Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty is as effective as microscopic type I tympanoplasty but less invasive-A meta-analysis

Preliminary results of a new endoscopic underlay cartilage tympanoplasty with lateral malleolar flap

BACKGROUND

A new endoscopic tympanoplasty technique for large and medium-sized central perforations via a transcanal approach, without tympanomeatal flap elevation compared the preliminary postoperative graft success and hearing outcomes with other techniques in the literature.

METHODS

The study involved 75 patients aged 12 to 44 who underwent tympanoplasty with the lateral malleolar flap technique from 2014 to 2017. Pre-operative otoscopy recorded perforation sizes, and pure tone averages were calculated at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia via a transcanal approach using tragal cartilage, without tympanomeatal flap elevation. A control otoscopy was conducted six months post-operation to assess reperforation and graft position. Pure tone averages were measured, and pre-operative and post-operative audiological values were compared.

RESULTS

Post-operative six-month graft success rate was 94.6%. Reperforation was observed in one patient (1.3%), while another patient (1.3%) exhibited lateralization, and two patients (2.6%) demonstrated medialization. The pre-operative mean hearing level was recorded at 33.3 ± 7.0 dB, accompanied by an Air-Bone Gap (ABG) of 24.0 ± 6.6 dB. Post-operative measurements indicated an improvement in these values, with the mean hearing level decreasing to 18.0 ± 4.8 dB and the ABG reducing to 16.3 ± 5.3 dB (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic underlay cartilage tympanoplasty with lateral malleolar flap is a safe technique that avoids elevating the tympanomeatal flap. It offers shorter operation time, easier postoperative dressing, and high graft success rates similar to other tympanoplasty techniques.

Conventional one-handed compared to two-handed endoscopic ear surgery using an endoscope holder: a single center study

INTRODUCTION

One-handedness is a challenge in conventional endoscopic ear surgery (EES). We present results on the first-ever application of the passive endoscope holder 'Endofix exo' (Co. AKTORmed GmbH, Neutraubling, Germany) in EES, which enables two-handed surgery.

METHODS

This two-sided study compares cut-suture time, operating time, postoperative complications, graft take rates, hearing results and quality of life in patients who underwent first stage tympanoplasty due to tympanic membrane perforation with intact ossicular chain conditions. 25 patients received classic EES (EES-, mean age: 28 ± 21 years) and 15 received EES with the passive holder (EES+, mean age: 48 ± 21 years).

RESULTS

Mean operating times (EES-: 96 ± 38 (SD) min; EES+: 107 ± 33 min), cut-suture times (EES-: 68 ± 30 min; EES+: 73 ± 31 min), complications, graft take rates and hearing results (preoperative air bone gap (ABG) (PTA4): 15 dB ± SD 8 dB (EES-); 16 dB ± SD 8 dB (EES+); postoperative ABG (PTA4): 11.25dB ± SD 11.3dB (EES-); 14 dB ± SD 10 dB (EES+)) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Postoperative hearing results and quality of life tended to improve in both groups (p > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The passive endoscope holder has been successfully applied during the course of the study. However, modifications of the endoscope holder and further studies are recommended focusing on positioning of grafts and prostheses to obtain conclusive results regarding the superiority of two-handed EES over one-handed conventional EES.

Endoscopic Myringoplasty for Pediatric Tympanic Membrane Perforations: Is It Worth It?

Background/Objectives: The endoscopic repair of the tympanic membrane is an established method for addressing perforations in the tympanic membrane. However, there are limited studies in the literature examining the success rate of this procedure in the pediatric population. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from the tertiary referral center at the University Hospital of Verona, Italy. This medical record contains data from 84 type 1 transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasties performed in pediatric patients between November 2014 and February 2022. Seventy-seven pediatric patients aged 4 to 16 years who underwent type 1 transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (seven of whom underwent bilateral surgery at different time points) were included in the study. Our study did not include more extensive procedures than type 1 endoscopic tympanoplasty. Only patients with tympanic membrane perforation due to simple chronic otitis media, trauma or when no apparent cause was found were included. Chronic otitis with cholesteatoma and other pathologies of the external or middle ear were exclusion criteria. Patients with a follow-up of less than 12 months were excluded from this study. The technique was based on the endoscopic placement of an underlay graft of temporal fascia or tragal cartilage to repair a tympanic membrane perforation. Demographic, clinical, audiologic, and surgical data were collected from each patient. In the study, we considered the reduction of the air-bone gap (ABG) as a functional outcome and the integrity of the reconstruction as an anatomic outcome of success. Results: The primary surgery had a closure rate of 92.9% (78 of 84). All patients underwent audiological evaluation 4-6 months post-surgery, with 84 ears tested. The mean preoperative ABG was 17.13 dB HL, reduced to 9.16 dB HL postoperatively, showing a mean reduction of 7.97 dB HL. No significant complications occurred. Conclusions: Transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty should be considered a safe procedure with a high success rate for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations, even in pediatric patients.

Endoscopic push through tragal cartilage tympanoplasty: A 10-year retrospective review of our technique and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) provides a magnified, high-definition view of the otological surgical field. EES allows otologists to avoid surgical incisions and associated postoperative complications. It is an ideal technique for the performance and teaching of tympanoplasty.

AIM

To examine the efficacy of total Endoscopic Push Through Tragal Cartilage Tympanoplasty (EPTTCT), at our institution over a 10-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 168 cases of EPTTCT for closure of small to medium tympanic membrane perforations from 2013-2023 was conducted. Patient sex, age range (pediatric vs adult), etiology of injury, success rate, complications, and postoperative hearing status were collected.

RESULTS

Graft uptake results indicated success in 94% of patients, with less than a 2% complication rate. Postoperative pure tone audiometry demonstrated hearing status improvement in 69% of patients.

CONCLUSION

EPTTCT has been shown to be effective in tympanic membrane perforation closures with minimal complications. This study further demonstrates the efficacy and safety of these procedures in a single-center review.

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic ear surgery is no longer a promising technique, but a well-established one. This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty based on current literature evidence, in terms of their efficacy and safety characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic literature search of four medical databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov), focusing on randomized controlled or observational studies comparing microscopic to endoscopic tympanoplasty.

REVIEW METHODS

Data related to the efficacy and safety of each technique were extracted. Outcome data were summarized using pooled mean differences or pooled odds ratio along with their 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was estimated, by using the ROBINS-I and RoB-II assessment tools, while the overall quality of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE working group.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies, with 2646 patients in total, were included in the meta-analysis. Success rate was evaluated by estimating tympanic graft failure (pooled mean difference:-0.23; 95% CI: -0.61, 0.14, I2 = 33.42%), and air-bone gap improvement (pooled mean difference:-0.05; 95% CI:-0.23, 0.13, I2 = 52.69%), resulting in comparable outcomes for the two techniques. A statistically significant difference favoring the endoscopic technique was detected regarding postoperative wound infection (OR: -1.72; 95% CI: -3.39, -0.04, I2 = 0%), dysgeusia (OR: -1.47; 95% CI: -2.47, -0.47, I2 = 0%), otitis externa development (OR: -1.96; 95% CI: -3.23, -0.69, I2 = 0%), auricular numbness (OR: -2.56; 95% CI: -3.93, -1.19, I2 = 0%), as well as surgical duration (OR: -1.86; 95% CI: -2.70, -1.02, I2 = 43.95%), when compared to the postauricular microscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic tympanoplasty is an innovative alternative to the microscopic technique, resulting in commensurate outcomes regarding success rate. Furthermore, it offers superior results concerning postoperative complications, while it presents a significant reduction in the duration of surgery, mainly when it is compared to the postauricular microscopic approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:3466-3476, 2024.

Comparison of endoscope-assisted and microscope-assisted type I tympanoplasty; a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyze and compare the available data about the outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic type I tympanoplasty.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane library Ovid, Scopus, Google scholar, and ClinicalTrials.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included comparative studies describing type I tympanoplasty, and comparing surgical outcomes of the endoscope with the microscope in terms of efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

Our systematic search yielded 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and eligible for analysis. The pooled graft uptake rates and audiological results of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty demonstrated non-significant differences. In contrast, endoscopic type I tympanoplasty outperforms microscopic tympanoplasty regarding a highly significant decrease not only in pooled mean operative time but also in the pooled complications rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analysis, the surgical outcomes of endoscope-assisted and microscope-assisted type I tympanoplasty in terms of postoperative hearing outcomes and the graft uptake rate were comparable. On the contrary, operative time and complications rate proved to be significantly reduced with endoscopy compared to microscopy. Hence, the endoscope is as efficient as the microscope in type I tympanoplasty but less invasive, fewer in complications and shorter in operative time.

Surgical results of 29 ears with congenital middle ear anomalies; Microscopic vs. endoscopic ear surgery

OBJECTIVE

Although congenital middle ear anomalies include various types of ossicular anomalies, all of these can be treated by ossiculoplasty or stapes surgery. Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) is a minimally invasive surgical method for middle ear disease with an excellent surgical view that has been widely adopted worldwide. To determine the efficacy of TEES for middle ear anomalies, we describe the surgical results and compare the hearing outcomes between patients treated by TEES and microscopic ear surgery (MES).

METHODS

A total of 39 ears with congenital middle ear anomalies were treated surgically at the University Hospital of Kochi Medical School between January 2011 and December 2021. In total, 29 ears of 23 patients were included in the study. Demographics, type of anomaly, surgical methods, pre- and postoperative hearing thresholds, and surgical complications were investigated by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Of the 29 ears, 11 were treated by MES and 18 were treated by TEES. There were no differences in sex, age, preoperative hearing thresholds, or rate of stapes surgery between the two groups. The mean air-bone gap improvement was 20.6 dB in the MES group and 28.8 dB in the TEES group; these values were not significantly different. The median operation time was not significantly different between the MES and TEES groups (125 and 130 min, respectively). The improvements of air conduction in class 1 and 2 (stapes surgery) and class 3 (ossiculoplasty) cases were also not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TEES achieved comparable hearing outcomes to MES without postauricular or endaural incisions. Further, class 1 and 2 anomalies demonstrated hearing improvement similar to class 3 without major complications. Since the surgical field limited around the ossicular chain, coupled with the fact that the middle ear anomaly itself does not exhibit inflammation leading to unfavorable bleeding, TEES is a feasible surgical procedure for all types of congenital ossicular anomalies.

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Type I Tympanoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes after endoscopic and microscopic type I tympanoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trials, two-arm prospective studies, and retrospective studies were included.

SETTING

Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until March 1, 2022 using the combinations of search terms: "endoscopic," "microscopic," and "tympanoplasty."

METHODS

Two independent reviewers utilized the abovementioned search strategy to identify eligible studies. If any uncertainty existed regarding eligibility, a third reviewer was consulted. Primary outcome measures were graft success rate, air-bone gap (ABG) improvement, and operative time. Secondary outcomes were the rate of need for canalplasty, the proportion of self-rated excellent cosmetic results, and pain visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Forty-three studies enrolled a total of 3712 patients who were undergoing type I tympanoplasty and were finally included. The pooled result showed endoscopic approach was significantly associated with shorter operative time (difference in means: -20.021, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -31.431 to -8.611), less need for canalplasty (odds ratio [OR]: 0.065, 95% CI: 0.026-0.164), more self-rated excellent cosmetic results (OR: 87.323, 95% CI: 26.750-285.063), and lower pain VAS (difference in means: -2.513, 95% CI: -4.737 to -0.228). No significant differences in graft success rate or ABG were observed between the two procedures.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty provides a similar graft success rate, improvement in ABG, and reperforation rate to microscopic tympanoplasty with a shorter operative time, better self-rated cosmetic results, and less pain. Unless contraindicated, the endoscopic approach should be the procedure of choice in type I tympanoplasty.

Quality-of-life outcomes with endoscopic and microscopic type I tympanoplasty-a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty was originally introduced in the 1990s and the extensive spread of this practice can be easily observed. The conventional technique performed involves the repair of a tympanic membrane perforation and is defined as microscopic type I tympanoplasty. The aim of this study is the comparison of quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes with endoscopic to that with microscopic type I tympanoplasty.

METHODS

All patients, or in the case of children with the aid of a parent, were asked to complete a novel QoL questionnaire drafted by our study group. The analysis was performed with descriptive statistics-mean, SD and relative frequency-and with a mixed model (generalized least squares fit). A two-sided p value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients completed the questionnaire, 38 in the endoscopic group and 45 in the microscopic group. Every question represented a different. A statistically significant result was found in favor of the endoscopic approach regarding average hospitalization rate (p = 0.003) and cosmetic outcomes (p = 0.015). No statistically significant difference was otherwise observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our prospective cohort study, the QoL outcomes of endoscopic type I tympanoplasty in terms of postoperative pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, taste disorder and hearing were comparable to the microscopic type I tympanoplasty. In regard to cosmetics, an increase in desirable results was achieved in the endoscopic group, particularly the average hospitalization rate proved to be statistically significantly lower than in the microscopic group.

Comparison between endoscopic and microscopic butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic and microscopic approaches for butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty regarding anatomical and hearing outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library was performed from inception to July 3rd, 2021, using keywords, such as tympanoplasty, cartilage graft, and inlay technique. Data from articles that met inclusion criteria were extracted by two authors independently. The PRISMA statement was followed. RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools were used to assess risk of bias. The primary outcome was tympanic membrane closure rate. The secondary outcome was improvement of the air-bone gap.

RESULTS

Five studies were included, one randomized clinical trial and four retrospective cohorts, in which a total of 318 patients were included. Graft take rate was 91.3% in the endoscopic group and 93.6% in the microscopic group (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.93-1.03; I² 0%; P = 0.68). Four studies provided data about the secondary outcome, all showing significant reductions in air-bone gap, ranging from 5.7 to 11.0 in the endoscope group and from 5.8 to 11.6 in the microscope group, with a mean difference between groups of 0.85 (95% CI - 0.79 to 2.48).

CONCLUSION

Although the overall evidence of the included studies was low, endoscopic and microscopic butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasties have similar results on anatomical and hearing outcomes, making the selection between such approaches an individual choice for the surgeon.

Learning curve comparable study of microscopic and endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty

OBJECTIVES

The comparative efficacy of microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) and endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) has been widely studied to some extent through meta-analyses. However, most studies on learning curve comparisons between the two surgeries were performed by experienced ET surgeons. We compared the surgical outcomes of MT and ET and evaluated the difference of learning curve between ET and MT performed by a single unskilled, in both MT and ET, surgeon.

DESIGN

A total of 91 patients underwent ET and MT at a tertiary hospital. We reviewed the patients' medical records and analyzed all findings, including otoscopic pictures, pure tone audiometry (PTA) before and after surgery, and operation records. All operations were performed by a single otologist who had an experience of a year of otology fellowship at a tertiary university hospital. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, admission duration, and audiological outcomes before and after surgery. We also assessed the difference in the decrease in operation time.

RESULTS

Among 91 patients, 44 were in the ET group and 47 were in the MT group. The mean age was 51.15 years, and 37 (40.7%) were men. Eighty-two (90.1%) patients were administered local anesthesia. Graft failure was observed in 19 (20.9%) patients, and the mean postoperative follow-up duration was 66.42 days. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, affected side, graft failure rate, and operation time between the ET and MT groups. There was a significant improvement in air conduction hearing and air-bone gap after surgery in both groups. Bone conduction hearing did not change before and after the surgery in either group. However, the improvement in air condition and reduction in the air-bone gap did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that there were no significant variables that affected operation time among age, sex, operation method (ET or MT), anesthesia, graft material, and technique. The spline regression analysis showed the decrease in operative time in ET was significantly faster than MT in the period from 8th to 19th cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical outcomes of ET are comparable to those of MT in terms of operation time, graft uptake, and postoperative hearing results, even in surgeons who are not experienced with both MT and ET. The operation time of ET was longer than that of MT in the early phase, and the decrease in the operating time was significantly faster in ET than in MT. Both MT and ET reached a plateau in the operation time, and this plateau appeared to be similar in both surgeries.

Transcanal Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: Is There a Difference in Perforation Closure Rates?

Objective

To compare closure rates of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) as influenced by perforation size, perforation location, and graft position.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

Tertiary university medical center.

Patients

Adult patients who underwent tympanoplasty by a fellowship-trained neurotologist from January 2010 to December 2019, had at least 2 months of follow-up, and had a tympanic perforation with no cholesteatoma before surgery.

Interventions

Transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) or MT.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome is postoperative closure of the tympanic membrane perforation as assessed using otomicroscopy at the last follow-up appointment.

Results

Two-hundred and eleven patients-98 in the transcanal ET group and 113 in the MT group-were identified. Tympanic membrane closure rates were not significantly different between the ET and MT groups (79.6% and 84.1% respectively; P = 0.473), and further multivariable analysis revealed that closure rates for ET relative to MT had an insignificant odds ratio (0.56; P = 0.144). Similar analyses also found no significant difference between the 2 methods in subsets of perforation size (small, large, subtotal/total), perforation location (anterior, posterior, inferior), and graft position (underlay, overlay).

Conclusions

ET resulted in similar rates of postoperative closure rates compared with the microscopic technique.

Endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty type I in children: Evolving experience in tragus perichondrium vs. acellular porcine small intestinal sub-mucosa grafts

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic trans-canal tympanoplasty type I (ETT) is gradually diffusing worldwide. It mainly allows less invasive surgery in children with respect to a microscope approach by avoiding post-auricular access. The aim of this study is to illustrate our experience in endoscopic reconstruction of tympanic membrane, using autologous tragus perichondrium (TP) and non-autologous acellular porcine small intestinal sub-mucosa (SIS) as grafts.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2020, the results of a prospective non-randomized series of consecutive ETT were analyzed. The primary outcome was closure rate at 6 months and secondary outcomes are closure rates associated with age, size of perforation, type of perforation and middle ear status, presence of myringosclerosis, type of graft, status of contralateral ear, adenoidectomy and pre-postoperative ABG change. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical package.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen consecutive procedures, mean age 9.4 years (range 4-17 years), were evaluated. TP and SIS grafts were used in 65 (56%) and 51 (44%) procedures, respectively. Mean duration of surgical procedure was 53 ± 21 min for SIS and 77 ± 18 min for TP (P = 0.001) Total graft intake was 82.8%; TP and SIS intake were 86.2% and 78.4% (P = 0.3), respectively. Graft intake w.r.t. in age stratified age groups was not statistically significant. Average preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap was 12.1 ± 7.6 dB and 5.5 ± 3.8 dB, respectively (P = 0.001). The difference in closure rates was not significant. Neither intra- nor postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In children, ETT is an applicable and less invasive technique compared to the microscope and offers less morbidity. The use of SIS contributes additional less invasiveness to endoscopic surgery by avoiding tragus harvesting with a comparable success rate and granting significantly less surgical duration.

Comparing two different techniques to repair pediatric anterior tympanic membrane perforations

OBJECTIVE

Compare outcomes between a microscopic and endoscopic technique for anterior tympanic membrane (TM) perforation.

METHODS

Results of microscopic overlay (MT) and endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) for management of anterior TM perforations from a single surgeon.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients in the MT group and 35 in the ET group. The mean age was 7.1 years and 10.9 years (p < 0.001) MT and ET groups respectively. There was no statistical differences in perforation location (p = 0.1), etiology (p = 0.52) or size (p = 0.1) between both groups. Mean operating time was 119.0 min and 131.0 min in the MT and ET groups respectively (p = 0.23). Follow up was 30.9 months and 9.0 months (p = 0.001) MT and ET respectively. The perforation was successfully closed in 29 patients at 6 weeks in the ET (82.9%) and 25 in the MT (89.3%), p = 0.47. Adjusting for age revealed no significant difference between groups. Long term follow up, resulted in 10 failures (28.6%) and 7 patients (25.0%) in the ET and MT groups respectively, p = 0.75. Adjusting for the follow-up period or age, there was no significant difference between groups. The change in ABG and PTA measures were not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An anteriorly based ET is a novel technique for management of anterior TM perforations. Results from this pilot study indicate that this ET approach may be an appropriate alternative to MT for difficult to repair anterior perforations. A longer follow-up will be necessary to determine its role in these perforations.

Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty as an Alternative to Conventional Surgery for Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (BCT) with that of conventional surgical approaches in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed by screening the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to October 31, 2020. Two coauthors independently identified studies in accordance with the selection criteria. Data were pooled and analyzed via Review Manager version 5.3 and Stata version 12.0 software. The postoperative outcomes were measured and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). Additionally, heterogeneity was assessed through the I² statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 15 articles were eligible for final inclusion. The OR values for the graft uptake rate, compared to conventional tympanoplasty, were 1.12 (95%CI: 0.56-2.22, I² = 52%, P = .75) and 1.22 (95%CI: 0.58-2.59, I² = 0%, P = .60), and the OR compared to fat plug myringoplasty was 3.02 (95%CI: 1.04-8.77, I² = 0%, P = .04). The qualitative analysis of the hearing results reflected significant postoperative auditory gains with no significant differences between the BCT and control groups, indicating satisfactory and similar postoperative hearing improvement. Moreover, the operation time was shortened (SMD = -2.19, 95%CI: -2.79 to -1.59, I² = 82%, P < .05), and the postoperative pain was less with the BCT approach.

CONCLUSION

Butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty has satisfactory efficacy in terms of anatomical and functional results in small to medium perforations. It reduces operation time and postoperative pain. However, the effectiveness on large perforation requires further assessment by well-designed studies.

Totally endoscopic tympanic membrane repair

BACKGROUND

Transcanal totally endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) has become increasingly popular internationally; however, for surgeons trained with a two-handed microscope-guided approach, the potential challenges of adopting TEES can appear off-putting.

OBJECTIVES

This article outlines the pros and cons of TEES for tympanic membrane repair and describes aspects of surgical technique relevant to those who might adopt this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data are provided from the author's experience along with a review of relevant literature, including several meta-analyses of tympanoplasty outcome.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses show that TEES tympanoplasty is as effective at closing tympanic membrane perforations and improving hearing as microscope-guided surgery. Yet patients benefit from avoidance of a skin incision and faster recovery.

CONCLUSION

Repair of the tympanic membrane with TEES is feasible and effective. This minimally invasive approach is very appealing to patients.

Risk stratification in endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty

PURPOSE

Several risk factors were studied in endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty, however, an easy-to-use risk stratification model is still missing.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review, focusing on individual risk factors and middle ear risk index (MERI). Patients who underwent endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty were included.

RESULTS

Closed tympanic cavity was succesfully created in 88.1% of the 42 cases, the overall 21,5 dB air-bone gap (ABG) was reduced by 9,8 dB. The average MERI score of the patients was 2.1 ± 1.5. 78.6% of the patients were categorised into the mild, while 21.4% into the moderate risk group. The perforation was considered small in 81.0% of the cases, while large in 19.0%. The size of the perforation and the preoperative ABG, but not the MERI status were the only single predictors of success. Using a risk stratification model that is based on the size of the perforation, the preoperative ABG and MERI status, patients could be referred into two distinct groups of risk: the majority expecting excellent outcomes with maximum one risk factor present, and patients with deteriorated rate of success when having two or three risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty with underlay perichondrium graft can be performed with good chance of success. However, if more than one risk factors are present, the chance of residual perforation becomes great. In addition to the established risk factors, our results point out that despite its strong correlation with perforation size, ABG may have a predictive role.

Comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty performed by a single experienced surgeon

PURPOSE

The use of endoscopes in otologic procedures has been increasing worldwide. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) and endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) for tympanic membrane and middle ear surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent MT (n = 44) and ET (n = 37) for chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation performed by a single surgeon between January 2013 and September 2019. The hearing outcomes, graft success rate, complications, operation time and hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness were recorded and compared between groups. Hearing outcomes were determined by pure tone audiometry. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the operation cost and total cost.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the MT and ET groups regarding demographic characteristics, with the exception of the male:female ratio. There was no significant difference in the pre- and postoperative air conduction, bone conduction thresholds, and air-bone gap values between the two groups, but a significant audiologic improvement was observed in both groups (p < 0.05). In terms of recurrence of tympanic membrane perforation, postoperative otorrhea, and discomfort symptoms, there was no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). The operation time and hospital stay were shorter in the ET group than in the MT group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in operation cost between the two groups (p > 0.05), but the total cost was significantly lower in the ET group than the MT group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ET is as safe and medically efficacious as conventional MT, shortens the operation time and hospital stay, and is cost-effective.

Auricular suppurative perichondritis secondary to exclusive endoscopic ear surgery for tympanoplasty: A case report and literature review

Endoscope is an innovative method for otologists in middle ear surgery. Many previous studies have confirmed the safety and efficiency of the endoscopic technique, as a reliable therapeutic option with very low complication rates, clearly supporting the use of endoscopy in ear surgery. Auricular suppurative perichondritis secondary to exclusive endoscopic ear surgery for tympanoplasty is an extremely rare type of those without any previously reported cases. In this report, we describe the course of auricular suppurative perichondritis of a 55-year-old woman. The patient was ultimately healed through surgical debridement and postoperative dressing with no evidence of recurrence at two months follow-up. There were no auricle deformity or external auditory canal stenosis with six months following-up.

The outcomes of endoscopic myringoplasty: elevating a tympanomeatal flap or not

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the differences between the no tympanomeatal flap approach and the tympanomeatal flap approach in endoscopic myringoplasty.

METHOD

A total of 132 patients with tympanic membrane perforation were randomly divided into two groups: the no tympanomeatal flap approach group (group A, 56 ears) and the tympanomeatal flap approach group (group B, 76 ears). A comparison between the two groups was made.

RESULTS

The average operation time of group A was 36.00 ± 5.24 minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of group B, which was 43.89 ± 4.57 minutes (p = 0.002). The blood loss of group A was 5.08 ± 1.83 ml, which was significantly less than that of group B (9.67 ± 2.29 ml; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the degree of hearing improvement, the rate of hearing improvement, the dry ear time (when the external auditory canal and the operating cavity were dry) after operation and the success rate of tympanic membrane repair when compared between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with group B, group A (no tympanomeatal flap approach) can achieve the same effect but has the advantages of a shorter operation time and less blood loss during the operation.