Long-term outcomes in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumours

Familial states of primary hyperparathyroidism: an update

BACKGROUND

Familial primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) includes syndromic and non-syndromic disorders. The former are characterized by the occurrence of PHPT in association with extra-parathyroid manifestations and includes multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) types 1, 2, and 4 syndromes, and hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPT-JT). The latter consists of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) types 1, 2 and 3, neonatal severe primary hyperparathyroidism (NSHPT), and familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism (FIHP). The familial forms of PHPT show different levels of PHPT penetrance, developing earlier and with multiglandular involvement compared to sporadic counterpart. All these diseases exhibit Mendelian inheritance patterns, and for most of them, the genes responsible have been identified. DNA testing for predisposing mutations is helpful in index cases or in individuals with a high suspicion of the disease. Early recognition of hereditary disorders of PHPT is of great importance for the best clinical and surgical approach. Genetic testing is useful in routine clinical practice because it will also involve appropriate screening for extra-parathyroidal manifestations related to the syndrome as well as the identification of asymptomatic carriers of the mutation.

PURPOSE

The aim of the review is to discuss the current knowledge on the clinical and genetic profile of these disorders along with the importance of genetic testing in clinical practice.

Evaluation and Surgical Management of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasias

Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes are rare autosomal dominant diseases that are associated with a mixture of both endocrine and non-endocrine tumors. Traditionally, there are 2 types of MEN that have unique clinical associations: MEN 1 (parathyroid hyperplasia, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and pituitary tumors) and MEN 2 (medullary thyroid carcinoma and pheochromocytoma), which is further classified into MEN 2A (adds parathyroid adenomas) and 2B (adds ganglioneuromas and marfanoid habitus). Many of the endocrine tumors are resected surgically, and the pre, intra, and postoperative management strategies used must take into account the high recurrence rates asscioated with MEN tumors.

Hereditary Syndromes Associated with Pancreatic and Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and lung NETs (LNETs) represent a rare but clinically significant subgroup of neoplasms. While the majority is sporadic, approximately 17% of PanNETs and a subset of LNETs develop in the context of monogenic familial tumor syndromes, especially multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome. Other inherited syndromes associated with PanNETs include MEN4, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). These syndromes are highly penetrant and their clinical manifestations may vary even among members of the same family. They are attributed to genetic mutations involving key molecular pathways regulating cell growth, differentiation, and angiogenesis. Pancreatic NETs in hereditary syndromes are often multiple, develop at a younger age compared to sporadic tumors, and are associated with endocrine and nonendocrine tumors derived from multiple organs. Lung NETs are not as common as PanNETs and are mostly encountered in MEN1 syndrome and include typical and atypical lung carcinoids. Early detection of PanNETs and LNETs related to inherited syndromes is crucial, and specific follow-up protocols need to be employed to optimize diagnosis and management. Genetic screening is recommended in childhood, and diagnostic screening starts often in adolescence, even in asymptomatic mutation carriers. Optimal management and therapeutic decisions should be made in the context of a multidisciplinary team in specialized centers, whereas specific biomarkers aiming to identify patients denoted to follow a more aggressive course need to be developed.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4): a thorough update on the latest and least known men syndrome

PURPOSE

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4) is a rare multiglandular endocrine neoplasia syndrome, associated with a wide tumor spectrum but hallmarked by primary hyperparathyroidism, which represents the most common clinical feature, followed by pituitary (functional and non-functional) adenomas, and neuroendocrine tumors. MEN4 clinically overlaps MEN type 1 (MEN1) but differs from it for milder clinical features and an older patient's age at onset. The underlying mutated gene, CDKN1B, encodes the cell cycle regulator p27, implicated in cellular proliferation, motility and apoptosis. Given the paucity of MEN4 cases described in the literature, possible genotype-phenotype correlations have not been thoroughly assessed, and specific clinical recommendations are lacking. The present review provides an extensive overview of molecular genetics and clinical features of MEN4, with the aim of contributing to delineate peculiar strategies for clinical management, screening and follow-up of the last and least known MEN syndrome.

METHODS

A literature search was performed through online databases like MEDLINE and Scopus.

CONCLUSIONS

MEN4 is much less common that MEN1, tend to present later in life with a more indolent course, although involving the same primary organs as MEN1. As a consequence, MEN4 patients might need specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and a different strategy for screening and follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the real oncological risk of MEN4 carriers, and to establish a standardized screening protocol. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of molecular genetics of MEN4 is needed in order to explore p27 as a novel therapeutic target.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in MEN1 Patients: Difference in Post-Operative Complications and Tumor Progression between Major and Minimal Pancreatic Surgeries

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) affect over 80% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Surgery is usually the therapy of choice, but the real immediate and long-term therapeutic benefit of a partial extensive pancreatic resection remains controversial. We analyzed, in 43 PNEN MEN1 patients who underwent 19 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), 19 distal pancreatectomies (DP), and 5 minimal pancreatectomies, the prevalence of surgery-derived early complications and post-operative pancreatic sequelae, and the PNEN relapse-free survival time after surgery, comparing major (PD+DP) and minimal pancreatic surgeries. No post-operative mortality was observed. Metastatic cancers were found in 12 cases, prevalently from duodenal gastrinoma. Long-term cure of endocrine syndromes, by the 38 major pancreatic resections, was obtained in 78.9% of gastrinomas and 92.9% of insulinomas. In only one patient, hepatic metastases, due to gastrinoma, progressed to death. Out of the 38 major surgeries, only one patient was reoperated for the growth of a new PNEN in the remnant pancreas. No functioning PNEN persistence was reported in the five minimal pancreatic surgeries, PNEN relapse occurred in 60% of patients, and 40% of cases needed further pancreatic resection for tumor recurrence. No significant difference in PNEN relapse-free survival time after surgery was found between major and minimal pancreatic surgeries.

Genetics of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) represent a relatively rare disease; however, the incidence has been increasing during the last 2 decades. Next generation sequencing has greatly increased our understanding of driver mutations in pNETs. Sporadic pNETs have consistently presented with mutations in MEN1, DAXX/ATRX, and genes related to the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Inherited pNETs have traditionally been associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1, and tuberous sclerosis complex. The current review expands on the existing knowledge and the relevant updates on the genetics of pNETs.

Long-Term Outcomes for Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Liver metastasis from duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (DP-NENs) is a major cause of mortality in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients, yet much of their natural history is unknown.

METHODS

This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study analyzed all MEN1 patients with imageable functional (F) and nonfunctional (NF) DP-NENs (1990-2021) for liver metastasis-free survival (LMFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 138 patients, 85 (61.6%) had imageable DP-NENs (28 F, 57 NF), and the mean largest tumor size was 1.8 ± 1.4 cm. Multifocality was present in 32 patients (37.7%). Surgery was performed for 49 patients (57.7%). During an 11-year median follow-up period (IQR, 6-17 years), 23 (27.1%) of the patients had liver metastasis, and 19 (22.4%) patients died. Death was attributed to liver metastasis in 60% of cases. The patients with F-DP-NENs versus NF-DP-NENs more often had liver metastasis (46.4% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.002) but had similar 10-year LMFS (80.9 vs. 87.0%; p = 0.44) and OS (82.7 vs. 94.3%; p = 0.69). The patients with NF-DP-NENs had surgery when their tumors were larger (p < 0.001). Tumor size was not associated with liver metastasis (p = 0.89). The average growth rate was 0.04 cm/year (SE, 0.02 cm/year; p = 0.01) during active surveillance for NF-DP-NENs (n = 38). Liver metastasis developed in four patients with tumors smaller than 2 cm. The risk of liver metastasis was independent of surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.93; p = 0.72) and death (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.08-3.06; p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the observed outcomes in this study were better than historical data, small NF-DP-NENs still developed liver metastasis and liver metastasis remains a major cause of death. These results suggest that size as a sole criterion for surgery may be insufficient to predict tumor behavior.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Best Surgical Procedure for Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome Associated with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

Simple Summary

Approximately 30% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) develop the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (ZES), caused by solitary or multiple duodenal gastrinomas. Its management, especially regarding indication, timing, and type of surgery, is highly controversial. Therefore, the present study evaluated the long-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) versus non-PD resections in MEN1-ZES with regard to biochemical cure and quality of life. We found in a series of 35 patients that initial PD is the superior surgical procedure for MEN1-ZES, leading to long-term cure in about 80% of patients, fewer duodenopancreatic reoperations and an acceptable quality of life. Based on the results of this study, MEN1-ZES should be considered a surgically curable disease.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the long-term outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) versus other duodenopancreatic resections (non-PD) for the surgical treatment of the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (ZES) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Methods: Prospectively recorded patients with biochemically confirmed MEN1-ZES who underwent duodenopancreatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed in terms of clinical characteristics, complications, cure rate, and long-term morbidity, including quality of life assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30). Results: 35 patients (16 female, 19 male) with MEN1-ZES due to duodenopancreatic gastrinomas with a median age of 42 (range 30–74) years were included. At the time of diagnosis, 28 (80%) gastrinomas were malignant, but distant metastases were only present in one (3%) patient. Eleven patients (31.4%) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) as the initial procedure, whereas 24 patients underwent non-PD resections involving duodenotomy with gastrinoma excision, enucleation of the pNEN from the head of the pancreas, and peripancreatic lymphadenectomy, either with or without distal pancreatectomy (i.e., either Thompson procedure, n = 12, or DUODX, n = 12). There was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups (p ≥ 0.05). One (9%) patient of the PD group required reoperation for recurrent or metastatic ZES compared to eight (22.8%) patients of the non-PD resection groups. After a median follow-up time of 134 months (range 6–480) nine of 11 (82%) patients in the PD group, two of 12 (16%) patients in the Thompson procedure group, and three of 12 (25%) patients in the DUODX group had normal serum gastrin levels. In addition, the global health QoLScore was better in the PD group (76.9) compared to the Thompson procedure (57.4) and DUODX (59.5) groups. Conclusions: Initial PD seems to be the superior surgical procedure for MEN1-ZES, resulting in a long-term cure rate of about 80%, fewer duodenopancreatic reoperations, and an acceptable quality of life.

The Research Landscape of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (2000–2021): A Bibliometric Analysis

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate the landscape of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 research during the last 22 years using machine learning and text analysis.

Method

In December 2021, all publications indexed under the MeSH term “Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1” were obtained from PubMed. The whole set of search results was downloaded in XML format, and metadata such as title, abstract, keywords, mesh words, and year of publication were extracted from the original XML files for bibliometric evaluation. The Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling method was used to analyze specific themes.

Results

This study eventually contained 1,407 publications. Among them, there are 768 (54.58%) case reports and reviews. Text analysis based on MeSH words revealed that the most often studied clinical areas include therapy efficacy, prognosis, and genetic diagnosis. The majority of basic study is focused on genetic alterations. The LDA topic model further identifies three topic clusters include basic research, treatment cluster, and diagnosis cluster. In the basic research cluster, many studies are focused on the expression of Menin. The primary focus of the therapy cluster is pancreatic resections and parathyroidectomy. In the diagnose cluster, the main focus is on Genetic Diagnosis and screening strategies for Hereditary Cancer Syndrome.

Conclusion

The current state of research on MEN1 is far from adequate. Research on rare diseases MEN1 necessitates implementing a broad research program involving multiple centers to advance MEN1 research together.

Beyond the "3 Ps": A critical appraisal of the non-endocrine manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), an autosomal-dominantly inherited tumor syndrome, is classically defined by tumors arising from the "3 Ps": Parathyroids, Pituitary, and the endocrine Pancreas. From its earliest descriptions, MEN1 has been associated with other endocrine and non-endocrine neoplastic manifestations. High quality evidence supports a direct association between pathogenic MEN1 variants and neoplasms of the skin (angiofibromas and collagenomas), adipose tissue (lipomas and hibernomas), and smooth muscle (leiomyomas). Although CNS tumors, melanoma, and, most recently, breast cancer have been reported as MEN1 clinical manifestations, the published evidence to date is not yet sufficient to establish causality. Well-designed, multicenter prospective studies will help us to understand better the relationship of these tumors to MEN1, in addition to verifying the true prevalence and penetrance of the well-documented neoplastic associations. Nevertheless, patients affected by MEN1 should be aware of these non-endocrine manifestations, and providers should be encouraged always to think beyond the "3 Ps" when treating an MEN1 patient.

A Direct Comparison of Patients With Hereditary and Sporadic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evaluation of Clinical Course, Prognostic Factors and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Introduction

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in hereditary syndromes pose a significant challenge to clinicians. The rarity of these syndromes and PNETs itself make it difficult to directly compare them with sporadic PNETs. Despite research suggesting differences between these two entities, the same approach is used in hereditary and sporadic PNETs.

Methods

We included 63 patients with hereditary PNET (GpNET) and 145 with sporadic PNET (SpNET) in a retrospective observational study. Clinical and genetic data were collected in two Polish endocrine departments from January 2004 to February 2020. Only patients with confirmed germline mutations were included in the GpNET cohort. We attempted to establish prognostic factors of metastases and overall survival in both groups and genotype-phenotype correlations in the GpNET group.

Results

Patients with GpNET were younger and diagnosed earlier, whereas their tumors were smaller and more frequently multifocal compared with patients with SpNET. Metastases occurred more frequently in the SpNET group, and their appearance was associated with tumor size in both groups. GpNET patients had longer overall survival (OS). OS was affected by age, age at diagnosis, sex, grade, stage, tumor diameter, occurrence and localization of metastases, type of treatment, and comorbidities. In the MEN1 group, carriers of frameshift with STOP codon, splice site, and missense mutations tended to have less advanced disease, while patients with mutations in exon 2 tended to have metastases more frequently.

Conclusions

Direct comparisons of GpNET and SpNET demonstrate significant differences in the clinical courses of both entities, which should force different approaches. A larger group of patients with GpNET should be assessed to confirm genotype-phenotype correlations.

New therapies for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

In 1953, for the first time, Paul Wermer described a family presenting endocrine gland neoplasms over several generations. The transmission was autosomal dominant and the penetrance was high. Forty years later in 1997, the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene was sequenced, thus enabling diagnosis and early optimal treatment. Patients carrying the MEN1 gene present endocrine but also non-endocrine tumors. Parathyroid, pancreatic and pituitary impairment are the three main types of endocrine involvement. The present article details therapeutic management of hyperparathyroidism, neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and pituitary adenomas in patients carrying the MEN1 gene. Significant therapeutic progress has in fact been made in the last few years. As concerns the parathyroid glands, screening of family members and regular monitoring of affected subjects now raise the question of early management of parathyroid lesions and optimal timing of parathyroid surgery. As concerns the duodenum-pancreas, proton-pump inhibitors are able to control gastrin-secreting syndrome, reducing mortality in MEN1 patients. Mortality in MEN1 patients is no longer mainly secondary to uncontrolled hormonal secretion but to metastatic (mainly pancreatic) disease progression. Tumor risk requires regular monitoring of morphological assessment, leading to iterative pancreatic surgery in a large number of patients. Finally, pituitary adenomas in MEN1 patients are traditionally described as aggressive, invasive and resistant to medical treatment. However, regular pituitary screening showed them to be in fact infra-centimetric and non-secreting in the majority of patients. Consequently, it is necessary to regularly monitor MEN1 patients, with regular clinical, biological and morphological work-up. Several studies showed that this regular monitoring impairs quality of life. Building a relationship of trust between patients and care provider is therefore essential. It enables the patient to be referred for psychological or psychiatric care in difficult times, providing long-term support and preventing any breakdown in continuity of care.

Clinical aspects of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare syndrome characterized by the co-occurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and/or pituitary adenomas. MEN1 can predispose patients to other endocrine and non-endocrine tumours, such as cutaneous tumours, central nervous system tumours and breast cancer. Endocrine tumours in patients with MEN1 differ from sporadic tumours in that they have a younger age at onset, present as multiple tumours in the same organ and have a different clinical course. Therefore, patients with overt MEN1 and those who carry a MEN1 mutation should be offered tailored biochemical and imaging screening to detect tumours and evaluate their progression over time. Fortunately, over the past 10 years, knowledge about the clinical phenotype of these tumours has markedly progressed, thanks to the implementation of national registries, particularly in France and the Netherlands. This Review provides an update on the clinical management of MEN1-related tumours. Epidemiology, the clinical picture, diagnostic work-up and the main lines of treatment for MEN1-related tumours are summarized. Controversial therapeutic aspects and issues that still need to be addressed are also discussed. Moreover, special attention is given to MEN1 manifestations in children and adolescents.

Complications After Major Surgery for Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with MEN1: Results from a Nationwide Cohort

Background

Little is known about complications after major duodenopancreatic surgery for duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (dpNETs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Therefore, the incidence and severity of complications after major surgery for MEN1-related dpNETs were assessed.

Methods

Patients were selected from the population-based Dutch MEN1 database if they had undergone a Whipple procedure or total pancreatectomy from 2003 to 2017. Complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (grade III or higher complications were considered a severe complication) and definitions from the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The Cumulative Complication Index (CCI^®) was calculated as the sum of all complications weighted for their severity. Univariable logistic regression was performed to assess potential associations between predictor candidates and a severe complication.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (median age 43 years) underwent a major duodenopancreatic resection, including 14 Whipple procedures and 13 total pancreatectomies. Morbidity and mortality were 100% (27/27) and 4% (1/27), respectively. A severe complication occurred in 17/27 (63%) patients. The median CCI^® was 47.8 [range 8.7–100]. Grade B/C pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, hemorrhage, and chyle leakage occurred in 7/14 (50%), 10/27 (37%), 1/27 (4%), 7/27 (26%), 3/27 (11%) patients, respectively. Patients with a severe complication had longer operative time and higher blood loss. After Whipple, new-onset endocrine and exocrine insufficiency occurred in 1/13 and 9/14 patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Major duodenopancreatic surgery in MEN1 is associated with a very high risk of severe complications and cumulative burden of complications and should therefore be reserved for a select subgroup of patients with MEN1-related dpNETs.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09496-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognosis after surgery for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Functionality matters

BACKGROUND

Metastasized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are the leading cause of death in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Aside from tumor size, prognostic factors of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are largely unknown. The present study aimed to assess whether the prognosis of patients with resected multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors differs from those with resected multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related insulinomas and assessed factors associated with prognosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors between 1990 and 2016 were identified in 2 databases: the DutchMEN Study Group and the International MEN1 Insulinoma Study Group databases. Cox regression was performed to compare liver metastases-free survival of patients with a nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors versus those with an insulinoma and to identify factors associated with liver metastases-free survival.

RESULTS

Out of 153 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, 61 underwent resection for a nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and 92 for an insulinoma. Of the patients with resected lymph nodes, 56% (18/32) of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors had lymph node metastases compared to 10% (4/41) of insulinomas (P = .001). Estimated 10-year liver metastases-free survival was 63% (95% confidence interval 42%-76%) for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and 87% (72%-91%) for insulinomas. After adjustment for size, World Health Organization tumor grade, and age, nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors had an increased risk for liver metastases or death (hazard ratio 3.04 [1.47-6.30]). In pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≥2 cm, nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (2.99 [1.22-7.33]) and World Health Organization grade 2 (2.95 [1.02-8.50]) were associated with liver metastases-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with resected multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors had a significantly lower liver metastases-free survival than patients with insulinomas. Postoperative counseling and follow-up regimens should be tumor type specific and at least consider size and World Health Organization grade.

Lanreotide Therapy vs Active Surveillance in MEN1-Related Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors < 2 Centimeters

PURPOSE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are frequent in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome. They are usually not surgically treated unless larger than 1 to 2 cm or a growth rate > 0.5 cm per year. Somatostatin analogues represent one of the main therapeutic options in pNETs, but they have never been prospectively investigated in MEN1-related pNETs. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of lanreotide in patients with MEN1-related pNETs < 2 cm.

METHODS

MEN1 patients with 1 or more pNETs < 2 cm of maximal diameter were considered. Study design was prospective observational, comparing patients treated with lanreotide autogel 120 mg every 28 days (LAN group) and patients in active surveillance, not receiving any therapy (AS group).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled: 23 in LAN and 19 in AS group. Median follow-up was 73 months. Initial imaging identified a total of 91 pNETs. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the LAN than in the AS group (median not reached vs 40 months, P < 0.001). In the LAN group, 4 patients had an objective tumor response, 15 patients had stable disease, while 4 had tumor progression. In the AS group, 13 patients had pNET progression, while 6 were stable.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective study evaluating the efficacy of somatostatin analogues in MEN1-related pNETs. These findings highlight that lanreotide autogel is effective as antiproliferative therapy in MEN1-related pNETs < 2cm, suggesting the utility of somatostatin analogues to arrest the development of tumor lesions as well as to delay or avoid pancreatic surgery.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: A Case Report With Review of Imaging Findings

Background

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare, autosomal dominant inherited syndrome caused by mutations in the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene. The diagnosis is defined clinically by the presence of 2 or more primary MEN1 tumors (parathyroid, anterior pituitary, and pancreatic islet). We describe the case of a patient who presented with classic history and imaging findings for MEN1.

Case Report

A male in his early thirties with a history of hyperparathyroidism and a transsphenoidal prolactinoma resection presented years later with abdominal symptoms concerning for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: worsening epigastric abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen revealed hyperenhancing pancreatic lesions and duodenal inflammation, suggesting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (gastrinoma) with secondary duodenitis. Bilateral indeterminate hypoattenuating adrenal nodules were also seen on contrast-enhanced CT, and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging confirmed benign adrenal adenomas. Furthermore, thyroid ultrasound and sestamibi scintigraphy revealed a parathyroid adenoma. With confirmatory imaging findings, history, and presenting symptoms, the patient was clinically diagnosed with MEN1 syndrome and underwent surgical and medical management.

Conclusion

This case exhibits the classic history with corresponding imaging findings of MEN1 syndrome, including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, parathyroid adenoma, and adrenal adenomas. High clinical suspicion for MEN1 should lead to endocrinology evaluation with appropriate laboratory workup and targeted imaging evaluation of the typical endocrine organs as described for this patient.

Gastrinomas: Medical or Surgical Treatment

This article reviews the role of surgical and medical management in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) due to a gastrin-secreting neuroendocrine tumor (gastrinoma). It concentrates on the status at present but also briefly reviews the changes over time in treatment approaches. Generally, surgical and medical therapy are complementary today; however, in some cases, such as patients with ZES and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, the treatment approach remains controversial.

Neuroendocrine Tumors in the Stomach, Duodenum, and Pancreas Accompanied by Novel MEN1 Gene Mutation

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome is a relatively rare disease, characterized by the occurrence of multiple endocrine tumors in the parathyroid and pituitary glands as well as the pancreas. Here, we report a case of MEN1 with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in the stomach, duodenum, and pancreas. A 53-year-old man visited our hospital to manage gastric NET. Five years prior to his visit, he had undergone surgery for incidental meningioma. His brother had pancreatic nodules and a history of surgery for adrenal adenoma. His brother's daughter also had pancreatic nodules, but had not undergone surgery. The lesion was treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection and diagnosed as a grade 1 NET. Another small NET was detected in the second duodenal portion, resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection, which was also diagnosed as a grade 1 NET. During evaluation, three nodules were detected in the pancreas, and no evidence of pituitary, parathyroid tumors, or metastasis was observed. After surgery, the pancreatic lesions were diagnosed as NETs, with the same immunohistochemical patterns as those of the stomach and duodenum. Genetic testing was performed, and a heterozygous mutation was detected in the MEN1 gene, which is located on 11q13.