A novel prognostic six-CpG signature in glioblastomas

Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identifies potent CpG signature for temzolomide response in non-G-CIMP glioblastomas with unmethylated MGMT promoter: MGMT-dependent roles of GPR81

PURPOSES

To identify potent DNA methylation candidates that could predict response to temozolomide (TMZ) in glioblastomas (GBMs) that do not have glioma-CpGs island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) but have an unmethylated promoter of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (unMGMT).

METHODS

The discovery-validation approach was planned incorporating a series of G-CIMP-/unMGMT GBM cohorts with DNA methylation microarray data and clinical information, to construct multi-CpG prediction models. Different bioinformatic and experimental analyses were performed for biological exploration.

RESULTS

By analyzing discovery sets with radiotherapy (RT) plus TMZ versus RT alone, we identified a panel of 64 TMZ efficacy-related CpGs, from which a 10-CpG risk signature was further constructed. Both the 64-CpG panel and the 10-CpG risk signature were validated showing significant correlations with overall survival of G-CIMP-/unMGMT GBMs when treated with RT/TMZ, rather than RT alone. The 10-CpG risk signature was further observed for aiding TMZ choice by distinguishing differential outcomes to RT/TMZ versus RT within each risk subgroup. Functional studies on GPR81, the gene harboring one of the 10 CpGs, indicated its distinct impacts on TMZ resistance in GBM cells, which may be dependent on the status of MGMT expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The 64 TMZ efficacy-related CpGs and in particular the 10-CpG risk signature may serve as promising predictive biomarker candidates for guiding optimal usage of TMZ in G-CIMP-/unMGMT GBMs.

Barriers to overcoming immunotherapy resistance in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, known for its poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although immunotherapies have yielded promising results in hematological malignancies, their successful application in GBM remains limited due to a host of immunosuppressive factors unique to GBM. As a result of these roadblocks, research efforts have focused on utilizing combinatorial immunotherapies that target networks of immune processes in GBM with promising results in both preclinical and clinical trials, although limitations in overcoming the immunosuppressive factors within GBM remain. In this review, we aim to discuss the intrinsic and adaptive immune resistance unique to GBM and to summarize the current evidence and outcomes of engineered and non-engineered treatments targeted at overcoming GBM resistance to immunotherapy. Additionally, we aim to highlight the most promising strategies of targeted GBM immunotherapy combinatorial treatments and the insights that may directly improve the current patient prognosis and clinical care.

Potent predictive CpG signature for temozolomide response in non-glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype glioblastomas with methylated MGMT promoter

Aim: We aimed to identify potent CpG signatures predicting temozolomide (TMZ) response in glioblastomas (GBMs) that do not have the glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) but have a methylated promoter of MGMT (me MGMT). Materials & methods: Different datasets of non-G-CIMP me MGMT GBMs with molecular and clinical data were analyzed. Results: A panel of 77 TMZ efficacy-related CpGs and a seven-CpG risk signature were identified and validated for distinguishing differential outcomes to radiotherapy plus TMZ versus radiotherapy alone in non-G-CIMP me MGMT GBMs. An integrated classification scheme was also proposed for refining a MGMT-based TMZ-guiding approach in all G-CIMP-GBMs. Conclusion: The CpG signatures may serve as promising predictive biomarker candidates for guiding optimal TMZ usage in non-G-CIMP me MGMT GBMs.

Hypoxia-induced polypoid giant cancer cells in glioma promote the transformation of tumor-associated macrophages to a tumor-supportive phenotype

Aims

Polypoid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) represent a unique subgroup of stem‐like cells, acting as a critical factor in promoting the recurrence of various solid tumors. The effect of PGCCs on the tumor malignancy of glioma and its immune microenvironment remains unclear.

Methods

Bioinformatic analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between M2 tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) infiltration and survival of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The spatial location of M2 TAMs in GBM was also investigated using the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) database. PGCCs were quantified in glioma of different grades. CoCl₂ was used to induce PGCCs in cultures of A172 cells. PGCCs, and their progeny cells in cultures were further evaluated for morphological features, tumorsphere formation, and TAMs activation.

Results

The magnitude of M2 TAMs infiltration is significantly correlated with poor survival in GBM patients. M2 TAMs were enriched in the perinecrotic zone (PNZ) of GBM and positively correlated with hypoxic levels. Increased PGCCs were detected in glioma specimens of higher grades. CoCl₂ induced hypoxia and the transformation of A172 cultures into PGCCs, producing the progeny cells, PGCCs‐Dau, through asymmetric division. PGCCs and PGCCs‐Dau possessed tumor stem cell‐like features, while PGCCs‐Dau enhanced the polarization of TAMs into an M2 phenotype with relevance to immunosuppression and malignancy in GBM.

Conclusions

PGCCs promote malignancy and immune‐suppressive microenvironment in GBM. PGCCs or their progeny cells may be a potential therapeutic target for GBM.

LRRFIP1, an epigenetically regulated gene, is a prognostic biomarker and predicts malignant phenotypes of glioma

Aims

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor with an adverse prognosis in the central nervous system. Traditional histopathological diagnosis accompanied by subjective deviations cannot accurately reflect tumor characteristics for clinical guidance. DNA methylation plays a critical role in GBM genesis. The focus of this project was to identify an effective methylation point for the classification of gliomas, the interactions between DNA methylation and potential epigenetic targeted therapies for clinical treatments.

Methods

Three online (TCGA, CGGA, and REMBRANDT) databases were employed in this study. T‐test, Venn analysis, univariate cox analysis, and Pearson's correlation analysis were adopted to screen significant prognostic methylation genes. Clinical samples were collected to determine the distributions of LRRFIP1 (Leucine Rich Repeat of Flightless‐1 Interacting Protein) protein by immunohistochemistry assay. Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox analysis were adopted to evaluate the prognostic value of LRRFIP1. Nomogram model was used to construct a prediction model. GO (Gene Ontology) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway were performed to explore functions and related mechanisms of LRRFIP1 in gliomas.

Results

Our results showed that 16 genes were negatively connected with their methylation level and correlated with clinical prognosis of GBM patients. Among them, LRRFIP1 expression showed the highest correlation with its methylation level. LRRFIP1 was highly expressed in WHO IV, mesenchymal, and IDH wild‐type subtype. LRRFIP1 expression was an independent risk factor for OS (overall survival) in gliomas.

Conclusion

LRRFIP1 is an epigenetically regulated gene and a potential prognostic biomarker for glioma. Our research may be beneficial to evaluate clinical efficacy, assess the prognosis, and provide individualized treatment for gliomas.

Genome-wide methylomic analyses identify prognostic epigenetic signature in lower grade glioma

Glioma is the most malignant and aggressive type of brain tumour with high heterogeneity and mortality. Although some clinicopathological factors have been identified as prognostic biomarkers, the individual variants and risk stratification in patients with lower grade glioma (LGG) have not been fully elucidated. The primary aim of this study was to identify an efficient DNA methylation combination biomarker for risk stratification and prognosis in LGG. We conducted a retrospective cohort study by analysing whole genome DNA methylation data of 646 patients with LGG from the TCGA and GEO database. Cox proportional hazard analysis was carried out to screen and construct biomarker model that predicted overall survival (OS). The Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and time‐dependent ROC were constructed to prove the efficiency of the signature. Then, another independent cohort was used to further validate the finding. A two‐CpG site DNA methylation signature was identified by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Further analysis indicated that the signature was an independent survival predictor from other clinical factors and exhibited higher predictive accuracy compared with known biomarkers. This signature was significantly correlated with immune‐checkpoint blockade, immunotherapy‐related signatures and ferroptosis regulator genes. The expression pattern and functional analysis showed that these two genes corresponding with two methylation sites contained in the model were correlated with immune infiltration level, and involved in MAPK and Rap1 signalling pathway. The signature may contribute to improve the risk stratification of patients and provide a more accurate assessment for precision medicine in the clinic.

Macrophages M1-Related Prognostic Signature in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A large number of studies have found that macrophages M1 play an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. The aim of our study is to explore the causes of differential infiltration of macrophages M1 in hepatocellular carcinoma from the perspective of transcriptome and establish a prognostic model of hepatocellular carcinoma. We downloaded gene expression and clinical data from the public database, estimated the content of macrophages M1 in different samples with R software, and found the different genes between high- and low-infiltration groups. Using differentially expressed genes, we constructed a model composed of 7 genes. The risk score of the model has a good ability to predict the prognosis, has a positive correlation with immune checkpoints, and is closely related to other immune cells and immune function. Our model shows good prognostic function and has wide application value.

Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications

Epigenetics involves a series of mechanisms that entail histone and DNA covalent modifications and non-coding RNAs, and that collectively contribute to programing cell functions and differentiation. Epigenetic anomalies and DNA mutations are co-drivers of cellular dysfunctions, including carcinogenesis. Alterations of the epigenetic system occur in cancers whether the initial carcinogenic events are from genotoxic (GTxC) or non-genotoxic (NGTxC) carcinogens. NGTxC are not inherently DNA reactive, they do not have a unifying mode of action and as yet there are no regulatory test guidelines addressing mechanisms of NGTxC. To fil this gap, the Test Guideline Programme of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development is developing a framework for an integrated approach for the testing and assessment (IATA) of NGTxC and is considering assays that address key events of cancer hallmarks. Here, with the intent of better understanding the applicability of epigenetic assays in chemical carcinogenicity assessment, we focus on DNA methylation and histone modifications and review: (1) epigenetic mechanisms contributing to carcinogenesis, (2) epigenetic mechanisms altered following exposure to arsenic, nickel, or phenobarbital in order to identify common carcinogen-specific mechanisms, (3) characteristics of a series of epigenetic assay types, and (4) epigenetic assay validation needs in the context of chemical hazard assessment. As a key component of numerous NGTxC mechanisms of action, epigenetic assays included in IATA assay combinations can contribute to improved chemical carcinogen identification for the better protection of public health.

Promoting Prognostic Model Application: A Review Based on Gliomas

Malignant neoplasms are characterized by poor therapeutic efficacy, high recurrence rate, and extensive metastasis, leading to short survival. Previous methods for grouping prognostic risks are based on anatomic, clinical, and pathological features that exhibit lower distinguishing capability compared with genetic signatures. The update of sequencing techniques and machine learning promotes the genetic panels-based prognostic model development, especially the RNA-panel models. Gliomas harbor the most malignant features and the poorest survival among all tumors. Currently, numerous glioma prognostic models have been reported. We systematically reviewed all 138 machine-learning-based genetic models and proposed novel criteria in assessing their quality. Besides, the biological and clinical significance of some highly overlapped glioma markers in these models were discussed. This study screened out markers with strong prognostic potential and 27 models presenting high quality. Conclusively, we comprehensively reviewed 138 prognostic models combined with glioma genetic panels and presented novel criteria for the development and assessment of clinically important prognostic models. This will guide the genetic models in cancers from laboratory-based research studies to clinical applications and improve glioma patient prognostic management.

Promoting Prognostic Model Application: A Review Based on Gliomas

Malignant neoplasms are characterized by poor therapeutic efficacy, high recurrence rate, and extensive metastasis, leading to short survival. Previous methods for grouping prognostic risks are based on anatomic, clinical, and pathological features that exhibit lower distinguishing capability compared with genetic signatures. The update of sequencing techniques and machine learning promotes the genetic panels-based prognostic model development, especially the RNA-panel models. Gliomas harbor the most malignant features and the poorest survival among all tumors. Currently, numerous glioma prognostic models have been reported. We systematically reviewed all 138 machine-learning-based genetic models and proposed novel criteria in assessing their quality. Besides, the biological and clinical significance of some highly overlapped glioma markers in these models were discussed. This study screened out markers with strong prognostic potential and 27 models presenting high quality. Conclusively, we comprehensively reviewed 138 prognostic models combined with glioma genetic panels and presented novel criteria for the development and assessment of clinically important prognostic models. This will guide the genetic models in cancers from laboratory-based research studies to clinical applications and improve glioma patient prognostic management.

Integrative Analysis of DNA Methylation and Transcriptome Identifies a Predictive Epigenetic Signature Associated With Immune Infiltration in Gliomas

Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor with poor prognosis and high mortality. The purpose of this study was to use the epigenetic signature to predict prognosis and evaluate the degree of immune infiltration in gliomas. We integrated gene expression profiles and DNA methylation data of lower-grade glioma and glioblastoma to explore epigenetic differences and associated differences in biological function. Cox regression and lasso analysis were used to develop an epigenetic signature based on eight DNA methylation sites to predict prognosis of glioma patients. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the overall survival time of high- and low-risk groups was significantly separated, and ROC analysis verified that the model had great predictive ability. In addition, we constructed a nomogram based on age, sex, 1p/19q status, glioma type, and risk score. The epigenetic signature was obviously associated with tumor purity, immune checkpoints, and tumor-immune infiltrating cells (CD8+ T cells, gamma delta T cells, M0 macrophages, M1 macrophages, M2 macrophages, activated NK cells, monocytes, and activated mast cells) and thus, it may find application as a guide for the evaluation of immune infiltration or in treatment decisions in immunotherapy.

An Immune-Related Gene Pairs Signature Predicts Prognosis and Immune Heterogeneity in Glioblastoma

Purpose

Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive nervous system neoplasms. Immunotherapy represents a hot spot and has not been included in standard treatments of glioblastoma. So in this study, we aim to filtrate an immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) signature for predicting survival and immune heterogeneity.

Methods

We used gene expression profiles and clinical information of glioblastoma patients in the TCGA and CGGA datasets, dividing into discovery and validation cohorts. IRGPs significantly correlative with prognosis were selected to conduct an IRGPs signature. Low and high risk groups were separated by this IRGPs signature. Univariate and multivariate cox analysis were adopted to check whether risk can be a independent prognostic factor. Immune heterogeneity between different risk groups was analyzed via immune infiltration and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Some different expressed genes between groups were selected to determine their relationship with immune cells and immune checkpoints.

Results

We found an IRGPs signature consisting of 5 IRGPs. Different risk based on IRGPs signature is a independent prognostic factor both in the discovery and validation cohorts. High risk group has some immune positive cells and more immune repressive cells than low risk group by means of immune infiltration. We discovered some pathways are more active in the high risk group, leading to immune suppression, drug resistance and tumor evasion. In two specific signaling, some genes are over expressed in high risk group and positive related to immune repressive cells and immune checkpoints, which indicate aggression and immunotherapy resistance.

Conclusion

We identified a robust IRGPs signature to predict prognosis and immune heterogeneity in glioblastoma patients. Some potential targets and pathways need to be further researched to make different patients benefit from personalized immunotherapy.

A Signature of Nine lncRNA Methylated Genes Predicts Survival in Patients With Glioma

Glioma is one of the most common malignant tumors of the central nervous system, and its prognosis is extremely poor. Aberrant methylation of lncRNA promoter region is significantly associated with the prognosis of glioma patients. In this study, we investigated the potential impact of methylation of lncRNA promoter region in glioma patients to establish a signature of nine lncRNA methylated genes for determining glioma patient prognosis. Methylation data and clinical follow-up data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The multistep screening strategy identified nine lncRNA methylated genes that were significantly associated with the overall survival (OS) of glioma patients. Subsequently, we constructed a risk signature that containing nine lncRNA methylated genes. The risk signature successfully divided the glioma patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group had a worse prognosis, higher glioma grade, and older age. Furthermore, we identified two lncRNAs termed PCBP1-AS1 and LINC02875 that may be involved in the malignant progression of glioma cells by using the TCGA database. Loss-of-function assays confirmed that knockdown of PCBP1-AS1 and LINC02875 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma cells. Therefore, the nine lncRNA methylated genes signature may provide a novel predictor and therapeutic target for glioma patients.

Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.

Current Opinion on Molecular Characterization for GBM Classification in Guiding Clinical Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly invasive and the deadliest brain tumor in adults. It is characterized by inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity, short patient survival, and lack of effective treatment. Prognosis and therapy selection is driven by molecular data from gene transcription, genetic alterations and DNA methylation. The four GBM molecular subtypes are proneural, neural, classical, and mesenchymal. More effective personalized therapy heavily depends on higher resolution molecular subtype signatures, combined with gene therapy, immunotherapy and organoid technology. In this review, we summarize the principal GBM molecular classifications that guide diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic recommendations.

Systematically characterize the clinical and biological significances of 1p19q genes in 1p/19q non-codeletion glioma

1p/19q codeletion, which leads to the abnormal expression of 1p19q genes in oligodendroglioma, is associated with chemosensitivity and favorable prognosis. Here, we aimed to explore the clinical implications of 1p19q gene expression in 1p/19q non-codel gliomas. We analyzed expression of 1p19q genes in 668 1p/19q non-codel gliomas obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 447) and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (n = 221) for training and validation, respectively. The expression of 1p19q genes was significantly correlated with the clinicopathological features and overall survival of 1p/19q non-codel gliomas. Then, we derived a risk signature of 25 selected 1p19q genes that not only had prognosis value in total 1p/19q non-codel gliomas but also had prognosis value in stratified gliomas. The prognosis value of the risk signature was superior than known clinicopathological features in 1p/19q non-codel gliomas and was also highly associated with the following features: loss of CDKN2A/B copy number in mutant-IDH-astrocytoma; telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, combined chromosome 7 gain/chromosome 10 loss and epidermal growth factor receptor amplification in wild-type-IDH-astrocytoma; classical and mesenchymal subtypes in glioblastoma. Furthermore, genes enriched in the biological processes of cell division, extracellular matrix, angiogenesis significantly correlated to the signature risk score, and this is also supported by the immunohistochemistry and cell biology experiments. In conclusion, the expression profile of 1p19q genes is highly associated with the malignancy and prognosis of 1p/19q non-codel gliomas. A 25-1p19q-gene signature has powerfully predictive value for both malignant molecular pathological features and prognosis across distinct subgroups of 1p/19q non-codel gliomas.

m6A RNA methylation regulators contribute to malignant progression and have clinical prognostic impact in gliomas

N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA methylation, associated with cancer initiation and progression, is dynamically regulated by the m⁶A RNA methylation regulators (“writers”, “erasers” and “readers”). Here, we demonstrate that most of the thirteen main m⁶A RNA methylation regulators are differentially expressed among gliomas stratified by different clinicopathological features in 904 gliomas. We identified two subgroups of gliomas (RM1/2) by applying consensus clustering to m⁶A RNA methylation regulators. Compared with the RM1 subgroup, the RM2 subgroup correlates with a poorer prognosis, higher WHO grade, and lower frequency of IDH mutation. Moreover, the hallmarks of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and TNFα signaling via NF-κB are also significantly enriched in the RM2 subgroup. This finding indicates that m⁶A RNA methylation regulators are closely associated with glioma malignancy. Based on this finding, we derived a risk signature, using seven m⁶A RNA methylation regulators, that is not only an independent prognostic marker but can also predict the clinicopathological features of gliomas. Moreover, m⁶A regulators are associated with the mesenchymal subtype and TMZ sensitivity in GBM. In conclusion, m⁶A RNA methylation regulators are crucial participants in the malignant progression of gliomas and are potentially useful for prognostic stratification and treatment strategy development.

Low expression or hypermethylation of PLK2 might predict favorable prognosis for patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Background

As the most aggressive brain tumor, patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have a poor prognosis. Our purpose was to explore prognostic value of Polo-like kinase 2 (PLK2) in GBM, a member of the PLKs family.

Methods

The expression profile of PLK2 in GBM was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The PLK2 expression in GBM was tested. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to assess the association between PLK2 expression and overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM. Furthermore, to assess its prognostic significance in patients with primary GBM, we constructed univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. The association between PLK2 expression and its methylation was then performed. Differentially expressed genes correlated with PLK2 were identified by Pearson test and functional enrichment analysis was performed.

Results

Overall survival results showed that low PLK2 expression had a favorable prognosis of patients with GBM (P-value = 0.0022). Furthermore, PLK2 (HR = 0.449, 95% CI [0.243–0.830], P-value = 0.011) was positively associated with OS by multivariate Cox regression analysis. In cluster 5, DNA methylated PLK2 had the lowest expression, which implied that PLK2 expression might be affected by its DNA methylation status in GBM. PLK2 in CpG island methylation phenotype (G-CIMP) had lower expression than non G-CIMP group (P = 0.0077). Regression analysis showed that PLK2 expression was negatively correlated with its DNA methylation (P = 0.0062, Pearson r = −0.3855). Among all differentially expressed genes of GBM, CYGB (r = 0.5551; P < 0.0001), ISLR2 (r = 0.5126; P < 0.0001), RPP25 (r = 0.5333; P < 0.0001) and SOX2 (r = −0.4838; P < 0.0001) were strongly correlated with PLK2. Functional enrichment analysis results showed that these genes were enriched several biological processes or pathways that were associated with GBM.

Conclusion

Polo-like kinase 2 expression is regulated by DNA methylation in GBM, and its low expression or hypermethylation could be considered to predict a favorable prognosis for patients with GBM.

Hypomethylation of 111 Probes Predicts Poor Prognosis for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a complicated brain tumor with heterogeneous outcome. Identification of effective biomarkers is an urgent need for the treatment decision-making and precise evaluation of prognosis. Based on a relatively large dataset of genome-wide methylation (138 glioblastoma patients), a joint-score of 111 methyl-probes was found to be of statistical significance for prognostic evaluation. Low joint-score were significantly associated with adverse outcomes (OS: P < 0.001, PFS: P = 0.03). Multivariable analyses adjusted for known risk factors confirmed the low joint-score of 111 methyl-probes as a high risk factor. The prognostic value of the methylated joint-score was further validated in another dataset of glioblastoma patients (OS: P = 0.006). Additionally, variance analysis revealed that aberrant genetic and epigenetic alterations were significantly associated with the joint-score of those methyl-probes. In conclusion, our results supported the joint-score of 111 methyl-probes as a potential prognosticator for the precision treatment of glioblastoma.

Specific glioblastoma multiforme prognostic-subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns

DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, and plays a significant role in carcinogenesis in the brain. Here, we explored specific prognosis-subtypes based on DNA methylation status using 138 Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The methylation profiles of 11,637 CpG sites that significantly correlated with survival in the training set were employed for consensus clustering. We identified three GBM molecular subtypes, and their survival curves were distinct from each other. Furthermore, ten feature CpG sites were obtained on conducting a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of the CpG sites. We were able to classify the samples into high- and low-methylation groups, and classified the prognosis information of the samples after cluster analysis of the training set samples using the hierarchical clustering algorithm. Similar results were obtained in the test set and clinical GBM specimens. Finally, we found that a positive relationship existed between methylation level and sensitivity to temozolomide (or radiotherapy) or anti-migration ability of GBM cells. Taken together, these results suggest that the model constructed in this study could help explain the heterogeneity of previous molecular subgroups in GBM and can provide guidance to clinicians regarding the prognosis of GBM.

Construction of Novel DNA Methylation-Based Prognostic Model to Predict Survival in Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a most aggressive primary cancer in brain with poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify novel tumor biomarkers with independent prognostic values in GBMs. The DNA methylation profiles were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differential methylated genes (DMGs) were screened from recurrent GBM samples using limma package in R software. Functional enrichment analysis was performed to identify major biological processes and signaling pathways. Furthermore, critical DMGs associated with the prognosis of GBM were screened according to univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis. A risk score-based prognostic model was constructed for these DMGs and prediction ability of this model was validated in training and validation data set. In total, 495 DMGs were identified between recurrent samples and disease-free samples, including 356 significantly hypermethylated and 139 hypomethylated genes. Functional and pathway items for these DMGs were mainly related to sensory organ development, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, pathways in cancer, etc. Five genes with abnormal methylation level were significantly correlated with prognosis according to survival analysis, such as ALX1, KANK1, NUDT12, SNED1, and SVOP. Finally, the risk model provided an effective ability for prognosis prediction both in training and validation data set. We constructed a novel prognostic model for survival prediction of GBMs. In addition, we identified five DMGs as critical prognostic biomarkers in GBM progression.

A novel CpG island methylation panel predicts survival in lung adenocarcinomas

The lack of clinically useful biomarkers compromise the personalized management of lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs); epigenetic events and DNA methylation in particular have exhibited potential value as biomarkers. By comparing genome-wide DNA methylation data of paired lung ADCs and normal tissues from 6 public datasets, cancer-specific CpG island (CGI) methylation changes were identified with a pre-specified criterion. Correlations between DNA methylation and expression data for each gene were assessed by Pearson correlation analysis. A prognostically relevant CGI methylation signature was constructed by risk-score analysis, and was validated using a training-validation approach. Survival data were analyzed by log-rank test and Cox regression model. In total, 134 lung ADC-specific CGI CpGs were identified, among which, a panel of 9 CGI loci were selected as prognostic candidates, and were used to construct a risk-score signature. The novel CGI methylation signature was identified to classify distinct prognostic subgroups across different datasets, and was demonstrated to be a potent independent prognostic factor for overall survival time of patients with lung ADCs. In addition, it was identified that cancer-specific CGI hypomethylation of RPL39L, along with the corresponding gene expression, provided optimized prognostication of lung ADCs. In summary, cancer-specific CGI methylation aberrations are optimal candidates for novel biomarkers of lung ADCs; the 9-CpG methylation panel and hypomethylation of RPL39L exhibited particularly promising significance.

A five-CpG signature of microRNA methylation in non-G-CIMP glioblastoma

AIMS

DNA methylation has been found to regulate microRNAs (miRNAs) expression, but the prognostic value of miRNA-related DNA methylation aberration remained largely elusive in cancers including glioblastomas (GBMs). This study aimed to investigate the clinical and biological feature of miRNA methylation in GBMs of non-glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (non-G-CIMP).

METHODS

Prognostic miRNA methylation loci were analyzed, with TCGA and Rennes cohort as training sets, and independent datasets of GBMs and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) were obtained as validation sets. Different statistical and bioinformatic analysis and experimental validations were performed to clinically and biologically characterize the signature.

RESULTS

We identified and validated a risk score based on methylation status of five miRNA-associated CpGs which could predict survival of GBM patients in a series of training and validation sets. This signature was independent of age and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. The risk subgroup was associated with angiogenesis and accordingly differential responses to bevacizumab-contained therapy. MiRNA target analysis and in vitro experiments further confirmed the accuracy of this signature.

CONCLUSION

The five-CpG signature of miRNA methylation was biologically relevant and was of potential prognostic and predictive value for GBMs. It might be of help for improving individualized treatment.

A novel prognostic six-CpG signature in glioblastomas

AIMS

We aimed to identify a clinically useful biomarker using DNA methylation-based information to optimize individual treatment of patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

A six-CpG panel was identified by incorporating genome-wide DNA methylation data and clinical information of three distinct discovery sets and was combined using a risk-score model. Different validation sets of GBMs and lower-grade gliomas and different statistical methods were implemented for prognostic evaluation. An integrative analysis of multidimensional TCGA data was performed to molecularly characterize different risk tumors.

RESULTS

The six-CpG risk-score signature robustly predicted overall survival (OS) in all discovery and validation cohorts and in a treatment-independent manner. It also predicted progression-free survival (PFS) in available patients. The multimarker epigenetic signature was demonstrated as an independent prognosticator and had better performance than known molecular indicators such as glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) and proneural subtype. The defined risk subgroups were molecularly distinct; high-risk tumors were biologically more aggressive with concordant activation of proangiogenic signaling at multimolecular levels. Accordingly, we observed better OS benefits of bevacizumab-contained therapy to high-risk patients in independent sets, supporting its implication in guiding usage of antiangiogenic therapy. Finally, the six-CpG signature refined the risk classification based on G-CIMP and MGMT methylation status.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel six-CpG signature is a robust and independent prognostic indicator for GBMs and is of promising value to improve personalized management.