Sexual function and depressive symptoms in young women with hypoprolactinaemia

Drug induced hypoprolactinemia

Prolactin levels can be influenced by multiple medications primarily through the interaction with dopamine receptors which regulate its secretion. Unlike hyperprolactinemia which has a well-defined clinical phenotype, the effects of hypoprolactinemia beyond inability to lactate are incompletely understood. Recent studies have raised concerns regarding detrimental changes in glucose metabolism, sexual function and psychological profile in patients with low prolactin levels. In contrast with anatomic and genetic etiologies, drug-induced hypoprolactinemia is usually reversible after dose reduction of the offending medication. The most common clinical scenario of drug-induced hypoprolactinemia in the endocrine clinic pertains to patients treated with cabergoline or bromocriptine for prolactin-secreting or other types of pituitary adenomas. Also, data has accumulated regarding hypoprolactinemia in patients receiving aripiprazole for schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders. These patients warrant careful evaluation for comorbidities. This review aims to increase awareness about the potentially detrimental effects of drug-induced hypoprolactinemia, which should be considered in clinical practice decisions.

Could low prolactin levels after radiotherapy predict the onset of hypopituitarism?

Both local and external cranial radiotherapy (RT) can induce neurotoxicity and vascular damage of the hypothalamic-pituitary area, which can promote neuroendocrine alterations. While anterior pituitary insufficiency after RT has been extensively characterized, data on the effect of RT on prolactin (PRL) secretion are limited and heterogeneous, with different patterns of PRL behavior described in the literature. A progressive decline in PRL levels, reflecting a time-dependent, slowly evolving radiation-induced damage to the pituitary lactotroph cells has been reported. To date, the association between hypopituitarism and hypoprolactinemia in patients undergoing RT has not yet been fully investigated. The few available data suggest that lower PRL levels can predict an extent damage of the pituitary tissue and a higher degree of hypothalamic dysfunction. However, most studies on the effect of RT on pituitary function do not properly assess PRL secretion, as PRL deficiency is usually detected as part of hypopituitarism and not systematically investigated as an isolated disorder, which may lead to an underestimation of hypoprolactinemia after RT. In addition, the often-inadequate follow-up over a long period of time may contribute to the non-recognition of PRL deficiency after RT. Considering that hypoprolactinemia is associated with various metabolic complications, there is a need to define appropriate diagnostic and management criteria. Therefore, hypoprolactinemia should enter in the clinical investigation of patients at risk for hypopituitarism, mainly in those patients who underwent RT.

What do we know about abnormally low prolactin levels in polycystic ovary syndrome? A narrative review

Hyper and hypoprolactinemia seem to be related to the occurrence of metabolic alterations in PCOS patients. In contrast, between significantly elevated and significantly low, prolactin levels seem to be protective against metabolic consequences. In the present review, we found 4 studies investigating hypoprolactinemia in patients with PCOS. We also identified 6 additional studies that reported low levels of PRL in PCOS patients. Although its prevalence is not considered high (13.2-13.9%), its contribution is certainly significant to the metabolic alterations observed in PCOS (insulin resistance, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and fatty liver disease). Dopamine inhibits the secretion of prolactin and GnRH. If dopamine levels are low or the dopamine receptor is less expressed or mutated, the levels of prolactin and GnRH increase, and consequently, LH also increases. On the other hand, hyperprolactinemia, in prolactinomas-typical levels, acting through kisspeptin inhibition causes GnRH suppression and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. In situations of hypoprolactinemia due to excessive dopamine agonist treatment, dosage reduction is important to minimize the decrease in prolactin levels. Nevertheless, there is a lack of prospective studies confirming these hypotheses, as well as randomized clinical trials with appropriate drugs targeting both hyperprolactin and hypoprolactin in patients with PCOS.

The molecular basis of hypoprolactinaemia

Hypoprolactinaemia is an endocrinopathy which is typically encountered as part of a combined pituitary hormone deficiency picture. The vast majority of genetic causes identified to date have been in the context of congenital hypopituitarism with multiple co-existent endocrinopathies. This is primarily with its closest hormonal relation, namely growth hormone. Acquired hypoprolactinaemia is generally rare in paediatric patients, and usually occurs together with other hormonal deficiencies. Congenital hypopituitarism occurs with an incidence of 1:4,000-10,000 cases and mutations in the following transcription factors account for the majority of documented genetic causes: PROP-1, POU1F1, LHX3/4 as well as documented case reports for a smaller subset of transcription factors and other molecules implicated in lactotroph development and prolactin secretion. Isolated prolactin deficiency has been described in a number of sporadic case reports in the literature, but no cases of mutations in the gene have been described to date. A range of genetic polymorphisms affecting multiple components of the prolactin signalling pathway have been identified in the literature, ranging from RNA spliceosome mutations (RNPC3) to loss of function mutations in IGSF-1. As paediatricians gain a greater understanding of the long-term ramifications of hypoprolactinaemia in terms of metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired fertility, the expectation is that clinicians will measure prolactin more frequently over time. Ultimately, we will encounter further reports of hypoprolactinaemia-related clinical presentations with further genetic mutations, in turn leading to a greater insight into the molecular basis of hypoprolactinaemia in terms of signalling pathways and downstream mediators. In the interim, the greatest untapped reserve of genetic causes remains within the phenotypic spectrum of congenital hypopituitarism.

Neuropsychological complications of hypoprolactinemia

Prolactin (PRL) is primarily produced by the pituitary lactotrophic cells and while initially named for its role in lactation, PRL has several other biological roles including immunomodulation, osmotic balance, angiogenesis, calcium metabolism, and appetite regulation. Most of the PRL-related literature has traditionally focused on hyperprolactinemia, whereas hypoprolactinemia has received little attention. There is evidence to suggest that PRL receptors are widely distributed within the central nervous system including the limbic system. Furthermore, PRL has been shown to play key role in the stress regulation pathway. Recent data also suggest that hypoprolactinemia may be associated with increased sexual dysfunction, anxiety, and depression. In this paper we discuss the current understanding regarding the neuropsychological impact of hypoprolactinemia and highlight the need for adequately defining hypoprolactinemia as an entity and consideration for future replacement therapies.

Modern approach to bone comorbidity in prolactinoma

Prolactinomas account for more than half of pituitary adenomas, and besides their clinical impact on fertility and gonadal function, they lead to detrimental effects on bone. Patients with prolactinoma are prone to deterioration of bone structure caused not only by prolactin (PRL) induced hypogonadism but also by its direct actions on bone cells and calcium metabolism. However, clinical studies have shown inconsistent evidence regarding whether PRL could have a deleterious effect independently from gonadal insufficiency on skeletal integrity. Seminal studies from our group reported an increased prevalence of vertebral fractures (VFs) in both female and male patients with prolactinoma. Treatment of prolactinoma with dopamine agonists can restore gonadal function and improve bone mineral density. Since the presence of VFs may be related to more aggressive disease, bone comorbidities in prolactinoma should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in line with the recent concept of 'pituitary tumors centers of excellence'. The review aims to evaluate the mechanism of PRL actions on bone, as well as to provide practical indications for a modern approach to the management of skeletal complications of patients with prolactin-secreting adenoma considering different clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Cardiometabolic effects of hypoprolactinemia

The fall of PRL levels below the lower limit of the normal range configures the condition of hypoprolactinemia. Unlike PRL excess, whose clinical features and treatments are well established, hypoprolactinemia has been only recently described as a morbid entity requiring prompt identification and proper therapeutic approach. Particularly, hypoprolactinemia has been reported to be associated with the development of metabolic syndrome and impaired cardiometabolic health, as visceral obesity, insulin-resistance, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, chronic inflammation, and sexual dysfunction have been found more prevalent in patients with hypoprolactinemia as compared to those with normoprolactinemia. This evidence has been collected mainly in patients on chronic treatment with dopamine agonists for PRL excess due to a PRL-secreting pituitary tumour, and less frequently in those receiving the atypical antipsychotic aripiprazole. Nowadays, hypoprolactinemia appears to represent a novel and unexpected risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, as is the case for hyperprolactinemia. Nevertheless, current knowledge still lacks an accurate biochemical definition of hypoprolactinemia, since no clear PRL threshold has been established to rule in the diagnosis of PRL deficiency enabling early identification of those individual subjects with increased cardiovascular risk directly ascribable to the hormonal imbalance. The current review article focuses on the effects of hypoprolactinemia on the modulation of body weight, gluco-insulinemic and lipid profile, and provides latest knowledge about potential cardiovascular outcomes of hypoprolactinemia.

Increased Cardiometabolic Risk in Men with Hypoprolactinemia: A Pilot Study

Low prolactin levels in men predispose them to mood disturbances, sexual dysfunction, and diabetes. The purpose of the current study was to assess cardiometabolic risk in males with hypoprolactinemia. This prospective study included three age-matched groups of young and middle-aged men: individuals with cabergoline-induced hypoprolactinemia (n = 15), cabergoline-treated subjects with prolactin levels within the reference range (n = 20), and untreated men with normal prolactin levels (n = 31). In men with hypoprolactinemia, the cabergoline dose was reduced in order to normalize prolactin concentration. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, QRISK3 score; plasma concentrations of prolactin, glucose, insulin, lipids, uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen, homocysteine, and testosterone; whole-blood levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C); urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR); and carotid intima-media thickness were assessed at baseline and six months later. Men with hypoprolactinemia were characterized by higher body mass index, fat content, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, fasting and 2 h post-load glucose, HbA1C, HOMA1-IR, uric acid, hsCRP, fibrinogen, homocysteine, and UACR; by lower HDL cholesterol and testosterone; by greater intima-media thickness; and by a higher QRISK3 score than their peers with normal prolactin levels. There were no statistically significant differences in the measured parameters between both groups of men with normal prolactin levels. Normalization of prolactin concentration was accompanied by normalization of biochemical variables, systolic blood pressure, and QRISK3 score. Although cabergoline dose reduction did not cause statistically significant changes in the remaining anthropometric parameters and intima-media thickness, six months later, they did not differ from those observed in the remaining study groups. Our findings suggest that iatrogenic hypoprolactinemia is associated with increased cardiometabolic risk, which is reversible and resolves after the normalization of prolactin levels.

Bmal1 regulates female reproduction in mice via the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis

The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPG) is the key neuroendocrine axis involved in reproductive regulation. Brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1 (Bmal1) participates in regulating the metabolism of various endocrine hormones. However, the regulation of Bmal1 on HPG and female fertility is unclear. This study aims to explore the regulation of female reproduction by Bmal1 via the HPG axis in mice. Bmal1-knockout (Ko) mice were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The structure, function, and estrous cycle of ovarian in Bmal1 Ko female mice were measured. The key genes and proteins of the HPG axis involved in regulating female reproduction were examined through transcriptome analysis and then verified by RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and western blot. Furthermore, the fertility of female mice was detected after intervening prolactin (PRL) and progesterone (Pg) in Bmal1 ko mice. The number of offspring and ovarian weight were significantly lower in Bmal1-Ko mice than in wild-type (Wt) mice. In Bmal1-Ko mice, ovarian cells were arranged loosely and irregularly, and the total number of follicles was significantly reduced. No corpus luteum was found in the ovaries. Vaginal smears revealed that Bmal1-Ko mice had an irregular estrus cycle. In Bmal1-Ko mice, Star expression was decreased, PRL and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were increased, and dopamine (DA) and Pg levels were decreased. Inhibition of PRL partially recovered the estrous cycle, corpus luteum formation, and Star expression in the ovaries. Pg supplementation promoted embryo implantation in Bmal1-Ko female mice. Bmal1 Ko increases serum PRL levels in female mice likely by reducing DA levels, thus affecting luteal formation, resulting in decreased Star expression and Pg production, hindering female reproduction. Inhibition of PRL or restoration of Pg can partially restore reproductive capacity in female Bmal1-Ko mice. Thus, Bmal1 may regulate female reproduction via the HPG axis in mice, suggesting that Bmal1 is a potential target to treat female infertility.

The diagnosis and prevalence of hypoprolactinemia in patients with panhypopituitarism and the effects on depression and sexual functions

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the prevalence and the diagnostic criteria of hypoprolactinemia in patients with panhypopituitarism and the effects of hypoprolactinemia on depression and sexual functions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with panhypopituitarism and 20 healthy volunteers were included. Basal hormone levels were measured and a TRH stimulation test was performed. For the evaluation of sexual functions, questionnaries of Female Sexual Functional Index (FSFI) for females and International Erectile Functional Index for males were performed to the subjects. Depressive symptoms were evaluated by Beck Depression Envontory score (BDI-II).

RESULTS

The peak PRL response to TRH stimulation test at 5th percentile in the control group was 18.6 ng/ml in males and 41.6 ng/ml in females and accepted as the cut-offs for sufficient response of PRL. Prolactin was insufficient in 42(87.5%) patients. A basal PRL level of ≤ 5.7 ng/ml in males and 7.11 ng/ml in females was 100% specific in predicting an inadequate response to TRH stimulation test with 80% and 70% sensitivity respectively. A basal PRL level of ≥ 8.5 ng/dl in males was 100% specific and 76% sensitive, and in females a level of ≥ 15.2 ng/dl was 96% specific and 66% sensitive in predicting an adequate response to TRH. PRL deficient patients with panhypopituitarism had higher depression scores compared to the controls, lower sexual function scores in males.

CONCLUSION

PRL deficiency is prevalent among individuals with panhypopituitarism, with the potential to result in elevated depression scores in both sexes and impaired sexual functions in males. A basal PRL level seems to be sufficient for the diagnosis of hypoprolactinemia in routine clinical practice.

Low prolactin level identifies hypoactive sexual desire disorder women with a reduced inhibition profile

PURPOSE

Data on the role of prolactin (PRL) in the physiologic range in the female sexual response are scanty. We aimed at investigating the association between PRL and sexual function as assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). We explored the presence of a cut-off level of PRL able to identify Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD).

METHODS

277 pre- and post-menopausal women consulting for Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) and sexually active were enrolled in an observational, retrospective study. 42 women were used as no-FSD controls. A clinical, biochemical and psychosexual evaluation was performed. The main outcome measures were: FSFI, Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised, Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire and Sexual excitation/sexual inhibition scale (SIS/SES).

RESULTS

Normo-PRL FSD women (n = 264) showed lower FSFI Desire score than controls (n = 42), and higher than hyper-PRL FSD women (n = 13). These differences emerged both in pre-menopausal and post-menopausal subjects. In the normo-PRL FSD group, those with PRL in the higher quintile reported higher FSFI Desire scores than those with PRL in the lowest quintile. Women with HSDD presented a lower PRL level than those without (p = 0.032). A ROC curve analysis for PRL showed an accuracy of 0.610 ± 0.044 (p = 0.014) in predicting HSDD. With a threshold of < 9.83 μg/L, sensitivity and specificity for HSDD were 63% and 56%, respectively. Subjects with PRL < 9.83 μg/L also reported lower sexual inhibition (p = 0.006) and lower cortisol levels (p = 0.003) than those with PRL >  = 9.83 μg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyper-PRL is associated with low desire; however, among normo-PRL FSD women, those with the lowest levels demonstrated a poorer desire than those with the highest levels. PRL < 9.83 μg/L predicted HSDD and a lower sexual inhibitory trait.

Impaired Prolactin-Lowering Effects of Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

The effect of metformin on prolactin concentration seems to be sex-dependent. The aim of this study was to determine whether the androgen status modulates the impact of metformin on plasma prolactin levels in women. This study included two matched groups of prediabetic women with hyperprolactinemia: 25 with PCOS and 25 control subjects with androgen levels within the reference range and with normal ovarian morphology. Glucose homeostasis markers, prolactin, the remaining anterior pituitary hormones, sex hormones, SHBG and IGF-1 were determined before and after six months of metformin treatment. At baseline, both groups differed in LH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, FAI, DHEA-S, androstenedione and estradiol. Although metformin improved insulin sensitivity and increased SHBG in both study groups, these effects were more pronounced in control subjects than in women with PCOS. In control subjects, the drug decreased total and monomeric prolactin and increased LH. In women with PCOS, metformin reduced LH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone and FAI. In the control group, the impact on total and monomeric prolactin positively correlated with their baseline levels and with the degree of improvement in insulin sensitivity, as well as negatively correlated with testosterone and FAI. In women with PCOS, treatment-induced changes in testosterone and FAI positively correlated with the changes in LH and LH/FSH ratio. The obtained results suggest that the prolactin-lowering properties of metformin are less pronounced in women with coexisting PCOS than in women with elevated prolactin levels, probably owing to the increased production of endogenous testosterone.

Prolactin and spermatogenesis: new lights on the interplay between prolactin and sperm parameters

PURPOSE

To clarify the relationship between one the most gender-specific hormone, i.e. prolactin (PRL), and semen parameters in men.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, cohort, real-world study was carried out, enrolling all men performing a semen analysis and PRL examination from 2010 to 2022. For each patient, the first semen analys was extracted, associated to PRL, total testosterone (TT), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Hyperprolactinaemia (>35 ng/mL) was excluded.

RESULTS

1211 subjects were included. PRL serum levels were lower in normozoospermia compared to azoospermia (p = 0.002) and altered semen parameters (p = 0.048) groups. TT serum levels were not different among groups (p = 0.122). Excluding azoospermic men, PRL serum levels were lower in normozoospermic patients, when compared to other groups of semen alterations. An inverse correlation was detected between PRL and sperm concentration. Considering normozospermic subjects, PRL was directly related to both non-progressive sperm motility (p = 0.014) and normal sperm morphology (p = 0.040). Subdiving the cohort in quartiles according to PRL distribution, the highest motilities were observed in the second PRL quartile (8.30-11.10 ng/mL) and asthenozoospermia was significantly predicted by FSH (p < 0.001) and second PRL quartile (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

The PRL-spermatogenesis connection seems to be mild, although low-normal PRL levels are associated with the best spermatogenetic profile. PRL serum levels could mirror the immunoregulatory status within the testis, suggesting that there is a sort of 'PRL optimal window' reflecting an efficent spermatogenesis. Alternatively, men with good semen parameters might have a higher central dopaminergic tone resulting in low PRL levels.

Identification of adolescent patients with depression via assessment of the niacin skin flushing response

BACKGROUND

Depressive disorder (DD) affects approximately 20 % of adolescents worldwide, but it is underdiagnosed due to the lack of objective biomarkers. Niacin skin flushing response (NSFR) is an objective and noninvasive biomarker of adult depression; however, its effectiveness has not been assessed in adolescents.

METHODS

This study included 198 adolescents with 50 % healthy controls (HC). Linear mixed-effects model and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess differences in NSFR between the DD and HC groups. Logistic regression models based on NSFR were constructed, and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of models. Spearman correlations were calculated to assess the relationships between NSFR and disease duration and hormone levels associated with puberty.

RESULTS

Adolescents with DD displayed significantly attenuated and delayed NSFR compared to HC. NSFR effectively distinguished DD patients from HC with AUC values of 0.719 (sensitivity = 0.844) and 0.721 (sensitivity = 0.829) determined in the discovery and validation sets, respectively. Within the DD group, the maximum degree of NSFR was negatively correlated with the disease duration (r = -0.28, p = 0.011), and the overall degree of NSFR was positively associated with prolactin (r = 0.29, p = 0.039) and thyroxine (r = 0.29, p = 0.027) levels.

LIMITATIONS

Future investigations will be necessary to confirm our results in an independent sample set.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first evidence of the utility of NSFR as an objective auxiliary diagnostic biomarker for adolescent depression. It provides new clues to understand the pathophysiology of the disease, and helps promote precise diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of adolescent depression.

Cardiometabolic profile of young women with hypoprolactinemia

PURPOSE

Unlike hyperprolactinemia, clinical significance of prolactin deficiency remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the cardiometabolic profile of patients with low prolactin levels.

METHODS

The study population consisted of three groups of young women. Two groups were chronically treated with cabergoline but differed in prolactin levels, which were either abnormally low (group A; n = 16) or within the reference range (group B, n = 23). Group C, serving as a control group, included 28 drug-naïve women with normal prolactin levels. The dose of cabergoline in group A was then tapered down. Glucose homeostasis markers, plasma lipids and circulating levels of hormones, uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen and homocysteine, as well as the carotid intima-media thickness were assessed at baseline and 6 months later.

RESULTS

Compared with subjects with normal prolactin levels, women with hypoprolactinemia had higher levels of 2-h postchallenge glucose, glycated hemoglobin, triglycerides, uric acid, hsCRP and fibrinogen, lower values of HDL-cholesterol, total testosterone and free androgen index, as well as reduced insulin sensitivity. No differences in these variables were observed between groups B and C. Apart from prolactin normalization, cabergoline dose reduction reversed all laboratory disturbances reported in group A.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results suggest that hypoprolactinemia in women of reproductive age may increase cardiometabolic risk.

Sexual function and depressive symptoms in men with hypoprolactinaemia secondary to overtreatment of prolactin excess: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Low prolactin levels have been found to impair libido and arousal, as well as to reduce wellbeing in young women.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether drug-induced hypoprolactinaemia affects male sexual function and depressive symptoms.

METHODS

The study population consisted of three groups of young and middle-aged men. Two groups were treated with dopamine agonists because of previous hyperprolactinaemia but differed in current prolactin levels, which were <3ng/ml (n=12; group 1) or within the reference range (3-20ng/ml) (n=20; group 2). The control group (group 3) included 24 dopamine agonist-naïve normoprolactinaemic men. During the study, doses of dopaminergic agents in group 1 were reduced by 25-50% compared to doses before the start of the study. Circulating levels of prolactin, testosterone, free calculated testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate, oestradiol and gonadotropins were measured upon enrolment in the study and six months later. Moreover, at the beginning and the end of the study, all men enrolled completed questionnaires assessing sexual functioning (IIEF-15) and depressive symptoms (BDI-II).

RESULTS

Group 1 differed from groups 2 and 3 in domain scores for sexual desire and erectile function, and in the overall BDI-II score. It was also characterised by lower levels of total testosterone and calculated free testosterone. Reduction of drug doses normalised sexual desire and erectile function, reduced BDI-II scores and increased prolactin as well as total and free calculated testosterone. Groups 2 and 3 did not differ from each other in sexual functioning, depressive symptoms or hormone levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained indicate that men with dopamine agonist-induced hypoprolactinaemia are characterised by impaired sexual functioning and reduced wellbeing. These disturbances are a consequence of subnormal prolactin levels and do not seem to reflect adverse effects of dopamine agonists.

The impact of metformin on prolactin levels in postmenopausal women

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Metformin-induced reduction in prolactin levels is more pronounced in users of hormonal contraception than in non-users. The current study was aimed at investigating whether physiological concentrations of estradiol determine the impact of metformin on lactotrope secretory function.

METHODS

We studied two matched groups of postmenopausal women with elevated prolactin levels. Twenty-three women were on hormone replacement therapy (group 1), while the remaining ones (group 2, n = 23) did not use sex hormones. Because of coexistent prediabetes, all individuals received metformin (2.55-3 g daily) for the following six months. Circulating levels of total prolactin, monomeric prolactin, thyrotropin, gonadotropins, free thyroid hormones and estradiol were determined at the beginning and at the end of the study.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Compared with group 1, group 2 was characterized by higher gonadotropin levels and lower estrogen levels. Although metformin reduced monomeric prolactin levels in both study groups, this effect was more pronounced in group 1 than in group 2. Only in group 1, metformin decreased total prolactin levels, while only in group 2 the drug reduced FSH levels. Metformin treatment did not affect circulating levels of the remaining hormones. The impact of metformin on total and monomeric prolactin levels correlated with baseline prolactin levels and with the degree of improvement in insulin sensitivity.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The obtained results indicate that the impact of metformin on lactotrope secretory function is partially determined by the estrogen status of patients.

Sexual function and depressive symptoms in men with hypoprolactinaemia secondary to overtreatment of prolactin excess: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Low prolactin levels have been found to impair libido and arousal, as well as to reduce wellbeing in young women.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether drug-induced hypoprolactinaemia affects male sexual function and depressive symptoms.

METHODS

The study population consisted of three groups of young and middle-aged men. Two groups were treated with dopamine agonists because of previous hyperprolactinaemia but differed in current prolactin levels, which were <3ng/ml (n=12; group 1) or within the reference range (3-20ng/ml) (n=20; group 2). The control group (group 3) included 24 dopamine agonist-naïve normoprolactinaemic men. During the study, doses of dopaminergic agents in group 1 were reduced by 25-50% compared to doses before the start of the study. Circulating levels of prolactin, testosterone, free calculated testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate, oestradiol and gonadotropins were measured upon enrolment in the study and six months later. Moreover, at the beginning and the end of the study, all men enrolled completed questionnaires assessing sexual functioning (IIEF-15) and depressive symptoms (BDI-II).

RESULTS

Group 1 differed from groups 2 and 3 in domain scores for sexual desire and erectile function, and in the overall BDI-II score. It was also characterised by lower levels of total testosterone and calculated free testosterone. Reduction of drug doses normalised sexual desire and erectile function, reduced BDI-II scores and increased prolactin as well as total and free calculated testosterone. Groups 2 and 3 did not differ from each other in sexual functioning, depressive symptoms or hormone levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained indicate that men with dopamine agonist-induced hypoprolactinaemia are characterised by impaired sexual functioning and reduced wellbeing. These disturbances are a consequence of subnormal prolactin levels and do not seem to reflect adverse effects of dopamine agonists.