Commentary on 'Impact of 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound on the outcome of anal fistula surgery: a prospective cohort study'

Using preoperative three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound to determine operative procedure in patients with perianal fistulas

AIM

Accurate preoperative identification of perianal fistula tracts and internal openings can facilitate the choice of surgical procedure and may lead to improved healing rates. Our aim was to explore the effectiveness of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in determining the type of perianal fistula and planning operative management.

METHOD

This was a cohort longitudinal study. Patients with perianal fistulas from January 2017 to January 2018 who underwent 3D-EAUS and subsequent surgery were included. Intra-operative findings were considered as standard for comparison with clinical examination and 3D-EAUS findings. The primary outcome measure was to evaluate the concordance between 3D-EAUS and intra-operative findings and the secondary outcome measure was healing rates.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with a mean age of 43.1 ± 14.1 years were included. Twenty-eight patients had inter-sphincteric (41.2%) and 40 (14 high and 26 low) trans-sphincteric fistulas (58.8%). 3D-EAUS, clinical examination and intra-operative exploration could predict the location of internal openings in 62/68 (91.2%), 48/68 (70.5%) and 56/68 (82.4%) patients, respectively. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-enhanced 3D-EAUS accurately predicted the location of internal openings when compared with 3D-EAUS without H₂O₂ (concordance K = 0.963, P = 0.05). High concordance rates were seen between intra-operative and 3D-EAUS findings on the type of perianal fistula. No significant difference was seen between the suggested surgical treatment based on 3D-EAUS and the eventual surgical treatment (P > 0.05). Study limitations were the small sample size and lack of randomization.

CONCLUSION

3D-EAUS may be considered as a first-line investigation for patients with perianal fistulas because of high concordance with intra-operative assessment and facilitation of surgical planning.

Effects of preoperative endoanal ultrasound on functional outcome after anal fistula surgery

Objective

Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is a recommended preoperative investigation for fistula-in-ano (FiA) which aims to provide the best chance of healing and preservation of continence function. This study aims are (1) to assess effect of EAUS on functional outcome and (2) to determine factors associated with clinical outcomes after FiA surgery.

Design

Retrospective analysis of subjects with cryptogenic FiA between January 2011 and December 2016, in a tertiary hospital, was performed by comparing EAUS and no-EAUS groups. Postoperative change in St. Mark’s faecal incontinence severity score (cFISS=FISS at 6 months after surgery–FISS before surgery) were compared. General linear model was used to determine factors associated with cFISS. Binary logistic regression was used to assess factors related to clinical outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 is considered significant.

Results

We enrolled 339 subjects; 109 (M:F 91:18, mean age 41.7±13.6 years) of 115 in EAUS group and 230 in no-EAUS group (M:F 195:35, mean age 42.6±13.0 years). There were higher proportions of recurrent cases (24.8% vs 13.9%, p=0.014) and complex FiA (80.7% vs 50.4%, p=0.001) in EAUS group. Postoperative FISS (mean±SE) were increased in both groups; preoperative versus postoperative FISS were 0.36±0.20 versus 0.59±0.25 in EAUS group (p=0.056) and 0.31±0.12 versus 0.76±0.17 in no-EAUS group (p<0.001). EAUS had significant effects on cFISS in both univariate analysis, F(1,261)=4.053, p=0.045; and multivariate analysis, F(3,322)=3.147, p=0.025, Wilk’s Lambda 0.972. Other associated factors included recurrent fistula (F(3,322)=0.777, p=0.007, Wilk’s Lambda 0.993) and fistula classification (F(3,322)=16.978, p<0.001, Wilk’s Lambda 0.863). After a mean follow-up of 33.6±28.6 weeks, success rate was 63.3%(EAUS) and 60% (no-EAUS), p=0.822. Factors associated with clinical outcomes were fistula complexity, number of tracts, recurrence, number of previous surgery and type of operations. Accuracy of EAUS was 90.8% and not related to clinical outcomes (p=0.522).

Conclusion

EAUS had favourable effects on functional outcome after FiA surgery while multiple factors were associated with clinical outcomes. EAUS is useful, accurate, inexpensive and can be the first tool for planning of complex and recurrent FiA.

Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the preoperative assessment of both simple and complex anorectal fistulas.

METHODS

All the patients referred for the treatment of anal fistulas were enrolled in this study and underwent, as preoperative assessment, anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS and MR. The results of imaging evaluation were compared with surgical findings, considered as reference standard.

RESULTS

During the study period, 124 patients operated on for anal fistulas underwent complete preoperative imaging assessment. Perfect agreement between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the anal fistulas' severity grading was found (K = 1). The fistulas were classified as simple in 68/126 (53.9%) and complex in 58/126 (46.03%) cases, according to fistulas' Parks' classification and the most recent American Guidelines. In both simple and complex anal fistulas, 3D-EAUS did not show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P = 0.47; McNemar's Chi-square test). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P = 0.041; McNemar's Chi-square test), whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found.

CONCLUSION

In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas' complete anatomy.