|
1
|
Pesqué D, Aerts O, Bizjak M, Gonçalo M, Dugonik A, Simon D, Ljubojević-Hadzavdić S, Malinauskiene L, Wilkinson M, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Krecisz B, John SM, Balato A, Ayala F, Rustemeyer T, Giménez-Arnau AM. Differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis: A practical-approach review by the EADV Task Force on contact dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024. [PMID: 38713001 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
The diagnosis of eczema ('dermatitis') is mostly clinical and depends on the clinical history and exploratory objective findings (primary lesions, patterns). Contact dermatitis remains as an important condition in the group of eczematous disorders, with important socioeconomic and occupational relevance. Although irritant and allergic contact dermatitis have a different pathogenesis, both are characterized by a rather typical morphology, are triggered by external factors and tend to occur primarily in the area of contact with the exogenous agent. In addition, allergic and irritant dermatitis may also co-exist. The importance of diagnosing contact dermatitis, especially when allergic in nature, is both due to the possibility of avoiding the trigger, and due to its role in aggravating other skin conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in daily practice may pose an important challenge for the suspicion and correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Furthermore, other conditions, with different pathogenesis and treatment, may clinically simulate contact dermatitis. The Task Force aims to conduct a review of the unifying clinical features of contact dermatitis and characterize its main clinical phenotypes, and its simulators, in order to contribute to an early suspicion or recognition of contact dermatitis and enable a correct differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pesqué
- Dermatology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Aerts
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and Research Group Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mojca Bizjak
- Division of Allergy, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Aleksandra Dugonik
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Dagmar Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Suzana Ljubojević-Hadzavdić
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Laura Malinauskiene
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Mark Wilkinson
- Leeds Centre for Dermatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Beata Krecisz
- Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University Kielce, Kielce, Poland
| | - Swen M John
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - Anna Balato
- Dermatology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Ayala
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Dermato-Allergology and Occupational Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ana M Giménez-Arnau
- Dermatology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Contact Allergy Induced by Mango ( Mangifera indica): A Relevant Topic? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:medicina57111240. [PMID: 34833457 PMCID: PMC8621529 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The most common clinical manifestation of mango allergy is contact dermatitis, which can be localized or systemic. The sensitising substances that have long been suspected are alk(en)yl catechols and/or alk(en)yl resorcinols. Methods: We reviewed the original articles published on Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library before 15 September 2021, on the topic of contact allergy induced by mango and we synthesized the key data. Results: We found 12 case reports and four case series, with a total of 37 patients. Only seven of these cases were reported in patients from mango-cultivating countries, the other 30 were from countries where mango cultivation does not occur, and 26 were also from countries where poison ivy/oak are commonly found. We found that contact dermatitis may occur on the first exposure to mango due to previous sensitisation to urushiol-containing plants. The diagnosis was confirmed by patch testing in some of the cases. There was great heterogeneity between the reagents used. Conclusion: Mango fruit is frequently consumed, but mango induced contact dermatitis, the main hypersensitivity reaction induced by mango, is rare. Further data is necessary for a better understanding of sensitising substances and, consecutively, standardization of patch test reagents.
Collapse
|