Falsely low immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 in routine analysis: how not to miss IgG4 disease

The Clinical Approach on Receipt of an Unexpected Laboratory Test Result

Approximately 70% of all healthcare decisions affecting diagnosis and treatment involve the use of tests performed within pathology laboratories. The utilisation of diagnostic laboratory services continues to increase, with growth both in volume of tests requested, as well as in the breadth of test repertoire. Every year in the United Kingdom, approximately 1 billion tests are run in hospital laboratories, equivalent to 14 tests per person. Fifty million tests are requested in primary care. Accordingly, there is an inevitable increase in the number of unexpected laboratory results which clinicians review. This is an important, and potentially time-consuming, issue, which we considered to merit a more detailed discussion. Unexpected laboratory results may be critical or non-critical in nature. They may be absolutely genuine, reflecting a clinical change in the patient’s condition, a differential diagnosis not previously considered, or an additional test specifically added by the laboratory. However, such results may also occur due to a variety of different circumstances, including much more rarely laboratory error. As there is little published evidence or guidance available, herein we discuss aspects of the clinical approach for physicians after receiving an unexpected laboratory test result.

Differential diagnosis between pancreatic involvement in IgG4-related disease and pancreatic cancer

IgG4-related disease is a systemic disorder characterised by diffuse or tumoural inflammatory lesions. It can mimic pancreatic cancer, leading to errors in diagnosis and treatment increasing rates of morbidity and mortality in patients. The aim of this review is to take a differential diagnostic approach to these two entities using epidemiology, clinical and laboratory findings, imaging and histopathology.

Clinical utility of serum IgG4 measurement

This article will review the structure and function of IgG4, methods of measuring serum IgG4 concentrations, clinical conditions associated with increased and decreased serum IgG4, and the test characteristics of serum IgG4 in the diagnosis and management of Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD). The four subclasses of IgG were discovered in 1964 through experiments on monoclonal IgG in patients with myeloma. Since 2001, interest in measuring serum IgG subclasses has increased dramatically due to the emergence of IgG4-RD, a multisystem fibroinflammatory condition wherein polyclonal serum IgG4 concentration is increased in approximately 70% of cases. Increased serum IgG4 typically manifests as a restriction in the anodal gamma region on serum protein electrophoresis, often with beta-gamma bridging, and can be mistaken as a monoclonal protein or polyclonal increase in IgA. Limitations of current clinical methods used in quantitation of serum IgG4 concentrations will be discussed, including the common immunonephelometric assays and LC-MS/MS based assays. Polyclonal IgG4 elevation is not specific for IgG4-RD, and may also occur in conditions such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman disease (MCD). Race and gender differences also affect interpretation of serum IgG4 concentrations, for instance Asians have a higher serum IgG4 concentration than Whites and males have a higher concentration than females.

MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Hypophysitis: diagnosis and treatment

Hypophysitis is a rare condition characterised by inflammation of the pituitary gland, usually resulting in hypopituitarism and pituitary enlargement. Pituitary inflammation can occur as a primary hypophysitis (most commonly lymphocytic, granulomatous or xanthomatous disease) or as secondary hypophysitis (as a result of systemic diseases, immunotherapy or alternative sella-based pathologies). Hypophysitis can be classified using anatomical, histopathological and aetiological criteria. Non-invasive diagnosis of hypophysitis remains elusive, and the use of currently available serum anti-pituitary antibodies are limited by low sensitivity and specificity. Newer serum markers such as anti-rabphilin 3A are yet to show consistent diagnostic value and are not yet commercially available. Traditionally considered a very rare condition, the recent recognition of IgG4-related disease and hypophysitis as a consequence of use of immune modulatory therapy has resulted in increased understanding of the pathophysiology of hypophysitis. Modern imaging techniques, histological classification and immune profiling are improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of the patient with hypophysitis. The objective of this review is to bring readers up-to-date with current understanding of conditions presenting as hypophysitis, focussing on recent advances and areas for future development. We describe the presenting features, investigation and diagnostic approach of the patient with likely hypophysitis, including existing conventional techniques and those in the research/development arena. Hypophysitis usually results in acute and persistent pituitary hormone deficiency requiring long-term replacement. Management of hypophysitis includes control of the inflammatory pituitary mass using a variety of treatment strategies including surgery and medical therapy. Glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of medical treatment but other immunosuppressive agents (e.g. azathioprine, rituximab) show benefit in some cases, but there is a need for controlled studies to inform practice.

A Challenging Diagnosis of IgG4-Related Disease When Understanding Limitations of Laboratory Testing Was Pivotal

A 76-year-old man was incidentally found on a CT scan to have lymphadenopathy and bilateral kidney enlargement suggestive of infiltrative renal disease. He was largely asymptomatic but had bilateral salivary and lacrimal gland enlargement. A grossly elevated serum IgG (>70 g/L) with concomitant suppression of other immunoglobulins, a small IgG restriction, and a parotid biopsy revealing lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with slight kappa light chain excess all suggested a lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD). The diagnostic workup was further confounded by a normal serum IgG4 concentration. Moreover, bone marrow and renal biopsies did not reveal evidence of LPD. Discussion with the laboratory not only clarified that the markedly increased total IgG could not be accounted for by the small IgG restriction, but also identified a discrepancy in the IgG4 measurement. Repeat analysis of a follow-up sample revealed an elevated IgG4 of 5.94 (reference interval: 0.039–0.864) g/L, which prompted a repeat parotid biopsy that showed predominant IgG4+ lymphocytic infiltrates. Despite the deluding presentations, a final diagnosis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) was made based on elevated serum IgG4 concentrations and histopathological findings. This case highlights the importance of recognizing limitations of laboratory testing and the benefit of close communications among clinical subspecialties and the laboratory.

Diagnostic and treatment workup for IgG4-related disease

INTRODUCTION

IgG4-Related Disease is a newly recognized condition which is increasingly diagnosed by practitioners due to improvement in clinical awareness. Men and women have been found to be affected by this disease in various organs, more commonly with involvement of the salivary and lacrimal glands as well as pancreas and liver. Areas covered: The diagnosis and management of this condition remain challenging as biomarkers and therapies are being investigated. Hallmark features on histology are still the gold standard for confirmation of diagnosis, whereas serum IgG4 level has been shown to be neither necessary nor sufficient for the diagnosis. Glucocorticoids remain the most effective initial management for this condition while there are limited clinical trials on the effectiveness of maintenance therapy. Expert commentary: This review serves as an update on approaches for diagnosis and management of IgG4-RD. Most of the known data in this field comes from retrospective cohort studies and expert consensus guidelines but new ongoing prospective studies, clinical trials and better understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition are promising.