1
|
Forst T, De Block C, Del Prato S, Armani S, Frias J, Lautenbach A, Ludvik B, Marinez M, Mathieu C, Müller TD, Schnell O. The role of incretin receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024. [PMID: 39072877 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODRODUCTION Obesity and its associated metabolic conditions have become a significant global health problem in recent years, with many people living with obesity fulfilling criteria for pharmacological treatment. The development of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for chronic weight management has triggered new interest in the incretins and other hormones as targets for obesity, and investigations into dual and triple co-agonists. METHODS The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the available data on approved and emerging incretin-based agents for the treatment of obesity. RESULTS In clinical trials of currently available agents in people with overweight or obesity, weight loss of between 6% and 21% of baseline body weight has been observed, with between 23% and 94% of participants achieving 10% or higher weight loss, depending on the study and the agent used. Favourable outcomes have also been seen with regard to cardiovascular risk and outcomes, diabetes prevention, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis and prevention of weight regain after metabolic surgery. Limitations associated with these agents include high costs, the potential for weight regain once treatment is stopped, the potential loss of lean body mass and gastrointestinal adverse events; potential issues with respect to gallbladder and biliary diseases require further investigation. CONCLUSIONS Many dual and triple co-agonists are still in development, and more data are needed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of these emerging therapies versus the established incretin-based therapies; however, data are promising, and further results are eagerly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Forst
- CRS Clinical Research Services GmbH, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Stefano Del Prato
- Interdisciplinary Research Center "Health Science," Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Armani
- CRS Clinical Research Services GmbH, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Juan Frias
- Biomea Fusion, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Anne Lautenbach
- University Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Ludvik
- Landstrasse Clinic and Karl Landsteiner Institute for Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Timo D Müller
- Institute for Diabetes and Obesity, Helmholtz Diabetes Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Walther-Straub Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at the Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sher T, McGee M, DuCoin C, Sujka J, Docimo S. Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant Anti-Obesity Medications and Bariatric Surgery: A Scoping Review. Curr Obes Rep 2024; 13:377-402. [PMID: 38507194 DOI: 10.1007/s13679-024-00558-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To comprehensively summarize the current body of literature on the topic of adjuvant and neoadjuvant pharmacotherapy used in combination with bariatric surgery. RECENT FINDINGS Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) have been used since the mid-1900s; however, their use in combination with bariatric surgery is a newer area of research that is rapidly growing. Pharmacotherapy may be used before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) bariatric surgery. Recent literature suggests that adjuvant AOMs may address weight regain and inadequate weight loss following bariatric surgery. Research on neoadjuvant AOM used to optimize weight loss before bariatric surgery is more limited. A literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Thirty-four studies were included after screening and exclusion of irrelevant records. Included studies were as follows: seven prospective studies on adjuvant AOM use, 23 retrospective studies on adjuvant AOM use, one prospective study on adjuvant and neoadjuvant AOM use, one retrospective study on adjuvant or neoadjuvant AOM use, one prospective study on neoadjuvant AOM use, and one case series on neoadjuvant AOM use. In the following scoping review, each of these studies is discussed with the goal of presenting a complete synthesis of the current body of literature on AOM use in combination with bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo Sher
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
| | - Michelle McGee
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| | - Christopher DuCoin
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| | - Joseph Sujka
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| | - Salvatore Docimo
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sher T, McGee M, DuCoin C, Sujka J, Docimo S. Evaluating the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant terminology in bariatric surgery: a scoping review. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:966-974. [PMID: 38523037 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight regain and inadequate weight loss are common after bariatric surgery. Literature is emerging regarding the use of pharmacotherapy with bariatric surgery as a potential solution to these adverse effects. Pharmacotherapy may be used before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) bariatric surgery, although this terminology has not been standardized. As a rapidly growing area of research, there is opportunity to standardize terminology for future ease of research, data synthesis, and communication. This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the use of the terms "adjuvant" and "neoadjuvant" to describe pharmacotherapy used in combination with bariatric surgery and propose standardized terminology for future research. METHODS Literature search was conducted systematically and in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they were published after 1999; were randomized controlled trials, prospective/retrospective cohort studies, or case series; and used human subjects that were adults at least 18 years of age. The use of the terms "neoadjuvant" and "adjuvant" was analyzed over time. RESULTS Thirty-four publications were included. Thirty-two (94.1%) studied the use of adjuvant pharmacotherapy after bariatric surgery. Four (11.8%) studied the use of pharmacotherapy before bariatric surgery, and 1 used the term "neoadjuvant" to describe medications used before bariatric surgery. Eight publications used the term "adjuvant" to describe medications used after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION Standardized terminology is needed to ease future understanding, evidence synthesis, and dissemination of work. We propose that the terms "neoadjuvant" and "adjuvant" become the standard terminology to describe pharmacotherapy use before and after bariatric surgery, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo Sher
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States.
| | - Michelle McGee
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Christopher DuCoin
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Joseph Sujka
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Salvatore Docimo
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dutta D, Nagendra L, Joshi A, Krishnasamy S, Sharma M, Parajuli N. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Post-bariatric Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2024; 34:1653-1664. [PMID: 38502519 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07175-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A significant number of patients face the issue of weight gain (WG) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) post-bariatric surgery for obesity. Several studies have been published evaluating the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) for weight loss post-bariatric surgery. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM) till date has evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GLP1RA in this clinical scenario. Hence, this SRM aimed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, cohort and observational studies involving use of GLP1RA in the intervention arm post-bariatric surgery. Primary outcome was weight loss post at least 3 months of therapy. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of body composition parameters, total adverse events (TAEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS From initially screened 1759 articles, 8 studies (557 individuals) were analysed. Compared to placebo, patients receiving liraglutide had significantly greater weight loss after 6-month therapy [MD - 6.0 kg (95% CI, - 8.66 to - 3.33); P < 0.001; I2 = 79%]. Compared to liraglutide, semaglutide had significantly greater percent reduction in body weight after 6-month [MD - 2.57% (95% CI, - 3.91 to - 1.23); P < 0.001; I2 = 0%] and 12-month [MD - 4.15% (95% CI, - 6.96 to - 1.34); P = 0.004] therapy. In study by Murvelashvili et al. (2023), after 12-month therapy, semaglutide had significantly higher rates of achieving > 15% [OR 2.15 (95% CI, 1.07-4.33); P = 0.03; n = 207] and > 10% [OR 2.10 (95% CI, 1.19-3.71); P = 0.01; n = 207] weight loss. A significant decrease in fat mass [MD - 4.78 kg (95% CI, - 7.11 to - 2.45); P < 0.001], lean mass [MD - 3.01 kg (95% CI, - 4.80 to - 1.22); P = 0.001] and whole-body bone mineral density [MD - 0.02 kg/m2 (95% CI, - 0.04 to - 0.00); P = 0.03] was noted with liraglutide. CONCLUSION Current data is encouraging regarding use of GLP1RAs for managing WG or IWL post-bariatric surgery. Deterioration of bone health and muscle mass remains a concern needing further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The predefined protocol has been registered in PROSPERO having registration number of CRD42023473991.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deep Dutta
- Department of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrinology Diabetes Arthritis & Rheumatism (CEDAR) Superspeciality Healthcare, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
| | - Lakshmi Nagendra
- Department of Endocrinology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India
| | - Ameya Joshi
- Department of Endocrinology, Bhaktivedanta Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Meha Sharma
- Department of Rheumatology, CEDAR Superspeciality Healthcare, Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Naresh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine/Endocrinology, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lupianez-Merly C, Dilmaghani S, Vosoughi K, Camilleri M. Review article: Pharmacologic management of obesity - updates on approved medications, indications and risks. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:475-491. [PMID: 38169126 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity has reached epidemic proportions, with >40% of the US population affected. Although traditionally managed by lifestyle modification, and less frequently by bariatric therapies, there are significant pharmacological advancements. AIMS To conduct a narrative review of the neurohormonal and physiological understanding of weight gain and obesity, and the development, clinical testing, indications, expected clinical outcomes, and associated risks of current FDA-approved and upcoming anti-obesity medications (AOMs). METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review in PubMed for articles on pathophysiology and complications of obesity, including terms 'neurohormonal', 'obesity', 'incretin', and 'weight loss'. Next, we searched for clinical trial data of all FDA-approved AOMs, including both the generic and trade names of orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, bupropion/naltrexone, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Additional searches were conducted for tirzepatide and retatrutide - medications expecting regulatory approval. Searches included combinations of terms related to mechanism of action, indications, side effects, risks, and future directions. RESULTS We reviewed the pathophysiology of obesity, including specific role of incretins and glucagon. Clinical data supporting the use of various FDA-approved medications for weight loss are presented, including placebo-controlled or, when available, head-to-head trials. Beneficial metabolic effects, including impact on liver disease, adverse effects and risks of medications are discussed, including altered gastrointestinal motility and risk for periprocedural aspiration. CONCLUSION AOMs have established efficacy and effectiveness for weight loss even beyond 52 weeks. Further pharmacological options, such as dual and triple incretins, are probable forthcoming additions to clinical practice for combating obesity and its metabolic consequences such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Lupianez-Merly
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Saam Dilmaghani
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kia Vosoughi
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O’Neill ES, Wiegmann AL, Parrella N, Pittman T, Hood K, Kurlander D. Injectable Weight Loss Medications in Plastic Surgery: What We Know, Perioperative Considerations, and Recommendations for the Future. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5516. [PMID: 38268718 PMCID: PMC10807879 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Obesity is a major epidemic plaguing American society. Injectable subcutaneous medications initially designed for use in type 2 diabetes management, such as semaglutide and other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, are rapidly gaining popularity for their effects on weight. These drugs (Ozempic, Wegovy, Saxenda, and Mounjaro) are ubiquitous on social media and are promoted by celebrities across all demographics. "Ozempic face" and "Ozempic butt" are now mainstream concepts highlighting the morphologic changes that occur with these medications. There is a paucity of literature available on the impact of these medications for plastic surgeons and their patients. As use becomes widespread, it is important for plastic surgeons to understand their indications, contraindications, appropriate perioperative management, and impact on plastic surgery procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S. O’Neill
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
| | - Aaron L. Wiegmann
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
| | - Naomi Parrella
- Weight Loss and Lifestyle Medicine Clinics, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
| | - Troy Pittman
- Private Practice, Somenek+Pittman MD, Washington, D.C
| | - Keith Hood
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
| | - David Kurlander
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rubio-Herrera MA, Mera-Carreiro S, Sánchez-Pernaute A, Ramos-Levi AM. Impact of Treatment with GLP1 Receptor Agonists, Liraglutide 3.0 mg and Semaglutide 1.0 mg, While on a Waiting List for Bariatric Surgery. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2785. [PMID: 37893158 PMCID: PMC10604375 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11102785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight loss before undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been suggested to reduce perioperative complications, although with controversial results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of treatment with GLP1-R agonists (liraglutide 3.0 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg) on preoperative weight loss and patients' decisions regarding MBS while on a surgical waiting list. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and two patients on a waiting list for MBS started treatment with GLP1-RA for at least 6 months. Changes in weight at 26 and 52 weeks, the number of patients achieving >5% weight loss, and patients' decisions regarding MBS were evaluated. RESULTS After 52 weeks, patients lost 16.9 ± 7.2% of weight with semaglutide 1.0 mg and 16.1 ± 5.8% of weight with liraglutide 3.0 mg. All patients lost ≥5% of initial weight, 84.7% lost ≥10%, 54.6% lost ≥15%, and 27.5% reached ≥20%. A total of 68.6% of participants were satisfied with the achieved weight loss and withdrew from the waiting list for MBS. A threshold of >15.1% weight loss had the greatest sensitivity and specificity for the final decision regarding undergoing MBS. CONCLUSIONS Losing >15% of initial weight after 52 weeks of treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg or semaglutide 1.0 mg during the waiting list for MBS impacts patients' decisions regarding the final acceptance or rejection of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A. Rubio-Herrera
- Departament of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Mera-Carreiro
- Departament of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
- Departament of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Ana M. Ramos-Levi
- Departament of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|