Acute arthritis and arthralgia as an adverse drug reaction to dupilumab

Biologics and small molecules treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients with comorbid conditions and special populations: an Italian perspective

This comprehensive review offers a detailed look at atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment in Italy, focusing primarily on the use of biologics and small molecules. In response to advancing knowledge of AD's causes and treatments, there's a global need for updated guidelines to provide physicians with a more comprehensive clinical perspective, facilitating personalized treatment strategies. Dupilumab, a groundbreaking biologic, gained approval as a significant milestone. Clinical trials demonstrated its ability to significantly reduce AD severity scores, with an impressive 37% of patients achieving clear or nearly clear skin within just 16 weeks of treatment. Real-world studies further support its efficacy across various age groups, including the elderly, with a safety profile akin to that of younger adults. Tralokinumab, a more recent approval, shows promise in clinical trials, particularly among younger populations. However, its real-world application, especially in older individuals, lacks comprehensive data. Janus Kinases inhibitors like Upadacitinib, Baricitinib, and Abrocitinib hold substantial potential for AD treatment. Nevertheless, data remains limited for patients over 75, with older adults perceived to carry a higher risk profile. Integrated safety analyses revealed individuals aged 60 and above experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events and malignancies, underscoring the need for cautious consideration. While these therapies offer promise, especially among younger patients, further research is essential to determine their safety and efficacy in various populations, including pediatric, geriatric, and those with comorbidities. Biologics and small molecules are improving AD treatment, as shown in this review.

[Adverse events in biologics for severe asthma]

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a pathology that remains severe and is inadequately controlled in 4% of patients. Identification of multiple pathophysiological mechanisms has led to the development of biomedicines, of which there are currently five available in France, with a safety profile that appears favorable but remains uncertain due to a lack of real-life experience with these new molecules.

STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

Although relatively benign, the adverse effects of biologics are diverse. Headache, joint pain, skin reactions at the injection site, fever and asthenia are commonly observed during the different treatments. Ophthalmological complications seem restricted to dupilumab, with numerous cases of keratitis and conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis. Several respiratory complications have also been observed, essentially consisting in pharyngitis and other upper respiratory infections. Hypereosinophilia may occur, mainly with dupilumab, requiring investigation of systemic repercussions or vasculitis. Allergic reactions are uncommon but require careful monitoring during initial injections.

CONCLUSION

Biologics for severe asthma are recent drugs with a favorable safety profile, but with little real-life experience, justifying increased vigilance by prescribing physicians.

Dupilumab-associated inflammatory arthritis: a literature review

Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that acts by inhibiting the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor subunit α, and hence the IL-4 and IL-13 signalling pathway. Dupilumab treatment has been linked to the onset of T helper 17-driven inflammatory diseases, including cases of seronegative arthritis and enthesitis. To date, dupilumab-associated inflammatory arthritis (DAIA) represents a relatively unknown adverse event, initially reported in single cases or case series reports. Indeed, the onset of DAIA may not be promptly recognized, and is probably underestimated. Here we have reviewed the available English literature regarding arthritis and enthesitis onset during dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis, aiming to improve rapid recognition and thus prompt treatment of these diseases.

A Review of Dupilumab-Induced Adverse Events to Dermatologists and the Potential Pathogenesis in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 antibody, is approved for use in many type 2 inflammatory diseases, including atopic dermatitis. It is generally well tolerated with no need of routine laboratory monitoring. However, several adverse events have been reported during real-world practice and in pivotal trials. We conducted a systematic literature research of the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases to identify articles recording the clinical manifestation and potential pathogenesis of these adverse events with interests (AEIs) to dermatologists. In total, 547 cases from 134 studies have developed 39 AEIs 1 day to 2.5 years after dupilumab treatment. The most common AEIs are facial and neck dermatitis (299 cases), psoriasis (70 cases), arthralgia (56 cases), alopecia (21 cases), cutaneous T cell lymphoma (19 cases), severe ocular diseases (19 cases), and drug eruption (6 cases). Most of the AEIs recorded in this review resolved or improved after dupilumab discontinuation or the addition of another treatment, whereas 3 of the cases died of severe AEI. The potential pathogenesis included T help type 1 (Th1)/T help type 2 (Th2) imbalance, Th2/T help type 17 (Th17) imbalance, immune reconstitution, hypersensitivity reaction, transient hypereosinophilia related, and Th1 suppression. Clinicians should be alert of these AEIs for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Dupilumab-Associated Arthritis: A Dermatology-Rheumatology Perspective

Dupilumab is an interleukin (IL)-4/13 inhibitor approved by the US FDA for multiple atopic indications. It is well-known to have favorable efficacy and safety profiles; however, emerging reports of dupilumab-associated arthritis suggest an underrecognized potential adverse effect. In this article, we summarize the literature to date to better characterize this clinical phenomenon. Arthritic symptoms were most commonly peripheral, generalized, and symmetric. Onset was generally within 4 months following initiation of dupilumab, and most patients resolved fully after a matter of weeks following discontinuation. Mechanistic insights suggest that suppression of IL-4 may lead to increased activity of IL-17, a prominent cytokine in inflammatory arthritis. We propose a treatment algorithm that stratifies patients by severity, recommending that patients with more mild disease continue dupilumab and treat through symptoms, while patients with more severe disease discontinue dupilumab and consider switching to another class (e.g., Janus kinase inhibitors). Lastly, we discuss important ongoing questions that should be addressed in future studies.

Two-year results of tapered dupilumab for CRSwNP demonstrates enduring efficacy established in the first 6 months

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is an anti-T2-inflammatory biological registered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), indicated by integrated CRS-care pathways when optimal medico-surgical treatment yields insufficient CRS control. This study aims to evaluate long-term results with focus on established therapeutic efficacy while tapering dupilumab.

METHODS

Real-life, prospective observational cohort study in single tertiary referral center with add-on dupilumab as primary biological treatment in adult (≥18 years) biological-naïve CRSwNP patients per the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS)2020-indication with a 2-year follow-up. Tapering (increasing interdose interval) applied every 24 weeks, conditional to sufficient treatment response and CRS control.

RESULTS

Mean scores (s.d.) of all co-primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline ( 228) to the 48 ( 214) and 96-weeks ( 99) timepoints: Nasal Polyp Score (0-8) improved from 5,3 (1,9) to 1,4 (1,8) and 1,3 (1,7); SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 (0-110) improved from 53,6 (19,6) to 20,2 (15,4) and 21,2 (15,6); Sniffin'Sticks-12 identification test (0-12; 0-6 anosmia, 7-10 hyposmia, 11-12 normosmia) improved from 3,7 (2,4) to 7,7 (2,9) and 7,3 (3,04); Asthma Control Test (5-25; >19 indicating well-controlled asthma) improved from 18,5 (4,8) to 21,8 (3,8) and 21,4 (3,9). Tapering was feasible in 79,5% of the patients at the 24-weeks timepoint, and in 93,7% and 95,8% at the 48- and 96-weeks timepoints, respectively. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant alterations of individual co-primary outcome mean-scores from 24 weeks onward.

CONCLUSION

This first long-term real-life prospective observational cohort study shows high therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab for severe CRswNP in the first 2 years. Therapeutic efficacy is principally established within 24 weeks and endures while tapering dupilumab conditional to treatment response and CRS control.

Dual Interleukin-4/Interleukin-13 Blocker-induced Arthralgia Treated Successfully with Upadacitinib in a Patient with Atopic Dermatitis

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Risks and safety of biologics: A practical guide for allergists

Biologic agents are a rapidly expanding class of medications, and several options are now available for the management of allergic and immunologic disorders. The risks of biologic therapy need to be understood in order to adequately counsel patients and appropriately monitor for potential adverse events. We sought to provide a comprehensive review of the risks and adverse effects reported for the current FDA-approved biologics used in management of allergic and immunologic disorders, including omalizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, tezepelumab and tralokinumab. Our review focuses on the risk of hypersensitivity reactions, pregnancy-specific considerations, risk of infection and risk of malignancy. We also highlight drug-specific adverse events and unique safety issues identified in case reports.

Dupilumab-induced skin-associated side effects in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a typical type-2 inflammation involving T-helper type-2 cells and impairing quality of life due to nasal obstruction, discharge and reduced sense of smell. Recently, the anti-IL4Rα antibody dupilumab was approved for CRSwNP. While dermatologic side effects in patients treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis are frequently observed, there is limited knowledge about these effects in patients with CRSwNP. We aimed to investigate frequency and characteristics of dermatologic side effects following initiation of dupilumab treatment in a cohort of Austrian CRSwNP patients. Therefore, CRSwNP patients presenting at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at the Vienna General Hospital were retrospectively evaluated for newly developed skin eruptions while under dupilumab treatment. Incidence was calculated and details on clinical symptoms were collected. One hundred and ninety-two CRSwNP patients receiving dupilumab treatment were included, comprising a cumulative follow-up of 89.65 years (median: 5.5, IQR: 5.9). We observed dermatologic side effects in four patients starting at a median time of 15.5 (range 4-23) weeks after dupilumab initiation corresponding to an incidence-rate of 4.46 (95%-confidence interval 1.39-11.23) events per 100 patient-years follow-up. The majority (75%, 3/4) of affected patients developed psoriasis-like dermatitis, whereas one individual experienced rosacea-like folliculitis and alopecia areata. While dupilumab dosing was reduced in 3/4 CRSwNP patients, one patient completely stopped dupilumab therapy. Our study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of both frequency and characteristics of dermatologic side effects caused by dupilumab in CRSwNP patients. All affected patients developed Th1-inflammatory associated skin disorders - previously observed only in individuals with prior affections of the skin (i.e. atopic dermatitis). Thus, individuals receiving dupilumab for CRSwNP may develop novel symptoms that require interdisciplinary management. Future studies on dupilumab in a real-world setting will be required to further explore its spectrum of side effects.

Dupilumab-Associated Adverse Events During Treatment of Allergic Diseases

Among the new biological therapies for atopic diseases, dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against IL-4Rα, the common chain of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 receptors. Dupilumab showed clinical improvements in patients with atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis and is currently under development for other indications. While dupilumab is considered to be well tolerated, a number of recent publications have reported various adverse events. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about these adverse events, which may help clinicians to improve the follow-up of patients on dupilumab. Injection-site reactions are the most common reported adverse event. However, dupilumab has also been shown to cause ophthalmic complications (e.g., dry eyes, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, and ocular pruritus), head and neck dermatitis, onset of psoriatic lesions, progression of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma exacerbation, alopecia areata, hypereosinophilia, and arthritis. Most are managed during dupilumab treatment continuation, but some (e.g., severe conjunctivitis) may result in a discontinuation of treatment. Their molecular origin is unclear and requires further investigations. Among other hypothesis, it has been suggested that T helper (Th)2-mediated pathway inhibition may worsen Th1/Th17-dependent immune responses. An ophthalmological examination for the presence of potential predictive indicators of ophthalmic adverse events is recommended before initiation of dupilumab therapy.

Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis After Switching from Dupilumab (JADE EXTEND)

BACKGROUND

Abrocitinib efficacy by prior dupilumab response status in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not previously been assessed in phase 3 studies.

OBJECTIVE

Examine efficacy and safety of abrocitinib among patients who received prior dupilumab.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe AD received abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg once-daily in JADE EXTEND (phase 3 extension) after dupilumab in double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 JADE COMPARE.

RESULTS

Among prior dupilumab responders, ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) was achieved in 93.5% and 90.2% of patients who received 12 weeks of abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively; ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) was achieved in 89.7% and 81.6%, respectively. Among prior dupilumab nonresponders, EASI-75 was achieved with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg in 80.0% and 67.7% and PP-NRS4 in 77.3% and 37.8%, respectively. Most common adverse events among abrocitinib-treated patients were nasopharyngitis, nausea, acne, and headache. Conjunctivitis occurred less frequently with abrocitinib in comparison to prior dupilumab.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term, 12-week analysis; no placebo arm.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy and safety profile of abrocitinib in JADE EXTEND supports the role of abrocitinib as a treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of prior dupilumab response status.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and a clinical diagnosis of NSAID-ERD: Results from two randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trials

Background

About one‐tenth of patients with difficult‐to‐treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have comorbid non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID‐ERD). Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared interleukin (IL)‐4/IL‐13 receptor component, is an approved add‐on treatment in severe CRSwNP. This post hoc analysis evaluated dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with CRSwNP with/without NSAID‐ERD.

Methods

Data were pooled from the phase 3 SINUS‐24 and SINUS‐52 studies in adults with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP who received dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. CRSwNP, nasal airflow, lung function, and asthma control outcomes at Week 24 were evaluated, and treatment–subgroup interactions were assessed for patients with and without NSAID‐ERD.

Results

Of 724 patients, 204 (28.2%) had a diagnosis of NSAID‐ERD. At Week 24, least squares mean treatment differences demonstrated significant improvements in nasal polyp score, nasal congestion (NC), Lund–Mackay computed tomography, 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22), Total Symptom Score (TSS), rhinosinusitis severity visual analog scale, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), six‐item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and improvement in smell with dupilumab versus placebo (all p < .0001) in patients with NSAID‐ERD. Treatment comparisons demonstrated significantly greater improvements with dupilumab in patients with versus without NSAID‐ERD for NC (p = .0044), SNOT‐22 (p = .0313), TSS (p = .0425), and PNIF (p = .0123).

Conclusions

In patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, dupilumab significantly improved objective measures and patient‐reported symptoms to a greater extent in the presence of comorbid NSAID‐ERD than without. Dupilumab was well tolerated in patients with/without NSAID‐ERD.

Management of inadequate response and adverse effects to dupilumab in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, skin pain, and sleep disturbances. Currently, dupilumab is the only systemic therapy and biologic medication approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for moderate-to-severe AD in adults and children. There is a sparsity of literature available on determining treatment failure with dupilumab and the next steps health care providers can take to treat AD. Individual goals and quality of life and not just body surface area should be considered when defining treatment failure. Possible confounding dermatoses also should be ruled out. Early identification of dupilumab-induced adverse events is important. For most patients, dupilumab can be continued while treatment for the adverse event is initiated. Adjusting the frequency of dupilumab dosing also may be considered in some circumstances. Adjuvant therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, or phototherapy can be added but the safety and efficacy of these combination treatments are not known at this time.

A Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with pruritus, characterized by recurrent eczema with exacerbations and remissions. AD impairs patients’ QOL and places a heavy burden on patients. Recently, dupilumab, an anti–IL-4Rα antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are refractory to topical agents and/or conventional systemic therapy. Clinical trials of dupilumab for AD demonstrated high efficacy and tolerable safety profiles. Furthermore, real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD is accumulating. Most of these data show favorable effectiveness and safety profile; however, they also clarified issues, including conjunctivitis and facial redness. There are still a certain number of patients with significant failure. In this article, we review real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD, identify concerns specific to dupilumab, and discuss unmet needs and issues to be addressed in the future.

An acute spondyloarthritis during successful treatment with dupilumab for severe atopic dermatitis

we report the case of a 44-year-old male affected by life-long, severe and recalcitrant form of atopic dermatitis (AD), with various atopic comorbidities. Multiple systemic therapies had been performed before our first observation, all interrupted for ineffectiveness. On May 2018, the patient recorded an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) of 52, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 8, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 20. Blood exams showed a significant increased of total immunoglobulin E (IgE) plasma levels (5321 kUa/L; 0,00-100,00 kUa/L reference range).

Regulation of entheseal IL-23 expression by IL-4 and IL-13 as an explanation for arthropathy development under dupilumab therapy

OBJECTIVES

Dupilumab blocks the IL-4 receptor (IL-4R) and thus signalling of the 'Th2' cytokines IL-4 and IL-13. It has a license to treat atopic eczema and was recently linked to emergent enthesitis and psoriasis. We investigated the cellular and functional basis for how IL-4/IL-13 regulates the IL-23-IL-17 axis in entheseal stromal, myeloid and lymphocyte cells.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was performed on healthy enthesis samples from patients undergoing elective spinal surgery to investigate entheseal tissue IL-4R expression and cytokine expression by intracellular flow cytometry for IL-4 and IL-13. Digested human enthesis samples were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for IL-23 induction, either alone or with IL-4 or IL-13. Enthesis fibroblasts were stimulated with TNF and IL-17 with and without IL-4 or IL-13 to assess the effect on CCL20 secretion. Synovial fluid samples from PsA patients were also analysed by ELISA for levels of IL-4 and IL-13.

RESULTS

The IL-4/IL-13 receptor was present in both the peri-entheseal bone and enthesis soft tissue, and entheseal-derived T cells produced basal levels of IL-4, but not IL-13. Both IL-4 and IL-13 attenuated LPS-induced entheseal IL-23 production. IL-4 also downregulated secretion of TNF/IL-17A-induced CCL20 from entheseal fibroblasts. Both IL-13 and IL-4 were also detectable in the synovial fluid of PsA patients. We also noted a seronegative inflammatory oligoarthritis whilst under dupilumab therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a previously unknown protective role for IL-4/IL-13 in entheseal induction of the IL-23-IL-17 axis. These findings point towards a novel explanation for IL-13 pathway single nucleotide polymorphisms in PsA and also a molecular explanation for why anti-IL-4/IL-13 therapy may induce musculoskeletal entheseal pathology as recently reported.

Safety of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: expert opinion

Introduction: Dupilumab, the first biologic drug to be approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adolescents and adults, has shown efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Data on long-term safety is limited but crucial for pharmacovigilance. Therefore, we performed this review to evaluate available real-world data on the long-term safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis.Areas covered: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), observational studies, case series, and case reports regarding the use of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Adverse events were summarized and critically evaluated.Expert opinion: Atopic dermatitis patients receiving dupilumab reported ocular surface disease more often than patients receiving placebo. Real-world data show previously unreported adverse events (blood eosinophilia, rosacea-like skin lesions, weight gain), but their mechanistic association to dupilumab treatment still requires clarification. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas occurring under the therapy with dupilumab might be unrelated to the drug use itself but long-term follow-up data of large patient cohorts is necessary to rule out such possibility. Real-world data show that dupilumab is well tolerated in atopic dermatitis; however, ocular adverse events are not rare. Registries are needed to monitor future adverse events.

Dupilumab shows long-term effectiveness in a large cohort of treatment-refractory atopic dermatitis patients in daily practice: 52-Week results from the Dutch BioDay registry

BACKGROUND

Real-life data on long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis patients are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To study 52-week effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a prospective multicenter cohort of adult patients with treatment-refractory atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Patients treated with dupilumab and participating in the Dutch BioDay registry were included. Clinical effectiveness and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten atopic dermatitis patients were included. Mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index score after 16 weeks was -70.0% (standard deviation 33.2%) and further decreased to -76.6% (standard deviation 30.6%) by week 52. A greater than or equal to 75% improvement in the score was achieved by 59.9% of individuals by week 16 and by 70.3% by week 52. The most reported adverse effect was conjunctivitis (34%). Limited patients (17; 8.1%) discontinued dupilumab treatment.

LIMITATIONS

Because of the lack of a control group and observational design, factors of bias may have been induced.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with dupilumab resulted in a rapid improvement in clinical outcome measures, and effectiveness further improved during the 52-week follow-up period.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of treatment with dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: Results of the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry

BACKGROUND

Evidence on long-term dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis in daily practice is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patient characteristics, treatment aspects, effectiveness, and safety of up to 84 weeks of dupilumab treatment.

METHODS

An observational prospective cohort study was conducted of patients with atopic dermatitis starting dupilumab in routine clinical care.

RESULTS

Of the 221 included patients, 103 used systemic therapy at baseline. At 84 weeks, we found a change of -15.2 (SE, 1.7) for the Eczema Area and Severity Index, -16.9 (SE, 1.4) for the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, and -17.2 (SE, 1.6) for the Dermatology Life Quality Index. We found a trend for improvement over time for the Investigator Global Assessment and Numerical Rating Scale for pruritus. Severe (n = 79) including serious (n = 11) adverse events were observed in 69 patients. Eye complaints were most frequently reported (n = 46). Twenty-one patients adjusted the regular dosing schedule, and 14 patients discontinued treatment, mainly due to ineffectiveness (n = 7).

LIMITATIONS

Only adverse events of severe and serious nature were registered for feasibility reasons.

CONCLUSION

Daily practice dupilumab treatment of up to 84 weeks is generally well-tolerated, apart from the reporting of eye complaints. It can be considered a long-term effective treatment for atopic dermatitis in combination with topical and initial concomitant systemic treatment, showing a sustained improvement of signs, symptoms, and quality of life.