Male genital lichen sclerosus and filaggrin

Balanopreputial sac and urine microbiota in patients with male genital lichen sclerosus

BACKGROUND

Male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLSc) is a chronic inflammatory scarring dermatosis associated with penile carcinoma. The prepuce is pivotal in its etiology. Other proposed etiological factors are the subject of dispute and include occluded urinary exposure, autoimmunity, immunodysregulation, and infectious agents.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the bacterial microbiota of the balanopreputial sac and urine are associated with MGLSc.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty uncircumcised patients with MGLSc and 20 healthy uncircumcised males were enrolled in a prospective case-control study. Balanopreputial swabs and urine specimens were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

RESULTS

Microbiota analysis indicated differences between the groups. In the balanopreputial sac, the median relative abundance of Finegoldia spp. was lower (9% [range 0-60%]) in MGLSc patients than in controls (28% [range 0-62%]). Conversely, the median relative abundance of Fusobacterium spp. was higher in MGLSc patients (4% [range 0-41%]) than in controls (0% [range 0-28%]). In the urine, the median relative abundance of Finegoldia spp. was comparable between groups, whereas that of Fusobacterium spp. was higher in MGLSc patients (0% [range 0-18%] vs. 0% [range 0-5%]). There was a strong association between the microbiota composition of the balanopreputial sac and urine in MGLSc.

CONCLUSION

Dysbiosis could be involved in the etiopathogenesis of MGLSc. Further studies are required to confirm the association suggested herein and to determine its nature.

Platelet-rich plasma for male genital lichen sclerosus resistant to conventional therapy: First prospective study

Ultrapotent topical corticosteroids and circumcision are usually effective for male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLSc); however, refractory cases are often referred to our Male Genital Dermatology Unit. Treatment with autologous platelet-rich plasma (TPRP) has recently been advocated as a safe and effective treatment option, but there have been no prospective studies in men to date. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of TPRP for MGLSc resistant to conventional therapy. A prospective, open-label, single-arm, therapeutic study was carried out in this study. Inclusion criteria: resistant to conventional therapy for at least 6 months. Procedure: infiltration of 0.1 mL/cm² PRP every 8 weeks. Monthly data recording: visual appearance with photographs and external scoring by an expert using Investigator's Global Assessment Scale (IGA scale 0-5), symptoms (scale 0-5), quality of life (QoL; Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), and complications. No. of patients included was n = 5. No. of patients excluded during treatment was n = 1. Mean initial IGA: 3.6. Mean initial DLQI: 6. TPRP n = 34 (range: 2-9; average: 6.8 per patient). Mean IGA at 18 months: 3.25. Mean DLQI at 18 months: 1.25. All patients reported being completely asymptomatic at 10 months. No. of patients with complications is n = 1 (balanitis). TPRP seems to be safe and effective, regarding symptom control and improvement in QoL; however, visual changes were minimal.

Recent advances in understanding and managing Lichen Sclerosus

Lichen sclerosus (LS), or balanitis xerotica obliterans as it was previously known, is a chronic inflammatory lymphocyte-mediated scarring dermatosis that often affects the preputial skin and glans, leading to phimosis and urethral strictures if left untreated. We present a narrative review of the literature assessing its aetiology and pathogenesis and discuss its links to penile cancer and its medical and surgical management. Possible hypotheses for the development of LS include chronic exposure to trapped urine, leading to changes in the epithelial structure. This is supported by the fact that circumcision is often curative in the early stages of the disease. Although circumcision can be curative, the use of topical steroids is typically the first-line treatment and may preserve the foreskin and forgo the need for circumcision altogether. Patients should be made aware of a possible association with penile cancer. Although the majority of cases can be treated by medical therapy and circumcision, a significant number of patients may also require penile reconstructive procedures.