Using chemical speciation modelling to discuss variations in patch test reactions to different aluminium and chromium salts

Metal(loid) speciation in dermal bioaccessibility extracts from contaminated soils and permeation through synthetic skin

Dermal exposure to metal(loid)s from contaminated soils can contribute to health risk. Metal(loid) speciation will influence their bioaccessibility in sweat and subsequent permeation across the skin. Therefore, the speciation of the bioaccessible fraction of metal(loid)s in two synthetic sweat formulations (sweat A (pH 6.5) and B (pH 4.7)) was assessed using chemical equilibrium modelling (Visual MINTEQ). Permeation through synthetic skin and the influence of sebum in the permeation of As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn were also investigated using Franz cells. Following dermal bioaccessibility tests for five Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA)-contaminated soils and one certified soil (SQC001), mean metal(loid) bioaccessibility (%) was higher in sweat B (2.33-18.8) compared to sweat A (0.12-7.53). Arsenic was almost entirely found as As(V) in both sweats. In sweat A, comparable concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) were found whereas in sweat B, Cr was primarily present as Cr(III). Copper was primarily found as Cu2+. Bioaccessible Cr extracted from nearly all soils permeated through the Strat-M membrane when it was coated with sebum. The Cr permeation coefficient (Kp) ranged between 0.004 and 0.13 cm/h and the Kp for Cu was higher (0.024-0.52 cm/h). As, Ni, Pb, and Zn did not permeate the synthetic skin.

Skin permeation studies of chromium species - Evaluation of a reconstructed human epidermis model

A reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) model, the EpiDerm, was investigated and compared to human skin ex vivo regarding tissue penetration and distribution of two chromium species, relevant in both occupational and general exposure in the population. Imaging mass spectrometry was used in analysis of the sectioned tissue. The RHE model gave similar results compared to human skin ex vivo for skin penetration of Cr^VI. However, the penetration of Cr^III into the tissue of the RHE model compared to human skin ex vivo differed markedly, such that in the RHE model the Cr^III species accumulated in the tissue layer corresponding to stratum corneum whereas in human skin ex vivo, the Cr^III species penetrated evenly through the skin tissue. Further, skin lipids such as cholesterol were less abundant in the RHE model compared to the human skin tissue. Results presented here indicate that the RHE models do not possess the same fundamental properties as human skin tissue. As the RHE models appear to be able to give false negative results, experiments using RHE models for the study of skin penetration should be evaluated with caution.

Effects of aluminium chloride added to common patch test substances

BACKGROUND

A modulating effect of aluminium regarding type IV reactions might exist but has not been further investigated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on patch test reactions when adding aluminium chloride hexahydrate (Al-Cl) to common test preparations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Al-Cl in different concentrations was added to nickel sulphate 15.0% aqua (Ni), methylisothiazolinone 0.2% aqua (MI) and fragrance mix I 10.0% aqua/ethanol (FM I). The Ni preparations were tested in 120 consecutive patients. MI and FM I were tested in participants known to have contact allergy to the respective allergen. McNemar's test was used to decide which Ni preparation had the highest sensitivity. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate pairwise comparison in summarized test score for the preparations with MI and FM I.

RESULTS

Adding Al-Cl 20.0%/30.0% to Ni identified twice as many patients with contact allergy to nickel compared to Ni without Al-Cl. Adding Al-Cl 20.0%/10.0% to MI, decreased the patch test reactivity compared to MI without Al-Cl. No differences in patch reactivity were noticed when adding Al-Cl to FM I.

CONCLUSION

Al-Cl 20.0% or 30.0% seems to enhance the patch test reactivity to Ni 15.0% aqua.

Aluminum-Allergen of the Year 2022

ABSTRACT

Exposure to elemental aluminum and its salts is unavoidable. Aluminum as a metal is present in transport, construction, packaging, and electronic equipment. Aluminum salts are present in consumer products, food items and drinking water, vaccines, drugs, and antiperspirants. Aluminum in vaccines and preparations for allergen-specific immunotherapy are the major sensitization sources. The predominent clinical manifestations of aluminum allergy are pruritic subcutaneous nodules and eczematous dermatitis. Patch testing shall be performed with aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) in petrolatum. The preparation with ACH 10% detects substantially more aluminum allergy than ACH 2%. A patch test with elemental aluminum, for example, an empty Finn Chamber, is only positive when there is a strong aluminum allergy. A patch test reading should be performed 1 week after the application so as not to miss 15% to 20% of aluminum allergy. Aluminum should be included in any baseline patch test series for children and investigated for a possible inclusion in baseline series for adults. Aluminum test chambers can interfere with the testing resulting in both false-negative and false-positive patch test reactions to nonaluminum contact sensitizers.