Effect of antiplatelet therapy on the incidence, prognosis, and rebleeding of intracerebral hemorrhage

Relationship between coagulopathy score and ICU mortality: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

Objective

Coagulopathy score has been applied as a new prognostic indicator for sepsis, heart failure and acute respiratory failure. However, its ability to forecast intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with an acute cerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has not been assessed. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between ICU mortality and early coagulation problem score.

Methods

Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) (v2.0) database were used in this retrospective cohort analysis. The association between the coagulation disorder score and ICU mortality was examined using multivariate logistic regression. Furthermore, the impact of additional variables on the results was investigated by a subgroup analysis.

Results

3174 patients (57.3 % male) were enrolled in total. The ICU mortality reached 18.2 %. After adjusting for potential confounders, the ICU mortality of patients rose with the increase of coagulation disorder score. The ROC curve revealed the predictive accuracy of coagulation dysfunction score to mortality in patients with ICU. The coagulation disorder score had a lower AUC value (0.601, P < 0.001) than the SAPSII(AUCs of 0.745[95 % CI, 0.730-0.761]) and the combined indicators(AUCs of 0.752[95 % CI, 0.737-0.767]), but larger than single indicators platelet, INR and APTT. In the subgroup analysis, most subgroups showed no significant interaction, but only age showed significant interaction in the adjusted model.

Conclusion

The coagulopathy score and ICU mortality were found to be strongly positively correlated in this study, and its ability to predict ICU mortality was better than that of a single measure (platelet, INR, or APTT), but worse than that of the SAPSII score, GCS system.

Role of O-GlcNAcylation in Central Nervous System Development and Injuries: A Systematic Review

The development of central nervous system (CNS) can form perceptual, memory, and cognitive functions, while injuries to CNS often lead to severe neurological dysfunction and even death. As one of the prevalent post-translational modifications (PTMs), O-GlcNAcylation has recently attracted great attentions due to its functions in regulating the activity, subcellular localization, and stability of target proteins. It has been indicated that O-GlcNAcylation could interact with phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and methylation to jointly regulate the function and activity of proteins. Furthermore, a growing number of studies have suggested that O-GlcNAcylation played an important role in the CNS. During development, O-GlcNAcylation participated in the neurogenesis, neuronal development, and neuronal function. In addition, O-GlcNAcylation was involved in the progress of CNS injuries including ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and played a crucial role in the improvement of brain damage such as attenuating cognitive impairment, inhibiting neuroinflammation, suppressing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and maintaining blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Therefore, O-GlcNAcylation showed great promise as a potential target in CNS development and injuries. In this article, we presented a review highlighting the role of O-GlcNAcylation in CNS development and injuries. Hence, on the basis of these properties and effects, intervention with O-GlcNAcylation may be developed as therapeutic agents for CNS diseases.

Antiplatelet Agent Use After Stroke due to Intracerebral Hemorrhage

This focused update about antiplatelet agents to reduce the high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after stroke due to spontaneous (nontraumatic) intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) complements earlier updates about blood pressure-lowering, lipid-lowering, and oral anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion for atrial fibrillation after ICH. When used for secondary prevention in people without ICH, antiplatelet agents reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (rate ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.75-0.87]) and might increase the risk of ICH (rate ratio, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.97-2.90]). Before 2019, guidance for clinical decisions about antiplatelet agent use after ICH has focused on estimating patients' predicted absolute risks and severities of ischemic and hemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular event and applying the known effects of these drugs in people without ICH to estimate whether individual ICH survivors in clinical practice might be helped or harmed by antiplatelet agents. In 2019, the main results of the RESTART (Restart or Stop Antithrombotics Randomized Trial) randomized controlled trial including 537 survivors of ICH associated with antithrombotic drug use showed, counterintuitively, that antiplatelet agents might not increase the risk of recurrent ICH compared to antiplatelet agent avoidance over 2 years of follow-up (12/268 [4%] versus 23/268 [9%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.25-1.03]; P=0.060). Guidelines in the United States, Canada, China, and the United Kingdom and Ireland have classified the level of evidence as B and indicated that antiplatelet agents may be considered/reasonable after ICH associated with antithrombotic agent use. Three subsequent clinical trials have recruited another 174 participants with ICH, but they will not be sufficient to determine the effects of antiplatelet therapy on all major adverse cardiovascular events reliably when pooled with RESTART. Therefore, ASPIRING (Antiplatelet Secondary Prevention International Randomized Study After Intracerebral Hemorrhage) aims to recruit 4148 ICH survivors to determine the effects of antiplatelet agents after ICH definitively overall and in subgroups.