Diet, eating behaviour and weight gain in men and women with overweight/obesity receiving varenicline for smoking cessation

Contingency management for smoking cessation for individuals with overweight or obesity: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Interventions for quitting smoking and weight control among individuals with excess weight are scarce. Our study evaluated the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus contingency management (CM) in this population, and examined whether CM for smoking cessation improved CBT treatment outcomes at end of treatment (EOT) and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups (FU).

METHODS

In an 8-week randomized clinical trial, 120 adults who smoke with overweight or obesity (54.16% females; MBMI = 31.75 ± 4.31) were randomly assigned to CBT for both quitting smoking and weight control (n = 60) or the same treatment plus CM for smoking cessation (n = 60). Outcome variables were compared (i.e., treatment completion, smoking abstinence, weight change and secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

At EOT, the CBT + CM group achieved 78.33% 7-day point-prevalence abstinence rates compared to 61.67% in the CBT group (p = .073), and rates declined over time (12-month FU: 18% vs 12%). Participants who attained abstinence weighed more compared to baseline at EOT (Mkg = 1.07; SD = 1.88) and over time (12-month FU: Mkg = 4.19; SD = 4.31). No differences were found between the two groups in outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Both interventions were effective in promoting abstinence and reducing tobacco use over time. Combining CBT with CM for smoking cessation did not improve treatment outcomes in individuals with overweight or obesity compared to CBT only. Future studies should evaluate whether implementing CM for weight maintenance helps control post-cessation weight gain in this population.

Body weight change during a smoking cessation intervention for individuals with overweight or obesity

INTRODUCTION

A more comprehensive understanding of the factors regarding weight control in individuals with overweight or obesity after quitting smoking is needed. The study aimed to analyze the changes of in-treatment variables during a smoking cessation intervention and examine their impact on weight.

METHODS

A total of 120 individuals who smoke with overweight or obesity (MBMI = 31.75 ± 4.31; 54.16 % female) participated in a cognitive-behavioral therapy for smoking cessation and weight control or the same treatment plus contingency management. Weight, smoking variables (cotinine and continuous abstinence), eating behaviors (appetite, grazing), exercise, and sleep were assessed weekly throughout the treatment.

RESULTS

More participants gained weight over time with reduced nicotine use or abstinence. There was a tendency during treatment to increase appetite and exercise time, while grazing episodes and sleeping hours remained stable. Higher baseline weight (p < .001), greater cotinine reduction (p = .021) and time (p = .009) were associated with greater weight gain, while more hours of exercise (p = .003), no appetite changes (p = .003) and diminished appetite (p < .001) were associated with less gain over the treatment. Both treatment conditions showed similar results in all in-treatment variables.

DISCUSSION

Individuals with overweight and obesity with higher baseline weight and higher baseline cotinine levels during smoking cessation interventions may require special attention to improve weight outcomes. Exercise and appetite regulation may be useful for mitigating weight gain in smoking cessation interventions for individuals with overweight or obesity.

Challenges in Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Obese Patients: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Many unique clinical challenges accompany the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people living with overweight/obesity. Similarly, physicians encounter numerous complicating factors when managing obesity among people with CVD. Diagnostic accuracy in CVD medicine can be hampered by the presence of obesity, and pharmacological treatments or cardiac procedures require careful adjustment to optimize efficacy. The obesity paradox concept remains a source of confusion within the clinical community that may cause important risk factors to go unaddressed, and body mass index is a misleading measure that cannot account for body composition (eg, lean mass). Lifestyle modifications that support weight loss require long-term commitment, but cardiac rehabilitation programs represent a potential opportunity for structured interventions, and bariatric surgery may reduce CVD risk factors in obesity and CVD. This review examines the key issues and considerations for physicians involved in the management of concurrent obesity and CVD.

Pilot randomized trial of cognitive-behavioral treatment plus contingency management for quitting smoking and weight gain prevention among smokers with overweight or obesity

BACKGROUND

Post-cessation weight gain is a risk factor for relapse among quitters. The primary study aim was to evaluate, among smokers with overweight or obesity, the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) plus contingency management (CM) for quitting smoking and weight control. The secondary aim was to examine preliminary tobacco abstinence and weight change outcomes.

METHODS

In an 8-week pilot randomized clinical trial, 41 participants (M_age = 52.73, SD = 10.91, 56.1% females) with overweight or obesity (M_BMI = 31.86, SD = 4.7) received a CBT for both quitting smoking and weight gain prevention (n = 24) or the same treatment plus CM (n = 17), consisting of providing incentives contingent upon smoking abstinence biochemically verified.

RESULTS

Recruitment success rate was 80.39% (41/51), completion rate was 90.24% (37/41), and mean number of sessions attended (out of 15 possible) was 13.20 (SD = 3.1). Mean satisfaction rating for the treatment (1-10 likert-type scale with 10 being most satisfactory) was 9.73 (SD =.61). Preliminary efficacy data indicated that the CM group achieved higher abstinence rates compared with the CBT condition (100% vs. 58.33%, p = .007). Abstinent participants increased 1.25 kg (SD = 1.79) their baseline body weight at the end of treatment (p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Providing weight gain prevention strategies and CM within a smoking cessation treatment seems feasible and acceptable. Preliminary data indicated that including CM facilitates tobacco abstinence rates, nevertheless no advantage for CM was found for weight control.