The use of an endostapler in the treatment of supralevator abscess of intersphincteric origin

Supralevator abscess: New treatment for an uncommon aetiology: Case report

•

Proper drainage of supralevantor abscess should be achieved for the fistulae path.

•

After supralevator abscess resolution the drain should be taken off and marsupialization with ENDO GIA® should be performed.

•

It is possible to adapt the length of ENDO GIA® to the length of the fistulae tract.

•

This treatment is a safe method for definitive treatment of traumatic supralevator abscess with intersphincteric fistulae.

Introduction

Supralevator abscess is the least common type of anorectal abscess. Its diagnosis can be hard and treatment difficult.

Presentation of the case

A 48-year-old men was diagnosed in the emergency department with a supralevantor abscess. Under general anaesthesia, the abscess drainage was accomplished after removal of a fish bone, who was perforating the rectum. Due to persistent rectal purulent discharge, a pelvic Magnetic Resonance (MRI) was performed: a supralevator abscess adjacent to the internal obturator muscle and an inter-sphincteric fistulae from the inferior margin of this collection were identified. A Pezzer® drain was placed through the fistula tract. After radiological resolution, under general anaesthesia, the patient was submitted to extraction of the drain and marsupialization of the path left using an ENDO GIA®. At two year follow up he remained asymptomatic.

Discussion

Despite of the abscess aetiology, the principles of treatment are the same: good radiological characterization and proper drainage. An adequate radiological characterization is important to avoid iatrogenic creation of a complex fistulae.

Conclusion

If a supralevator abscess diagnosis is made, fistulae trajectory should be studied. If no clear internal opening is evident, a pelvic MRI should be done followed by drainage of the abscess. After resolution the drain should be taken off and marsupialization with ENDO GIA® should be performed.

Management of retrorectal supralevator abscess-results of a large cohort

PURPOSE

Proximal intersphincteric fistulas with proximal extension causing supralevatoric, retrorectal abscesses are a rare disease. There is only very limited experience, with small groups, and the limited published literature confirms the complexity of diagnostics and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate transrectal internal abscess drainage as planned definitive treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied medical records of all patients with the diagnosis of retrorectal abscesses that underwent transrectal internal abscess drainage in the Department of Colo-proctology of the University Medical Centre Mannheim (2003-2012).

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients were operated on retrorectal abscesses, 70 (64.2%) men and 39 (35.8%) women. Mean age was 45.3 years (18-81). In 96 cases (88.1%), only a transrectal internal abscess drainage was performed as planned definitive treatment. Primary healing occurred in 60 patients (62.5%). A second transrectal internal drainage procedure was necessary in 27 cases (28.1%) to assure complete internal drainage. All secondary procedures led to subsequent healing. A combined surgical treatment due to coexisting fistula tracts to the perianal skin or additional ischioanal abscesses was required in 13 patients (11.9%), and an additional seton placement was performed. Nine patients (9.4%) underwent one or more reoperations due to previously unidentified complex coexisting fistulas. Most of these patients were immunosuppressed due to Crohn's disease. Internal drainage alone was successful in 90.6% with an overall healing rate of 94.5% for the entire population of complex fistulas.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrectal internal abscess drainage is a safe and highly successful procedure for treatment of retrorectal abscess, with very low risk of postoperative fecal incontinence. Inflammatory bowel disease and immunosuppressives have a negative impact on the healing process.

Simulation of Supralevator Abscesses and Complex Fistulas in Cadavers: Pelvic Dissemination and Drainage Routes

BACKGROUND

Most perianal abscesses have a cryptoglandular origin, following the pathogenesis described by Parks in 1961. Supralevator abscesses have the most uncommon location. Nevertheless, such pathology results in a high morbidity because of their difficult diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to deepen the knowledge of the pathogenesis and management of supralevator abscesses, as well as the complications derived from incorrect treatment, by using simulation in cadavers.

DESIGN

This study is an anatomosurgical description of pelvic and perianal zone and simulation of the different types of supralevator abscesses, their correct drainage routes, and secondary complex fistulas due to incorrect drainage.

SETTINGS

This dynamic article is based on cadaveric simulation.

PATIENTS

Three cadaveric pelvises (2 male and 1 female) were prepared in formalin and sagittally sectioned, and one perineal dissection was performed of a fresh male pelvis. This is an iconographic description of 3 patients treated for supralevator abscesses in our colorectal surgical unit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The virtual anatomical spaces map out a correct treatment.

RESULTS

We reproduced the origin of the different types of supralevator abscesses, as well as their locations and possible drainage pathways, and we determined the definitive treatment of secondary fistulas and their morbidity due to their incorrect drainage.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this study are inherent to anatomical studies without real case intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A proper anatomical knowledge of the supralevator abscesses and surgical training by using cadaveric simulations could improve the diagnostic criteria, facilitate the correct decision on surgical drainage pathways, and, thus, decrease postoperative morbidity in patients with this disease.

PERFACT procedure to treat supralevator fistula-in-ano: A novel single stage sphincter sparing procedure

AIM: To prospectively perform the PERFACT procedure in supralevator anal fistula/abscess.

METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging was done preoperatively in all the patients. Proximal cauterization around the internal opening, emptying regularly of fistula tracts and curettage of tracts (PERFACT) was done in all patients with supralevator fistula or abscess. All types of anal fistula and/or abscess with supralevator extension, whether intersphincteric or transsphincteric, were included in the study. The internal opening along with the adjacent mucosa was electrocauterized. The resulting wound was left open to heal by secondary intention so as to heal (close) the internal opening by granulation tissue. The supralevator tract/abscess was drained and thoroughly curetted. It was regularly cleaned and kept empty in the postoperative period. The primary outcome parameter was complete fistula healing. The secondary outcome parameters were return to work and change in incontinence scores (Vaizey objective scoring system) assessed preoperatively and at 3 mo after surgery.

RESULTS: Seventeen patients were prospectively enrolled and followed for a median of 13 mo (range 5-21 mo). Mean age was 41.1 ± 13.4 years, M:F - 15:2. Fourteen (82.4%) had a recurrent fistula, 8 (47.1%) had an associated abscess, 14 (82.4%) had multiple tracts and 5 (29.4%) had horseshoe fistulae. Infralevator part of fistula was intersphincteric in 4 and transsphincteric in 13 patients. Two patients were excluded. Eleven out of fifteen (73.3%) were cured and 26.7% (4/15) had a recurrence. Two patients with recurrence were reoperated on with the same procedure and one was cured. Thus, the overall healing rate was 80% (12/15). All the patients could resume normal work within 48 h of surgery. There was no deterioration in incontinence scores (Vaizey objective scoring system). This is the largest series of supralevator fistula-in-ano (SLF) published to date.

CONCLUSION: PERFACT procedure is an effective single step sphincter saving procedure to treat SLF with minimal risk of incontinence.

Management of cryptoglandular supralevator abscesses in the magnetic resonance imaging era: a case series

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of supralevator abscess, regarding its origin, location, drainage route, subsequent treatment of the fistula, and long-term results.

METHODS

A retrospective case series including thirteen consecutive patients with cryptoglandular supralevator abscess treated between 2001 and 2011 at a colorectal unit of a tertiary referral center. A magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients before surgical drainage, and its usefulness in assessing supralevator abscess origin was analyzed. Short- and long-term results after drainage were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis of supralevator abscess and the location described in the magnetic resonance were confirmed intraoperatively in all patients. An ischiorectal origin was identified in nine patients, and perineal translevator drainage was performed placing a mushroom catheter through the ischiorectal or the postanal space. Four patients underwent secondary treatment of anal fistula: two rectal advancement flap and two non-cutting seton. In the other four patients, an intersphincteric origin was identified and transanal surgical drainage was performed placing a long-term mushroom catheter. Several weeks later, transanal unroofing of the residual cavity was performed and the fistula lay open to the anorectal lumen. In the long-term follow-up (median 61 months), only patients with supralevator abscess of ischiorectal origin in whom fistula was not subsequently treated presented a recurrence of the anal sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging seems essential to clarify the location of supralevator abscess, its origin, and choice of the right drainage route. Subsequent treatment of the fistula is necessary to avoid recurrence.