1
|
Pelletier J, Sugar D, Koyfman A, Long B. Multiple Sclerosis: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Narrative Review. J Emerg Med 2024; 66:e441-e456. [PMID: 38472027 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity. OBJECTIVE This review provides a focused assessment of MS for emergency clinicians, including the presentation, evaluation, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence. DISCUSSION MS is an autoimmune disorder targeting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by clinical relapses and radiological lesions disseminated in time and location. Patients with MS most commonly present with long tract signs (e.g., myelopathy, asymmetric spastic paraplegia, urinary dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign), optic neuritis, or brainstem syndromes (bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia). Cortical syndromes or multifocal presentations are less common. Radiologically isolated syndrome and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may or may not progress to chronic forms of MS, including relapsing remitting MS, primary progressive MS, and secondary progressive MS. The foundation of outpatient management involves disease-modifying therapy, which is typically initiated with the first signs of disease onset. Management of CIS and acute flares of MS in the ED includes corticosteroid therapy, ideally after diagnostic testing with imaging and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Emergency clinicians should evaluate whether patients with MS are presenting with new-onset debilitating neurological symptoms to avoid unnecessary testing and admissions, but failure to appropriately diagnose CIS or MS flare is associated with increased morbidity. CONCLUSIONS An understanding of MS can assist emergency clinicians in better diagnosing and managing this neurologically devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Pelletier
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Davis Sugar
- Department of Neurology, Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Alex Koyfman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brit Long
- SAUSHEC (San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium), Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Wang J, Feng J. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: Pathogenesis, influencing factors, and treatment options. Autoimmun Rev 2023; 22:103449. [PMID: 37741528 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated degenerative disease of the central nervous system, characterized by inflammatory demyelination. It is primarily found in women of childbearing age, making pregnancy a significant concern for both patients with MS and clinicians. To assist these patients in achieving their desire for pregnancy, reducing MS relapses during all stages of pregnancy, preventing the progression of MS, mitigating the impact of MS treatment on the course and outcome of pregnancy, and a thorough understanding of the relationship between pregnancy and MS, as well as specific management and the application of relevant medications for MS patients at each stage of pregnancy, are essential. This article provides an update on pregnancy-related issues in women with MS, including the general recommendations for management at each stage of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinxiang Wang
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 36 Sanhao St., Shenyang 110004, China
| | - Jue Wang
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 36 Sanhao St., Shenyang 110004, China
| | - Juan Feng
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 36 Sanhao St., Shenyang 110004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vukusic S, Carra-Dalliere C, Ciron J, Maillart E, Michel L, Leray E, Guennoc AM, Bourre B, Laplaud D, Androdias G, Bensa C, Bigaut K, Biotti D, Branger P, Casez O, Cohen M, Daval E, Deschamps R, Donze C, Dubessy AL, Dulau C, Durand-Dubief F, Guillaume M, Hebant B, Kremer L, Kwiatkowski A, Lannoy J, Maarouf A, Manchon E, Mathey G, Moisset X, Montcuquet A, Pique J, Roux T, Marignier R, Lebrun-Frenay C. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis: 2022 recommendations from the French multiple sclerosis society. Mult Scler 2023; 29:11-36. [PMID: 36317497 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221129472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations on pregnancy management for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). BACKGROUND MS typically affects young women in their childbearing years. Increasing evidence is available to inform questions raised by MS patients and health professionals about pregnancy issues. METHODS The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and university databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on healthcare topics; it was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence. RESULTS A strong agreement was reached for all 104 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, locoregional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses and disease-modifying treatments. CONCLUSION The 2022 recommendations of the French MS society should be helpful to harmonise counselling and treatment practice for pregnancy in persons with MS, allowing for better and individualised choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Vukusic
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Bron, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France/Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation against Multiple Sclerosis, State-approved Foundation, Bron, France
| | | | - Jonathan Ciron
- Centre Ressources et Compétences sclérose en plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Elisabeth Maillart
- Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, CRC-SEP, Paris, France
| | - Laure Michel
- Neurology Department, CIC_P1414 INSERM, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Leray
- EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes - UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé) - U 1309, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - David Laplaud
- Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université and INSERM, Nantes, France/CIC INSERM 1413, CRC-SEP Pays de la Loire, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Géraldine Androdias
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Bensa
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Bigaut
- CRC-SEP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Damien Biotti
- Centre Ressources et Compétences sclérose en plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Branger
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Casez
- Pathologies Inflammatoires du Système Nerveux, Neurologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France/Translational Research in Autoimmunity and Inflammation Group (T-RAIG), TIMC-IMAG, Université de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Mikael Cohen
- CRCSEP Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice Pasteur 2, Nice, France/Université Nice Côte d'Azur UR2CA-URRIS, Nice, France
| | - Elodie Daval
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Romain Deschamps
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Donze
- Hôpital saint Philibert, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Faculté de médecine et de maïeutique de Lille, Lomme, France
| | - Anne-Laure Dubessy
- Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP-6, Paris, France/Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Dulau
- CRC-SEP, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Françoise Durand-Dubief
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | | | | | - Laurent Kremer
- CRC-SEP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Arnaud Kwiatkowski
- Department of Neurology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France
| | - Julien Lannoy
- Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier de Lens, Lens, France
| | - Adil Maarouf
- CRMBM, UMR 7339, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France/APHM Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Manchon
- Department of Neurology, Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France
| | - Guillaume Mathey
- Service de neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy - Hôpital Central, Nancy, France
| | - Xavier Moisset
- Neuro-Dol, Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France/Department of neurology et CRC-SEP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Julie Pique
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Bron, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Roux
- Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, CRC-SEP, Paris, France
| | - Romain Marignier
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Christine Lebrun-Frenay
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France/Université Nice Côte d'Azur UR2CA-URRIS, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leguy S, Lefort M, Lescot L, Michaud A, Vukusic S, Le Page E, Edan G, Kerbrat A, Lebrun-Frenay C, De Sèze J, Laplaud DA, Wiertlewski S, Leray E, Michel L. COPP-MS: COrticosteroids during the Post-Partum in relapsing Multiple Sclerosis patients. J Neurol 2022; 269:5571-5581. [PMID: 35737108 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11215-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No specific treatment has demonstrated its effectiveness to prevent post-partum relapses for multiple sclerosis (MS) women. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of preventive high-dose corticosteroids in the post-partum period by comparing two strategies: (1) no preventive treatment and (2) standardized preventive treatment. METHODS We selected five French Multiple Sclerosis centers using the same post-partum strategy for their patients-either high-dose steroids (treating centers TC) or no treatment (non-treating centers NTC). We included relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis women who delivered between January 2007 and January 2017. Our primary outcomes were the time from delivery to first relapse, EDSS progression and MRI activity between patients of treating centers and non-treating centers, after propensity-score weighting. RESULTS 350 patients were included (116 from treating centers, 234 from non-treating centers). For both groups, the annualized relapse rate decreased during pregnancy (0.28 in treating centers and 0.34 in non-treating centers during the third trimester) and increased during the first post-partum trimester (0.45 and 0.69, respectively) with 11% and 14% (NS) of patients facing at least one relapse, respectively. Our primary outcomes were not statistically different between both groups. CONCLUSION This study provides class III evidence that systematic high-dose corticosteroids are not associated with a reduced inflammatory activity during the post-partum period in multiple sclerosis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soizic Leguy
- Neurology Department, CRC-SEP Rennes, Rennes Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes University Hospital Rennes University INSERM, CHU Pontchaillou, 35033, Rennes, France
| | - Mathilde Lefort
- EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes, UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé), University Rennes, U 1309, 35000, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Lucile Lescot
- Neurology Department, CRC-SEP Rennes, Rennes Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes University Hospital Rennes University INSERM, CHU Pontchaillou, 35033, Rennes, France
| | - Audrey Michaud
- EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes, UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé), University Rennes, U 1309, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation et Centre de Recherche, Ressources et Compétences sur la Sclérose en Plaques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69677, Bron, France.,Inserm 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, 69003, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69000, Lyon, France.,Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation Against Multiple Sclerosis, state-approved foundation, 69677, Bron, France
| | - Emmanuelle Le Page
- Neurology Department, CRC-SEP Rennes, Rennes Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes University Hospital Rennes University INSERM, CHU Pontchaillou, 35033, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Gilles Edan
- Neurology Department, CRC-SEP Rennes, Rennes Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes University Hospital Rennes University INSERM, CHU Pontchaillou, 35033, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Anne Kerbrat
- Neurology Department, CRC-SEP Rennes, Rennes Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes University Hospital Rennes University INSERM, CHU Pontchaillou, 35033, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| | | | - Jérôme De Sèze
- CRCSEP, CHU de Nice Pasteur 2, Université Nice Côte d'Azur UR2CA URRIS, Nice, France.,Centre d'investigation Clinique, INSERM U1434, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - David-Axel Laplaud
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie UMR1064, INSERM; Université de Nantes, CHU de Nantes France, Nantes, France
| | - Sandrine Wiertlewski
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie UMR1064, INSERM; Université de Nantes, CHU de Nantes France, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Leray
- EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes, UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé), University Rennes, U 1309, 35000, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Laure Michel
- Neurology Department, CRC-SEP Rennes, Rennes Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes University Hospital Rennes University INSERM, CHU Pontchaillou, 35033, Rennes, France. .,CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France. .,Microenvironment, Cell Differentiation, Immunology and Cancer Unit, INSERM, Rennes I University, French Blood Agency, Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lamaita R, Melo C, Laranjeira C, Barquero P, Gomes J, Silva-Filho A. Multiple Sclerosis in Pregnancy and its Role in Female Fertility: A Systematic Review. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:493-499. [PMID: 34061482 PMCID: PMC8312296 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disease that typically affects young women of reproductive age. There are still many questions and heterogeneous clinical approaches partly due to the lack of consensus and guidelines. For many years, women with MS have been discouraged from getting pregnant for fears that the disease might negatively affect the fetus or increase their obstetric risk or for claims that the disease might decrease fertility. However, fertility does not seem to be impaired to a larger extent in women with MS. Therefore, all healthcare providers involved in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis patients must be prepared to discuss future fertility, pregnancy, and others matters, in addition to providing them with the best possible counseling. This study presents data based on updated evidence and discusses fertility and pregnancy in patients with MS with respect to the impacts of pregnancy on the risk and prognostic factors tied to MS, and the impact of MS on pregnancy outcomes and fertility treatments administered to females with MS. In conclusion, a clear relationship between infertility and MS has not been established. There seems to exist a link between disease aggressiveness and progression with several processes that might impair fertility. However, MS does not stand as a contraindication to assisted reproductive technology. From the several studies analyzed, it is possible to conclude that pregnancy is possible in women with MS. It is important to discuss and plan the ideal moment to start treatment and managing pregnancy and contraception aiming at better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rivia Lamaita
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo Horizonte Minas Gerais Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Carolina Melo
- Rede Mater Dei de Saúde Belo Horizonte Minas Gerais Brazil Rede Mater Dei de Saúde, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Laranjeira
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo Horizonte Minas Gerais Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | | | - Agnaldo Silva-Filho
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo Horizonte Minas Gerais Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abdel-Wahed L, Cho TA. Immune-Mediated Myelopathies: A Review of Etiologies, Diagnostic Approach, and Therapeutic Management. Semin Neurol 2021; 41:269-279. [PMID: 34030191 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Myelopathy is a broad term used to describe a heterogeneous group of disorders that affects the spinal cord; the focus of this article will be a subgroup of these disorders with an autoimmune and inflammatory-based pathology. Symptoms typically develop over hours or days and then worsen over a matter of days to weeks, but sometimes can have a more insidious or subacute presentation, which can make the diagnosis more puzzling. Despite relatively low incidence rates, almost a third of affected patients are left with severely disabling symptoms. Prompt recognition of the underlying etiology is essential so that a specific targeted therapy can be implemented for optimal outcomes. The authors discuss a systematic approach to immune-mediated myelopathies, with a focus on the unique characteristics of each that may aid in diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lama Abdel-Wahed
- Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Tracey A Cho
- Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rommer PS, Ellenberger D, Hellwig K, Haas J, Pöhlau D, Stahmann A, Zettl UK. Relapsing and progressive MS: the sex-specific perspective. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2020; 13:1756286420956495. [PMID: 33029201 PMCID: PMC7521047 DOI: 10.1177/1756286420956495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory and neurodegenerative
disease whose aetiology is not fully understood. The female sex
is clearly predominant, with a sex ratio between 2 and 3. In
primary progressive MS the sex ratio almost balances out. Since
the age at onset is higher for patients with progressive onset
(POMS) than for relapsing onset (ROMS), it can be hypothesized
that the age at onset is a decisive factor for the sex
ratio. Methods: To address this aspect, we compare clinical and demographic data
between females and males for the different disease courses
within the population of the German MS Register by the German MS
Society. Only patients with complete details in mandatory data
items and a follow-up visit since 01. Jan 2018 were
included. Results: A total of 18,728 patients were included in our analyses, revealing
a female-to-male ratio of 2.6 (2.7 for patients with ROMS and
1.3 for POMS). The age at diagnosis is higher in patients with
POMS (43.3 and 42.3 years for females and males
versus 32.1 and 33.2 years,
respectively). Females irrespective of disease course are
statistically significantly more often affected by cognitive
impairment (POMS: p = 0.013, ROMS:
p = 0.001) and depression (POMS:
p = 0.002, ROMS: 0.001) and suffer more
often from pain (POMS and ROMS: p < 0.001).
Fatigue is significantly more often seen in females with ROMS
(p < 0.001) but not in POMS. Females
with ROMS retire significantly (p < 0.001)
earlier (42.8 versus 44.2 years) and to a
greater extent than males (28 versus 24%).
Disease progression was similar for women and men. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that clinical and demographic data differ more
between disease courses than between men and women. For pain,
depression and cognitive impairment the female sex is the
decisive factor. Whether these factors are responsible for the
earlier retirement of females with ROMS is not clear.
Appropriate measures for optimization of symptomatic treatment
as well as to promote employment should be taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulus Stefan Rommer
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunological Section, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, Rostock, 18147, Germany
| | - David Ellenberger
- German MS-Register by the German MS Society, MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Judith Haas
- Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Jewish Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dieter Pöhlau
- Department of Neurology, German Red Cross-Kamillus-Clinic, Asbach, Germany
| | - Alexander Stahmann
- German MS-Register by the German MS Society, MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Uwe Klaus Zettl
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunological Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Treatment Optimization in Multiple Sclerosis: Canadian MS Working Group Recommendations. Can J Neurol Sci 2020; 47:437-455. [DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2020.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract:The Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Working Group has updated its treatment optimization recommendations (TORs) on the optimal use of disease-modifying therapies for patients with all forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Recommendations provide guidance on initiating effective treatment early in the course of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and modifying or switching therapies to optimize disease control. The current TORs also address the treatment of pediatric MS, progressive MS and the identification and treatment of aggressive forms of the disease. Newer therapies offer improved efficacy, but also have potential safety concerns that must be adequately balanced, notably when treatment sequencing is considered. There are added discussions regarding the management of pregnancy, the future potential of biomarkers and consideration as to when it may be prudent to stop therapy. These TORs are meant to be used and interpreted by all neurologists with a special interest in the management of MS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Nazareth T, Datar M, Yu TC. Treatment Effectiveness for Resolution of Multiple Sclerosis Relapse in a US Health Plan Population. Neurol Ther 2019; 8:383-395. [PMID: 31564036 PMCID: PMC6858912 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-00156-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Timely and effective resolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse is critical to minimizing residual deficits, which can result in neurologic disability. Oral corticosteroids (OCS) and intravenous corticosteroids [intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP)] are earlier line treatments; alternatives include repository corticotropin injection (RCI; H.P. Acthar® Gel), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Contemporary insight into the use of relapse treatments and their effectiveness is needed. OBJECTIVE To evaluate relapse rates, frequency of treatments used, and treatment effectiveness (i.e., relapse resolution). METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients ages 18-89 years experiencing MS relapse from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2015 was conducted using administrative claims data. MS relapse was defined based on established claims-based methodology. The first claim for relapse treatment (i.e., prescription or administration) was used to designate the treatment group and relapse date, respectively. Relapses occurring ≤ 30 days were considered an episode. The first relapse episode was identified for every patient. Treatment was deemed effective in resolving the relapse if no additional relapses followed within the episode; otherwise, the relapse was considered unresolved. A 5-day OCS taper following IVMP administration, designated IVMP ± OCS, was allowed. Relapse frequency, treatment use, and relapse resolution were quantified. Relapse resolution was likewise evaluated in patients continuously enrolled for 12 months before and after first treatment with RCI or PMP/IVIG, with PMP/IVIG administrations within 7 days of each other being considered a single course of therapy. RESULTS During the study period, 9574 patients experienced ≥ 1 relapse; 26.0% of patients had ≥ 2 relapses/year. The mean number of relapse episodes was 2.6 over a mean follow-up of 2.7 years for an annualized relapse rate of 1.0. Corticosteroids were the first treatment used in 90.4% of relapses (OCS = 51.8%, IVMP = 38.6%), followed by IVIG (6.0%), RCI (2.2%) and PMP (1.5%). The proportion of patients achieving relapse resolution with their first treatment was 90.5% with OCS (n = 5710), 47.8% with IVMP ± OCS (n = 3425), 96.9% with RCI (n = 195), 50.7% with PMP (n = 73), and 43.9% with IVIG (n = 171). Among continuously enrolled patients (n = 373), relapse resolution was 95.7% with RCI (n = 232) and 66.0% with PMP/IVIG (n = 141); significant cohort differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS As demonstrated in other studies, OCS were generally effective. However, real-world effectiveness varied with other treatments. Relapse resolution of the first treatment with OCS was higher than with IVMP ± OCS; similarly, relapse resolution was higher with RCI as the first treatment than with PMP/IVIG. Results demonstrate RCI's effectiveness in appropriate patients. Limitations pertaining to claims-based research apply. FUNDING Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (Bedminster, NJ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manasi Datar
- Comprehensive Health Insights (CHI), Humana, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Tzy-Chyi Yu
- Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
General Principles of Immunotherapy in Neurological Diseases. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19515-1_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
11
|
Winkelmann A, Rommer PS, Hecker M, Zettl UK. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in multiple sclerosis: A prospective, rater-blinded analysis of relapse rates during pregnancy and the postnatal period. CNS Neurosci Ther 2018; 25:78-85. [PMID: 29858532 DOI: 10.1111/cns.12985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects predominantly young women. Currently available disease-modifying drugs have neither been approved during pregnancy nor nursing. AIMS Evaluating the effect of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in MS patients with desire to have a baby. METHODS In all, 70 MS patients were either treated with IVIg before conception, during first trimester of pregnancy and 12 months postnatal (group I, n = 38) or started IVIg after delivery for 12 months (group II, n = 23) or were untreated (group III, n = 9). Relapse rates and disease progression were analyzed. RESULTS Pre-gestational relapse rates differed between groups. Lowest relapse rates were observed during late pregnancy, followed by an elevated relapse rate after delivery compared to the pre-pregnancy year and the first trimester. Only in group I, the postnatal relapse rate did not exceed the relapse rate before conception. IVIg treatment did not influence disease progression after delivery. CONCLUSIONS In MS patients, IVIg treatment during and/or after delivery is an option to reduce the incidence of relapses during pregnancy and the postnatal period. Surprisingly, untreated patients becoming pregnant showed an increase in the relapse rate in the first trimester compared with the pre-gestational period. How alterations of hormone status during pregnancy affect disease activity in MS has to be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulus Stefan Rommer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Michael Hecker
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.,Steinbeis Transfer Centre for Proteome Analysis, Rostock, Germany
| | - Uwe Klaus Zettl
- Department of Neurology, University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|