1
|
Saini RS, Kanji MA, Okshah A, Alshadidi AAF, Binduhayyim RIH, Vyas R, Aldosari LIN, Vardanyan A, Mosaddad SA, Heboyan A. Comparative efficacy of photobiomodulation on osseointegration in dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2024; 48:104256. [PMID: 38914185 DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) in enhancing bone integration with dental implants. METHOD PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies assessing PBM effectiveness with defined intervention/control groups were included, while those lacking specified laser types, involving severe maxillofacial defects or surgery, and not reporting outcomes related to dental implant osseointegration post-PBM therapy were excluded. The studies' risk of bias was assessed using Robvis for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. The meta-analysis was conducted utilizing a random-effects model at a significance level of 0.01. RESULTS The study reviewed 26 papers involving 571 patients undergoing dental implant procedures with PBM/Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) or placebo/control. Implant stability quotients (ISQ) analysis showed a non-significant difference (p = 0.06, mean difference: 1.02, 95 % CI: 0.28 to 1.75, I2=28 %), while the Periotest method indicated significant improvement in stability (p < 0.01, mean difference: -0.51, 95 % CI: -0.78 to -0.24, I2=71 %). PBM resulted in a significant bone density increase (p < 0.01, mean difference: 26, 95 % CI: 6.93 to 45.06, I2=91 %), but marginal bone loss showed no significant difference (p = 0.11, mean difference: 0.00, 95 % CI: -0.06 to 0.05, I2=45 %). Implant survival rate did not significantly differ (p = 0.73, mean difference: 1.56, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.46, I2=0 %). Most studies raised concerns regarding randomization. CONCLUSION PBM could improve implant stability, as assessed with Periotest, and increase bone density, enhancing osseointegration. However, implant stability assessed with ISQ, marginal bone loss, and implant survival rate were comparable between the study groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravinder S Saini
- Department of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Masroor Ahmed Kanji
- Department of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmajeed Okshah
- Department of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Rajesh Vyas
- Department of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Anna Vardanyan
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Seyed Ali Mosaddad
- Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Bucofacial Prosthesis, Faculty of Odontology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Artak Heboyan
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia; Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singhania A, Bhoyar A, Dubey SA, Jaiswal T. Effect of Photobiomodulation on Crestal Bone Density Around Dental Implants: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e63546. [PMID: 39086791 PMCID: PMC11289497 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Dental implants are becoming a necessary component of the dental profession. The first bone resorption at the implant surface has an impact on implant success. Bone alterations surrounding the implant are a significant factor in determining the implant's effectiveness. Reducing the loss of peri-implant crestal bone has been a constant goal. In dental implantology, several procedures are carried out to improve implant stability and the healing of the bone. The ability of photobiomodulation techniques or low-level laser therapy (LLLT) to speed up osseointegration by inducing cellular metabolism and stimulating tissue healing has made them popular. This case study details the implant loading in a patient treated with photobiomodulation to achieve implant stability and who has compromised bone type or D4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashika Singhania
- Prosthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Anjali Bhoyar
- Prosthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Surekha A Dubey
- Prosthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Tanvi Jaiswal
- Prosthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El-Waseef FA, Helmy MA, Said Ahmed WM, Hegazy SA, El-Shaheed NH. Efficacy of laser biostimulation for mandibular narrow ridges treated with one-stage ridge splitting and two-implant overdentures: A one-year preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent 2024:S0022-3913(24)00239-7. [PMID: 38670908 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The management of patients with narrow-mandibular ridges who seek prosthetic rehabilitation is challenging. PURPOSE The purpose of this one-year preliminary clinical study was to compare the effects of laser biostimulation and a placebo on peri-implant tissues for a 2-implant-retained mandibular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) overdenture on expanded narrow mandibular ridges. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighteen completely edentulous participants were enrolled for mandibular ridge splitting in the canine regions, followed by expansion, the placement of implants, and the application of a bone graft. In the test group, laser therapy was applied labially and lingually at the surgical sites, while a placebo laser was used in the control group. PEEK overdentures retained by LOCATOR attachments were provided after 6 months. Clinical evaluations were performed using probing depth, plaque, bleeding, and gingival indices at insertion and 3, 6, and 12 months after insertion. Vertical bone loss (VBL) was evaluated with periapical radiograph at insertion and 6 and 12 months later. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test the difference between the 2 different groups at each evaluation time (α=.05). The Friedman-test was used, followed by Wilcoxon signed rank test, to test the change over time in the same group, and the Bonferroni adjusted significance level was used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS Some clinical and radiographic parameters significantly increased with time in both groups (P<.001). Significant differences between the 2 groups were revealed in bleeding scores at 3 months (P=.006) and 6 months (P=.018). Also, significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in gingival scores at 3 months (P=.002), 6 months (P=.015), and 12 months (P=.019) after overdenture insertion in favor of the laser group. Peri-implant VBL was significantly higher in the non-laser group at 6 months (P=.015), and 12 months (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this clinical study, respecting the small sample size and the short follow-up period, laser bio-stimulation after 1-stage ridge splitting in narrow mandibular ridges enhanced the soft and hard peri implant tissues when used with LOCATOR attachments and PEEK overdentures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Ahmad El-Waseef
- Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | - Marwa Adel Helmy
- Teaching Assistant, Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Wael Mohamed Said Ahmed
- Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Salah Abdelfattah Hegazy
- Professor, Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; and Dean, Faculty of Dentistry, Menoufia University, Shibin el Kom, Egypt
| | - Noha Hosny El-Shaheed
- Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Le JRM, Wu JH, Jaw FS, Su CT. The effect of bone remodeling with photobiomodulation in dentistry: a review study. Lasers Med Sci 2023; 38:265. [PMID: 37973668 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03933-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been emerging as a promising alternative therapy in dentistry. However, various parameters of PBM are used in different studies, and there is limited cumulative data on PBM for improving bone formation in clinical trials. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of PBM in the process of bone remodeling in dentistry using randomized controlled trials. Initially, a total of 1,011 articles published from January 2008 to December 2021 were retrieved from five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL). After a two-step review, nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The parameter of PBM, group, treatment sessions, assessment times and outcomes of the included studies were reviewed. Eighty-nine percent of the studies revealed positive effects on bone formation between the laser group and the control group. Only one article reported that light-emitting diode did not significantly enhance osteogenesis. Additionally, the present study shows that Gallium aluminum arsenide of near infrared (NIR) laser with continuous mode is the most commonly used form of PBM. The biostimulatory effects are dependent on several parameters, with wavelength and dose being more important than others. Based on this review, it is suggested that the NIR range and an appropriate dose of PBM could be used to increase the efficiency of stimulating bone healing and remodeling. However, standardization of treatment protocols is needed to clarify therapeutic strategies in dentistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Ren Mi Le
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan
| | - Jih-Huah Wu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, 33348, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Shan Jaw
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Tsung Su
- Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan City, 33348, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foletti JM, Remy F, Chevenement L, Sterba M, Tavitian P, Badih L, Kenck-Veran O. Effect of LED photobiomodulation on dental implant osseointegration: An in vivo study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2023; 17:28-34. [PMID: 37650019 PMCID: PMC10462914 DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2023.36954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Photobiomodulation (PBM) may be prescribed after dental surgery to accelerate tissue healing and improve implant stability. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of LED-PBM on the dental implant osseointegration. Methods A total of 48 implants (KontactTM) were inserted in 8 Yucatan minipigs (6 implants per minipig) divided into 2 groups (test and control). The test group received LED-PBM with a total energy of 124.2 J/cm2 delivered over 4 sessions (at day0, day+8, day+15 and day+28) lasting 12 minutes each. At day+28, all animals were sacrificed, and their mandibles removed to perform histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Implant osseointegration was evaluated using the computation of bone/implant contact (BIC) index and bone surface/total surface (BS/ TS) ratio. The groups were compared using Student's unpaired t test. Results BIC index and BS/TS ratio were significantly higher within the test group as compared to the control group (P<0.01). Histologic observations on bone tissues demonstrated that LED-PBM may improve and accelerate dental implant osseointegration: 25% of dental implants analyzed within the test group were completely osseointegrated, versus 12.5% within the control group. Conclusion This experimental study indicates that LED-PBM contributes to enhancing implant treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Marc Foletti
- Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, APHM, Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Gustave Eiffel Univ, LBA, Marseille, France
| | - Floriane Remy
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Gustave Eiffel Univ, LBA, Marseille, France
| | - Luc Chevenement
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Gustave Eiffel Univ, LBA, Marseille, France
| | | | - Patrick Tavitian
- Department of Dentistry, APHM, la Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qu C, Luo F, Hong G, Wan Q. Effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on implant stability and postoperative recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 60:e712-e721. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
7
|
Bozkaya S, Uraz A, Guler B, Kahraman SA, Turhan Bal B. The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021; 23:329-340. [PMID: 33851765 DOI: 10.1111/cid.12999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have reported a positive effect on bone healing and the elimination of microorganisms placed on the titanium implants, while others have not confirmed the positive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) effects on bone regeneration and bone structure around the implants. PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to address the following questions: Does PBMT improve implant stability and affect microbiota around dental implants in the early stage of osseointegration? MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was designed as randomized-controlled prospective, split mouth, single-blinded clinical trial. Implants were randomly divided into two groups and implants placed in the test group were treated with Gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser with PBMT immediately after surgery and for 15 days (n = 47). In the control group, implants were not irradiated(n = 46). The primary stability of the implants was measured by the Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) after insertion and the secondary stability values were recorded at 30th, 60th, and 90th days after surgery as implant stability quotient (ISQ). The hand-held RFA was held perpendicular to the jaw line as indicated by the manufacturer for buccal-lingual (BL), mesial-distal (MD), and lingual-buccal (LB) measurement and different measurements were analyzed as separately. RESULTS Significantly higher magnetic RFA values were achieved on the 90th day in all measurement sides for both groups. ISQ levels in groups at baseline and the day-30, 60, and 90. ISQ readings were not statistically significant between test and control groups for each time point. A statistically significant increase in ISQ reading for BL, MD, and LB dimensions in both groups was noted from baseline to the day-90 (P < .05). CONCLUSION It was concluded that PBMT did not have a clinically significant effect on implant stabilization, especially in terms of ISQ values at early alveolar bone healing term. Clinical trial number is NCT04495335.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleyman Bozkaya
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahu Uraz
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berceste Guler
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Kütahya Health Science University, Kütahya, Turkey
| | - Sevil Altundağ Kahraman
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bilge Turhan Bal
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Restorative Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|