Characteristic dynamics of height and weight in preschool boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Delayed Puberty Including Constitutional Delay: Differential and Outcome

Constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) is the most common cause of delayed puberty in both male and female individuals. This article reviews the causes of delayed puberty focusing on CDGP, including new advances in the understanding of the genetics underpinning CDGP, a clinical approach to discriminating CDGP from other causes of delayed puberty, outcomes, as well as current and potential emerging management options.

Outcomes and experiences of adults with congenital hypogonadism can inform improvements in the management of delayed puberty

Patients with congenital hypogonadism will encounter many health care professionals during their lives managing their health needs; from antenatal and infantile periods, through childhood and adolescence, into adult life and then old age. The pubertal transition from childhood to adult life raises particular challenges for diagnosis, therapy and psychological support, and patients encounter many pitfalls. Many patients with congenital hypogonadism and delayed or absent puberty are only diagnosed and treated after long diagnostic journeys, and their management across different centres and countries is not well standardised. Here we reconsider the management of pubertal delay, whilst addressing problematic diagnostic issues and highlighting the limitations of historic pubertal induction protocols - from the perspective of both an adult and a paediatric endocrinologist, dealing in our everyday work with the long-term adverse consequences to our hypogonadal patients of an incorrect and/or late diagnosis and treatment in childhood.

Key features of puberty onset and progression can help distinguish self-limited delayed puberty from congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism

Introduction

Delayed puberty (DP) is a frequent concern for adolescents. The most common underlying aetiology is self-limited DP (SLDP). However, this can be difficult to differentiate from the more severe condition congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH), especially on first presentation of an adolescent patient with DP. This study sought to elucidate phenotypic differences between the two diagnoses, in order to optimise patient management and pubertal development.

Methods

This was a study of a UK DP cohort managed 2015-2023, identified through the NIHR clinical research network. Patients were followed longitudinally until adulthood, with a definite diagnosis made: SLDP if they had spontaneously completed puberty by age 18 years; HH if they had not commenced (complete, cHH), or had commenced but not completed puberty (partial, pHH), by this stage. Phenotypic data pertaining to auxology, Tanner staging, biochemistry, bone age and hormonal treatment at presentation and during puberty were retrospectively analysed.

Results

78 patients were included. 52 (66.7%) patients had SLDP and 26 (33.3%) patients had HH, comprising 17 (65.4%) pHH and 9 (34.6%) cHH patients. Probands were predominantly male (90.4%). Male SLDP patients presented with significantly lower height and weight standard deviation scores than HH patients (height p=0.004, weight p=0.021). 15.4% of SLDP compared to 38.5% of HH patients had classical associated features of HH (micropenis, cryptorchidism, anosmia, etc. p=0.023). 73.1% of patients with SLDP and 43.3% with HH had a family history of DP (p=0.007). Mean first recorded luteinizing hormone (LH) and inhibin B were lower in male patients with HH, particularly in cHH patients, but not discriminatory. There were no significant differences identified in blood concentrations of FSH, testosterone or AMH at presentation, or in bone age delay.

Discussion

Key clinical markers of auxology, associated signs including micropenis, and serum inhibin B may help distinguish between SLDP and HH in patients presenting with pubertal delay, and can be incorporated into clinical assessment to improve diagnostic accuracy for adolescents. However, the distinction between HH, particularly partial HH, and SLDP remains problematic. Further research into an integrated framework or scoring system would be useful in aiding clinician decision-making and optimization of treatment.  .

Delayed puberty, gonadotropin abnormalities and subfertility in male Padi2/Padi4 double knockout mice

BACKGROUND

Peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes (PADs) convert arginine residues to citrulline in a process called citrullination or deimination. Recently, two PADs, PAD2 and PAD4, have been linked to hormone signaling in vitro and the goal of this study was to test for links between PAD2/PAD4 and hormone signaling in vivo.

METHODS

Preliminary analysis of Padi2 and Padi4 single knockout (SKO) mice did not find any overt reproductive defects and we predicted that this was likely due to genetic compensation. To test this hypothesis, we created a Padi2/Padi4 double knockout (DKO) mouse model and tested these mice along with wild-type FVB/NJ (WT) and both strains of SKO mice for a range of reproductive defects.

RESULTS

Controlled breeding trials found that male DKO mice appeared to take longer to have their first litter than WT controls. This tendency was maintained when these mice were mated to either DKO or WT females. Additionally, unsexed 2-day old DKO pups and male DKO weanlings both weighed significantly less than their WT counterparts, took significantly longer than WT males to reach puberty, and had consistently lower serum testosterone levels. Furthermore, 90-day old adult DKO males had smaller testes than WT males with increased rates of germ cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The Padi2/Padi4 DKO mouse model provides a new tool for investigating PAD function and outcomes from our studies provide the first in vivo evidence linking PADs with hormone signaling.

Growth variations with opposite clinical outcomes and the emerging role of IGF-1

Normal growth pattern variations [i.e., constitutional advancement and constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CAGP and CDGP)] are the mirror image of each other and are associated with early puberty (EP) and delayed puberty (DP), respectively. Differences between CAGP and CDGP relate not only to auxological characteristics (height, weight) but also to insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). IGF-1 levels in CAGP are above average whereas in CDGP they are below average, suggesting a role for IGF-1 in the induction of these growth patterns. Herein, we provide data suggesting that early activation of the growth hormone (GH)/IGF-1 axis induces the growth pattern of CAGP. Moreover, we suggest that IGF-1 is a decisive factor for the release of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) inhibition brake that occurs in prepuberty. It is therefore crucial for puberty onset.

Adolescent boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty grow faster than patients with organic growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE

Constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) is a tempo variant with a good prognosis. Healthy late-maturing adolescents grow slower than postulated by age-related references, and therefore, CDGP is frequently confused with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). For differential diagnosis, height velocity references for CDGP are needed.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Here, we provide height velocity data for late-maturing boys based on mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional observations in a group of 38 German adolescents with proven CDGP and compare them with cross-sectional observations in a group of 164 adolescents with organic GHD from the National Cooperative Growth Study registry.

RESULTS

In the critical age interval from 13.4 to 14.9 years, the growth of prepubertal adolescents with CDGP was faster (mean/median height velocity, 5.2/5.4 cm/years; quartiles, 4.4-6.2 cm/years) than that of prepubertal adolescents with organic GHD (3.5/3.2 cm/years; quartiles, 2.0-4.4 cm/years) in the cross-sectional analysis (p < .0001). Based on our mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis, the height velocity of adolescent boys with CDGP exceeded previous model calculations on average by 1.0 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, prepubertal adolescents with CDGP grow faster than patients with organic GHD. Previous model estimates underestimated height velocity of boys with CDGP.

Clinical benefits of sex steroids given as a priming prior to GH provocative test or as a growth-promoting therapy in peripubertal growth delays: Results of a retrospective study among ENDO-ERN centres

OBJECTIVES

Sex steroids, administered as a priming before GH stimulation tests (GHST) to differentiate between growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) or as growth-promoting therapy using low-dose sex steroids (LDSS) in CDGP, are much debated. We aimed to compare auxological outcomes of CDGP or GHD children undergoing primed or unprimed GHST and to evaluate LDSS treatment in CDGP.

DESIGN

Retrospective study among three paediatric University Hospitals in Italy and UK.

METHODS

184 children (72 females) aged 12.4 ± 2.08 years underwent primed (/P⁺ ) or unprimed (/P^- ) GHST and were followed up until final height (FH). CDGP patients were untreated (CDG P^- ) or received LDSS (CDGP⁺ ). The cohort included 34 CDG P^- /P⁺ , 12 CDGP⁺ /P⁺ , 51 GHD/P⁺ , 29 CDG P^- /P^- , 2 CDGP⁺ /P^- and 56 GHD/P^- . FH standard deviation score (SDS), Δ SDS FH-target height (TH) and degree of success (-1 ≤ Δ SDS FH-SDS TH ≤ +1) were outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

GHD/P⁺ had better FH-SDS (-0.87 vs -1.49; P = .023) and ΔSDS FH-TH (-0.35 vs -0.77; P = .002) than CDGP^- /P⁺ . Overall, GHD/P⁺ showed the highest degree of success (90%, P = .006). Regardless of priming, both rhGH and LDSS improved degree of success compared to no treatment (89% and 86% vs 63%, P = .0009). GHD/P⁺ showed a trend towards a higher proportion of permanent GHD compared to GHD/P^- (30.43% vs 15.09%; P = .067).

CONCLUSION

In peripubertal children, priming before GHST improves diagnostic accuracy of GHST for idiopathic GHD. LDSS treatment improves auxological outcomes in CDGP.

A Proposal for the Interpretation of Serum IGF-I Concentration as Part of Laboratory Screening in Children with Growth Failure

The serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration is commonly used as a screening tool for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), but there is no consensus on the cut-off limit of IGF-I standard deviation score (SDS) to perform GH stimulation tests for confirmation or exclusion of GHD. We argue that the cut-off limit is dependent on the clinical pre-test likelihood of GHD and propose a diagnostic strategy in which the cut-off limit varies between zero to -2 SDS.