A practical algorithm to predict postsurgical recurrence and progression of pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET)s

Grading and staging for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Pituitary adenoma/pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the second most common primary intracranial tumor and the most frequent neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms of the human body. Thus, they are one of the most frequent diagnoses in neuropathologist's practise. 2022 5th edition WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors does not support a grading and/or staging system for PitNETs and argues that histological typing and subtyping are more robust than proliferation rate and invasiveness to stratify tumors. Numerous studies suggest the existence of clinically relevant molecular subgroups encouraging an integrated histo-molecular approach to the diagnosis of PitNETs to deepen the understanding of their biology and overcome the unresolved problem of grading system. The present review illustrates the main issues involved in establishing a grading and a staging system, as well as alternative systems validated by independent series to date. The state of art of the current histological and molecular markers is detailed, demonstrating that a standardized and reproducible clinico-pathological approach, combined with the integration of molecular data may help build a workflow to refine the definition of PitNETs with 'malignant potential' and most importantly, avoid delay in patient treatment. Next molecular studied are needed to validate an integrated histo-molecular grading for PitNETs.

scRNA sequencing technology for PitNET studies

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are common, most likely benign tumors with complex clinical characteristics related to hormone hypersecretion and/or growing sellar tumor mass. PitNET types are classified according to their expression of specific transcriptional factors (TFs) and hormone secretion levels. Some types show aggressive, invasive, and reoccurrence behavior. Current research is being conducted to understand the molecular mechanisms regulating these high-heterogeneous neoplasms originating from adenohypophysis, and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology is now playing an essential role in these studies due to its remarkable resolution at the single-cell level. This review describes recent studies on human PitNETs performed with scRNA-seq technology, highlighting the potential of this approach in revealing these tumor pathologies, behavior, and regulatory mechanisms.

Outcome of non-functioning ACTH pituitary tumors: silent does not mean indolent

INTRODUCTION

Silent corticotroph tumors (siACTH) represent a rare entity of pituitary tumors (PT), usually more aggressive than other PT. Few predictor factors of recurrence in the post-operative period have been proposed until now. This study aimed (1) to evaluate the clinical outcome of siACTH after surgery according to a five-tiered clinicopathological classification (2) to compare siACTH characteristics to ACTH-secreting macroadenomas (macroCD), and silent gonadotropinomas (siLH/FSH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2022, 29 siACTH out of 865 PT cases operated in one tertiary center were included. Clinical, paraclinical, histological, and surgical data were collected and compared to 25 macroCD and 143 siLH/FSH cases, respectively. The tumor grading was established according to both invasion (no = 1; yes = 2) and proliferation (no = a; yes = b). Progression-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

We identified 15 (51.7%) grade 1a, 11 (37.9%) grade 2a and 3 (10.3%) grade 2b siACTH with a trend for a 7-fold-time higher risk of progression/recurrence in grade 2b as compared to 1a (p = 0.06). The repartition of tumor grades was similar between the three subgroups, however a 5.7-fold-higher risk of progression was observed in grade 1a siACTH than in grade 1a siLH/FSH (p = 0.02). Compared to siLH/FSH, higher ACTH levels may help to preoperatively identify siACTH.

CONCLUSION

The five-tiered clinicopathological classification contribute to predict the risk of recurrence of operated siACTH tumors. Noteworthy, non-invasive and non-proliferative siACTH exhibit a less favorable outcomes than their siLH/FSH counterparts, which should prompt for a personalized follow up.

A clinicopathological study of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumours using the World Health Organization 2022 classification

Background

The 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumour (PitNET) supersedes the previous one in 2017 and further consolidates the role of transcription factors (TF) in the diagnosis of PitNET. Here, we investigated the clinical utility of the 2022 WHO classification, as compared to that of 2017, in a cohort of patients with non-functioning PitNET (NF-PitNET).

Methods

A total of 113 NF-PitNET patients who underwent resection between 2010 and 2021, and had follow-up at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, were recruited. Surgical specimens were re-stained for the three TF: steroidogenic factor (SF-1), T-box family member TBX19 (TPIT) and POU class 1 homeobox 1 (Pit-1). The associations of different NF-PitNET subtypes with tumour-related outcomes were evaluated by logistic and Cox regression analyses.

Results

Based on the 2022 WHO classification, the majority of NF-PitNET was SF-1-lineage tumours (58.4%), followed by TPIT-lineage tumours (18.6%), tumours with no distinct lineage (16.8%) and Pit-1-lineage tumours (6.2%). Despite fewer entities than the 2017 classification, significant differences in disease-free survival were present amongst these four subtypes (Log-rank test p=0.003), specifically between SF-1-lineage PitNET and PitNET without distinct lineage (Log-rank test p<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the subtype of PitNET without distinct lineage (HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.28-7.16, p=0.012), together with tumour volume (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p=0.017), were independent predictors of a composite of residual or recurrent disease.

Conclusion

The 2022 WHO classification of PitNET is a clinically useful TF and lineage-based system for subtyping NF-PitNET with different tumour behaviour and prognosis.

Histopathology of growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors: State of the art and new perspectives

Somatotroph (GH) adenomas/PitNETs typically arise from adenohypophysis and are biochemically active, leading to acromegaly and gigantism. More rarely, they present with ectopic origin and do not present overt biochemical or clinical features (silent variants). Histopathological examination should consider the clinical and radiological background, and include multiple steps assessing tumor morphology, pituitary transcription factors (PTFs), hormone secretion, proliferation markers, granulation, and somatostatin receptors (STRs), aimed at depicting as better as possible tumor origin (in case of non-functioning and/or metastatic tumor), and clinical behavior, including response to treatment. GH-secreting tumors are part of the Pit-1 family tumors and can secrete GH only (pure somatotrophs) or co-secrete prolactin (mixed tumors; in this case, various histological subtypes have been identified). Each subtype presents unique radiological, biochemical, and clinical characteristic. Therefore, the integration of biochemical, clinical, radiological, and histopathological elements is fundamental for proper diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs, to be performed in referral Centers. In more recent times, the importance of genetic and epigenetic evaluation in the characterization of pituitary tumors (i.e., early identification of aggressive variants) has been outlined by some large studies, with the intention of improving targeted treatments.

Drug Repositioning for Refractory Benign Tumors of the Central Nervous System

Drug repositioning (DR) is the process of identifying novel therapeutic potentials for already-approved drugs and discovering new therapies for untreated diseases. DR can play an important role in optimizing the pre-clinical process of developing novel drugs by saving time and cost compared with the process of de novo drug discovery. Although the number of publications related to DR has rapidly increased, most therapeutic approaches were reported for malignant tumors. Surgical resection represents the definitive treatment for benign tumors of the central nervous system (BTCNS). However, treatment options remain limited for surgery-, chemotherapy- and radiation-refractory BTCNS, as well as malignant tumors. Meningioma, pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), and schwannoma are the most common BTCNS. The treatment strategy using DR may be applied for refractory BTCNS, such as Grade 2 meningiomas, neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis, and PitNETs with cavernous sinus invasion. In the setting of BTCNS, stable disease can provide significant benefit to the patient. DR may provide a longer duration of survival without disease progression for patients with refractory BTCNS. This article reviews the utility of DR for refractory BTCNS.

The Effects of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy on the Neoplastic and Normal Pituitary

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) are usually benign and slow-growing; however, in some cases, they may behave aggressively and become resistant to conventional treatments. Therapeutic options for aggressive or metastatic PitNETs are limited, and currently mainly consist of temozolomide, with little experience of other emerging approaches, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Somatostatin receptor expression in PitNETs explains the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for treating PitNETs, particularly those hypersecreting pituitary hormones, such as growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone. The expression of such receptors in pituitary tumour cells has provided the rationale for using PRRT to treat patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs. However, the PRRT efficacy in this setting remains unestablished, as knowledge on this today is based only on few case reports and small series of cases, which are reviewed here. A total of 30 PRRT-treated patients have been thus far reported: 23 aggressive PitNETs, 5 carcinomas, and 2 of malignancy status unspecified. Of the 27 published cases with information regarding the response to PRRT, 5 (18%) showed a partial response, 8 (30%) had stable disease, and 14 (52%) had progressive disease. No major adverse effects have been reported, and there is also no increased risk of clinically relevant hypopituitarism in patients with pituitary or non-pituitary neuroendocrine tumours following PRRT. PRRT may be regarded as a safe option for patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs if other treatment approaches are not feasible or have failed in controlling the disease progression, with tumour shrinkage occurring in up to a fifth of cases, while about a third of aggressive pituitary tumours may achieve stable disease. Here, the data on PRRT in the management of patients with aggressive pituitary tumours are reviewed, as well as the effects of PRRT on the pituitary function in other PRRT-treated cancer patients.

Usefulness of a clinicopathological classification in predicting treatment-related outcomes and multimodal therapeutic approaches in pituitary adenoma patients: retrospective analysis on a Portuguese cohort of 129 patients from a tertiary pituitary center

PURPOSE

A clinicopathological classification has been designed to predict recurrence/progression in patients with pituitary adenomas (PAs). We aimed to study its usefulness in predicting PAs that will have a challenging disease course and may require more often complex multimodal and multiple therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 129 patients with PAs operated in our institution between 2001 and 2020 (84 non-clinically functioning PAs, 32 acromegaly, 9 Cushing's disease, 2 prolactinomas and 2 thyrotropinomas). Grading was based on invasion and proliferation: 1a (non-invasive, non-proliferative; n = 59), 1b (non-invasive, proliferative; n = 17), 2a (invasive, non-proliferative; n = 38), and 2b (invasive, proliferative; n = 15).

RESULTS

Of the 129 patients, 68 (52.7%) were females, and the mean age at diagnosis was 53.7 ± 15.4 years. The mean follow-up duration was 93.1 ± 61.8 months. Grade 2b PAs when compared to other grades (2b-2a-1b-1a) had significantly higher rates of persistent tumor remnant within 1-year after operation (93-78-18-30%; p < 0.001), active disease at last follow-up (40-27-12-10%; p = 0.004), re-operation (27-16-0-5%; p = 0.023), irradiation (53-38-12-7%; p < 0.001), multimodal treatment (67-49-18-25%; p = 0.003), multiple treatment (33-27-6-9%; p = 0.017). Patients with grade 2b PAs also required a higher mean number of treatments (2.6-2.1-1.2-1.4; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This clinicopathological classification appears to be a useful grading system to identify PAs that may be more refractory and more often require complex multimodal and multiple therapeutic approaches. Invasive PAs, especially grade 2b tumors, may be more likely to need complex treatment approach, including radiotherapy, and may display higher rates of active disease at last follow-up, despite receiving higher number of treatments.

Initial pathology in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas: 2b or not 2b?-that is the question

From a cohort of 171 patients comprising 121 aggressive pituitary tumours (APT) and 50 pituitary carcinomas (PC), the clinicopathological or five-tiered classification based on tumour invasion and proliferation evaluated by at least 2 proliferative markers over the cut-offs (Ki-67 ≥3% or ≥10%, p53 positive or expressed in %, mitotic count &gt;2%), could be applied on 43 tumours: 20 PC and 23 APT. At the initial surgery, 29/43 tumours (67.4%) were grade 2b (invasive and proliferative) of which 44.8% developed metastases during follow-up (PC, grade 3). Out of these 29 tumours, 55.1% had a Ki-67 ≥10%, and were classified grade 2b* (invasive and highly proliferative). There was one tumour grade 1b* (non-invasive and highly proliferative) which metastazed. Out of the 43 tumours, 30.2 % were grade 2a (invasive and non-proliferative). The sensitivity and the specificity of grade 2b for the diagnosis of APT at the initial surgery, were 68% and 90% respectively. The comparison of the high percentage (67.4%) of grade 2b tumours in this selected cohort of APT/PC with the low percentage (8.8%) in a surgical cohort of unselected tumours shows that the initial pathological diagnosis of grade 2b tumour may be considered, in the clinic, as representing a diagnosis of APT. In addition, a significant subgroup of tumours, which will develop metastases supports the proposal that an aggressive grade 2b tumour is “a tumour with malignant potential” or “a malignant tumour without metastases”. So, the clinician may take into account the pathological diagnosis, at the initial surgery, to propose a strict follow-up and to consider earlier use of radiotherapy and/or of temozolomide in the presence of tumours with aggressive behaviour.

Aggressive pituitary tumors (PitNETs)

The majority of anterior pituitary tumors behave benignly, that is, they grow slowly and do not metastasize, and were therefore called adenomas. However, they would frequently invade adjacent structures, leading to recurrence. One of the misleading assumptions in their previous classification was the simplistic distinction made between adenoma and carcinoma. In the upcoming WHO 2022 classification, a new terminology will be introduced: pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) which is consistent with that used for other neuroendocrine neoplasms. In general, aggressive PitNETs are invasive and proliferative tumors with frequent recurrences, resistant to conventional treatments, and yet virtually without metastases. At present, no single morphological or histological marker has been shown as yet to reliably predict their aggressive behavior. In terms of treatment, temozolomide (TMZ) had been considered promising and the sole therapeutic option for aggressive and malignant PitNETs following failure of standard therapies. However, recent reports have disclosed that TMZ does not provide long-term control of many aggressive PitNETs. A further multidisciplinary approach is necessary for both reliable prediction and successful management of aggressive PitNETs.

Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Role of Ki67 Proliferative Index in Neuroendocrine and Endocrine Neoplasms: Past, Present, and Future

The introduction of Ki67 immunohistochemistry in the work-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has opened a new approach for their diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Since the first demonstration of the prognostic role of Ki67 proliferative index in pancreatic NENs in 1996, several studies have been performed to explore its prognostic, diagnostic, and predictive role in other neuroendocrine and endocrine neoplasms. A large amount of information is now available and published results globally indicate that Ki67 proliferative index is useful to this scope, although some differences exist in relation to tumor site and type. In gut and pancreatic NENs, the Ki67 proliferative index has a well-documented and accepted diagnostic and prognostic role and its evaluation is mandatory in their diagnostic work-up. In the lung, the Ki67 index is recommended for the diagnosis of NENs on biopsy specimens, but its diagnostic role in surgical specimens still remains to be officially accepted, although its prognostic role is now well documented. In other organs, such as the pituitary, parathyroid, thyroid (follicular cell-derived neoplasms), and adrenal medulla, the Ki67 index does not play a diagnostic role and its prognostic value still remains a controversial issue. In medullary thyroid carcinoma, the Ki67 labelling index is used to define the tumor grade together with other morphological parameters, while in the adrenal cortical carcinoma, it is useful to select patients to treated with mitotane therapy. In the present review, the most important information on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive role of Ki67 proliferative index is presented discussing the current knowledge. In addition, technical issues related to the evaluation of Ki67 proliferative index and the future perspectives of the application of Ki67 immunostaining in endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms is discussed.

Single-cell sequencing identifies differentiation-related markers for molecular classification and recurrence prediction of PitNET

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) is one of the most common intracranial tumors with variable recurrence rate. Currently, the recurrence prediction is unsatisfying and can be improved by understanding the cellular origins and differentiation status. Here, to comprehensively reveal the origin of PitNET, we perform comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data from 3 anterior pituitary glands and 21 PitNETs. We identify distinct genes representing major subtypes of well and poorly differentiated PitNETs in each lineage. To further verify the predictive value of differentiation biomarkers, we include an independent cohort of 800 patients with an average follow-up of 7.2 years. In both PIT1 and TPIT lineages, poorly differentiated groups show significantly higher recurrence rates while well-differentiated groups show higher recurrence rates in SF1 lineage. Our findings reveal the possible origin and differentiation status of PitNET based on which new differentiation classification is proposed and verified to predict tumor recurrence.

A case of aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumour with extremely rapid progression: possible diagnostic value of TERT promoter methylation

Most pituitary adenoma/neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET) are histologically benign and grow slowly; however, a subset of these tumours exhibit a more aggressive clinical course characterized by local invasiveness and early recurrence. These high-risk PitNETs often require multiple surgeries and radiation over several years and may eventually acquire carcinomatous characteristics, such as metastasis in some cases. Herein, we report a rare case of PitNET causing oculomotor paresis with extremely rapid recurrence only 3 months after initial surgery, followed by lethal liver metastasis. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings were consistent with typical PitNETs, other than moderate invasion of the cavernous sinus. Pathological examination of the specimen obtained from the initial transsphenoidal surgery revealed increased mitosis and elevated rates of cells positive for Ki-67 and p53. Based on the immunohistochemical assessment for transcription factors and pituitary hormones, the diagnosis was determined to be a silent sparsely granulated corticotroph PitNET with focal malignant transformation. Aggressive features represented by Ki-67 and p53 positivity were more robust in recurrent and metastatic specimens, but hormone immunostaining was decreased. Epigenetic analysis revealed methylation of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter in the tumour, resulting in TERT upregulation. Despite extensive research, markers for distinguishing extremely aggressive PitNETs have not been determined. Although further analysis is needed, our case demonstrates the possible usefulness of assessing TERT promoter methylation status in the stratification of recurrence risk in extremely high-risk variants of PitNET.

Real-life clinical impact of a five-tiered classification of pituitary tumors

INTRODUCTION

Usually benign, pituitary tumors (PT) can be invasive and aggressive with a propensity to progress and/or recur. Trouillas's clinicopathological classification attempts to predict the evolutionary risk of a PT. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of this classification in an independent patient cohort and analyzed its impact on treatment strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, 607 patients operated on between 2008 and 2018 for a PT were included. Grading was established based on invasion, proliferative activity (Ki-67, mitotic index) and p53 positivity. The therapeutic management following surgery was analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) of the graded tumors was estimated (Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test) and a multivariate analysis was performed (Cox regression model).

RESULTS

Grading identified non-invasive PT without (grade 1a: 303 cases) or with proliferative activity (grade 1b: 53 cases) and invasive PT without (grade 2a: 202 cases) or with proliferative activity (grade 2b: 49 cases). The mean follow-up was 47 ± 30 months (median: 38 months). Progression/recurrence occurred in 127 cases. Grades were significant and independent predictors of PFS (P < 0.001) with a 4.8-fold higher risk of progression/recurrence in grade 2b as compared to grade 1a. As second-line therapy, gamma knife or conventional radiotherapy controlled tumor growth in 91.6 and 100% of cases, respectively, irrespective of the grade. Proliferative tumors exposed the patient to a 9.5-fold higher risk of having ≥3 adjuvant therapeutic lines as compared to non-proliferative tumors.

DISCUSSION

Grading of a PT according to Trouillas's classification predicts its risk of progression and should advocate for a personalized therapeutic approach in invasive and proliferative tumors.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This is the first study to assess, on a cohort of 607 well-characterized patients, the real-life therapeutic impact of the five-tiered clinicopathological classification of pituitary tumors. First, we validate that pituitary tumor grades predict the evolutionary risk of the tumor, with a significant higher risk of progression/recurrence in invasive and/or proliferative tumors (mean follow-up: 47 ± 30 months, median: 38 months). Moreover, our study provides evidence that patients with proliferative tumors have a higher risk to be retreated after primary surgery and point toward the fact that radiotherapy can successfully control tumor growth in case of progression or recurrence. Our findings advocate for a personalized therapeutic approach in clinically aggressive pituitary tumors.

Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma

All endocrine glands are susceptible to neoplastic growth, yet the health consequences of these neoplasms differ between endocrine tissues. Pituitary neoplasms are highly prevalent and overwhelmingly benign, exhibiting a spectrum of diverse behaviors and impact on health. To understand the clinical biology of these common yet often innocuous neoplasms, we review pituitary physiology and adenoma epidemiology, pathophysiology, behavior, and clinical consequences. The anterior pituitary develops in response to a range of complex brain signals integrating with intrinsic ectodermal cell transcriptional events that together determine gland growth, cell type differentiation, and hormonal production, in turn maintaining optimal endocrine health. Pituitary adenomas occur in 10% of the population; however, the overwhelming majority remain harmless during life. Triggered by somatic or germline mutations, disease-causing adenomas manifest pathogenic mechanisms that disrupt intrapituitary signaling to promote benign cell proliferation associated with chromosomal instability. Cellular senescence acts as a mechanistic buffer protecting against malignant transformation, an extremely rare event. It is estimated that fewer than one-thousandth of all pituitary adenomas cause clinically significant disease. Adenomas variably and adversely affect morbidity and mortality depending on cell type, hormone secretory activity, and growth behavior. For most clinically apparent adenomas, multimodal therapy controlling hormone secretion and adenoma growth lead to improved quality of life and normalized mortality. The clinical biology of pituitary adenomas, and particularly their benign nature, stands in marked contrast to other tumors of the endocrine system, such as thyroid and neuroendocrine tumors.

Recommendations for the diagnosis and radiological follow-up of pituitary neuroendocrine tumours

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours with a gradually increasing incidence, partly accounted for by more sensitive imaging techniques and more extensive experience in neuroradiology in this regard. Although most PitNETs are indolent, some exhibit aggressive behaviour, and recurrence may be seen after surgical removal. The changes introduced in the WHO classification in 2017 and terminological debates in relation to neuroendocrine tumours warrant an update of the guidelines for the diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative management, and follow-up of response to treatment of PitNETs. This multidisciplinary document, an initiative of the Neuroendocrinology area of the Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición [Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition] (SEEN), focuses on neuroimaging studies for the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of PitNETs. The basic requirements and elements that should be covered by magnetic resonance imaging are described, and a minimum radiology report to aid clinicians in treatment decision-making is proposed. This work supplements the consensus between the Neuroendocrinology area of the SEEN and the Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica [Spanish Society of Pathology] (SEAP) for the pathological study of PitNETs.

Clinical and radiological presentation of parasellar ectopic pituitary adenomas: case series and systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Parasellar ectopic pituitary adenomas (pEPAs) are extremely rare tumors located out of the sella turcica. PEPAs are heterogeneous entities in terms of anatomical localization and secretion of anterior pituitary hormones.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective study. Clinical charts' consultation of patients diagnosed with parasellar lesions, to identify all subjects fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of parasellar EPAs. Systematic review of the literature focused on the medical management of prolactin-secreting pEPAs and on the prevalence of radiological bone invasion in pEPAs.

RESULTS

We identified four cases of pEPAs: (1) 54-year-old female with a prolactin-secreting suprasellar EPA successfully treated with cabergoline; (2) 74-year-old male with a non-functioning EPA of the sphenoidal sinus treated with endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery; (3) 75-year-old female with a giant lesion of the skull base (maximum diameter 7.2 cm) diagnosed as a non-functioning EPA after biopsy; (4) 49-year-old male with a silent corticotroph EPA of the sphenoidal sinus and clivus. Three out of four cases had radiological evidence of invasion of the surrounding bone structures. A systematic review of the literature highlighted that medical therapy can be effective in prolactin-secreting pEPAs. Overall, we found mention of local invasiveness in 65/147 cases (44.2%), confirmed by radiological signs of bone invasion/erosion.

CONCLUSION

Our experience confirms the heterogeneity of pEPAs in terms of clinical and radiological presentation, as well as hormone secretion. PEPAs show a high frequency of radiological bone invasion, though similar to that of sellar pituitary adenomas. Although extremely rare, pEPAs need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of parasellar lesions.

Aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas

Pituitary tumors are generally benign, although in rare cases aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and carcinomas present important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and are associated with a high mortality rate. Almost half of these APTs and carcinomas are corticotroph tumors, suggesting a specific prognosis. Clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic markers are limited and do not allow early management of these tumors. Temozolomide remains the first-line treatment once a diagnosis of aggressive pituitary tumor or carcinoma has been made. Novel alternative treatments exist, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, which can be used in the case of temozolomide treatment failure. The aim of this review is to present the clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics of aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas, and to describe the results obtained with currently available treatments.

High-risk pituitary adenomas and strategies for predicting response to treatment

High-risk pituitary adenomas are aggressive. They show clinical and imaging features similar to those of carcinomas, including infiltration of the surrounding brain structures, but lack cerebrospinal or systemic metastases. In addition, they display distinct behavior, including tendency for fast growth and frequent recurrences, which are difficult to control. The term "high-risk" adenoma was first introduced in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Endocrine Tumors in 2017. Five defined adenoma types belong to this category, including sparsely granulated somatotroph, lactotroph in men, Crooke cell, silent corticotroph, and plurihormonal PIT-1 positive adenomas. The morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of high-risk adenomas are herein described in detail. In addition, the clinical features and the treatment options are presented. This review focuses on predictive markers assessed by immunohistochemistry, which help clinicians to design the appropriate treatment strategies for high-risk adenomas. Somatostatin receptor status predicts effectiveness of postsurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs, and MGMT expression predicts response to treatment with temozolomide. This comprehensive review presents the clinical and pathological features of high-risk pituitary adenomas, underlines the contribution of immunohistochemistry, and emphasizes the leading role of pathology in the design of optimal clinical management.

Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas

Although usually benign, anterior pituitary tumours occasionally exhibit aggressive behaviour, with invasion of surrounding tissues, rapid growth, resistance to conventional treatments and multiple recurrences. In very rare cases, they metastasize and are termed pituitary carcinomas. The time between a 'classical' pituitary tumour and a pituitary carcinoma can be years, which means that monitoring should be performed regularly in patients with clinical (invasion and/or tumour growth) or pathological (Ki67 index, mitotic count and/or p53 detection) markers suggesting aggressiveness. However, although both invasion and proliferation have prognostic value, such parameters cannot predict outcome or malignancy without metastasis. Future research should focus on the biology of both tumour cells and their microenvironment, hopefully with improved therapeutic outcomes. Currently, the initial therapeutic approach for aggressive pituitary tumours is generally to repeat surgery or radiotherapy in expert centres. Standard medical treatments usually have no effect on tumour progression but they can be maintained on a long-term basis to, at least partly, control hypersecretion. In cases where standard treatments prove ineffective, temozolomide, the sole formally recommended treatment, is effective in only one-third of patients. Personalized use of emerging therapies, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, angiogenesis-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, will hopefully improve the outcomes of patients with this severe condition.

Medical Therapy of Aggressive Pituitary Tumors

The rare aggressive pituitary adenoma presents a special challenge, due to the heterogenous presentation of the disease. The prognosis of aggressive pituitary adenomas has been improved due to recent studies demonstrating clinically-relevant efficacy of temozolomide, which is now considered first-line chemotherapy. However, there is limited data on second-line therapies in patients with treatment failure. This review presents a summary on the potential of medical therapies in aggressive pituitary tumors.