A systematic review of the predictive value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography on survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer worldwide. Although its incidence is increasing, mainly in those aged under50, mortality has decreased by 50% in the more developed countries, principally due to the adoption of new practices in prevention, diagnosis and treatment. In particular, the various diagnostic imaging modalities allow improved therapeutic decision-making, evaluation of the response and early detection of recurrence. The aim of this paper is to review the available scientific evidence on the value of positron emission tomography with ¹⁸F-FDG (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in the colorectal cancer, with special emphasis on the indications of the guidelines and recommendations of the main international scientific associations regarding this imaging technique.

Advanced imaging of colorectal cancer: From anatomy to molecular imaging

Imaging techniques play a key role in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. The introduction of new advanced anatomical, functional, and molecular imaging techniques may improve the assessment of diagnosis, prognosis, planning therapy, and assessment of response to treatment of these patients. Functional and molecular imaging techniques in clinical practice may allow the assessment of tumour-specific characteristics and tumour heterogeneity. This paper will review recent developments in imaging technologies and the evolving roles for these techniques in colorectal cancer.

TEACHING POINTS

• Imaging techniques play a key role in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. • Advanced imaging techniques improve the evaluation of these patients. • Functional and molecular imaging allows assessment of tumour hallmarks and tumour heterogeneity.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Other Imaging Modalities in Diagnostic and Tumor Response Evaluation

Functional imaging is emerging as a valuable contributor to the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Techniques such as diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, perfusion imaging, and positron emission tomography can offer meaningful insights into tissue architecture, vascularity, and metabolism. Moreover, new techniques targeting other aspects of tumor biology are now being developed and studied. This study reviews the potential role of functional imaging for the diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and assessment of prognosis in patients with rectal cancer.

The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing pathological response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether metabolic changes in the primary tumour during and after preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) can predict the histopathological response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with cT2-4 N0-2 rectal adenocarcinoma were included. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at baseline, at the end of the second week of RCT (early PET/CT) and before surgery (late PET/CT). The PET/CT results were compared with histopathological data (ypT0 N0 vs. ypT1-4 N0-2 as well as TRG1 vs.TRG2-5) and survival.

RESULTS

The study included 126 patients. Among 124 patients in whom TNM classification was available, 28 (22.6 %) were ypT0 N0, and among all 126 patients, 31 (24.6 %) were TRG1. The areas under the curve of the early response index (RI) for identifying non-complete pathological response (non-cPR) were 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61 - 0.87) for ypT1-4 N0-2 patients and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.62 - 0.88) for TRG2-5 patients. The optimal cut-off for differentiating patients with non-cPR and cPR was found to be a reduction of 61.2 % (83.1 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity in ypT1-4 N0-2 patients; 85.4 % sensitivity and 65.2 % specificity in TRG2-5 patients). The optimal cut-off for late RI could not be found. The qualitative analysis of images obtained after RCT demonstrated 81.5 % sensitivity and 61.3 % specificity in predicting TRG2-5. After a median follow-up of 68 months, the low number of patients with local/distant recurrence or who had died did not allow the value of PET/CT for predicting DFS and OS to be calculated.

CONCLUSION

The early assessment of response to RCT by (18)F-FDG PET/CT can predict non-cPR allowing practical modification of preoperative treatment. Conversely, late RI is not sufficiently accurate for guiding the decision as to whether local excision or even observation is appropriate in an individual patient. Qualitative analysis of late PET/CT images is also not sensitive enough alone to rule out the presence of residual disease.