Patient perspectives on recall period and response options in patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology: A pilot study

Patient perspectives on recall period and response options in patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology: An international multi-centered study

BACKGROUND

Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use a variety of recall periods and response scales to assess CRS symptom burden. Global perspectives of CRS patients regarding optimal recall periods and response scales for CRS PROMs are unknown.

METHODS

This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study recruiting 461 CRS patients from sites across the United States, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Austria. Participants chose which CRS symptom recall period (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, >1 month) was most reflective of their current disease state and upon which to best base treatment recommendations (including surgery). Participants also chose which of six response scales (one visual analogue scale and five Likert scales ranging from four to eight items) was easiest to use, understand, and preferred.

RESULTS

A plurality of participants (40.0%) felt their CRS symptoms' current state was best reflected by a 1-month recall period. However, most patients (56.9%) preferred treatment recommendations to be determined by symptoms experienced over a >1 month period. The four- and five-item Likert scales were the easiest to understand (26.0% and 25.4%, respectively) and use (23.4% and 26.7%, respectively). The five-item (26.4% rating it most preferred and 70.9% rating it preferred) and four-item Likert (22.3% rating it most preferred and 56.4% rating it preferred) response scales were most preferred.

CONCLUSION

Future PROMs for CRS should consider assessment of symptoms over a 1-month period and use a four- or five-item Likert response scale to reflect global patient preferences. These findings also inform interpretation of current CRS PROMs.

Heterogeneity in the definition of chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: a systematic review of the scientific literature

PURPOSE

Disease control is conceptually recognized to be an important outcome measure for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, inconsistent usage is a significant factor in disadoption of important concepts and it is presently unclear how consistently the construct of CRS 'control' is being defined/applied. The objective of this study was to determine the heterogeneity of CRS disease control definitions in the scientific literature.

METHODS

Systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception through December 31, 2022. Included studies used CRS disease control as an explicitly stated outcome measure. The definitions of CRS disease control were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified with more than half published in 2021 or later. Definitions of CRS control were variable, although 48.4% of studies used the EPOS (2012 or 2020) criteria to define control, 14 other unique definitions of CRS disease control were also implemented. Most studies included the burden CRS symptoms (80.6%), need for antibiotics or systemic corticosteroids (77.4%) or nasal endoscopy findings (61.3%) as criteria in their definitions of CRS disease control. However, the specific combination of these criteria and prior time periods over which they were assessed were highly variable.

CONCLUSION

CRS disease control is not consistently defined in the scientific literature. Although many studies conceptually treated 'control' as the goal of CRS treatment, 15 different criteria were used to define CRS disease control, representing significant heterogeneity. Scientific derivation of criteria and collaborative consensus building are needed for the development of a widely-accepted and -applied definition of CRS disease control.

Chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: a review of the history and the evidence

INTRODUCTION

Control is an important concept and outcome measure for chronic incurable diseases, defined as the extent to which manifestations of a disease are within acceptable limits. Control reflects a global metric of disease status and serves as the goal of treatment. This review will encompass the history of the disease control concept applied to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and the body of scientific literature that has focused on the definition of CRS disease control.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the scientific literature identified historical studies and guidelines that have developed definitions of CRS disease control, as well as recent studies identifying the most significant determinants of CRS control. A particular focus was made on studies that investigated patients' and physicians' perspectives of CRS control.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients and physicians have well-aligned perspectives about the definition, criteria, and application of CRS disease control, with a specific prioritization of patients' assessments of their own CRS control, as well as the symptoms of nasal obstruction and nasal drainage. The development of future guidelines for assessing CRS control must be based on criteria supported by evidence as essential to the assessment of CRS control but should also be the subject of broad international consensus.

Defining 'control' of chronic rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Control is a global disease metric defined as the extent to which manifestations of a disease are within acceptable limits. Control serves as the goal of treatment for chronic diseases, such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), that cannot be cured. The objective of this review is to summarize recommendations for assessment of CRS control with a specific focus on how these recommendations align with patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives of CRS control.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several staging systems for CRS control have been developed with the first and most widely recognized by the 2012 European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps, which was developed through expert opinion. Patients' and providers'/guideline-based assessments of CRS control frequently do not align. Patients understand the concept of CRS control and their assessment is dominated by the perceived severity of nasal symptoms. In comparison, providers' and guideline-based assessments of control are more global, incorporating nasal and extra-nasal symptoms, need for systemic antibiotics and corticosteroids, and nasal endoscopy.

SUMMARY

Although more research is needed, future development of CRS control criteria through consensus around explicitly determined perspectives of healthcare providers and patients may one day serve as the foundation for a standardized approach to treatment of CRS.

Individual symptom visual analogue scale severity scores for determining EPOS guideline-based chronic rhinosinusitis disease control

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine how to translate visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom scores to the binary, descriptive symptom scales used in the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control.

METHODS

309 CRS patients were recruited. All patients rated their burden of 5 symptoms (nasal blockage, rhinorrhea/postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, smell loss, sleep disturbance or fatigue) using the binary EPOS descriptive symptom scales and a VAS (on a scale of 0 to 10). In addition, participants completed a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and rated their overall CRS disease control as "controlled", "partly controlled" or "uncontrolled".

RESULTS

Symptom burdens measured by VAS, binary descriptive EPOS scale and SNOT-22 were associated with worsening CRS disease control reported by participants. Each symptom had a distinct VAS score cut-off that strongly predicted the uncontrolled option on the corresponding binary descriptive EPOS symptom scale. However, the predictive ability of VAS for rhinorrhea/ postnasal drip was disparately worse than the other 4 symptoms. When considering all symptom data simultaneously, a VAS score >3.5 strongly predicted the uncontrolled option on the corresponding binary descriptive EPOS symptom scale for all 5 symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

A VAS symptom score of >3.5 translates to the uncontrolled option in the binary, descriptive symptom scale of the EPOS control criteria. The rhinorrhea/postnasal drip descriptive symptom scale translates disparately worse to VAS scores and may be considered for revision in future criteria.

Patient-reported chronic rhinosinusitis disease control is a valid measure of disease burden

BACKGROUND

Disease control is an important treatment goal for chronic uncurable conditions such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The objective of this study was to determine whether patient-reported CRS disease control is a valid reflection of disease burden.

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal study of 300 CRS patients (35% CRS with nasal polyps, 65% CRS without nasal polyps). At enrollment and at a subsequent follow-up timepoint, all participants were asked to rate their CRS disease control as "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "very," or "completely", as well as to complete a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and the 5-dimension EuroQol general health questionnaire from which the visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) was used.

RESULTS

At enrollment and follow-up timepoints, patient-reported CRS disease control was significantly correlated with SNOT-22 and EQ-5D VAS scores. The change in patient-reported CRS disease control was significantly correlated with change in SNOT-22 and change in EQ-5D VAS scores. There was significant cross-sectional and longitudinal correlation between patient-reported control and all SNOT-22 subdomain scores. A SNOT-22 score of ≤ 25 points or lower, or an EQ-5D VAS score of ≥77 was predictive of having well - (i.e. "very" or "completely") controlled CRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported CRS disease control is a valid measure of CRS disease burden and general QOL. A patient-reported assessment of CRS disease control could be considered as a component of a more comprehensive measure of CRS disease control.