomes and prevent allergic disease on the population level.

Filaggrin and beyond: New insights into the skin barrier in atopic dermatitis and allergic diseases, from genetics to therapeutic perspectives

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease worldwide, affecting 20% of children and 5% of adults. One critical component in the pathophysiology of AD is the epidermal skin barrier, with its outermost layer, the stratum corneum (SC), conferring biochemical properties that enable resilience against environmental threats and maintain homeostasis. The skin barrier may be conceptualized as a key facilitator of complex interactions between genetics, host immunity, the cutaneous microbiome, and environmental exposures. The key genetic risk factor for AD development and persistence is a loss-of-function mutation in FLG, with recent advances in genomics focusing on rare variant discovery, establishment of pathogenic mechanisms, and exploration of the role of other epidermal differentiation complex gene variants in AD. Aberrant type 2 inflammatory responses down-regulate the transcription of key epidermal barrier genes, alter the composition of SC lipids, and induce further injury through a neurocutaneous feedback loop and the itch-scratch cycle. The dysbiotic epidermis exhibits reduced bacterial diversity and enhanced colonization with Staphylococcus and Malassezia species, which contribute to both direct barrier injury through the action of bacterial toxins and perpetuation of the inflammatory cascades. Enhanced understanding of each of the pathogenic mechanisms underpinning barrier disruption has led to the development of novel topical and systemic molecules, including interleukin (IL)-4Ra, IL-13, PDE4, and Janus-associated kinase inhibitors, whose clinical effectiveness exceeds conventional treatment modalities. In this narrative review, we aim to summarize the current understanding of the above-mentioned pathophysiological and therapeutic mechanisms, with a focus on the genetic, cellular, and molecular mechanisms underpinning AD development.

Skin TARC/CCL17 increase precedes the development of childhood atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether skin biomarkers collected in infancy can predict the onset of atopic dermatitis (AD) and be used in future prevention trials to identify children at risk.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine whether skin biomarkers can predict AD during the first 2 years of life.

METHODS

This study enrolled 300 term and 150 preterm children at birth and followed for AD until the age of 2 years. Skin tape strips were collected at 0 to 3 days and 2 months of age and analyzed for selected immune and barrier biomarkers. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Cox regression was calculated for the risk of AD.

RESULTS

The 2-year prevalence of AD was 34.6% (99 of 286) and 21.2% (25 of 118) among term and preterm children, respectively. Skin biomarkers collected at birth did not predict AD. Elevated thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine/C-C motif chemokine ligand 17 -levels collected at 2 months of age increased the overall risk of AD (HR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.36-3.26; P = .0008) and moderate-to-severe AD (HR: 4.97; 95% CI: 2.09-11.80; P = .0003). IL-8 and IL-18 predicted moderate-to-severe AD. Low filaggrin degradation product levels increased the risk of AD (HR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.32-3.15; P = .001). Elevated biomarker levels at 2 months predicted AD at other skin sites and many months after collection.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that noninvasively collected skin biomarkers of barrier and immune pathways can precede the onset of AD.

Effects of ultra-pure soft water on the hands of nurses in a neonatal intensive care unit: A randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

Healthcare workers (HCWs) wash their hands with tap water (TW) and soap. However, hard TW causes dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to compare the effects of ultra-pure soft water (UPSW) with those of TW on the hands of HWCs.

METHODS

The present study was a prospective randomized trial with a crossover design. All the nurses in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at the study centre were divided into Sequence 1 (UPSW to TW) or 2 (TW to UPSW) and washed their hands with TW or UPSW in alternating 4-week periods with a 4-week washout period. Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) were evaluated. Skin condition was self-assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one and 22 nurses were assigned to Sequence 1 and Sequence 2, respectively. USPW increased SCH to a significantly greater degree than TW (mean: 26.3 μS ± 12.3 SD; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-51.54; p = 0.041) although it did not affect TEWL. UPSW use significantly improved the subjects' skin condition, as reflected in an overall increase in the assessment scores.

CONCLUSIONS

UPSW improved SCH and the condition of hand skin. Prolonged USPW use may increase nurses' comfort during work and hand hygiene compliance.

Preventing allergies through the skin

OBJECTIVE

To inform readers of the current and forthcoming skin barrier interventions that have clinically relevant implications in the prevention of allergic sensitization and atopic diseases.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed journal articles indexed on PubMed and clinical trials referenced on clinicaltrials.gov were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Literature searches from PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were performed using combinations of the following search terms: prevention, allergy, atopy, skin, cutaneous, microbiome, microbiota, Staphylococcus aureus, atopic dermatitis, eczema, food allergy, and asthma.

RESULTS

The skin barrier represents an entry point for allergic sensitization and T_H2-mediated allergic disorders. Results from clinical trials designed to improve microbiome complexity and reduce S aureus colonization, provide skin barrier enhancement, and deliver epicutaneous immunotherapy are summarized and discussed in the context of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of allergic disease.

CONCLUSION

The skin barrier is a promising target for prevention of allergic disease, though clinical trial results thus far have been mixed, at best.