Intraocular lens power calculation in primary angle closure

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with a history of acute primary angle-closure attack

BACKGROUND

To compare the accuracy of nine intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas, including three traditional formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, and Hoffer Q) and six new-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II [BUII], Hill-Radial Basis Function [RBF] 3.0, Kane, Emmetropia verifying optical [EVO], Ladas Super, and Pearl-DGS) in patients who underwent cataract surgery after acute primary angle closure (APAC).

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 44 eyes of 44 patients (APAC) and 60 eyes of 60 patients (control) were included. We compared the mean absolute error, median absolute error (MedAE), and prediction error after surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed on whether axial length (AL) or preoperative laser peripheral iridotomy affected the postoperative refractive outcomes.

RESULTS

In the APAC group, all formulas showed higher MedAE and more myopic shift than the control group (all P < 0.05). In APAC eyes with AL ≥ 22 mm, there were no differences in MedAEs according to the IOL formulas; however, in APAC eyes with AL < 22 mm, Haigis (0.49 D) showed lower MedAE than SRK/T (0.82 D) (P = 0.036) and Hill-RBF 3.0 (0.54 D) showed lower MedAE than SRK/T (0.82 D), Hoffer Q (0.75 D) or Kane (0.83 D) (P = 0.045, 0.036 and 0.027, respectively). Pearl-DGS (0.63 D) showed lower MedAE than Hoffer Q (0.75 D) and Kane (0.83 D) (P = 0.045 and 0.036, respectively). Haigis and Hill-RBF 3.0 showed the highest percentage (46.7%) of eyes with PE within ± 0.5 D in APAC eyes with AL < 22 mm. Iridectomized eyes did not show superior precision than the non-iridotomized eyes in the APAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive errors in the APAC group were more myopic than those in the control group. Haigis and Hill-RBF 3.0 showed high precision in the eyes with AL < 22 mm in the APAC group.

Prediction of effective Lens position using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Chinese subjects with angle closure

Purpose

To assess the accuracy of biometric parameters measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) in prediction of effective lens position (ELP) compared with previous formulas in PACG patients.

Methods

121 PACG eyes were randomly divided into training set (85 eyes) and validation set (36 eyes) with same procedure including AS-OCT, PCI, phacoemulsification and IOL implantation surgery. Preoperative anterior chamber depth (pre-ACD), scleral spur depth (SSD), scleral spur width (SSW), lens vault (LV) and cornea thickness (CT) were measured from AS-OCT image. Axial length (AL) and corneal power (K) were measured by PCI. All the 7 parameters were analyzed by multiple linear regression in training set and a statistic regression formula was developed. In validation set, one-way ANOVA was applied to compare the new regression formula with Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff theoretic (SRK/T), Holladay 1, Haigis, and a regression formula developed in previous study.

Results

The coefficient of determination (R²) of different parameter combinations are 0.19 (pre-ACD, AL), 0.25 (AL, K) and 0.49 (SSD, AL, SSW) in training set. In validation set, the correlation between predicted and measured ELP are: new formula (R² = 0.50, P = 0.9947) Holladay 1 (R² = 0.12, P < 0.0001), SRK/T (R² = 0.11, P < 0.0001) and Haigis (R² = 0.06, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Among 7 tested parameters, pre-ACD contribute little in ELP prediction. Formula consist of SSD, AL and SSW showed better accuracy than other formulas tested.