Value of double mucoperiosteal flaps to prevent restenosis in Draf IIb/III: First clinical report

Value of a lateral inferior pedicle flap in Draf IIb for recurrent frontal sinus diseases: a prospective study

Purpose

The Draf IIb procedure allows the widest unilateral access to the frontal sinus in a minimally invasive fashion, with efficiency and safety comparable to the Draf III. However, this technique is still associated with a high postoperative stenosis rate. The exposure of drilled bone induces osteitis predisposing to scarring and neo-osteogenesis causing ostium restenosis. We developed a novel lateral inferior pedicle flap (LIPF) to cover the exposed bone and prevent restenosis during Draf IIb. We aimed to describe our technique.

Methods

Adult patients requiring a Draf IIb for unilateral recurrent frontal sinus disease were prospectively enrolled. A LIPF technique was systematically performed. Demographics and complications were recorded. The primary outcome measure was neo-ostium patency at 12 months. In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), the clinical control rate was evaluated at 12 months.

Results

59 patients underwent the Draf IIb with LIPF technique from 2013 to 2021. 49 patients (20 women/29 men, median age of 48.0 years) completed at least 12 months of follow-up (median 41.0 months, range 12–100 months). Indications included recalcitrant CRS (n = 32), inverted papilloma (n = 9) and frontal mucocele (n = 8). Overall, the neo-ostium remained patent at 12 months in all patients, and the clinical control rate of 32 patients with recalcitrant CRS at 12 months was 100%. No main complications were recorded.

Conclusion

The LIPF technique was associated with a high rate of success for a Draf IIb.

Effect of a Superior Lateral Anterior Pedicle Flap for Draf Procedures

Several types of flap techniques have been developed to cover exposed bone after Draf procedures to reduce the possibility of re-stenosis. These techniques are relatively new and detailed measurements of the size of neo-Ostia during follow-up have not been reported. The authors aim to assess outcomes precisely by not only using endoscopic evaluation but also by measuring the diameter of the ostium and the thickness of the nasal beaks on pre- and postoperative computed tomography images. The authors reviewed 25 patients with 37 nasal cavities who have undergone a Draf surgery with a previously-reported superior lateral anterior pedicle flap technique. The anteroposterior (AP) distance of the frontal recess and the thickness of the nasal beaks were measured before, immediately after, and more than 6 months after surgery. Measured distances were statistically analyzed. The neo-ostium remained patent in long-term follow-up of all patients. The AP distance of the frontal recess and the thickness of the nasal beak were preserved during follow-up. Neither synechiae nor orbital injuries occurred. In conclusion, Draf type II and III procedures with superior lateral anterior pedicle flaps are safe and effective. Neo-Ostia remained patent throughout the follow-up period.

Septal branches of the anterior ethmoidal artery: anatomical considerations and clinical implications in the management of refractory epistaxis

PURPOSE

Epistaxis is a commonly presenting complaint. In severe cases, nosebleeds may occur despite antero-posterior nasal packing and often in the absence of identifiable sources of bleeding. In such cases, epistaxis may occur from septal branches of the anterior ethmoidal artery (sbAEA). The purposes of this study are to highlight the clinical role of the sbAEA in different fields of endoscopic endonasal surgery and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of their selective endoscopic endonasal ligation in the management of refractory epistaxis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients presenting with epistaxis who underwent endoscopic endonasal coagulation of sbAEA in three Italian tertiary-care referral centers between October 2010 and October 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen patients had never experienced nosebleeds before, while 14 patients recalled previous epistaxes. Seventeen patients were treated under local anesthetic, while 13 required general anesthesia. No intra- or post-operative complications were observed and none of the patients received nasal packing after the procedure. In all cases the coagulation was effective in controlling the bleeding, with only two relapses in the series (2/30, 6.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The sbAEA are of great interest in endoscopic endonasal surgery, both as surgical landmarks and as feeding vessels for a variety of pedicled nasal flaps. What is more, they can be crucial for the management of refractory epistaxis. Their selective endoscopic coagulation represents an effective and safe procedure in cases of difficult-to-control epistaxis from the upper nasal fossa, with several advantages over nasal packing.