Long-term results of cabergoline therapy for macroprolactinomas and analyses of factors associated with remission after withdrawal

Impact of maternal thyroid dysfunction on fetal and maternal outcomes in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy can adversely impact maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the association between thyroid status and specific adverse outcomes needs clarity, especially in understudied regions.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective cohort study aimed to illuminate the multifaceted associations between maternal thyroid dysfunction and feto-maternal outcomes in Gujarat, India.

METHODS

This hospital-based cohort study recruited and monitored 500 euthyroid, 250 hypothyroid, and 150 hyperthyroid pregnant women until delivery. Maternal thyroid status was determined by serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (fT4) levels. Adverse fetal outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, respiratory issues, and low APGAR scores. Maternal outcomes included preeclampsia, haemorrhage, hypertension, postpartum thyroiditis, and thromboembolism. Relative risks quantified associations between thyroid dysfunction and outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared to euthyroid women, hypothyroid women had a higher RR for preterm birth (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), low APGAR score (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.1), preeclampsia (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.8), postpartum haemorrhage (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1), and venous thromboembolism (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.7-5.7). Hyperthyroid women had over twice the risk of low APGAR score (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.9-3.5), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 1.5, 95% CI 0.5-4.3), respiratory distress (RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.8), and postpartum thyroiditis (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8).

CONCLUSION

Maternal thyroid dysfunction escalates risks for adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Thyroid monitoring and management during pregnancy are critical to mitigate complications.

Withdrawal of dopamine agonist treatment in patients with hyperprolactinaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the proportion of patients with persistent normoprolactinaemia following dopamine agonist (DA) withdrawal and to identify predictors of successful withdrawal in patients with hyperprolactinaemia.

DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

A systematic review of observational eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with normoprolactinaemia after cessation of DA treatment. Secondary outcome included the proportion of patients with normoprolactinaemia after DA withdrawal using individual patient data. Risk of bias was assessed by using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled proportions were estimated using a random effects model in case I²  ≤ 75% or by reporting range of effects if I²  > 75%.

RESULTS

Thirty-two observational studies enroling 1563 patients were included. The proportion of patients with persistent normoprolactinaemia ranged from 0% to 75% (I²  = 84%). Heterogeneity was partly explained by age with more successful withdrawal in patients of higher age. Individual patient data analyses suggested that the proportion of patients with persistent normoprolactinaemia 6 months after DA withdrawal with a low maintenance dose and full regression of the prolactinoma was 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 60.7-97.1; I²  = 0%) and 58.4% (95% CI = 23.8-86.3; I²  = 75%) for microadenomas and macroadenomas, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with persistent normoprolactinaemia following DA withdrawal treatment varied greatly, partly explained by the mean age of participants of the individual studies. Individual patient data analysis suggested that successful withdrawal was likely in patients with full regression of prolactinomas using a low maintenance dose before cessation.

Anastrozole as add-on therapy for cabergoline-resistant prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: real-life experience in male patients

INTRODUCTION

Prolactin-secreting adenoma (PRLoma) can present as large and invasive neoplasm, with increased markers of cellular proliferation. First-line approach is Dopamine Agonists (DAs) treatment; however, DA-resistance has been reported, especially in male patients. Estrogens induce lactotroph cell replication and PRL secretion: the use of anti-estrogen treatment in patients with PRLoma have been described in few cases. We reported our experience regarding treatment with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (ANA) as add-on therapy for male patients with DA resistant PRLoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe four male patients (26, 38, 29 and 19 years old at diagnosis), with PRLoma (median diameter 26 mm, PRL 7730 μg/L). They were resistant to cabergoline (CAB, > 2 mg/week) in terms of PRL secretion and tumor size reduction. ANA 1 mg/day was added to the maximum tolerated dose of CAB for at least 1 year. Magnetic Resonance was performed at baseline, after 6 months of CAB + ANA combination and every 12 months afterward.

RESULTS

PRL levels decreased in all patients after CAB + ANA (mean - 70%, range - 44/- 97%), achieving a normalization of PRL levels in one case. Tumor size decreased in all cases (mean - 47%, range - 24.5/- 68%). No severe adverse effects have been reported, a moderate weight gain has been observed in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of an aromatase inhibitor (ANA) to the dopamine agonist therapy improved the control of prolactin levels and induced tumour regression.

The recurrence of prolactinoma after withdrawal of dopamine agonist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prolactinoma is the major cause of hyperprolactinemia, and dopamine agonists (DAs) are generally the first-line treatment for them. Several studies have reviewed the recurrent rate of hyperprolactinemia after DAs withdrawal. However, few of them have concerned the recurrence risk of prolactinoma following the withdrawal of DAs.

METHODS

Three medical databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, were retrieved up to February, 14, 2021 to identify studies related to recurrence of prolactinoma and withdrawal of DAs. Statistical analyses including meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, funnel plot and Egger test were performed through software R.

RESULTS

A total of 3225 studies were retrieved from the three data bases, and 13 studies consisted of 616 patients and 19 arms were finally included in this systematic analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity among the included studies, and fixed effect model was thus used. The pooled recurrence proportion of prolactinoma after withdrawal of DA was 2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1-3%.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a very low recurrent rate of prolactinomas after DAs withdrawal. Much more prospective studies with larger cases and longer follow-up period are encouraged to confirm our finding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number CRD42021245888 (PROSPERO).

Hyperprolactinemia in the postmenopause: versions and contraversions

The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia in postmenopausal women is unknown and has been estimated as infrequent by many studies. Prolactinomas found after menopause are usually macroadenomas and remain unrecognized for a long time due to atypical clinical signs or their absence. The growth potential of prolactinomas persists after menopause, most of them are invasive and accompanied by high prolactin levels. Treatment with dopamine agonists is usually long-term, the goals of which are to reduce tumor size, normalize prolactin levels and the negative effects of hyperprolactinemia. Treatment with cabergoline makes it possible to achieve remission of the disease in the first years after discontinuation, however, the proportion of relapses in postmenopausal women increases 5 years after discontinuation of the drug. Remission of prolactinomas is not evident in postmenopausal women. The modern management of patients with prolactinoma and/or hyperprolactinemia does not have clear positions in the postmenopausal period. Controversial issues remain: an ambiguous relationship between prolactin levels and breast cancer, there are no convincing conclusions on the improvement of bone mineral density and/or a decrease in the risk of fractures with normalization of prolactin levels, there are no data on metabolic parameters after the end of treatment with dopamine agonists, conflicting information about the relationship of prolactin levels and the severity of the manifold manifestations of the climacteric syndrome. The use of estrogen-progestin drugs in women with hyperprolactinemia/prolactinomas is also not well understood. Thus, the problem of hyperprolactinemia in the perimenopausal and postmenopausal period is underestimated and requires additional research, as well as the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for potential benefits in terms of weight loss, improving insulin sensitivity, reducing the risk of fractures, maintaining sexuality and psycho-emotional well-being.

High biochemical recurrence rate after withdrawal of cabergoline in prolactinomas: is it necessary to restart treatment?

PURPOSE

Treatment with dopamine agonists (DA) is highly effective in patients with prolactinomas. In selected patients, discontinuation of DA after several years of successful treatment is possible, however, hyperprolactinemia recurs in 60-80% of them. It is unclear what is the clinical significance of these recurrences and hence, whether or not reinitiation of therapy is necessary.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the recurrence rate in prolactinoma patients after DA withdrawal and the necessity to restart treatment.

METHODS

Patients with >2 years of treatment with cabergoline (CBG) who achieved normoprolactinemia and a > 50% reduction in tumor size were included. DA dose was down titrated until withdrawal. Basal tumor size, as well as PRL and gonadal steroid levels were recorded at diagnosis, at withdrawal of DA and every 3-6 months for 1-3 years.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included (38 women, 34 macroprolactinomas). After withdrawal, 34 (68%) presented recurrence of hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels <5 ng/mL at the time of withdrawal predicted remission (sensitivity 76%, specificity of 63%). CBG was restarted in eight patients (23%) because of the presence of hypogonadism. CBG was withheld in the remaining 26, based on the following arguments: (1) premenopausal women without biochemical hypogonadism, (54%); (2) asymptomatic men under 65 without biochemical hypogonadism (19%); (3) asymptomatic postmenopausal women (19%); (4) asymptomatic men over 65 (8%). After a median follow-up of 30 months, no increase in PRL levels or tumor growth was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical recurrence in prolactinomas is very frequent, however, in only a few of these patients reinitiation of DA is necessary.

Temozolomide cytoreductive treatment in a giant cabergoline-resistant prolactin-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor

Dopamine agonists (DAs, especially cabergoline) are recommended as first-line treatment in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas, to reduce hormone secretion and tumor size. Pituitary surgery, suggested in nonresponsive patients, cannot achieve a gross total resection or is not feasible in some cases. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been proposed in patients with aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) who do not respond to conventional treatments. We present a 47-year-old man with a giant (70×51×64 mm) prolactin-secreting PitNET. Cabergoline treatment (at first 1.5 mg/week, and then increased to 3.5 mg/week after 3 months) achieved prolactin suppression; however, magnetic resonance revealed a stable mass. After explanation of surgical complications, the patient rejected the procedure. Therefore, a primary neoadjuvant cytoreductive TMZ treatment was discussed during a meeting of the Pituitary Multidisciplinary Team, and added to cabergoline. After 13 cycles of TMZ (1 year of treatment), we observed dramatic reduction of the PitNET (from 18 cm of adenoma to 6 cm of necrotic tissue). MRI performed 4, 12, and 18 months after TMZ discontinuation revealed a stable residual PitNET, and 1.5 mg/week of cabergoline has been continued until today. Recently, the criteria for developing Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence have been proposed, indicating that a multidisciplinary team is the best care for patients. Surgery, rejected by the patient, could only achieve a partial resection; therefore, we decided to combine TMZ and cabergoline. An early initiation of TMZ could be considered in selected cases, especially when surgery could be only partially effective.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas; a review of the evidence

PURPOSE

This review aimed to evaluate data on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas.

METHODS

Recent literature about prolactinoma behavior and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas is reviewed.

RESULTS

A review of evidence regarding prolactinoma pituitary MRI follow-up; techniques and sequences, recent data on possible gadolinium retention, the role and a review of T2-weighted images in the identification of prolactinomas and frequently encountered clinical scenarios, as well as MRI correlation with prolactin secretion, tumor growth and prediction of response to medical therapy are presented.

CONCLUSION

The underlying decision to perform serial imaging in prolactinoma patients should be individualized on a case-by-case basis. Future studies should focus on alternative imaging methods and/or contract agents.

Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Hyperprolactinemia in Children and Adolescents: National Survey

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to report the characteristics at admission, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cases of pediatric hyperprolactinemia in a large multicenter study.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 233 hyperprolactinemic patients, under 18 years of age, who were followed by different centers. The patients were divided as having microadenomas, macroadenomas, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Complaints of the patients, their mode of treatment (medication and/or surgery) and outcomes were evaluated in detail.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients with hyperprolactinemia was 14.5 years, and 88.4% were females. In terms of etiology, microadenomas were observed in 32.6%, macroadenomas in 27%, idiopathic hyperprolactinemia in 22.7% and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia in 6.4%. Other causes of hyperprolactinemia were defined in 11.3%. Common complaints in females (n=206) were sorted into menstrual irregularities, headaches, galactorrhea, primary or secondary amenorrhea and weight gain, whereas headache, gynecomastia, short stature and blurred vision were common in males (n=27). Median prolactin levels were 93.15 ng/mL, 241.8 ng/mL, 74.5 ng/mL, 93.2 ng/mL, and 69 ng/mL for microadenomas, macroadenomas, idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia, and other causes of hyperprolactinemia, respectively. Of 172 patients with hyperprolactinemia, 77.3% were treated with cabergoline and 13.4% with bromocriptine. 20.1% of the patients with pituitary adenomas underwent pituitary surgery.

CONCLUSION

We present the largest cohort of children and adolescents with hyperprolactinemia in the literature to date. Hyperprolactinemia is more common in females and cabergoline is highly effective and practical to use in adolescents, due to its biweekly dosing. Indications for surgery in pediatric cases need to be revised.

The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of Prolactinomas: The old and the new

Prevalence and incidence of prolactinomas are approximately 50 per 100,000 and 3-5 new cases/100,000/year. The pathophysiological mechanism of hyperprolactinemia-induced gonadotropic failure involves kisspeptin neurons. Prolactinomas in males are larger, more invasive and less sensitive to dopamine agonists (DAs). Macroprolactin, responsible for pseudohyperprolactinemia is a frequent pitfall of prolactin assay. DAs still represent the primary therapy for most prolactinomas, but neurosurgery has regained interest, due to progress in surgical techniques and a high success rate in microprolactinoma, as well as to some underestimated side effects of long-term DA treatment, such as impulse control disorders or impaired quality of life. Recent data show that the suspected effects of DAs on cardiac valves in patients with prolactinomas are reassuring. Finally, temozolomide has emerged as a valuable treatment for rare cases of aggressive and malignant prolactinomas that do not respond to all other conventional treatments.

Sellar and Parasellar Pain Syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sellar and parasellar lesions are numerous and varying in terms of their patholphysiology and physical and radiographic characteristics but often incite pain syndromes that are similar in semiology. The goal of this review was to familiarize the reader with a variety of sellar and parasellar lesions grouped together based on common clinical symptomatology, with a focus on important imaging characteristics that are often distinguishing features diagnostically.

RECENT FINDINGS

In most cases, tissue acquisition via surgical resection or stereotactic biopsy are the mainstay for definitive diagnosis of sellar and parasellar lesions. With advances in MRI technology in particular in terms of resolution and the inclusion of new techniques including dynamic imaging with delayed contrast, imaging studies of lesions in the sellar and parasellar regions have become increasingly important for diagnostic purposes, with pituitary adenomas and schwannomas as prime examples. In the case of chordoid gliomas, molecular features of the tumor also help distinguish it from other disease processes similar in presentation, which have dramatic impacts on management. Advances in surgical approaches and radiation techniques offer more precise and targeted therapy to lesions in an area with increased risk of clinical morbidity given the high concentration of critically important structures that must be spared during treatment. Sellar and parasellar lesions have the potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality, highlighting the importance of clinical recognition of warning signs/symptoms, obtaining high-quality imaging studies in various modalities for diagnostic purposes, and prompt management which often involves a multimodal approach that includes surgical resection, radiation, and/or medical therapy. Future advanced imaging techniques will only improve presurgical diagnostic accuracy and lead to more prompt and efficient management.

Hyperprolactinemia/Prolactinomas in the Postmenopausal Period: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management

Hyperprolactinemia is not a common finding in postmenopausal women. Prolactinomas detected after menopause are usually macroadenomas. Due to atypical clinical features they may remain unrecognized for a long period of time. Interestingly the growth potential of prolactinomas remains after menopause. Most tumors are invasive and present with high prolactin levels. They respond to medical treatment with dopamine agonists in terms of prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and improvement in pituitary function. Treatment with dopamine agonists is usually long term. Reducing doses of cabergoline to the lowest that keeps prolactin levels normal prior to withdrawal is proposed to patients with macroprolactinomas who normalize prolactin after > 5 years of treatment and who do not have cavernous sinus invasion. Cabergoline can achieve a high percentage of remission maintenance in the first years after withdrawal. However, the percentage of relapse-free patients 5 years after withdrawal is significantly lower. Besides recurrent hyper-prolactinemia in a subgroup of macroprolactinomas after a long-interval tumor regrowth may be detected. Menopause cannot ensure remission of the tumor so long-term surveillance is suggested. In patients with microadenomas data on long-term remission rates (normalization of prolactin and disappearance of the tumor) after suspension of treatment with dopamine agonists are highly variable. The current strategy for microprolactinomas is not to treat hyperprolactinemia in menopause if it recurrs after discontinuation of dopamine agonists. This is based on: (1) reports that elevated prolactin levels may normalize in some women after menopause, (2) the fact that the association between prolactin levels and breast cancer is inconsistent in postmenopausal women, (3) the lack of clinical evidence that normalization of prolactin levels in postmenopausal women improves bone mineral density or reduces the risk of fracture, and (4) the fact that, concerning the metabolic syndrome, no data are available on metabolic parameters after suspension of treatment with dopamine agonists. For a change in strategy, i.e., for the potential benefits from treatment of hyperprolactinemia in the postmenopausal period with dopamine agonists concerning weight loss, improved insulin sensitivity, decreased fracture risk, and improved sexuality, more evidence is needed.

Controversial issues in the management of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas - An overview by the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary adenomas (approximately 40% of cases), and they represent an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility in both sexes. The magnitude of prolactin (PRL) elevation can be useful in determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia. Indeed, PRL levels > 250 ng/mL are highly suggestive of the presence of a prolactinoma. In contrast, most patients with stalk dysfunction, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia or systemic diseases present with PRL levels < 100 ng/mL. However, exceptions to these rules are not rare. On the other hand, among patients with macroprolactinomas (MACs), artificially low PRL levels may result from the so-called "hook effect". Patients harboring cystic MACs may also present with a mild PRL elevation. The screening for macroprolactin is mostly indicated for asymptomatic patients and those with apparent idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas, particularly cabergoline, which is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine. After 2 years of successful treatment, DA withdrawal should be considered in all cases of microprolactinomas and in selected cases of MACs. In this publication, the goal of the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) is to provide a review of the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas, emphasizing controversial issues regarding these topics. This review is based on data published in the literature and the authors' experience.