Primary Aldosteronism: unnecessary complexity in definition and diagnosis as a barrier to wider clinical care

Willingness to be tested for a secondary cause of hypertension: a survey of the Australian general community

BACKGROUND

Primary aldosteronism (PA) represents the most common and potentially curable cause of secondary hypertension. However, PA is not commonly screened for, and up to 34% of patients who screen positive do not complete the full diagnostic process. This suggests that the diagnostic process may pose a barrier to patients and may contribute to the under-diagnosis of PA.

AIMS

To evaluate the willingness of the Australian general public to undergo testing for secondary causes of hypertension and identify enablers or barriers to testing from the patients' perspective.

METHODS

An online survey containing questions on knowledge and attitudes towards hypertension, willingness to be tested and enablers/barriers towards testing was distributed to the Australian community.

RESULTS

Of 520 adult respondents (mean age 50.4 years, SD 27.3 years; 28.8% hypertensive; 56.0% female), the majority of non-hypertensive and hypertensive respondents (82.7% vs 70.0%; P = 0.03) were willing to undergo testing for a secondary cause of hypertension that involved blood and urine tests. Greater knowledge of hypertensive risk modification strategies and complications was predictive of willingness to be tested, whereas age, sex, education level, geographic location, socio-economic status and cardiovascular comorbidities were not. The top three barriers to testing included fear of a serious underlying condition, lack of belief in further testing and increased stress associated with further testing.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of patients are willing to engage in testing for a secondary cause of hypertension. Education about the risks associated with hypertension and the testing process may overcome several barriers to testing.

'I can't understand why others don't screen more': a qualitative study exploring why Australian general practitioners screen for primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand the factors that influence a general practitioner's (GP's) experience of screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) in hypertensive patients.

DESIGN

A qualitative study, framed by phenomenology, using semistructured interviews that were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, entered into NVivo V.12.0 for coding and analysed for emerging themes.

SETTING

Melbourne, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible GPs had received education on PA as part of a previous study. We recruited a purposive sample of 16 GPs (6 females, 10 males) who varied in practice location, clinical experience and the number of patients screened for PA.

RESULTS

Although GPs had been educated about PA, they found it challenging to explain the condition to patients and were uncertain about how to screen patients who were already taking antihypertensive medications. Most viewed the screening process to be practical, inexpensive and, by and large, acceptable to their patients. However, they found it inconvenient to alter antihypertensive medications before screening to allow for easier interpretation of the aldosterone-renin ratio. They were also less enthused about screening patients whom they thought fitted a clinical picture of essential hypertension. Knowledge of the screening process, cost and convenience of performing the aldosterone-renin ratio, conceptualisation of risk related to PA, and a desire to improve clinical care were influencing factors that modified the GPs' screening experience.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that knowledge gaps, practical limitations of the aldosterone-renin ratio, and errors in diagnostic reasoning were challenges of routine PA screening. Most of these practical barriers could be addressed by relatively simple educational and practice modifications to increase PA screening rates and optimise detection for the most common cause of secondary hypertension in primary care.

Establishing Reference Ranges for Aldosterone, Renin and Aldosterone-to-Renin Ratio for Women in the Third-Trimester of Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism in pregnancy is complicated due to lack of reference ranges for aldosterone, renin and aldosterone-to-renin ratio. We have endeavoured to establish third-trimester reference ranges for the above-mentioned parameters.

DESIGN & PATIENTS

We performed postural tests for aldosterone and renin (chemiluminescence immunoassay Liason® DiaSorin Inc., Italy) in 70 healthy pregnant women (age 30.53±4.51 years), at 32.38±4.25 weeks of gestation and in 22 non-pregnant healthy women (age 33.08±8.72 years).

RESULTS

Aldosterone reference ranges were 6.51-73.97 ng/dl and 12.33-86.38 ng/dl, for supine and upright positions, respectively and that for renin were 6.25-59.36 µIU/ml and 11.12-82.55 µIU/ml, respectively. Aldosterone and renin concentrations were higher in an upright position (p=0.000459 and p=0.00011, respectively). In contrast, aldosterone-to-renin ratio was not affected by posture (i. e. 0.497-3.084 ng/dl/µIU/ml versus 0.457-3.06 ng/dl/µIU/ml, p=0.12), but was higher (p=0.00081) than in non-pregnant controls. In comparison to manufacturer-provided non-pregnant reference range, supine aldosterone concentrations increased by 556% (lower cut-off) and 313% (upper cut-off), while upright aldosterone concentrations increased by 558% (lower cut-off) and 244% (upper cut-off). The reference range for supine renin concentrations increased by 223% (lower cut-off) and 48.7% (upper cut-off), while upright renin concentrations increased by 253% (lower cut-off) and 79% (upper cut-off).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an upward shift in aldosterone and renin reference ranges in the third-trimester of pregnancy accompanied by an increase in an aldosterone-to-renin ratio, that is not influenced by posture. It remains to be established whether the aldosterone-to-renin ratio may be used as a screening tool for primary hyperaldosteronism in pregnancy.

Screening Rates for Primary Aldosteronism Among Individuals With Hypertension Plus Hypokalemia: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Primary aldosteronism is a common, yet highly underdiagnosed, cause of hypertension that leads to disproportionately high rates of cardiovascular disease. Hypertension plus hypokalemia is a guideline-recommended indication to screen for primary aldosteronism, yet the uptake of this recommendation at the population level remains unknown. We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults ≥18 years old in Ontario, Canada, with hypertension plus hypokalemia (potassium <3.5 mEq/L) from 2009 to 2015 with follow-up through 2017. We measured the proportion of individuals who underwent primary aldosteronism screening via the aldosterone-to-renin ratio based upon hypokalemia frequency and severity along with concurrent antihypertensive medication use. We assessed clinical predictors associated with screening via Cox regression. The cohort included 26 533 adults of which only 422 (1.6%) underwent primary aldosteronism screening. When assessed by number of instances of hypokalemia over a 2-year time window, the proportion of eligible patients who were screened increased only modestly from 1.0% (158/15 983) with one instance to 4.8% (71/1494) with ≥5 instances. Among individuals with severe hypokalemia (potassium <3.0 mEq/L), only 3.9% (58/1422) were screened. Among older adults prescribed ≥4 antihypertensive medications, only 1.0% were screened. Subspecialty care with endocrinology (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.10-2.09]), nephrology (HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.07-1.91]), and cardiology (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.14-1.70]) were associated with an increased likelihood of screening, whereas age (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.96]) and diabetes (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.50-0.89]) were inversely associated with screening. In conclusion, population-level uptake of guideline recommendations for primary aldosteronism screening is exceedingly low. Increased education and awareness are critical to bridge this gap.

Subtype-specific trends in the clinical picture of primary aldosteronism over a 13-year period

OBJECTIVE

Primary aldosteronism has two main clinically and biologically distinct subtypes: unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH). We aimed to evaluate the changes of each subtype's clinical characteristics over a 13-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved time-trend analyses to identify changes in the clinical features of APA and BAH at diagnosis (2006-2018). A nationwide database from 41 Japanese referral centers was searched, which identified 2804 primary aldosteronism patients with complete baseline information and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) data.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with APA decreased from 51% in 2006-2009 to 22% in 2016-2018. Among the 1634 patients with BAH, trend analyses revealed decreases in hypertension duration (median 7--3 years; P < 0.01) and hypokalemia prevalence (18--11%; P < 0.01). However, among the 952 patients with APA, there were no significant changes in hypertension duration (median 8 years) and hypokalemia prevalence (overall 70%). Furthermore, the APA group had a trend towards increased use of multiple hypertensive drugs at diagnosis (30--43%; P < 0.01). When subtypes were reclassified according to the precosyntropin stimulation AVS data, APA patients tended to be diagnosed earlier and at milder forms, consistent with the trend in overall primary aldosteronism patients.

CONCLUSION

During 2006-2018, we identified marked subtype-specific trends in the clinical findings at the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. Our results suggested that the emphasis on the implementing cosyntropin stimulation during AVS might lead to under-identification of APA, especially in patients with mild or early cases.

Primary aldosteronism is a public health issue: challenges and opportunities

A significant proportion of hypertension (potentially more than 5% in the general population) is due to primary aldosteronism (PA) which carries a worse prognosis when compared with blood pressure-matched essential hypertension. Effective targeted treatments are available which mitigate many of the cardiovascular complications of untreated PA. Despite this, the detection rate of PA in primary care is sub-optimal. In this review, we explore the challenges contributing to the under-diagnosis of PA in the community, including uncertainties regarding its actual prevalence. In order to detect PA early and offer targeted treatment before adverse cardiovascular consequences develop, routine screening for PA at the time of a diagnosis of hypertension would seem desirable. However, this is limited by a lack of studies to establish whether routine screening in primary care is cost-effective. Newer techniques are also being developed which could lessen the complexity of diagnosing PA. Most importantly, a dramatic increase in awareness of PA, as a treatable cause of hypertension, is needed amongst clinicians who manage hypertension.

A short review of primary aldosteronism in a question and answer fashion

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to present up to date information concerning the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism (PA). PA is the most common cause of endocrine hypertension. It has been reported up to 24% of selective referred hypertensive patients.

METHODS

We did a search in Pub-Med and Google Scholar using the terms: PA, hyperaldosteronism, idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia, diagnosis of PA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, adrenalectomy, and surgery. We also did cross-referencing search with the above terms. We had divided our study into five sections: Introduction, Diagnosis, Genetics, Treatment, and Conclusions. We present our results in a question and answer fashion in order to make reading more interesting.

RESULTS

PA should be searched in all high-risk populations. The gold standard for diagnosis PA is the plasma aldosterone/plasma renin ratio (ARR). If this test is positive, then we proceed with one of the four confirmatory tests. If positive, then we proceed with a localizing technique like adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and CT scan. If the lesion is unilateral, after proper preoperative preparation, we proceed, in adrenalectomy. If the lesion is bilateral or the patient refuses or is not fit for surgery, we treat them with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, usually spironolactone.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary aldosteronism is the most common and a treatable case of secondary hypertension. Only patients with unilateral adrenal diseases are eligible for surgery, while patients with bilateral and non-surgically correctable PA are usually treated by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Thus, the distinction between unilateral and bilateral aldosterone hypersecretion is crucial.

Novel Approach to Establishing an Aldosterone: Renin Ratio Cutoff for Primary Aldosteronism

Direct renin concentration is replacing plasma renin activity in many laboratories for the investigation of primary aldosteronism, which may have a significant impact on the resulting aldosterone:renin ratios. We sought to develop a population-based approach to establishing an aldosterone:renin ratio cutoff when transitioning between assays. A population-based study was performed in Calgary, Alberta, Canada of 4301 individuals who received testing from January 2012 to November 2015. In 2014, direct renin concentration replaced plasma renin activity in routine testing. We described the prevalence of primary aldosteronism in our population before the change and, using the assumption of disease prevalence stability, determined the corresponding ratio cutoffs after the introduction of the new assay. During the initial portion of the study (using plasma renin activity), 4.9% of those screened were classified as highly probable cases, whereas 10.4% were considered probable and 28.9% possible using locally validated cutoffs. Aldosterone:renin ratio cutoffs were then determined for the direct renin concentration assay. A highly probable case of primary aldosteronism corresponded to a cutoff of >100 pmol L −1 mIU −1 L −1 with hypokalemia. A probable case corresponded to a cutoff of >100 and a possible case to >35 pmol L −1 mIU −1 L −1 . In contrast, cutoffs derived using a conversion factor resulted in significantly higher cutoffs and the potential for missed cases. In conclusion, using large population data, historically consistent aldosterone:renin ratio cutoffs can be established when transitioning between assays. Population-derived cutoffs may be more appropriate for clinical use and less likely to result in false-negative classification than those obtained from conventional direct method comparisons.