Bone Ceramic® at Implants Installed Immediately into Extraction Sockets in the Molar Region: An Experimental Study in Dogs

In Vitro Handling Characteristics of a Particulate Bone Substitute for Ridge Preservation Procedures

While particulate bone substitute materials are applied in a variety of augmentation procedures, standardized defects are being used for preclinical testing. This in vitro study evaluated the density and homogeneity of a particulate bone substitute in ridge preservation procedures. Premolars and molars were extracted in ten semimandibles of minipig cadavers. Light body impression material was used for determining the volume of the extraction sites followed by augmentation with particulate material, thereby weighing the graft material needed. Microradiographs and histologic sections were obtained for evaluating the homogeneity and density of the augmentation material. Statistical analyses were based on Shapiro-Wilk tests, Spearman's rho and one sample Wilcoxon test followed by Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing (α = 0.05). Based on 103 single alveoli evaluated, the mean volume determined was 0.120 cm3 requiring a mean amount of graft material of 0.155 g. With only three exceptions, all parameters (volume, mass of augmentation material, density and homogeneity) correlated significantly (p < 0.020). The apical parts of the alveoli showed reduced density as compared to the middle parts (p < 0.001) and the homogeneity of the augmentation material was also lower as compared to the middle (p < 0.001) and cervical parts (p Collapse

Key Words

• alveolar ridge augmentation
• bone substitute materials
• ridge preservation

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Samira Dahl
Virgilia Klär-Quarz
Annika Schulz
Matthias Karl
Tanja Grobecker-Karl Department of Prosthodontics, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany; (S.D.); (V.K.-Q.); (A.S.); (M.K.)

Collapse

Critical review on bone grafting during immediate implant placement

In the last 20 years, immediate implant placement has been proposed as a predictable protocol to replace failing teeth. The research conducted in preclinical and clinical studies have focused on soft and hard tissue changes following tooth extraction and immediate implant placement. Different approaches for hard and soft tissue grafting together with provisional restorations have been proposed to compensate tissue alterations. This review analyzed some relevant clinical and preclinical literature focusing on the impact of bone grafting procedures on immediate implant placement in terms of hard and soft tissue changes, aesthetic results, and patient-related outcomes.

Pre-Clinical Models in Implant Dentistry: Past, Present, Future

Biomedical research seeks to generate experimental results for translation to clinical settings. In order to improve the transition from bench to bedside, researchers must draw justifiable conclusions based on data from an appropriate model. Animal testing, as a prerequisite to human clinical exposure, is performed in a range of species, from laboratory mice to larger animals (such as dogs or non-human primates). Minipigs appear to be the animal of choice for studying bone surgery around intraoral dental implants. Dog models, well-known in the field of dental implant research, tend now to be used for studies conducted under compromised oral conditions (biofilm). Regarding small animal models, research studies mostly use rodents, with interest in rabbit models declining. Mouse models remain a reference for genetic studies. On the other hand, over the last decade, scientific advances and government guidelines have led to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of the use of all animal models in dental implant research. In new development strategies, some in vivo experiments are being progressively replaced by in vitro or biomaterial approaches. In this review, we summarize the key information on the animal models currently available for dental implant research and highlight (i) the pros and cons of each type, (ii) new levels of decisional procedures regarding study objectives, and (iii) the outlook for animal research, discussing possible non-animal options.

Healing of BoneCeramic™ at buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To assess the healing outcomes at buccal dehiscence defects after 4 months following implant placement immediately into extraction sockets (IPIES) and filled with a mixture of synthetic hydroxyl apatite (HA) 60% and β-tri-calcium phosphate (β-TCP) 40% in comparison with leaving a blood clot.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight Labrador dogs were used, and an implant was placed immediately following tooth extraction into the distal alveolus of the third premolars, bilaterally. Standardized buccal defects, 8 mm in depth and 4 mm in width at the coronal and 2 mm in width at the apical outlines were created. A mixture of synthetic HA 60% and β-TCP 40% was used to fill the defects at the test sites, while the control sites were left unfilled. Collagen membranes were used to cover the defects at both sides, and a non-submerged healing was allowed. After 4 months of healing, biopsies were obtained and processed for morphometric analysis.

RESULTS

A vertical gain in the extent of the bony crest and of osseointegration levels of 4.2 ± 2.4 and 3.3 ± 2.1 mm at the test sites and of 5.0 ± 0.8 and 4.6 ± 1.0 mm at the control sites, respectively, were observed. BIC% within the buccal defects reached similar levels (37-42%) both at test and control sites. None of the means of the variables differed significantly between the two groups. New bone formation within the defects was higher, and the percentage of the connective tissue was lower at the control (65.7 ± 11.7% and 2.5 ± 3.3%, respectively) compared to the test sites (16.8 ± 11.3% and 48.9 ± 29.5%, respectively). These differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a mixture of synthetic HA 60% and β-TCP 40% to fill surgically created buccal dehiscence defects at IPIES sites covered with a collagen membrane did not improve osseointegration in the defect area.