Pilot study assessing the efficacy of a novel treatment for sleep-related breathing disorders in patients undergoing sleep nasendoscopy: Our Experience

Effect of intranasal stents (AlaxoLito, AlaxoLito Plus and AlaxoLito Xtreme) on the nasal airway: A case report

BACKGROUND

The study of intranasal stents on the nasal airway is limited in the medical literature. The authors aim to provide objective measurements on their effects on the nasal airway. The aim is to study the feasibility of three novel intranasal stenting devices, AlaxoLito, AlaxoLito Plus, and AlaxoLito Xtreme, as treatment for nasal obstruction.

CASE SUMMARY

A 58- year-old man, who had right sided nasal obstruction, used stents during sporting activities intermittently for four years and subsequently in addition to intermittent sports use regularly for sleep for another two years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the nasal passages and rhinomanometric measurements were taken with and without stents in situ. The stents tested are all braided from thin nitinol wires. The AlaxoLito Nasal Stent has a length of 35 mm. The AlaxoLito Plus and AlaxoLito Xtreme Nasal Stents have a length of 60 mm. Both have a diameter of about 10 mm in unloaded state and comprise a widened, ball-shaped section (which is positioned at the nasal alar) of about 11 and 14 mm, respectively. Rhinomanometric nasal airflow after application of the stents improved 1.11, 1.23, and 1.38 fold, respectively, with application of the AlaxoLito, AlaxoLito Plus and AlaxoLito Xtreme stents. MRI showed that after application of the stents, the nasal passage increased in diameter.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal stenting shows improvement in nasal airflow. Intermittent and regular longterm use had been shown to be safe, with no discomfort and no side effects.

[Drug-induced sedation endoscopy-quo vadis? : Review and outlook]

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) is a diagnostic procedure which allows evaluation of the collapsibility of the upper airway. According to expert opinion, it is possible to imitate nocturnal collapsibility and perform a realistic investigation of the site of obstruction and vibration. This should enable sufficient and precise therapeutic advice to be given solely on the basis of clinical assessment.

OBJECTIVE

The current publication critically evaluates the present state of development of DISE and its potential indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed literature research was performed using "sleep" and "endoscopy" or "DISE" as keywords. Relevant publications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The present publication provides a historical summary of the available publications and relates these to other methods for examining obstructive sleep apnea. The present state of DISE in terms of drugs applied, grading systems, and validity is evaluated. Indications for DISE are described and critically discussed on the basis of literature data.

CONCLUSION

DISE provides deep insights into the genesis of obstructions of the upper airway and snoring. Although its value for diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing could not yet be demonstrated for all non-CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) therapies, DISE could identify predictive parameters some methods. Further potential indications for DISE might be predictive examinations for mandibular advancement devices and respiration-synchronous neurostimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. DISE will thus remain a valuable diagnostic tool for obstructive sleep apnea and rhonchopathy.

A novel nasopharyngeal stent for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a case series of nasopharyngeal stenting versus continuous positive airway pressure

The objective of the study was to investigate the first-night treatment success of a nasopharyngeal stent compared to standard nCPAP-titration. This is a case series and a single-center study. Eight participants (n = 8) were selected with untreated obstructive sleep apnea with a prestudy AHI ≥ 10. A newly developed nasopharyngeal stent was tested individually versus standard nCPAP-titration. Cardiorespiratory polysomnography was performed on two consecutive nights (random order: stent, nCPAP). The AHI, the number of obstructive apneas and hypopneas, the mean oxygen saturation, and the minimum oxygen saturation were compared before and after using the nasopharyngeal stent or standard nCPAP. The AHI value before treatment (AHIpre) was 31.1 ± 12.0 (mean ± standard deviation). After inserting the AlaxoStent, the mean AHIstent was 19 ± 12.0 compared to mean AHInCPAP 8.2 ± 11.9 with standard nCPAP-titration. Both nasopharyngeal stenting and nCPAP-titration could reduce the mean number of obstructive apneas by >94 %. Compared to responder rates of classic surgical interventions like uvulopalatopharyngoplasty or multi-level surgery, the nasopharyngeal stent seems to give a comparable responder rate of 50 %. There were no complications associated with the use of the stent and it was well tolerated by all subjects. Nasopharyngeal stenting widens the range of non-invasive mechanical treatment and seems to be an effective mechanical therapeutic alternative to surgery in nCPAP non-compliant patients with OSA. Careful selection of the patient population is a prerequisite of treatment and therefore it should be reserved for individual cases only.