Effect of subconjunctival Bevacizumab injection on the outcome of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized control trial

The efficacy of adjunctive mitomycin C and/or anti-VEGF agents on glaucoma tube shunt drainage device surgeries: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy has long been established. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive agents in tube shunt drainage device surgery for glaucoma or ocular hypertension, since controversy still exists regarding their benefit.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and BASE for RCTs, which have used adjuvant antimetabolites-either MMC or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) agents. The main outcome was IOP reduction at 12 months.

RESULTS

Ten studies met our inclusion criteria. Nine used the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implant, while the double-plate Molteno implant was used in one study. Four studies used MMC. The remaining six studies used an anti-VEGF drug - either bevacizumab, ranibizumab or conbercept. Only one MMC-study reported a significant difference in the IOP reduction between groups at 12 months, favouring the MMC group (55% and 51%; p < 0.01). A significant difference was also reported by two out of five bevacizumab-studies, both favouring the bevacizumab group (55% and 51%, p < 0.05; 58% and 27%, p < 0.05), with the highest benefit seen in neovascular glaucoma cases, especially when panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) was also used. Neither ranibizumab nor conbercept were found to produce significant differences between groups regarding IOP reduction.

CONCLUSION

There is no high-quality evidence to support the use of MMC in tube shunt surgery. As for anti-VEGF agents, specifically bevacizumab, significant benefit seems to exist in neovascular glaucoma patients, especially if combined with PRP.

Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with/without intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in neovascular glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation with or without anti-VEGF injections in neovascular glaucoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study assessed NVG patients who underwent AGV implantation with or without anti-VEGF injections. Demographic and clinical data, including ocular findings, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, and glaucoma medication count, were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at one day, one month, and one year. The study included 35 patients. Group 1 consisted of 23 patients who received anti-VEGF injections before AGV surgery. Group 2, with 12 patients, had no anti-VEGF injections prior to surgery. Successful surgery was defined as IOP values between 6 and 21mmHg. The primary outcome was a 30% or more reduction in IOP.

RESULTS

The groups displayed no significant difference in their demographic or clinical profiles (P>0.05). The visual acuity before and one year after surgery did not differ significantly between the groups. However, IOP values significantly decreased by the end of the one-year follow-up for both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding visual acuity, IOP, or the number of medications during the one-year follow-up (P>0.05). Success rates were 95.7% for Group 1 and 91.7% for Group 2. No significant difference in complications between the groups was observed (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF injections prior to AGV implantation did not significantly impact visual acuity, IOP values, or medication count during the one-year follow-up.

Does Bevacizumab Improve Outcomes After Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation for Refractory Glaucoma?: A Meta-Analysis

PRCIS

Mean intraocular pressure (IOP), complete and overall success, mean IOP-lowering medications, incidence of hypertensive phase, and complications were found to be comparable between patients undergoing Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (AGVI) with adjunctive bevacizumab versus AGVI alone.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to assess how adjunctive bevacizumab impacts the surgical outcomes of AGVI compared with AGVI alone in all subtypes of refractory glaucoma.

METHODS

A systematic search of databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in March 2023. Primary outcomes included mean IOP and success rates. Secondary outcomes were mean IOP-lowering medications, incidence of hypertensive phase, and complications. Qualitative assessment, meta-analysis, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 203 eyes were included in the quantitative analysis. Initial meta-analysis showed a strong yet nonsignificant trend (all P > 0.05) favoring adjunctive bevacizumab in all outcomes of interest. Significant heterogeneity was observed for mean IOP and success outcomes at all time points (all I2 > 50%). Subgroup analysis of the administration route revealed a reduced incidence of hyphaema in the intravitreal bevacizumab subgroup (odds ratio: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.59; P = 0.01) with significant heterogeneity persisting in the intravitreal bevacizumab subgroup for all measures (all I2 > 50%). Post hoc sensitivity analysis of studies without concurrent pan-retinal photocoagulation for mean IOP and success outcomes demonstrated more conservative effect sizes with a corresponding decrease in heterogeneity for all measures (all I2 < 30%).

CONCLUSION

Published studies investigating the role of adjunctive bevacizumab show a strong trend to improve outcomes but contain a relatively small number of participants. This analysis underpins the need for an adequately powered RCT to explore the role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in AGVI surgery.

Glaucoma Tube Outcomes with and without Anti-VEGF in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To compare glaucoma tube outcomes of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections versus dry AMD eyes and no anti-VEGF.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with wet AMD and a history of anti-VEGF within a year prior or after stand-alone glaucoma tube surgery and eyes with dry AMD and no history of anti-VEGF with at least 6 months of follow-up. Eyes with neovascular glaucoma or anti-VEGF for reason other than wet AMD were excluded.

METHODS

A Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival for wet versus dry AMD eyes. Failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mmHg or < 20% IOP reduction from baseline or IOP ≤ 5 mmHg for 2 consecutive postoperative visits starting at month 3, additional glaucoma surgery, or no light perception. Complete success was defined as no failure or medications at final follow-up. Hypertensive phase was defined for valved tubes as IOP > 21 mmHg within 3 months of surgery after a reduction to < 22 mmHg during the first postoperative week. Intraocular pressure, percent reduction in IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and early (< 1 year) and late (> 1 year) complications were compared through 5 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Survival analysis, IOP, number of medications.

RESULTS

Baseline IOP, number of medications, or tube type were not significantly different between wet (n = 24) and dry AMD eyes (n = 54). No wet AMD eyes failed versus 10 (18%) dry AMD eyes (P = 0.03). Five-year survival was estimated as 100% for wet AMD and 72% for dry AMD (P = 0.04). Wet AMD eyes had lower IOP (10.6 vs. 12.7 mmHg, P = 0.05), greater IOP reduction (60% vs. 49%, P = 0.04), fewer medications (1.2 vs. 2.1, P = 0.02), and more complete success (50% vs. 15%, P = 0.001) at final follow-up (32 vs. 36 months, P = 0.42). Fewer wet than dry AMD eyes experienced hypertensive phase (0/10 [0%] vs. 4/10 [40%], P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in early or late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to anti-VEGF may influence postoperative wound healing and capsule formation which may improve glaucoma tube surgical outcomes. Prospective data is needed to consider perioperative administration of anti-VEGF for glaucoma tube surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with and without subconjunctival bevacizumab in refractory glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on intraocular pressure (IOP), hypertensive phase, and failure and success rates of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation.

METHODS

A total of 63 eyes of 63 patients (30 cases in control and 33 cases in bevacizumab group) were included in this randomized masked prospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative BCVA, IOP, number of medications, complications and success rates were compared between AGV + bevacizumab and AGV alone group.

RESULTS

Both groups showed statistically significant reductions in IOP in all their follow-up visits (P < 0.05). The mean IOP was lower in the AGV + Bevacizumab group than AGV group in all follow-up visits. However, the difference was only significant at the 3rd month (17.3 ± 6.2 vs. 20.7 ± 4.6, p = 0.04). The number of medications was not differed significantly between the two groups at their last visit (p value = 0.84) Complete success rate was higher in AGV + Bevacizumab. However, the difference was not significant (p = 0.73). The qualified and overall success rate, failure rate and the need for second tube were not statistically different between the two groups. The hypertensive phase was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (33.3% in AGV + Bevacizumab group and 50% in AGV group, p = 0.06) CONCLUSION: Adjunctive use of Bevacizumab during AGV implantation is beneficial in controlling hypertensive phase and IOP control and may lead to higher success rates and lower failure rates after AGV implantation. However, whether it's clearly beneficial or its exact role remains to be investigated.

Treatment Outcomes Using the PAUL Glaucoma Implant to Control Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Refractory Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To investigate efficacy 1 year after implantation of a novel glaucoma tube shunt, the PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI; Advanced Ophthalmic Innovations, Singapore, Republic of Singapore), in the treatment of eyes with refractory glaucoma.

DESIGN

Clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Glaucoma patients who are recalcitrant to maximum tolerated medical therapy and require tube shunt surgery.

METHODS

Interventional cohort study involving consecutive PGIs implanted at 6 international centers between December 1, 2017, and December 1, 2018. All the participants were followed up for 1 year after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was failure, defined prospectively as intraocular pressure (IOP) of more than 21 mmHg or less than 20% reduction from the preoperative baseline on 2 consecutive visits, 3 months or more after surgery; persistent late hypotony, defined as IOP of less than 6 mmHg on 2 consecutive visits after 3 months; additional glaucoma surgery; loss of light perception vision; or removal of the implant for any reason.

RESULTS

Of 82 patients enrolled, 74 (74 eyes) completed 12 months of follow-up. The mean age ± standard deviation at enrollment was 62.3±14.7 years, 73.0% were men, and 36.5% had secondary glaucoma. One year after surgery, 4 patients (5.4%) fulfilled the surgical criteria for failure, 68.9% (51/74 eyes) were deemed complete successes, and 93.2% (69/74 eyes) were considered qualified successes. Compared with the medicated preoperative IOP (23.1±8.2 mmHg), the postoperative IOPs at 6 and 12 months were 13.8±4.0 mmHg and 13.2±3.3 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean number of IOP-lowering drugs used before surgery and after 12 months of follow-up were 3.3±0.9 and 0.3±0.6, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant postoperative complications included self-limiting shallow anterior chamber (n = 11; 14.9%), hypotony requiring intervention (n = 7; 9.5%), tube shunt occlusion (n = 5; 6.8%), tube exposure (n = 3; 4.1%), and endophthalmitis with resultant loss of vision (n = 1; 1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PGI demonstrated comparable efficacy with other currently available implants, with almost three quarters of the enrolled patients with refractory glaucoma achieving complete surgical success after 1 year of follow-up.