1
|
Lin X, Li S, Zheng X, Que G. Comprehensive sinus contour classification and its characteristics from radiographic examination: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24:1021. [PMID: 39215296 PMCID: PMC11365276 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04707-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to propose a comprehensive maxillary sinus (MS) contour classification system based on the evaluation of anatomical characteristics from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination and investigate the relationship between sinus contours and sinus floor elevation (SFE). METHODS A total of 283 CBCT scans from patients who had single tooth loss in the posterior maxilla and underwent SFE were analyzed. The MS was classified at each tooth position. For buccal-palatal evaluation, the classification from Type A to E was narrow-taper, taper, ovoid, square, and irregular, respectively. For mesial-distal evaluation, the classification from Type 1 to 4 was flat, slope, concave, and septa, respectively. The major anatomical parameters evaluated were (1) residual bone height (RBH), (2) sinus width (SW), (3) maxillary sinus angle (MSA), (4) buccal dip angle (BDA), (5) palatonasal recess (PNR), and (6) sinus depth. RESULTS Eleven groups of MS contour were classified after detailed calculation. Differences in the RBH, MSA, BDA, and SW among different groups were statistically significant. The narrow-taper and slope MS (A2) group had the highest RBH (8.66 ± 0.77 mm), largest BDA (79.9° ± 3.18°), smallest MSA (19.8° ± 2.01°), and narrowest SW (6.30 ± 1.23 mm). The lowest RBH was in the square and concave sinus (D3) group (5.11 ± 2.70 mm). The ovoid and concave sinus (C3) group had the smallest BDA (50.64 ± 8.73 mm) and largest MSA (74.11° ± 11.52°). The square and flat MS (D1) group had the widest SW (19.13 ± 3.69 mm). A strongly significant positive correlation was observed between the SW and MSA (r = 0.67) and a strongly negative correlation between the SW and BDA (r = - 0.65). The prevalence of PNR (mean angle: 104.06° ± 16.83°, mean height: 14.72 ± 11.78 mm) was 38% and frequently observed in the ovoid and slope MS (C2) group. CONCLUSION Despite certain characteristics at different tooth sites, the same tooth position was categorized differently using different classification systems, indicating large anatomical variations in the MS. The classification system proposed herein allows for classification based on general characteristics at a single tooth site, aiming to help surgeons in improving presurgical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Lin
- Affiliated Implantology center, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaobing Li
- Affiliated Implantology center, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianghuai Zheng
- Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Guoying Que
- Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng Y, Ma R, He Y, Yu S, Cao S, Gao K, Dou Y, Ma P. Biomechanical analysis of the maxillary sinus floor membrane during internal sinus floor elevation with implants at different angles of the maxillary sinus angles. Int J Implant Dent 2024; 10:11. [PMID: 38472687 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00530-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study analyzed and compared the biomechanical properties of maxillary sinus floor mucosa with implants at three different maxillary sinus angles during a modified internal sinus floor elevation procedure. METHODS 3D reconstruction of the implant, maxillary sinus bone, and membrane were performed. The maxillary sinus model was set at three different angles. Two internal maxillary sinus elevation models were established, and finite element analysis was used to simulate the modified maxillary sinus elevation process. The implant was elevated to 10 mm at three maxillary sinus angles when the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 0 and 4 mm. The stress of the maxillary sinus floor membrane was analyzed and compared. RESULTS When the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 0 mm and elevated to 10 mm, the peak stress values of the implant on the maxillary sinus floor membrane at three different angles were as follows: maxillary sinus I: 5.14-78.32 MPa; maxillary sinus II: 2.81-73.89 MPa; and maxillary sinus III: 2.82-51.87 MPa. When the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 4 mm and elevated to 10 mm, the corresponding values were as follows: maxillary sinus I: 0.50-7.25 MPa; maxillary sinus II: 0.81-16.55 MPa; and maxillary sinus III: 0.49-22.74 MPa. CONCLUSION The risk of sinus floor membrane rupture is greatly reduced after adequate dissection of the maxillary sinus floor membrane when performing modified internal sinus elevation in a narrow maxillary sinus. In a wide maxillary sinus, the risk of rupture or perforation of the wider maxillary sinus floor is reduced, regardless of whether traditional or modified internal sinus elevation is performed at the same height.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinxin Deng
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
- Department of Stomatology, Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, No. 3 Yongding Road East Street, Beijing, HaiDian District, 100039, China
| | - Ruihong Ma
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
| | - Yilin He
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
| | - Shujia Yu
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
| | - Shiyu Cao
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
| | - Kang Gao
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
| | - Yiping Dou
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China
| | - Pan Ma
- Dental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harlos MM, da Silva TB, Montagner PG, Teixeira LN, Gomes AV, Martinez EF. Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26:1-9. [PMID: 35511290 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04515-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus can make it difficult, if not impossible, to install osseointegrated implants, and undertake their eventual functional rehabilitation, which may ultimately require regenerative techniques to achieve. This randomized controlled study proposed conducting a histological evaluation of the behavior of different graft materials in wide maxillary sinuses, at a height of 8 to 10 mm from the alveolar ridge, combined with bone remnants less than 3mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients underwent a sinus elevation procedure through the lateral window. The sinuses were randomly filled with the following materials (n=12/group): group 1, xenogenic bone + autogenous bone (ratio 70:30, respectively); group 2, xenogenic bone + L-PRF; and group 3, xenogenic bone. At 8 months, bone biopsies of engrafted sites were harvested and analyzed histomorphometrically in order to quantify newly formed bone tissue. RESULTS The results showed a greater area of newly formed bone for G1, averaging 2678.37 (1116.40) μm2, compared with G2 at 984.87 (784.27) μm2, and G3 at 480.66 (384.76) μm2 (p < 0.05). Additionally, fewer xenogenic bone particles and a large amount of connective tissue were observed in G2. CONCLUSIONS In maxillary sinuses with large antral cavities, autogenous bone combined with xenogenic bone seems to demonstrate better graft remodeling and improve bone formation, compared with the addition of L-PRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE L-PRF produces few advantages regarding new bone formation in the wide maxillary sinuses. TRIAL REGISTRATION Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC) number RBR-2pbbrvg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Marcelo Harlos
- Division of Implantology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (SLMandic), R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Thiago Bezerra da Silva
- Division of Implantology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (SLMandic), R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Pedro Giorgetti Montagner
- Division of Implantology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (SLMandic), R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lucas Novaes Teixeira
- Division of Cell Biology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (SLMandic), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriana Vanderley Gomes
- Division of Implantology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (SLMandic), R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stacchi C, Rapani A, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Nicolin V, Berton F. Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022; 33:322-332. [PMID: 34978096 PMCID: PMC9306466 DOI: 10.1111/clr.13891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate histomorphometric outcomes of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation in different areas of the same cavity and to correlate results to bucco-palatal sinus width (SW) and residual bone height (RBH). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients needing maxillary sinus floor elevation (RBH <5 mm) to insert two nonadjacent implants were treated with lateral augmentation using a composite graft. Six months later, two bone-core biopsies (mesial/distal) were retrieved in implant insertion sites. SW and RBH were measured on cone beam computed tomography, and correlations between histomorphometric and anatomical parameters were evaluated by multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS Twenty patients underwent sinus augmentation, and eighteen were included in the final analysis (two dropouts for membrane perforation). Mean newly formed mineralized tissue percentage (%NFMT) after 6 months in mesial and distal sites was 17.5 ± 4.7 and 11.6 ± 4.7, respectively (p = .0004). Multivariate linear regression showed a strong negative correlation between SW and %NFMT (β coefficient=-.774, p < .0001) and no correlation between RBH and %NFMT (β coefficient =-.038, p = .825). CONCLUSIONS The present study confirms that %NFMT after lateral sinus augmentation occurs at different rates in different anatomical areas of the same maxillary sinus, showing a strong negative correlation with SW, whereas no influence of RBH was observed. Clinicians should regard SW as a guide for graft selection and to decide duration of the healing period. Researchers should consider SW as a predictor variable, when comparing regenerative outcomes of different biomaterials by using maxillary sinus as an experimental model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Stacchi
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Antonio Rapani
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Teresa Lombardi
- Department of Health Sciences, University 'Magna Graecia', Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Vanessa Nicolin
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Federico Berton
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krennmair S, Gugenberger A, Weinländer M, Krennmair G, Malek M, Postl L. Prevalence, risk factors, and repair mechanism of different forms of sinus membrane perforations in lateral window sinus lift procedure: A retrospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021; 23:821-832. [PMID: 34665489 DOI: 10.1111/cid.13016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate prevalences, affecting risk factors and efforts for repair mechanism for different forms of sinus membrane perforations (SMP) during sinus floor elevation (SFE) using the lateral window technique (LWT). MATERIAL AND METHODS For 334/434 patients, SFE undergoing LWT prevalence of SMP was retrospectively evaluated including a subselection based on membrane perforation size (<10 mm: small-moderate/≥10 mm: large) and biotype (BT; thick BT/thin BT) into four subgroups (SMP1: thick BT/small-moderate; SMP2: thin BT/small-moderate; SMP3: thick BT/large; SMP4: thin BT/large). For the various subgroups, patient- and surgery-related/anatomic risk factors affecting SMP were evaluated and the scope of sinus membrane repair (SSMR) mechanisms rated with 1 (easy) to 5 (complex) was compared. RESULTS For 103/434 SMP (27.6%) in 93/334 patients (30.8%) the prevalence of various forms of SMP differed significantly (p < 0.001) among the four subgroups. SMP4 with a prevalence of 45.6% (n = 47) was the most frequent type, while SMP3 had low prevalence with 4.85% (n = 5). Small/moderate SMPs with thick (SMP1: n = 26) or thin BT (SMP2: n = 23) were seen in 26.2% and 23.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between subgroups with large perforations (SMP3/SMP4) and those with small/moderate perforations (SMP1/SMP2) regarding anatomic risk factors such as residual ridge height (p = 0.023) and history of previous oral surgical interventions (OSI; p = 0.026). Most evidently, multivariate analysis showed that induction of large SMP with thin biotype (SMP4) was significantly affected by the presence of sinus septa (p < 0.022, OR: 2.415), reduced residual ridge height (p < 0.001, OR: 1.842), and previous OSI (p < 0.001, OR: 4.545). SSMR differed significantly (p < 0.001) between SMP4 (4.62 ± 0.49) and the subgroups SMP1 (1.11 ± 0.32), SMP2 (1.08 ± 028), and SMP3 (2.2 ± 0.55). CONCLUSION The most frequently found type of SMP had characteristics of thin biotype and large size associated with risk factors such as sinus septa, reduced residual ridge, and previous surgical interventions and required challenging repair mechanisms assessing clinical impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Krennmair
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical (JKU) University, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | - Gerald Krennmair
- Head Department of Prosthodontics, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Malek
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical (JKU) University, Linz, Austria
| | - Lukas Postl
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical (JKU) University, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shemtov-Yona K. Quantitative assessment of the jawbone quality classification: A meta-analysis study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253283. [PMID: 34133463 PMCID: PMC8208540 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Bone quality is evaluated using bone density for qualitative classification, a characteristic that may be delicate to evaluate. Contemporary implantology that relies on modern measurement techniques, needs a more quantitative estimate of the bone quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched with no time restriction. Clinical and radiographic studies reporting on alveolar ridge dimensions and its parameters in different areas of the dentate and edentulous jaws were included. A meta-analysis was performed using random effect models to report a combined mean for alveolar ridge and its parameters. Meta regression statistical tests were performed in order to identify differences in those outcome parameters. RESULTS 30 studies were included. The majority of the selected studies (total of 27) used live human subjects and CBCT to analyze alveolar ridge dimensions and its parameters. Using the combined mean obtained from the meta-analysis, a typical portrait of the alveolar ridge was constructed, and a geometrically based quantitative bone classification proposed. The quantitative classification was found to match the existing qualitative classification. CONCLUSION A geometry-based analysis was constructed that yields valuable insights on the bone type based on its components and on the dynamics of the dentate / edentulous states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Shemtov-Yona
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel
- The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Bruun NH, Tinoco EMB. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Alone Compared with Alternate Grafting Materials: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Histomorphometric Outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2020; 11:e2. [PMID: 33262881 PMCID: PMC7644272 DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2020.11302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The objective of present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in histomorphometric outcome after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft alone compared with alternate grafting materials applying the lateral window technique. Material and Methods MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with hand-search of relevant journals were conducted. Human studies published in English until the 25th of March, 2020 were included. Histomorphometric outcomes were evaluated by descriptive statistics and meta-analysis including 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Electronic search and hand-searching resulted in 1902 entries. Sixteen randomized controlled trials with unclear risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics showed comparable or improved histomorphometric outcomes with autogenous bone graft. Meta-analysis revealed a mean difference of -7.1% (CI = -11.0 to -3.2) indicating a significant higher amount of bone after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with alternate grafting materials. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a non-significantly differences of -3.7% (CI = -10.9 to 3.4), -11.5% (CI = -25.9 to 2.8), 2.2% (CI = -16.9 to 21.3), and -4.6% (CI = -14.4 to 5.2), when autogenous bone graft was compared with allogeneic bone graft, xenograft, composite grafting materials involving xenograft or synthetic biomaterial mixed with autogenous bone graft, respectively. Conclusions Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft seems to facilitate improved histomorphometric outcomes compared with alternate grafting materials. However, the included studies were characterised by an unclear risk of bias and various methodological confounding factors. Hence, the conclusions drawn from the results of present study should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Starch-Jensen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, AalborgDenmark
| | - Daniel Deluiz
- Department of Periodontology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de JaneiroBrazil
| | - Niels Henrik Bruun
- Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, AalborgDenmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Batas L, Tsalikis L, Stavropoulos A. PRGF as adjunct to DBB in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: histological results of a pilot split-mouth study. Int J Implant Dent 2019; 5:14. [PMID: 30931490 PMCID: PMC6441666 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0166-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Various technologies of autologous blood concentrates are currently evaluated for their potential to enhance bone formation. Aim To report on the histological outcome of maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) in combination with chair-side prepared autologous platelet-rich growth factor (PRGF), in comparison to that with DBB alone. Materials and methods Six partially edentulous patients with ≤ 3-mm residual bone height bilaterally in the posterior maxilla were subjected to MSFA with the lateral window technique, using DBB in combination with PRGF (PRGF System1 Vitoria, Spain) on one side or DBB alone on the contralateral side. Cylindrical biopsies from the augmented sinuses were collected during implant installation, ca. 6 months post-MSFA, and subjected to non-decalcified histological and histomorphometric evaluation. Results The collected biopsies varied in length (range 3.5–9.9 mm); consequently, the portion of the biopsy representing augmented tissues also varied (range 2.3–14.6 mm2). New bone formation with a trabecular appearance and numerous DBB particles in contact with the new bone or with loose connective tissue were observed. No differences in the relative volumes of bone formation were found in sinuses augmented with DBB + PRGF or DBB alone 6 months after MSFA (35.6 ± 8.26 mm and 37.8 ± 3.15 mm, respectively). Conclusion and clinical implications In conclusion, based on these preliminary results, PRGF as adjunct to DBB for MSFA, except from improved handling during the operation, does not appear to enhance nor interfere with bone formation inside the human sinus 6 months after MSFA, compared with the use of DBB alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas Batas
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Lazaros Tsalikis
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Andreas Stavropoulos
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.,Center for Experimental and Preclinical Biomedical Research (CEPBR), Athens, Greece.,Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|