Use of liothyronine (T3) in hypothyroidism: Joint British Thyroid Association/Society for endocrinology consensus statement

Hypothyroidism

Hypothyroidism, the deficiency of thyroid hormone, is a common condition worldwide. It affects almost all body systems and has a wide variety of clinical presentations from being asymptomatic to, in rare cases, life threatening. The classic symptoms of hypothyroidism include fatigue, lethargy, weight gain, and cold intolerance; however, these symptoms are non-specific and the diagnosis is typically made on biochemical grounds through serum thyroid function tests. The most common cause of hypothyroidism is chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto's thyroiditis), although other causes, including drugs (such as amiodarone, lithium, and immune checkpoint inhibitors), radioactive-iodine treatment, and thyroid surgery, are frequent. Historically, severe iodine deficiency was the most common cause. Reference ranges for thyroid function tests are based on fixed percentiles of the population distribution, but there is increasing awareness of the need for more individualised reference intervals based on key factors such as age, sex, and special circumstances such as pregnancy. Levothyroxine monotherapy is the standard treatment for hypothyroidism; it is safe and inexpensive, restores thyroid function tests to within the reference range, and improves symptoms in the majority of patients. However, 10% of patients have persistent symptoms of ill health despite normalisation of thyroid function tests biochemically and a substantial proportion of patients on levothyroxine have thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations outside the reference range. Ongoing symptoms despite levothyroxine treatment has led to some patients using liothyronine or desiccated thyroid extract. Taken together, these factors have led to intense debate around the treatment thresholds and treatment strategies for hypothyroidism. In this Seminar, we review the epidemiology, genetic determinants, causes, and presentation of hypothyroidism; highlight key considerations and controversies in its diagnosis and management; and provide future directions for research.

The Association Between Hypothyroidism and Cognitive Function Change in Women across the Menopause Transition: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation

Background: Patients treated for hypothyroidism with levothyroxine (LT4) monotherapy may present with persistent hypothyroidism symptoms, including cognitive symptoms, despite having a normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level. It remains unclear whether LT4 monotherapy is sufficient to normalize cognitive function outcomes over time. Methods: This is a multisite longitudinal study of a diverse group of women during midlife representing 5 ethnic/racial groups from 7 enrollment sites across the United States in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Women were screened for a history of thyroid disease and the use of LT4. The study consisted of two primary groups: women with LT4-treated hypothyroidism and control women without thyroid disease. Each participant completed up to 9 cognitive assessments over the study period testing processing speed, working memory, and episodic memory (immediate and delayed recall). Multivariable generalized linear mixed models of scores for each cognitive assessment were developed to determine the association between LT4-treated hypothyroidism and cognitive function trajectories. Covariates included sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and menopausal status (pre/early peri, late peri, and surgical/post). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of abnormal TSH levels and practice effects (i.e., improvements in scoring after repeated testing). Results: Of the 2033 women who were included in the study, 227 (11.2%) met criteria for LT4-treated hypothyroidism. At baseline, both processing speed and working memory scores were higher in LT4-treated women (mean processing speed scores: 56.5 vs 54.4; p value = 0.006; mean working memory scores: 6.8 vs 6.4; p value = 0.018). However, when considering the effect of LT4-treated hypothyroidism over time, there were no significant differences in the rate of cognitive decline (in any measure) between the hypothyroidism and control groups with or without covariate adjustment. The results were similar when considering LT4-treated women with abnormal TSH levels or after minimizing practice effects. Conclusions: We observed no difference in cognitive decline between women with LT4-treated hypothyroidism and women without thyroid disease. For similar aged patients with cognitive complaints, if thyroid function testing is normal, clinicians should consider causes other than inadequate thyroid hormone treatment to explain these symptoms.

Dose-dependent relationship between levothyroxine and health-related quality of life in survivors of differentiated thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival for patients with differentiated (papillary, follicular, and Hürthle cell) thyroid cancer exceeds 95% but self-reported health-related quality of life scores remain low compared with survivors of cancers with worse prognoses. There are reports that thyroid hormone replacement therapy is associated with lower health-related quality of life. This hypothesis was tested in a sample of Medicare Advantage survivors of differentiated thyroid cancer.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the linked 2007-2017 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer to conduct a cross-sectional study. Levothyroxine 6-month defined daily dose was calculated from claims data. Defined daily dose was classified as low, average, or high on the basis of standard deviations around body mass index-specific means. Veterans RAND 12-item Quality of Life Survey measures were categorized by T score as low health-related quality of life (T scores ≤25), moderately low (25< T scores ≤50), and high (T scores >50). The association of defined daily dose and health-related quality of life was tested using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (n = 782), 67.5% were prescribed levothyroxine for thyroid hormone replacement therapy (mean defined daily dose 123 μg; standard deviation 44.1 μg). Greater defined daily dose was associated with greater relative risk of low (compared with moderately low) health-related quality of life on several measures including Role Limitation (relative risk, 4.9, 95% confidence interval, 2.1-11.6) and Social Functioning (relative risk, 5.6, 95% confidence interval, 2.5-12.5), as well as greater relative risk of multiple low-scoring health-related quality of life measures.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest greater-than-average thyroid hormone replacement therapy dosages may be associated with lower health-related quality of life among survivors of differentiated thyroid cancer. Given the prevalence of thyroid hormone replacement therapy among survivors of differentiated thyroid cancer, thyroid hormone replacement therapy dose adjustment warrants close attention to address the functional and psychosocial well-being of patients.

Triiodothyronine levels in athyreotic pediatric patients during levothyroxine therapy

Objective

Levothyroxine (LT4) monotherapy is the current recommended approach for treating pediatric patients post-total thyroidectomy (TT) based on the assumption that peripheral conversion of thyroxine (T4) to triiodothyronine (T3) normalizes thyroid hormone levels. In adults, approximately 15% of post-TT patients on LT4 monotherapy have altered T4:T3 ratios with ongoing debate in regard to the clinical impact with respect to health-related quality of life (hrQOL). The ability to normalize T3 and T4 levels on LT4 monotherapy for pediatric patients' post-TT is important but not previously described. This study reports data on T3 levels in athyreotic pediatric patients to determine if a similar cohort of patients exists on LT4 monotherapy targeting normalization of TSH (LT4 replacement) or suppression (LT4 suppression).

Methods

Thyroid function tests (TFTs) were retrospectively extracted from medical charts for patients <19 years old who underwent TT for definitive treatment of Graves' disease (GD) or differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) between 2010-2021. LT4 dosing was selected to normalize the TSH in GD patients (LT4 replacement) or suppress TSH in DTC patients (LT4 suppression). Pre- and post-surgical TSH, T3 and T4 levels were compared.

Results

Of 108 patients on LT4 replacement (n=53) or LT4 suppression (n=55) therapy, 94% (102/108) of patients demonstrated T3 levels in the normal range post-TT. However, the majority of patients on LT4 replacement (44/53; 83%) and LT4 suppression (31/55; 56%) displayed post-TT T3 levels in the lower half of the normal range despite 50% (22/44) and 48% (15/31) of these patients, respectively, having post-TT fT4 levels above the upper limit of the normal range.

Conclusion

A significant number of pediatric patients do not achieve similar T3 and T4:T3 levels pre- and post-TT. Future multi-center, prospective studies evaluating LT4 monotherapy in comparison to combined LT4/LT3 therapy are warranted to determine the potential clinical impact of altered T3 levels in athyreotic pediatric patients.

EMAS position statement: Thyroid disease and menopause

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid diseases are common in women in their late reproductive years; therefore, thyroid disease and menopause may co-exist. Both conditions may present with a wide range of symptoms, leading to diagnostic challenges and delayed diagnosis. Aim To construct the first European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) statement on thyroid diseases and menopause.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion (EMAS executive board members/experts on menopause and thyroid disease).

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

This position paper highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas in managing women with thyroid disease during the menopausal transition, aiming to increase healthcare professionals' awareness of thyroid disorders and menopause-related symptoms. Clinical decisions regarding the treatment of both conditions should be made with caution and attention to the specific characteristics of this age group while adopting a personalized patient approach. The latter must include the family history, involvement of the woman in the decision-making, and respect for her preferences, to achieve overall well-being.

Liothyronine (LT3) prescribing in England: Are cost constraints inhibiting guideline implementation?

BACKGROUND

Primary hypothyroidism affects about 3% of the general population in Europe. In most cases people with hypothyroidism are treated with levothyroxine. In the context of the 2023 British Thyroid Association guidance and the 2020 Competitions and Marketing Authority (CMA) ruling, we examined prescribing data for levothyroxine, Natural desiccated thyroid (NDT) and liothyronine by dose, regarding changes over the years 2016-2022.

DESIGN

Monthly primary care prescribing data for each British National Formulary code were analysed for levothyroxine, liothyronine and NDT.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

The rolling 12-month total/average of cost or prescribing volume was used to identify the moment of change. Results included number of prescriptions, the actual costs, and the cost/prescription/mcg of drug.

RESULTS

Liothyronine: In 2016 94% of the total 74,500 prescriptions were of the 20 mcg dose. In 2020 the percentage prescribed in the 5 mcg and 10 mcg doses started to increase so that by 2022 each reached nearly 27% of total liothyronine prescribing. The average cost/prescription in 2016 of 20 mcg was £404/prescription and this fell by 80% to £101 in 2022; while the 10 mcg cost of £348/prescription fell by only 35% to £255 and the 5 mcg cost of £355/prescription fell by 38% to £242/prescription. The total prescriptions of liothyronine in 2016 were 74,605, falling by 30% up to 2019 when they started to grow again - most recently at 60,990-15% lower than the 2016 figure, with the result that total costs fell by 70% to £9 m/year.

CONCLUSIONS

Liothyronine costs fell after the CMA ruling but remain orders of magnitude higher than for levothyroxine. The remaining 0.2% of patients with liothyronine treated hypothyroidism are still absorbing 16% of medication costs. The lower liothyronine 5cmg and 10 mcg doses as recommended by BTA are 240% the costs of the 20 mcg dose. Thus, following latest BTA guidance which recommends the lower liothyronine doses still incurs substantial additional costs vs the prescribing liothyronine in the no longer recommended treatment regime. High drug price continues to impact clinical decisions, potentially limiting liothyronine therapy availability to a considerable number of patients who could benefit from this treatment.

Use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid and euthyroid patients: A survey of members of the Endocrine Society of Australia

OBJECTIVE

Hypothyroidism is a common endocrine condition usually managed with levothyroxine (LT4). However, controversy remains around the use of liothyronine (LT3). We aimed to investigate the practices of Australian endocrinologists when managing patients with hypothyroidism, their use of LT3 + LT4 combination therapy and use of thyroid hormones in euthyroid patients.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Endocrine Society of Australia (ESA) were invited to participate in an online questionnaire.

MEASUREMENTS

We analysed questionnaires that had complete demographic data.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven questionnaires fulfilled the criteria. LT4 was used as first line treatment for hypothyroidism by all respondents. Only 45% reported that their patients were dispensed the brand of LT4 that they recommend. LT3 (alone or in combination) was prescribed by 44% in their clinical practice. Although 49% of respondents would consider LT3 + LT4 in patients with normal TSH who had ongoing symptoms of hypothyroidism, the inability of LT4 to restore normal physiology was ranked the least likely explanation for persistent symptoms and only 32% would consider it for themselves if they were diagnosed with hypothyroidism. The majority (55%), in accordance with evidence, would not prescribe thyroid hormone to euthyroid individuals but 39% would consider use in euthyroid female infertility with high levels of thyroid antibodies and 11% in euthyroid patients with a simple goitre growing over time. LT4 use in pregnancy was variable among members.

CONCLUSIONS

Australian endocrinologists mostly follow international guidelines when prescribing thyroid hormone therapy and many prescribe combination LT3 and LT4 therapy, particularly for patients who remain symptomatic on LT4 monotherapy. Prescribing practices are largely similar to other countries who have completed similar questionnaires.

Emerging Therapies in Hypothyroidism

Levothyroxine (LT4) is effective for most patients with hypothyroidism. However, a minority of the patients remain symptomatic despite the normalization of serum thyrotropin levels. Randomized clinical trials including all types of patients with hypothyroidism revealed that combination levothyroxine and liothyronine (LT4+LT3) therapy is safe and is the preferred choice of patients versus LT4 alone. Many patients who do not fully benefit from LT4 experience improved quality of life and cognition after switching to LT4+LT3. For these patients, new slow-release LT3 formulations that provide stable serum T3 levels are being tested. In addition, progress in regenerative technology has led to the development of human thyroid organoids that restore euthyroidism after being transplanted into hypothyroid mice. Finally, there is a new understanding that, under certain conditions, T3 signaling may be compromised in a tissue-specific fashion while systemic thyroid function is preserved. This is seen, for example, in patients with metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease, for whom liver-selective T3-like molecules have been utilized successfully in clinical trials.

Designing a combined liothyronine (LT3), L- thyroxine (LT4) trial in symptomatic hypothyroid subjects on LT4 - the importance of patient selection, choice of LT3 and trial design

Approximately 10%-15% of subjects with hypothyroidism on L-thyroxine (LT4) alone have persistent symptoms affecting their quality of life (QoL). Although the cause is unclear, there is evidence that "tissue T3 lack" may be responsible. If so, combining liothyronine (LT3) with LT4 would be helpful. However, randomized controlled trials (RCT), have not established greater efficacy for the LT3 + LT4 combination in these subjects than for LT4 alone. While the trial design may have been responsible, the use of unphysiological, short-acting LT3 preparations and non-thyroid-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may have contributed. We recommend attention to the following aspects of trial design for future RCTs of LT3 + LT4 compared to LT4 alone: (a) Subject selection-(i) measurable symptoms (disadvantages should be recognized); (ii) using a validated thyroid specific PROM such as ThyPRO39 or the Composite scale derived from it; (iii) those taking over 1.2 μg/day or 100 μg/day (for pragmatic reasons) of LT4 defining a population likely without intrinsic thyroid activity who depend on exogenous LT4; (iv) recruiting a preponderance of subjects with autoimmune thyroiditis increasing generalisability; and (v) those with a high symptom load with a greater response to combination therapy e.g. those with the deiodinase 2 polymorphism. (b) The use of physiological LT3 preparations producing pharmacokinetic similarities to T3 profiles in unaffected subjects: two long-acting LT3 preparations are currently available and must be tested in phase 2b/3 RCTs. (c) The superiority of a crossover design in limiting numbers and costs while maintaining statistical power and ensuring that all subjects experienced the investigative medication.

Myxedema Coma Precipitated by Sepsis in a Patient With a Complex Mental Health History

Myxedema coma is a rare and life-threatening manifestation of severe hypothyroidism. Myxedema refers to altered mental status observed in these patients. Clinical characteristics observed include hypothermia, bradycardia, respiratory failure, hyponatremia, and altered mental status. We present the case of a 57-year-old female who was brought into the hospital with a history of collapse and a long lie. On initial assessment, she was hypothermic, hypotensive, bradycardic, and hypoglycemic with elevated infection markers, acute kidney injury, and electrolyte derangement. Her thyroid function tests on admission were severely impaired with a TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) level of 144.46 mU/L and Free T4 (thyroxine) levels of 3.4 pmol/L. She was admitted to the intensive care unit and was started on intravenous antibiotics, intravenous liothyronine, oral levothyroxine, and intravenous hydrocortisone. Initially, her hypothermia and bradycardia were slow to respond to treatment measures, but following the introduction of liothyronine, she showed marked improvement. Over the next few days, her infection markers improved, her acute kidney injury resolved, and her thyroid function tests normalized. Liothyronine was stopped after 6 days, levothyroxine was continued at her regular dose of 175 micrograms, and she was safely discharged with outpatient endocrinology follow-up.