Riboflavin and ultraviolet A as adjuvant treatment against Acanthamoeba cysts

Collagen cross-linking beyond corneal ectasia: A comprehensive review

The history of corneal cross-linking (CXL) dates back to 2003 when some German scientists investigated possible treatments to harden the corneal structure to increase its resistance in ectatic corneal diseases. Nowadays, CXL is considered the most effective therapy in ectatic corneal diseases due to its proven efficacy in hardening the cornea, thus halting the development of the disease. Since 2003, CXL applications have dramatically expanded and have been implemented in several other areas such as infectious keratitis, corneal edema, and before performing keratoplasty for various purposes. Moreover, several irradiation patterns are being studied to correct refractive errors, taking into account the corneal refractive changes that occur after the procedure. Currently, scleral cross-linking is also being investigated as a potential therapy in cases of progressive myopia and glaucoma. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available applications of cross-linking in nonectatic ocular conditions and highlight the possible future indications of this procedure.

Use of corneal cross-linking beyond keratoconus: a systemic literature review

PURPOSE

The success of corneal collagen cross-linking in altering keratoconus' clinical course has driven a search for further uses of this procedure. This literature review aims to analyze the scientific evidence available for the benefit of cross-linking in the management of ophthalmic diseases other than progressive keratoconus or ectasia induced by corneal refractive procedures.

METHODS

A systemic literature review.

RESULTS

We reviewed 97 studies. We found that collagen cross-linking can limit the progression of several other corneal ectasias, thus reducing and limiting the need for keratoplasty. Collagen cross-linking also can reduce the refractive power of the cornea and can be considered for a moderate degree of bacterial keratitis or when the organism is unidentified, which is refractive to antibiotics alone. However, the comparative rarity of these procedures has limited the extent of evidence. In fungal, Acanthamoeba, and herpes virus keratitis, the evidence is inconclusive of the safety and efficacy of cross-linking.

CONCLUSION

Current clinical data is limited, and laboratory data has not fully correlated with published clinical data.

Treatment of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba Keratitis with Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL)

PURPOSE

To describe a case of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba Keratitis (AK) complicated by medical non-compliance and medication intolerance that was successfully treated with photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL).

OBSERVATIONS

A 31-year-old male presented with right eye pain and redness in the setting of fresh water exposure and scleral contact lens wear. He had lack of a response to treatment with antiviral therapy for 3 months by an outside provider. Cultures were found to be positive for Acanthamoeba and the patient was treated with an extended course of various anti-amoebic therapies with poor compliance due to pain and toxicity. He was eventually treated with intrastromal voriconazole and Miltefosine without improvement and eventually had PACK-CXL with resolution of his infection and pain.

CONCLUSION

PACK-CXL was associated with a dramatic improvement in a case of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba keratitis unresponsive to both traditional and novel therapies and may be a viable alternative or adjunctive therapy for Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Evaluation of Amebicidal and Cysticidal Activities of Antifungal Drug Isavuconazonium Sulfate against Acanthamoeba T4 Strains

Acanthamoeba species of amebae are often associated with Acanthamoeba keratitis, a severe corneal infection. Isavuconazonium sulfate is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. This prodrug is metabolized into the active isavuconazole moiety. Isavuconazole was previously identified to have amebicidal and cysticidal activity against Acanthamoeba T4 strains, but the activity of its prodrug, isavuconazonium sulfate, against trophozoites and cysts remains unknown. Since it is not known if isavuconazonium can be metabolized into isavuconazole in the human eye, we evaluated the activities of isavuconazonium sulfate against trophozoites and cysts of three T4 genotype strains of Acanthamoeba. Isavuconazonium displayed amebicidal activity at nanomolar concentrations as low as 1.4 nM and prevented excystation of cysts at concentrations as low as 136 μM. We also investigated the cysticidal activity of isavuconazonium sulfate in combination with a currently used amebicidal drug polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB). Although combination of isavuconazonium with PHMB did not elicit an obvious synergistic cysticidal activity, the combination did not cause an antagonistic effect on the cysts of Acanthamoeba T4 strains. Collectively, these findings suggest isavuconazonium retains potency against Acanthamoeba T4 strains and could be adapted for Acanthamoeba keratitis treatment.

Acanthamoeba Keratitis: an update on amebicidal and cysticidal drug screening methodologies and potential treatment with azole drugs

Introduction: Acanthamoeba encompasses several species of free-living ameba encountered commonly throughout the environment. Unfortunately, these species of ameba can cause opportunistic infections that result in Acanthamoeba keratitis, granulomatous amebic encephalitis, and occasionally systemic infection.Areas covered: This review discusses relevant literature found through PubMed and Google scholar published as of January 2021. The review summarizes current common Acanthamoeba keratitis treatments, drug discovery methodologies available for screening potential anti-Acanthamoeba compounds, and the anti-Acanthamoeba activity of various azole antifungal agents.Expert opinion: While several biguanide and diamidine antimicrobial agents are available to clinicians to effectively treat Acanthamoeba keratitis, no singular treatment can effectively treat every Acanthamoeba keratitis case.Efforts to identify new anti-Acanthamoeba agents include trophozoite cell viability assays, which are amenable to high-throughput screening. Cysticidal assays remain largely manual and would benefit from further automation development. Additionally, the existing literature on the effectiveness of various azole antifungal agents for treating Acanthamoeba keratitis is incomplete or contradictory, suggesting the need for a systematic review of all azoles against different pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains.

[Surgical management of infectious keratitis]

Infectious keratitis is one of the most common causes of blindness worldwide. Despite the existence of a wide arsenal of quite effective antimicrobial drugs, some forms of bacterial and viral keratitis are resistant. Advanced acanthamoeba and mycotic lesions of the cornea, as well as mixed forms of infection usually do not respond well to conservative treatment. In the absence of positive dynamics from the applied etiotropic therapy with observed further progression of the microbial process, there is a risk of corneal perforation and spread of infection to the sclera or deep ocular structures with a high probability of irreversible functional disorders or anatomical death of the eye. In such cases, a timely transition to surgical treatment is necessary in order to maintain structural integrity of the eyeball. For this purpose, corneal crosslinking, microdiathermocoagulation, tissue adhesive, autoconjunctival plasty, amniotic membrane, corneoscleral flap coating, various combinations of these methods, as well as therapeutic keratoplasty are used most often in clinical practice. The choice depends on the etiology, size and depth of the lesion, its localization, prognosis of visual outcomes, somatic status of the patient. Therapeutic keratoplasty is the most radical and effective method of surgical intervention that allows eradication of the infectious focus and best possible restoration of the structural integrity of the eyeball. However, in some cases due to inaccessibility of donor material or high risks of the surgery and non-transparent graft engraftment, it is advised to use alternative surgical approaches, and keratoplasty, if necessary, should be carried out for optical purposes at a further, "quiet" period.

High fluence PACK-CXL as adjuvant treatment for advanced Acanthamoeba keratitis

Purpose

To describe the outcome of adjuvant high fluence photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis cross-linking (PACK-CXL) used to treat an advanced form of refractory Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) diagnosed several months after initial presentation.

Observations

An otherwise healthy 24-year old female presented with a severe unilateral keratitis. The diagnosis eluded clinicians for several months and when finally confirmed as AK, anti-amoebic therapy was instated and only appeared to be effective after addition of high fluence PACK-CXL.

Conclusion and importance

In this case of advanced AK, high fluence PACK-CXL treatment given adjuvant to pharmacologic anti-amoebic therapy resulted in lasting pain relief, re-epithelization and eradication of the Acanthamoeba parasite. Given adjuvant to anti-amoebic pharmacotherapy, high fluence PACK-CXL might be a useful method for treating typically refractory advanced AK.

Effect of Riboflavin/Rose Bengal-Mediated PACK-CXL on Acanthamoeba Trophozoites and Cysts in Vitro

PURPOSE

To evaluate the antiamoebic properties of photo-activated chromophore for keratitis (PACK)-corneal cross-linking (CXL) (PACK-CXL), in combination with riboflavin (0.1 and 0.25%) or rose bengal (0.1 and 0.2%), for treatment of Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cultures of Acanthamoeba castellanii were grown in a fluid medium at a concentration of 2.7 × 10⁵ cell/ml. PACK-CXL was used on A. castellani cells in combination with either riboflavin (0.1 and 0.25%) or rose bengal (0.1 and 0.2%). Riboflavin-containing wells were irradiated with ultraviolet-A (UVA) light (365-nm wavelength). Rose bengal-containing wells were irradiated with green light (523-nm wavelength). A power density of 9 mW/cm² for 10 min and total irradiation dose of 5.4 J/cm² was used for both riboflavin and rose bengal. After UVA and green light irradiation, cell viabilities were evaluated, and percentage of dead cells calculated.

RESULTS

No significant amoebicidal activity was observed following PACK-CXL/riboflavin at either concentration. PACK-CXL/rose bengal, however, was observed to be highly effective in eradicating Acanthamoeba cells at either concentration, with no significant difference observed between the two concentrations. The percentage of dead cells was 63% following treatment at either rose bengal concentration.

CONCLUSION

PACK-CXL with rose bengal demonstrated pronounced antiamoebic activity against A.castellanii. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to confirm this finding.

In-vitro development of an effective treatment for Acanthamoeba keratitis

The aim of this study was to develop an in-vitro topical treatment for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) effective against cysts and trophozoites. Qualitative assays were performed with voriconazole, chlorhexidine, propamidine, cellulase, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin and paromomycin as monotherapy and various combinations. Riboflavin with ultraviolet-A (R + UV-A) as monotherapy or combined with voriconazole and moxifloxacin was also tested. Quantitative assays to assess cyst viability after treatment were performed for the chemicals that showed the highest activity in the qualitative assays. Paromomycin and propamidine did not show antiamoebic activity. Regardless of the total dose, no amoebicidal effect was observed for R + UV-A. Tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, voriconazole, chlorhexidine and cellulase were selected for quantitative assays because they appeared to cause greater damage to the structure of amoebae. Chlorhexidine and ciprofloxacin were the most active against Acanthamoeba spp. as monotherapy. Among the combinations evaluated, ciprofloxacin-voriconazole-chlorhexidine showed the greatest amoebicidal activity, with severe damage of the cellular membrane and an important decrease in cell concentration. In summary, ciprofloxacin as monotherapy and in combination with voriconazole and chlorhexidine has been classified as promising treatment. Additional in-vivo studies in animal models and clinical trials in patients with AK should be considered to confirm the efficacy of ciprofloxacin.