Intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients who were surgically ablated do not need adjuvant radioiodine therapy: long-term outcome study

Survival benefit of postoperative radioiodine therapy among patients with intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines proposed the use of the ATA Risk Stratification System and American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis (AJCC/TNM) Staging System for postoperative radioiodine decision-making. However, the management of patients with intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is not well defined. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) among various subgroups of patients with intermediate-risk DTC after surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015). The DTC patients with intermediate risk of recurrence were divided into two groups (treated or not treated with radioactive iodine (RAI)). As the treatment was not randomly assigned, stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to reduce selection bias. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to analyze overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis after sIPTW found a significant difference in OS and CSS between no RAIT and RAIT (log-rank test, P < 0.0001; P = 0.0019, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier curves of CSS in age cutoff of 55 years showed a significant association between no RAIT and RAIT (log-rank test, P = 0.0045). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression showed RAIT was associated with a reduced risk of mortality compared with no RAIT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [95% CI 0.44-0.80]). Age (≥ 55) years showed a worse CSS regardless of whether or not a patient was treated or not treated with RAI ([HR] 8.91, 95% confidence interval [95% CI 6.19-12.84]).

CONCLUSIONS

RAIT improves OS and CSS in patients with intermediate-risk DTC after surgery. 55 years is a more appropriate prognostic age cutoff for the relevant classification systems and is a crucial consideration in RAI decision-making. Therefore, we need individualized treatment plans.

Current practice in intermediate risk differentiated thyroid cancer - a review

Although the overall prognosis for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is excellent, a subset of patients will experience disease recurrence or may not respond to standard treatments. In recent years, DTC management has become more personalized in order to enhance treatment efficacy and avoid unnecessary interventions.In this context, major guidelines recommend post-surgery staging to assess the risk of disease persistence, recurrence, and mortality. Consequently, risk stratification becomes pivotal in determining the necessity of postoperative adjuvant therapy, which may include radioiodine therapy (RIT), the degree of TSH suppression, additional imaging studies, and the frequency of follow-up.However, the intermediate risk of recurrence is a highly heterogeneous category that encompasses various risk criteria, often combined, resulting in varying degrees of aggressiveness and a recurrence risk ranging from 5 to 20%. Furthermore, there is not enough long-term prognosis data for these patients. Unlike low- and high-risk DTC, the available literature is contradictory, and there is no consensus regarding adjuvant therapy.We aim to provide an overview of intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer, focusing on criteria to consider when deciding on adjuvant therapy in the current context of personalized approach, including molecular analysis to enhance the accuracy of patient management.

Impact of radioiodine therapy on recurrence and survival outcomes in intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma -A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The utility of radioiodine (RAI) therapy in intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains a topic of ongoing discussion. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate existing evidence on the impact of postoperative RAI therapy on recurrence and survival outcomes in intermediate-risk PTC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using relevant keywords in PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. Articles from January 2008 to March 2023 were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates were generated using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven articles comprising 56,266 intermediate-risk PTC patients were included. 41,530 (73.8%) patients underwent postoperative RAI therapy, while 14,736 (26.2%) patients were kept on no-RAI (NOI) follow-up. No significant reduction in rates of structural disease recurrence was noted with RAI therapy in comparison to NOI follow-up (pooled univariate OR, 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1.87, I2  = 75%). RAI therapy was not a significant predictor of better recurrence-free survival (pooled multivariate HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01-3.74, I2  = 94%). Interestingly, RAI therapy was associated with an overall survival benefit compared to NOI follow-up (pooled multivariate HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.82, I2  = 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not establish a conclusive benefit of RAI therapy in preventing structural disease recurrence or improving recurrence-free survival in intermediate-risk PTC. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution owing to significant heterogeneity in the existing literature. A prospective, randomised clinical trial is the need of the hour to better understand the effect of RAI therapy on long-term outcomes.

A comparative analysis of treatment efficacy in intermediate-risk thyroid cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment combinations on patient survival in intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

METHODS

The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for intermediate-risk papillary (PTC), follicular (FTC), or Hurthle cell (HTC) thyroid cancer patients. Four treatments were analyzed using Kaplan Meier and multivariable Cox regression: surgery, surgery with adjuvant radioiodine ablation (S + RAI), surgery with adjuvant thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy (S + THST), and S + RAI + THST. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analyses evaluated treatment-associated overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 65,736 patients, 72.2% were female and the average age was 45.4 ± 15.4 years. The 10-year OS rates for PTC, FTC, and HTC were 93.2%, 85.2%, and 78.5%, respectively. S + RAI + THST exhibited higher OS than surgery alone and S + RAI (all p < 0.05). Compared to surgery alone, S + RAI + THST demonstrated reduced mortality in PTC (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.628, p < 0.001), FTC (HR: 0.490, p < 0.001), and HTC (HR: 0.520, p = 0.006). Similarly, adjuvant RAI + THST reduced mortality regardless of lymphovascular invasion (HR: 0.490, p < 0.001), N1a (HR: 0.570, p < 0.001) or N1b metastasis (HR: 0.621, p < 0.001), or positive margin status (HR: 0.572, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment combinations demonstrated varying efficacies in intermediate-risk DTC depending on histology and tumor characteristics, with S + RAI + THST exhibiting the greatest treatment response.

An immediate postoperative response to therapy assessment can help avoid unnecessary RAI therapy

Background

Radioiodine (RAI) therapy plays a vital role in the postoperative treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients underwent total thyroidectomy (TT). However, even in the presence of capsular invasion and lymph node metastasis prognosis can be excellent and a postoperative RAI treatment might not be necessary for all patients. Therefore, this study explored the criteria for avoiding unnecessary RAI therapy in these patients.

Method

We applied response to therapy assessment immediately after surgery and prospectively recruited 179 excellent or indeterminate response DTC patients with capsular invasion and/or LNM who underwent TT without RAI therapy. During the follow-up, thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) levels, and cervical ultrasonography were collected and analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, response to therapy assessments was performed on patients during each follow-up.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 29.85 ± 17.44 months, and the 3- and 5-year DFS for all the patients was 99.3% in each. At the last follow-up, 165 (92.2%) patients had excellent responses, while 12 (6.7%) had an indeterminate response, and one (0.6%) each had biochemical and incomplete responses. No significant difference was observed in response to therapy between the subgroups of LNM and tumor invasion (P>0.05). For patients with capsular invasion and a number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤5 and >5, the proportions of recorded excellent responses were 95.9%, 91.0%, and 85.7%, respectively. Better responses were observed in females (excellent response: 95.5%, P=0.023), patients with stimulated Tg (s-Tg) ≤1ng/ml (excellent response: 100%, P<0.001), s-Tg ≤ 2ng/ml (excellent response: 98.4%, P<0.001), and excellent response for the immediate postoperative assessment (excellent response: 98.5%, P=0.004).

Conclusions

The current study suggested that the response to therapy assessment immediately applied postoperatively could help avoid unnecessary RAI therapy among DTC patients with capsular invasion and/or LNM. Moreover, excellent response patients and patients with indeterminate response and s-Tg ≤ 2ng/ml could be managed without RAI therapy.

Strategies for Radioiodine Treatment: What’s New

Radioiodine treatment (RAI) represents the most widespread and effective therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). RAI goals encompass ablative (destruction of thyroid remnants, to enhance thyroglobulin predictive value), adjuvant (destruction of microscopic disease to reduce recurrences), and therapeutic (in case of macroscopic iodine avid lesions) purposes, but its use has evolved over time. Randomized trial results have enabled the refinement of RAI indications, moving from a standardized practice to a tailored approach. In most cases, low-risk patients may safely avoid RAI, but where necessary, a simplified protocol, based on lower iodine activities and human recombinant TSH preparation, proved to be just as effective, reducing overtreatment or useless impairment of quality of life. In pediatric DTC, RAI treatments may allow tumor healing even at the advanced stages. Finally, new challenges have arisen with the advancement in redifferentiation protocols, through which RAI still represents a leading therapy, even in former iodine refractory cases. RAI therapy is usually well-tolerated at low activities rates, but some concerns exist concerning higher cumulative doses and long-term outcomes. Despite these achievements, several issues still need to be addressed in terms of RAI indications and protocols, heading toward the RAI strategy of the future.

Radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: An update and reconsideration

Radioiodine (¹³¹I) therapy (RAI) has been utilized for treating differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) for decades, and its uses can be characterized as remnant ablation, adjuvant therapy (RAT) or treatment for known diseases. Compared with the definite ¹³¹I treatment targets for remnant ablation and known disease, ¹³¹I adjuvant therapy (RAT) aims to reduce the risk of recurrence by destroying potential subclinical disease. Since it is merely given as a risk with no imaging confirmation of persistence/recurrence/metastases, the evidence is uncertain. With limited knowledge and substance, the indication for RAT remains poorly defined for everyday clinical practice, and the benefits of RAT remain controversial. This ambiguity results in a puzzle for clinicians seeking clarity on whether patients should receive RAT, and whether patients are at risk of recurrence/death from undertreatment or adverse events from overtreatment. Herein, we clarified the RAT indications in terms of clinicopathological features, postoperative disease status and response to therapy evaluation, and retrospectively examined the clinical outcomes of RAT as reported in current studies and guidelines. Furthermore, given the evolution of nuclear medicine imaging techniques, it can be expected that the future of RAT may be advanced by nuclear medicine theranostics (i.e., ¹³¹I whole-body scan, PET/CT) by accurately revealing the biological behaviors, as well as the underlying molecular background.

Intermediate-risk thyroid carcinoma: indicators of a poor prognosis

OBJECTIVE

The intermediate-risk (IR) category includes tumors with different degrees of aggression. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with unfavorable response to initial treatment and compare the effect of low/high radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy.

METHODS

A total of 614 IR patients were selected from a database, during 1972-2015. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy and RAI therapy and were reclassified after 12-18 months into the favorable (complete/indeterminate) response group and the unfavorable (biochemical/incomplete structural) response group. A total of 92 patients were assessed for late response (mean: 9.19 ± 5.73 years). Age, gender, tumor size, histology, multifocality, vascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, presence and number of lymph node metastasis, and stimulated thyroglobulin at ablation (sTg) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 41.47 ± 15.81 years, and 83.6% of the patients were female. Within 12-18 months after initial therapy, unfavorable response was detected in 41.2% of the patients and was associated, in multivariate analysis, with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.041; odds ratio [OR] = 1.9), presence of more than five metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0,017; OR = 2.6), and sTg > 10 ng/mL (p = 0.005; OR = 10.0). For patients with a longer follow-up, sTg >10 ng/mL was associated with unfavorable response (p = 0.002; OR = 6.8). A higher RAI dose was not related to better prognosis at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A sTg level of >10 ng/mL and lymph node metastasis were associated with an unfavorable response 12-18 months after initial treatment. A RAI dose below 150 mCi was proven sufficient to treat IR patients.

Pro-Arrhythmic Signaling of Thyroid Hormones and Its Relevance in Subclinical Hyperthyroidism

A perennial task is to prevent the occurrence and/or recurrence of most frequent or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). VF may be lethal in cases without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or with failure of this device. Incidences of AF, even the asymptomatic ones, jeopardize the patient's life due to its complication, notably the high risk of embolic stroke. Therefore, there has been a growing interest in subclinical AF screening and searching for novel electrophysiological and molecular markers. Considering the worldwide increase in cases of thyroid dysfunction and diseases, including thyroid carcinoma, we aimed to explore the implication of thyroid hormones in pro-arrhythmic signaling in the pathophysiological setting. The present review provides updated information about the impact of altered thyroid status on both the occurrence and recurrence of cardiac arrhythmias, predominantly AF. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of both thyroid status monitoring and AF screening in the general population, as well as in patients with thyroid dysfunction and malignancies. Real-world data on early AF identification in relation to thyroid function are scarce. Even though symptomatic AF is rare in patients with thyroid malignancies, who are under thyroid suppressive therapy, clinicians should be aware of potential interaction with asymptomatic AF. It may prevent adverse consequences and improve the quality of life. This issue may be challenging for an updated registry of AF in clinical practice. Thyroid hormones should be considered a biomarker for cardiac arrhythmias screening and their tailored management because of their multifaceted cellular actions.

Current dilemmas in the diagnosis and management of follicular thyroid tumors

Follicular carcinoma (FTC) is a relatively uncommon type of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Guidelines have often dealt with FTC and papillary thyroid cancer as a single disease. Over the last decade, however, a better understanding of these two types of thyroid cancer indicates that they cannot be analysed together. Neither ultrasonography nor fine-needle aspiration cytology can provide a clear distinction between FTC and follicular adenoma. New molecular diagnostic techniques may be used to identify a subpopulation of follicular neoplasms with a low probability of being malignant. Diagnostic surgery-usually hemithyroidectomy- is recommended for most thyroid follicular lesions without a certain preoperative diagnosis. If FTC is diagnosed most-perhaps not all- patients will require a completion thyroidectomy. While widely invasive FTC usually does not pose diagnostic or therapeutic doubts, consensus on the diagnosis of non-invasive follicular lesions is still lacking. Prognosis of FTC is mostly dependent on local invasion and distant metastasis that, in turn, correlate with tumor size.

Prediction of radioactive iodine remnant ablation failure in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: A cohort study of 740 patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to detect parameters that could serve as predictors of radioactive iodine (I-131) ablation failure in patients with low-risk and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

METHODS

Our cohort study included 740 patients with DTC who received postoperative I-131 remnant ablation. Anthropometric, biochemical, and pathohistological parameters were analyzed and correlated with ablation outcome using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Treatment failure rates were higher in patients <53 years, with N1a classification, and lymph node capsular invasion. In patients with N1a disease, thyroglobulin (Tg) > 2.4 ng/mL predicted treatment failure with 93.8% sensitivity and 52.5% specificity, and in patients with N1b disease, Tg > 14.9 ng/mL with 77.8% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity. I-131 activity was not associated with treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patients < 53 years old, with higher Tg levels, N1a classification, and lymph node capsular invasion have a higher risk of ablation failure. Stimulated Tg is an excellent predictor of treatment failure in patients with N1 disease. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 109-115, 2017.

Radioactive Iodine Administration Is Associated with Persistent Related Symptoms in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Context. Radioiodine (RAI) administration has adverse effects in patients treated for thyroid cancer (DTC), but there is scarce information regarding their intensity and duration. Objective. To evaluate frequency and intensity of early and late RAI-related symptoms in patients with DTC. Design. Observational prospective study. Patients. DTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy, with or without RAI. Measurements. Patients answered 2 surveys: (1) from 0 to 6 months and (2) between 6 and 18 months after initial treatment. Results. 110 patients answered the first survey and 61 both. Nearly 80 percent received RAI. Among early symptoms, periorbital edema, excessive tearing, salivary gland disturbances, dry mouth, taste disorders, and nausea were more frequent and intense among RAI patients. Regarding late symptoms, periorbital edema, salivary gland pain and swelling, and dry mouth were more frequent and intense in RAI patients. Frequency and intensity of adverse effects were not different between low and high RAI doses (50 versus ≥100 mCi). Conclusion. RAI-related symptoms are frequent and usually persist after 6 months of administration, even when low doses are given. This finding must be considered when deciding RAI administration, especially in low risk patients, among whom RAI benefit is controversial.